NationStates Jolt Archive


Silly and/or Illegal Proposals. zOMG! - Page 8

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Cluichstan
24-01-2006, 18:53
Not under that nation name, for sure.

Didn't mean that literally. :p
Waterana
25-01-2006, 03:40
Global Currency

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: United Badlands

Description: NOTED THAT a currency difference between nations restricts free trade and the ability to do business on an international level.
IN ADDITION this difference of currency values allows "first world" nations to take advantage of those with lesser developed economies, through measures such as governmental loans and cheap labor.
AND FINALLY that this difference in essence quashes opportunity to rise from economic slump and participate in a conceivable fashion in global trade
it is HEREBY stated that all nations must recognize a STANDARD CURRENCY that has worldwide, rather than national, value, and that ALL UN MEMBERS must adhere to this currency conversion WITHIN 24 months after passage of this act. UN members are responsible for orchestrating their currency change on their own.
If the countries in this organization are to be truly United, then they cannot be separated by difference of coin.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 121 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sat Jan 28 2006
I think this breaks some rule or another, but even if it didn't, how can we change to a standard currency when the author failed to tell us what that currency is?

Repeal "Metric System "

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal


Resolution: #24


Proposed by: Nonviolent Jews

Description: UN Resolution #24: Metric System (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: UN Resolution 24 is a hateful resolution that tramples on the religious rights of many states.

Within the Armed Republic of Nonviolent Jews our local measurement system is an integral part of our state run religion. The measurements we used were handed down to us by God 2.0 at Sinai Casino 3,000 years ago. To throw away our god-given measurement system would disgrace our lord.

Therefore, Resolution 24 should be repealed so as to promote the religious freedom of all states whose measurement systems are part of their theocratic dogma.

Approvals: 3 (NewTexas, Desert Storm Iraq, Dorksonia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 118 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Fri Jan 27 2006
I've seen lots of repeal attempts against the metric system but never religion before. At least it's something new and different from the usual boring old nat sov rant.
Flibbleites
25-01-2006, 03:56
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Family guy watcher

Description: You are aloud to go to the United States army when you 18. But you are only aloud to drink when your 21. If you could fight for your country when your 18...you should be able to have a drink when your 18 to. Many people think this is a bad idea because they think the 18 yr olds will just get drunk and are to imature to drink. To make sure they are mature enough, they will take a test given from the government about alchohal. People say that when your 18 you a young adult. A adult should be able to have a drink.Illegal RL reference, not to mention the atrocious spelling.
Frisbeeteria
25-01-2006, 04:06
Not under that nation name, for sure.Didn't mean that literally. :p
It's obvious that you'd never make Bastard Mod material. Despite the fact that there's only one line, read between them.
Cluichstan
25-01-2006, 05:36
It's obvious that you'd never make Bastard Mod material. Despite the fact that there's only one line, read between them.

Oh, I got it alright. ;)

And I'm set on the bastard front, which will prevent me from ever being a mod. Not that I'd ever want to be a mod. I mean, who in their right mind wants to have to deal with jackasses like me? :p
Waterana
25-01-2006, 07:22
Recycle for the Ocelots

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: All Businesses


Proposed by: Ocelots and owls

Description: In my country, the ocelot's habitat is being destroyed because nobody is recycling. I say we should make recycling mandatory.

Approvals: 1 (New Hamilton)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 120 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sat Jan 28 2006
I know I've already posted in this thread once today, but just couldn't scroll past this effort.
Gruenberg
25-01-2006, 07:24
I know I've already posted in this thread once today, but just couldn't scroll past this effort.
...just...wow.
St Edmund
25-01-2006, 11:46
Originally Posted by Lower alchohal age to 18
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Family guy watcher

Description: You are aloud to go to the United States army when you 18. But you are only aloud to drink when your 21. If you could fight for your country when your 18...you should be able to have a drink when your 18 to. Many people think this is a bad idea because they think the 18 yr olds will just get drunk and are to imature to drink. To make sure they are mature enough, they will take a test given from the government about alchohal. People say that when your 18 you a young adult. A adult should be able to have a drink.

Illegal RL reference, not to mention the atrocious spelling.

Want to bet that they're aged between 18 & 21? ;)
St Edmund
25-01-2006, 11:48
Recycle for the Ocelots

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: All Businesses


Proposed by: Ocelots and owls

Description: In my country, the ocelot's habitat is being destroyed because nobody is recycling. I say we should make recycling mandatory.

Approvals: 1 (New Hamilton)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 120 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sat Jan 28 2006

I know I've already posted in this thread once today, but just couldn't scroll past this effort.


"Think of the ocelots!"
Commonalitarianism
25-01-2006, 14:24
December 21st is now proclaimed hot tub beach party day. All public officials must report to the beach where they will sit all day in mobile hot tubs.
Flibbleites
25-01-2006, 18:19
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Crazy Leftists

Description: Fully aware that there are deplorable human rights abuses taking place around the world involving the trafficking of persons,

Acknowledging that the international community has been lax in its enforcement of already instated, internationally recognized laws prohibiting human trafficking,

Taking into account that the international community has been making numerous attempts in recent years to reverse aforementioned trends involving a lack of law enforcement and to halt human rights abuses as depicted by trafficking,


1. Aims to raise awareness for the inhumane establishment that is human trafficking,

2. Condemns human trafficking in all its forms,

3. Expresses its hope for continued success with the aforementioned attempt(s) at halting the spread of human trafficking,

4. Calls upon all nations in the United Nations to acknowledge the inhumanity of human trafficking.Haven't we already done this?

Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Spooky Green Aliens

Description: I.a.
RESOLVED that the United Nations and its member states shall hereby recognize and henceforth regard the inherent rights of all sentient sapients as equal to the rights of human beings.

I.b.
The category labeled as "Human Rights" within the United Nations archives shall be renamed as "Sentient Sapient Rights."

II. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this resolution.

Sentient sapient means any being with the ability to perceive and react to the environment around them, and the ability to demonstrate the ability to think about sensations, feelings and ideas.Hmmm, altering something fundamental to the nature of the game, I believe that qualifies as game mechanics.

Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Woodchipping


Proposed by: The Dead Angels

Description: THE PROBLEM,

The destruction of our forests leads to many negative environmental impacts. The destruction of our forests leaves millions of animals without homes or food. Clear cutting often leads to massive soil erosion which destroys countless streams and rivers. Killing whatever lives in those rivers and streams. Trees vital for keeping our air clean, and providing us with oxygen. If we cut down all of our trees then we lose a major source of oxygen on our planet.

ACKNOWLEDGING that we must protect our forests for several very important reasons. Forests provide homes for animals, and provide food for animals. The forests help protect soil from erosion especially on hills and mountain sides. We need our trees for clean air, and to maintain a vital source of oxygen. Not to mention that protecting our forests and green spaces we are able to maintain some semblance of wilderness and to keep the natural beauty. Many of our forests provide many great opportunities for recreational opportunities.

THEREFORE,

I PROPOSE the following solutions to this problem. Lumber companies in all nations MUST practice the principles of sustainable forestry. This means that clear cutting would be illegal and strictly enforced. If a lumber company is caught clear cutting then they will have to pay a fine of $50,000, and if they are caught again they will lose their license to harvest trees. Companies have to rotate the areas they cut, and have to replace the trees they cutdown with trees that are native to the area. If this proves to be a financial burden for a lumber company then they may apply to their government to recieve funds to alleviate this burden. Also, companies not currently practicing sustainable forestry will have 6 months to put into effect sustainable practices.

The UN will annually donate to each nation a sum of money that is 10% of that nations revenue from the harvesting of trees. A UN comittee will be established to oversee the disbursement of these funds. The comittee will be composed of 9 officials. They will be 3 environmental policy makers, 3 officials on sustainable forestry, and 3 environmental scientists.

If a lumber company is proven to have followed these regulations for at least one year then they will be eligible for tax breaks in their respective country. The tax breaks are to be determined by that nation.Aren't the resolutions we already have about trees enough?
Cluichstan
25-01-2006, 18:23
No, absolutely not! You can never do enough for the trees!
Roaring man
25-01-2006, 20:11
I like this line too:

If everybody has "conflicting agendas", then who are these "many" mentioned in there? And who is it that "runs" the UN anyway, but everybody in it?

Oh, and that it says "FACT: THE UN SUCKS."
Who needs rationality?
:D
yea THE UN DOES SUCKS I WANNA :sniper: em! and :mp5: em!
Cluichstan
25-01-2006, 20:20
Is it just me, or have there been a lot of mentally challenged nooblets crawling out of the woodwork the past few days?
Fonzoland
25-01-2006, 20:24
Is it just me, or have there been a lot of mentally challenged nooblets crawling out of the woodwork the past few days?

Oh, is that where they come from? *burns another forest*
Cluichstan
25-01-2006, 21:12
Oh, is that where they come from? *burns another forest*

I hear napalm works pretty well. ;)
The great morpheus
25-01-2006, 21:29
[QUOTE=Neo-Anarchists]:confused:

Wow. That's going to get through.
Or not...
QUOTE:What are you on about you silly person :sniper: :headbang: :gundge: :mp5:
Cluichstan
25-01-2006, 21:39
[QUOTE=Neo-Anarchists]:confused:

Wow. That's going to get through.
Or not...
QUOTE:What are you on about you silly person :sniper: :headbang: :gundge: :mp5:

http://www.p0stwh0res.com/images/supern00b[1].jpg


Damn...I've been getting a lot of mileage out of that pic lately.
Fonzoland
25-01-2006, 21:42
Damn...I've been getting a lot of mileage out of that pic lately.

Your quote tags are all screwed up... you silly person.
Cluichstan
25-01-2006, 21:56
Your quote tags are all screwed up... you silly person.

They were screwed up in the post I was quoting. *shrug*
Forgottenlands
25-01-2006, 22:19
The nooblets found the forum where we laugh at nooblets so they are now passing it around to all of their nooblet friends to harass us for making fun of them.
Cluichstan
25-01-2006, 22:22
The nooblets found the forum where we laugh at nooblets so they are now passing it around to all of their nooblet friends to harass us for making fun of them.

Uh-oh...time to start deploying the Gandalfs!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v335/JimRad-Mac/ns/gandalf.jpg
Ceorana
26-01-2006, 04:38
Check this one out:

Human Rights

A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.


Category: Social Justice


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Polaksi

Description: Alarmed at the amount of below average human rights nations

Concerned for the well-being of each nation;

1. Demands that nations enact laws protecting humans from:
a. Long work hours
b. health hazards
c. war
d. humiliation

2. Proclaims that the United Nations is an organization that will uphold the rights and law of the people.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 121 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Jan 29 2006

(Large text mine.) So you name a pointless resolution "Human Rights", and then you don't even put it in the "Human Rights Category"?

Also, Ceorana has been segregated into two halves: those allergic to cats and those not. A large wall will be constructed between them, as a way of protecting the people from health hazards. We are also censoring all stupid content to avoid humiliation on the part of the speaker.

[/dystopianviewofwhatwillhappenifthispasses]
Inflatable Gandalf
26-01-2006, 05:37
Uh-oh...time to start deploying the Gandalfs!
You cannot pass...

I am a servant of the Secret Gnomes, wielder of the Bastardsword of Reploid. Thy Dark N00bishness will not avail you, Flamer of Smiliedom. Go back to the shadow.

You shall not pass.
Cluichstan
26-01-2006, 13:34
You shall not pass.

Ah, always good to see the motto of the Misbehaving Sultanate of Cluichstan! :D
Yelda
26-01-2006, 17:29
Bedding Harm to Hamsters!

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Woodchipping


Proposed by: Hamster-Ferret Land

Description: The Chippy the Hamster Wood Chipping Company has been sued on various accounts of hamsters dying from improper bedding.

"I'll never get to hold my sweet hamster again!" moans Valerie Hampton, hamster lover. "This company must be shut down without further thought, before another hamster dies!"

"I agree," says Mr. McFuzzly Wuzzly Chubbly, a full grown hamster. "But I would grow farther. We must have, not proper bedding, But a real bed! I cannot tell you how many times I must recreate my bed because my cage is cleaned out! We MUST have a law that says hamsters must have REAL beds like humans! Equal rights! Equal rights! Oh, yes, and also the right to change our names. I for one, would like to be called Alexander."
"this is an outrage! Cries Mr. McDonald of the wood chipping company. " We must have the right to put these protesters out of action, and continue with our booming buisness!"
Brilliant.
Hou Mian
26-01-2006, 17:32
" Bedding Harm to Hamsters!

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Woodchipping


Proposed by: Hamster-Ferret Land

Description: The Chippy the Hamster Wood Chipping Company has been sued on various accounts of hamsters dying from improper bedding.

"I'll never get to hold my sweet hamster again!" moans Valerie Hampton, hamster lover. "This company must be shut down without further thought, before another hamster dies!"

"I agree," says Mr. McFuzzly Wuzzly Chubbly, a full grown hamster. "But I would grow farther. We must have, not proper bedding, But a real bed! I cannot tell you how many times I must recreate my bed because my cage is cleaned out! We MUST have a law that says hamsters must have REAL beds like humans! Equal rights! Equal rights! Oh, yes, and also the right to change our names. I for one, would like to be called Alexander."
"this is an outrage! Cries Mr. McDonald of the wood chipping company. " We must have the right to put these protesters out of action, and continue with our booming buisness!" "

Brilliant.

(Still not to sure how these tags work...)

I really wonder if they meant that to be a daily issue...but I don't understand how they could have put that in such the wrong place.
Fonzoland
26-01-2006, 17:33
Brilliant.

Sounds like a misplaced issue...
Cluichstan
26-01-2006, 17:36
Sounds like a misplaced issue...

Another case for SUPERN00B! (Don't worry. I'm not going to post the pic again. :p )
St Edmund
26-01-2006, 19:27
Sounds like a misplaced issue...

And it would have been 'silly' even in that role...
Fonzoland
26-01-2006, 19:31
And it would have been 'silly' even in that role...

Nah, it has some innocent silly charm. Of course, the hamster would have to be replaced by the national beast, but it would be fun.
St Edmund
26-01-2006, 19:56
Nah, it has some innocent silly charm. Of course, the hamster would have to be replaced by the national beast, but it would be fun.

And then we could argue about whether that made all national beasts sapient, and consequently deserving of rights... ;)
Palentine UN Office
27-01-2006, 01:06
And then we could argue about whether that made all national beasts sapient, and consequently deserving of rights... ;)

The Dolphins in my navy, might eloquently argue with you if you'ld like.:p
Flibbleites
27-01-2006, 06:07
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #38


Proposed by: Groovy man

Description: UN Resolution #38: The Rights of Labor Unions (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This law attempts to force socialism onto all UN nations the free elections of the nation i represent have shown that it is not the peoples will to have socialist laws. This law is attemping to opress the minority by the left wing majority.How the heck does this one force socialism on the nations?

Category: Social Justice


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Jihadlovers

Description: Suicide bombing is so prevalent in the world that we propose it be considered as a category for the olympicsFirst off, we don't have an olympics, secondly how would you judge such an event?
Ceorana
27-01-2006, 06:16
how would you judge such an event?
Simple. Five points for killing someone, three for causing permanent damage, DQ if you don't actually kill yourself, and five points for substantial building damage.
Yelda
27-01-2006, 09:04
Restriction of Repeals Act

A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.


Category: Political Stability


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Jamesburgh

Description: In an effort to curb the influence of volatile, radical trends and preserve the laws which we hold sacrosanct, I propose the below restrictions on Repeal Proposals and Resolutions. It is far too easy and fashionable to repeal UN Resolutions, hence, one cannot help but expect the absurdly large quantity of Repeal Proposals and general waste of legislative time. These Repeal Proposals and Resolutions are often insulting to the very integrity of the UN and repudiate the values on which it was founded, and it is thus that I propose the following.

Noting:

1. The importance and necessity of repealing UN Resolutions unfit for execution.


Given:

1. The staggering number of Proposals to repeal important UN Resolutions in recent months.

2. The alarming ease with which UN Resolutions can be repealed.

3. The arbitrary and capricious nature of most Repeal oriented Proposals.

4. The slow, but steady erosion of vital civil liberties that protect the citizens of UN Nation States by Repeal Proposals under the guise of Nation State sovereignty.

5. The diminishment of UN jurisdiction by frivolous Repeal Proposals by proponents of Nation State sovereignty.


Hereby Mandates:

1. All Repeal Proposals require 12% approval by the Regional Delegates to achieve quorum.

2. All Repeal Resolutions require a 60% majority approval by UN Nation States to take effect.


Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 121 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Mon Jan 30 2006
Silly.
Fonzoland
27-01-2006, 13:08
Simple. Five points for killing someone, three for causing permanent damage, DQ if you don't actually kill yourself, and five points for substantial building damage.

That is the technical grade. You should then have an artistic merit grade.
Forgottenlands
27-01-2006, 14:56
How would you address the false claims?
Cluichstan
27-01-2006, 15:48
First off, we don't have an olympics, secondly how would you judge such an event?

And I can just see piles of body parts on a podium with medals draped around them.
Omigodtheykilledkenny
27-01-2006, 16:54
Restriction of Repeals Act
A resolution to restrict political freedoms in the interest of law and order.

Category: Political Stability
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Jamesburgh

Description: In an effort to curb the influence of volatile, radical trends and preserve the laws which we hold sacrosanct, I propose the below restrictions on Repeal Proposals and Resolutions. It is far too easy and fashionable to repeal UN Resolutions, hence, one cannot help but expect the absurdly large quantity of Repeal Proposals and general waste of legislative time. These Repeal Proposals and Resolutions are often insulting to the very integrity of the UN and repudiate the values on which it was founded, and it is thus that I propose the following.

Noting:

1. The importance and necessity of repealing UN Resolutions unfit for execution.

Given:

1. The staggering number of Proposals to repeal important UN Resolutions in recent months.

2. The alarming ease with which UN Resolutions can be repealed.

3. The arbitrary and capricious nature of most Repeal oriented Proposals.

4. The slow, but steady erosion of vital civil liberties that protect the citizens of UN Nation States by Repeal Proposals under the guise of Nation State sovereignty.

5. The diminishment of UN jurisdiction by frivolous Repeal Proposals by proponents of Nation State sovereignty.

Hereby Mandates:

1. All Repeal Proposals require 12% approval by the Regional Delegates to achieve quorum.

2. All Repeal Resolutions require a 60% majority approval by UN Nation States to take effect.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 121 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Mon Jan 30 2006Silly.Jamesburgh? The same prick who started that outlandish telegram campaign to accuse me of bigotry and homophobia? I hope he shows up for the Repeal 'Gay Rights' debate. I really do. His presence will reveal the anti-repeal advocates for the pack of shrill, hysterical empty-headed smear artists that they are.
Jey
27-01-2006, 17:24
Death of Max Barry
A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: The Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: The Wandering Nomads

Description: Max Barry

Max Barry is a homosexual, pedophile, who rapes little children ranging from ages 1-10.

He is obsessed with a girl named Jennifer, which is why this stalker named his book "Jennifer Government."

He should be tortured for months, hung, and all his inside organs should be sacrificed to the gods.

'nough said!

Hm...i think someone is hoping to be banned...
Flibbleites
27-01-2006, 17:25
Category: Political Stability


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Evictory

Description: -States that all nations in the United Nations must abide by this new international law that shall reduce the growing global threat of terrorism. By authorizing WARRANTED wiretapping and reasonable random searches of all suspected terrorists, without INFRINGING upon civil rights.
-Thus protecting all citizens of the world without infringing upon rights already guaranteed by the United Nations Constitution. This act can be put in place for a short period of time before a newer, more complex act can be put in place.Since when does the UN have a constitution?
Cluichstan
27-01-2006, 17:29
Since when does the UN have a constitution?

Since I um...just made it up. :p
Forgottenlands
27-01-2006, 18:24
Hm...i think someone is hoping to be banned...

He obviously forgets that Max Barry is our unquestioned God. All the Max Barry does must be emulated in every way possible so that we can possibly be considered equal to his mightiness.
Gruenberg
27-01-2006, 20:01
No offence to MB, really, but seeing this on the UN happenings just made me laugh so hard:

1 minute ago: The proposal "Death of Max Barry" was removed from the floor.
Palentine UN Office
28-01-2006, 02:06
And I can just see piles of body parts on a podium with medals draped around them.

You don't need a pile of body parts. Just collect the right ear of said deceased. They're compact, easy to store and count, and when you open up your collection sack, they're not staring at you.:p
Ceorana
28-01-2006, 04:09
You don't need a pile of body parts. Just collect the right ear of said deceased. They're compact, easy to store and count, and when you open up your collection sack, they're not staring at you.:p
So DQ if you blow up your right ear?
Flibbleites
28-01-2006, 07:08
Category: Free Trade


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Desert Storm Iraq

Description: DECLARING that embargoes are illegal and that the UN will not be able to issue economic sanctions against any UN member for any reason.

This will be a big step in promoting free trade and will end UN influence over the world market.The UN can't issue economic sanctions anyway.
Gruenberg
28-01-2006, 07:28
Rather poor showing tonight...Euroslavia got the proposal list down to three pages, which took out some potential candidates.
The Most Glorious Hack
28-01-2006, 07:38
Rather poor showing tonight...Euroslavia got the proposal list down to three pages, which took out some potential candidates.Hey! I nuked a couple!
Gruenberg
28-01-2006, 07:53
Hey! I nuked a couple!
Sorry. He just mentioned deleting some. Thinking about the ones Sillytopia reported, none of them were excessively silly anyway.

We demand more frivolity, stupidity, and cack-handed twattishness on the part of delegates!
Waterana
28-01-2006, 10:11
Ban on Evil

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Timachius

Description: ALARMED by the presence of evil in many UN member nations,

RECOGNIZING that the UN has not yet passed regulations concerning the so-called right to evil,

OBSERVING that this right to be evil is currently only exercised by those who are evil,

And NOTING that evil is properly regarded as worse than good by all moral nations,

REMINDING those concerned that the UN itself is good, not evil,

And relatedly, ENCOURAGING even those evildoers in our midst to support this resolution, since, being evil, they would naturally prefer to be in violation of UN regulations,

Therefore let it be RESOLVED that evil is henceforth outlawed.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Tue Jan 31 2006
For the sake of our sanity, I beg the entire UN to display very evil tendencies and banish this draft to a very hot place.
Fonzoland
28-01-2006, 10:22
For the sake of our sanity, I beg the entire UN to display very evil tendencies and banish this draft to a very hot place.

I find it cute. I would be curious to see the definition of evil in there.
St Edmund
28-01-2006, 11:11
I find it cute. I would be curious to see the definition of evil in there.

"Who knows what evil lurks in the heart of man?"
Fonzoland
28-01-2006, 11:45
"Who knows what evil lurks in the heart of man?"

You should contact The Black New World, but I believe that is confidential information.
Palentine UN Office
28-01-2006, 19:19
So DQ if you blow up your right ear?

yep, just like uncontrolled urination is an Automatic DQ in powerlifting.;)
Forgottenlands
28-01-2006, 19:21
Man - it would suck if in your first attempt, you blew off your right ear but failed to kill yourself. You wouldn't be eligable with your second attempt
Cluichstan
28-01-2006, 22:35
"Who knows what evil lurks in the heart of man?"

"The Shadow knows..."
Cluichstan
28-01-2006, 22:36
We demand more frivolity, stupidity, and cack-handed twattishness on the part of delegates!

I'd oblige, but I don't need another reprimand/forumban/DEAT. ;)
Fonzoland
28-01-2006, 23:00
I'd oblige, but I don't need another reprimand/forumban/DEAT. ;)

That's debatable... :p
Cluichstan
28-01-2006, 23:08
That's debatable... :p

That's it! No phonesex for you! :p
Fonzoland
28-01-2006, 23:21
That's it! You are forumbanned for a week for erotic content!

*Wonders if the above statement qualifies as impersonating a mod, which would make him liable for a forumban himself.*















*Screams: I AM NOT A MOD!!! HONEST!!! BAN HIM, NOT ME!!!*
James_xenoland
29-01-2006, 02:17
Ban on Evil

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Timachius

Description: ALARMED by the presence of evil in many UN member nations,

RECOGNIZING that the UN has not yet passed regulations concerning the so-called right to evil,

OBSERVING that this right to be evil is currently only exercised by those who are evil,

And NOTING that evil is properly regarded as worse than good by all moral nations,

REMINDING those concerned that the UN itself is good, not evil,

And relatedly, ENCOURAGING even those evildoers in our midst to support this resolution, since, being evil, they would naturally prefer to be in violation of UN regulations,

Therefore let it be RESOLVED that evil is henceforth outlawed.

Approvals: 5 (Alexandrian Ptolemais, Governor JEB, New Hamilton, Timachius, Desert Storm Iraq)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 116 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Tue Jan 31 2006

The Holy Empire of James_xenoland has not approved this proposal. [Approve]
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. x 100

Oh god, I really wish that I could approve this! :D
Great stuff.
Quaon
29-01-2006, 15:14
SPAM Prevention Act
A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Kevin Island

Description: A resolution to eliminate the burdens and costs associated with e-mail spam by prohibiting the transmission of all UCE mail to persons who place their electronic mail addresses on an international No-Spam Registry, and to prevent fraud and deception in commercial electronic mail.

Be it enacted by the United Nations:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Resolution may be cited as the `SPAM Resolution'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Kevin Islands finds the following:

(1) Electronic mail is an increasingly valuable tool for personal and commercial communication. Unsolicited commercial electronic mail (UCE), commonly known as SPAM , however, has become an impediment to efficient electronic mail use and creates problems for all types of users and organizations, including Internet Service Providers, individual users, and corporate organizations.

(2) UCE often contains objectionable, fraudulent, and offensive content. Kevin Islands reports that over 60 percent of all UCE contains false, misleading, or deceptive information. Nearly one-fourth contains sexually explicit imagery. Parents have little ability to prevent these images from reaching their child's electronic mail in-box.

(3) Consumers increasingly ignore or delete legitimate commercial messages as they face an ever increasing amount of UCE. If the vitality and force of the Internet and electronic mail are to be preserved as a tool for commercial communication, UCE must be curbed.

(4) UCE is also a severe financial concern. Lost productivity, increased spending on technology systems and personnel, and personal frustration are some of the costs associated with UCE.

(5) Despite the increasing deployment of anti-spam services and technology, the number and size of spam messages are growing faster than ever. In 1999, the average electronic mail user received just 40 pieces of UCE per year. In 2003, the number is expected to pass 2,500. Experts estimate as much as 70 percent of electronic mail traffic qualifies as UCE.

(6) Existing anti-spam service solutions alone are insufficient to stop the growth of spam . Despite the fact that Internet Service Providers spend millions of dollars each year on research, filtering and other anti-spam software, and larger servers to deal with the ever expanding volume of UCE, current technology alone cannot control the spam problem.

(7) Laws does not specifically address UCE and leaves law enforcers and consumers with inadequate redress for the problem.

SEC. 3. PURPOSES.
The purposes of this Resolution are to--
(1) preserve electronic mail as a vital tool in interstate commerce by--
(A) reducing the costs associated with UCE;
(B) reducing the amount of UCE; and
(C) eliminating false, misleading, and deceptive content in all commercial electronic mail; and
(2) give consumers control over their in-boxes.
(A) to reaffirm the nation's right to complain against any SPAM sender/s.

SEC. 4. UN ACTION
The UN and its member nations shall be tasked to enforce SPAM Prevention through their complaints about the said problem. The UN member nations shall develop vigilance in SPAM Prevention to fully curtail this illegal activity.

Approvals: 12 (Vuland, Kevin Island, Yeldan UN Mission, Barsaca, Republic of Freedonia, Manussa, Gaiah, Mandlandia, Darpatia, Michelandia, Darth Mall, Inflatable Furniture)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 110 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Feb 1 2006


I've got a sinking feeling that this is copied...;)
Cluichstan
29-01-2006, 15:16
I've got a sinking feeling that this is copied...;)

Especially with this:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Resolution may be cited as the `SPAM Resolution'.
Cobdenia
29-01-2006, 15:19
Ah, that explains something. I sent Kevin's Island a telegram as part of my campaign, and I got one back from him about this. I originally thought it was just some snotty comeback to my form letter TG...
Sillytopia
29-01-2006, 21:34
Climate Near 'Tipping Point'
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: All Businesses
Proposed by: Desert Storm Iraq

Description: REALIZING Now that most scientists agree human activity is causing Earth to warm, the central debate has shifted to whether climate change is progressing so rapidly that, within decades, humans may be helpless to slow or reverse the trend.

DECLARING that governments to make major cuts in the carbon dioxide emissions linked to global warming.
The target will be to reduce them by 50% by 2035.

FURTHER DECLARES that nations begin to promote cleaner technology.
:rolleyes:

Age to Vote
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Zragon

Description: The age to vote should be lowered to 16.5 years. At this age people are well aware of their opinions and are able to make intelegent decisions.

By this age people begin to feel the need to speak out and decide in their nations choices.
We of Sillytopia are curious...'vote'?

Repeal "Freedom of Press"
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #63
Proposed by: Norcie

Description: UN Resolution #63: Freedom of Press (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: It is the right of every nation to govern it's people. While regretable, sometimes, when journalists spread lies about a government, said government must step in and punish those responsible.
Try reading the resolution. As an aside, does Univeral Bill of Rights prevent this?

How great Democracy really is
Category: The Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Hirshey

Description: Democracy is a free idea of many people of a nation. We need to become more democratic in this world, I'm not saying all the same. But we need to end all these dictatorships that seem to be ruining cultures within their own country. We are a strong country. We will fight YOU if you do not comply within our rules if dealt with us through trade, etc. The Fe. The Proud. The People's Republic. President Yossarian Keller.
We of Sillytopia are quaking. Just quaking.
Quaon
30-01-2006, 01:20
Well, there is that pesky "Citzen Run Goverment Resolution..."
Fonzoland
30-01-2006, 03:50
Right to Bear Arms

A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.

Category: Gun Control

Decision: Relax

Proposed by: Midview

Description: ACT 1: Right to purchase

This ensures that any individual has the right to purchase virtually any weapon he/she would like. Of course virtually means that there are exceptions.

Exceptions include:

1)anti-tank weapons
2)heavy machine guns
3)mortars
4)flame-throwers
5)cannons,artillery or anti-aircraft batteries of any type

All other weapons such as shotguns, rifles, pistols, and assault weapons are hereby legal to purchase.

In order for a person to purchase a weapon, they must be in compliance with the following:

1)18 years of age or older
2)possess a valid drivers license or form of identification
3)clear of any type of criminal record

A person under 18 can purchase a weapon if:

1)They are with a legal parent or guardian
2)have no juvenile record
3)cannot purchase assault weapons

ACT 2: Transportation

A person has the following rights to transport a weapon:

1)A person can transport legal weapons in their private vehicle given that it is unloaded with the action locked in an open position and is inside a case.
2)A person can transport a weapon on an airplane given that it is unloaded with the action locked in an open position and is inside a case. The weapon must be stowed with the luggage and CANNOT be a carry on item.
3)A person can transport a weapon on a bus given that it is unloaded with the action locked in an open position and is inside a case. The weapon must be stowed inside the luggage holds of the bus.
4)Ammunition CANNOT be transported on any public vehicles but is legal to transport in a person's private vehicle.

ACT 3: Right to Carry

A person has the right to carry a concealed weapon weapon under the following conditions:

1)They are of 18 years of age or older.
2)They have no criminal record of any kind.
3)The weapon they carry is a pistol of .45 caliber or smaller
4)They are carrying ONLY TWO fully loaded magazines including the one in the gun.
5)They ARE NOT permitted to carry extra rounds to reload their magazines
6)They are required to pass a weapons safety course

ACT 4: The Weapons Safety Course

The Weapons Safety Course will consist of the following:

1)Class of the parts of a pistol and pistol rounds
2)Class of the safety and precautionary measures when dealing with a weapon
3)Marksmanship class
4)Class of when and where to discharge the pistol
5)A final test going over subjects covered in the Weapons Safety Course

Daddy, if I finish terror-camp with honours, can I have my own nuke?
Flibbleites
30-01-2006, 05:56
Well, there is that pesky "Citzen Run Goverment Resolution..."
Are you referring to resolution #8 which you can be in compliance with just by letting your citizens vote for their dogcatcher?

Category: Repeal


Resolution: #38


Proposed by: Niscor

Description: UN Resolution #38: The Rights of Labor Unions (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Syndicalism is the way to counter the overexploitation of the workers for furious capitalist bosses!I could very well be misinterperting the argument presented here, but it sounds to me like the arguement here is actually against repealing the resolution.

Category: Repeal


Resolution: #39


Proposed by: Niscor

Description: UN Resolution #39: Alternative Fuels (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: To help the environment, it is necessary to promote the green and renewable energies. As the transport is responsible for 40 % of the world pollution, it is necessary to aim at this sector.And so to protect the environment we're going to repeal the resolution.:rolleyes: Someone want to get the author a dictonary with the word "repeal" highlighted.

Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Fidelity Theory

Description: REALISING the dangers of fast food on both a personal and broader sociological level.
REALISING the dangers of fast food on individuals health
DEFINING fast food as any restaurant using 90% or more pre-packaged and/or frozen foods from a third-party company.
DECLARES any fast food chain, or individual restaurant to be terminated within a period of six months, with reasonable compensation (value of real estate plus value of any remaining food products) to be paid by the nation, for the better health of all UN members.Like hell my nation's going to subsidize the shut down of fast food restaurants, besides where else are the youth of my nation going to get a job.

Category: Political Stability


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Cadian Marines

Description: Unemployment, which causes severe social instability will be greatly reduced if all persons that are physically and mentally eligable for military service be drafted into the military.And what about those nations that don't have a military?
Palentine UN Office
30-01-2006, 18:50
Quote:
Right to Bear Arms

A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.

Category: Gun Control

Decision: Relax

Proposed by: Midview

Description: ACT 1: Right to purchase

This ensures that any individual has the right to purchase virtually any weapon he/she would like. Of course virtually means that there are exceptions.

Exceptions include:

1)anti-tank weapons
2)heavy machine guns
3)mortars
4)flame-throwers
5)cannons,artillery or anti-aircraft batteries of any type

All other weapons such as shotguns, rifles, pistols, and assault weapons are hereby legal to purchase.

In order for a person to purchase a weapon, they must be in compliance with the following:

1)18 years of age or older
2)possess a valid drivers license or form of identification
3)clear of any type of criminal record

A person under 18 can purchase a weapon if:

1)They are with a legal parent or guardian
2)have no juvenile record
3)cannot purchase assault weapons

ACT 2: Transportation

A person has the following rights to transport a weapon:

1)A person can transport legal weapons in their private vehicle given that it is unloaded with the action locked in an open position and is inside a case.
2)A person can transport a weapon on an airplane given that it is unloaded with the action locked in an open position and is inside a case. The weapon must be stowed with the luggage and CANNOT be a carry on item.
3)A person can transport a weapon on a bus given that it is unloaded with the action locked in an open position and is inside a case. The weapon must be stowed inside the luggage holds of the bus.
4)Ammunition CANNOT be transported on any public vehicles but is legal to transport in a person's private vehicle.

ACT 3: Right to Carry

A person has the right to carry a concealed weapon weapon under the following conditions:

1)They are of 18 years of age or older.
2)They have no criminal record of any kind.
3)The weapon they carry is a pistol of .45 caliber or smaller
4)They are carrying ONLY TWO fully loaded magazines including the one in the gun.
5)They ARE NOT permitted to carry extra rounds to reload their magazines
6)They are required to pass a weapons safety course

ACT 4: The Weapons Safety Course

The Weapons Safety Course will consist of the following:

1)Class of the parts of a pistol and pistol rounds
2)Class of the safety and precautionary measures when dealing with a weapon
3)Marksmanship class
4)Class of when and where to discharge the pistol
5)A final test going over subjects covered in the Weapons Safety Course

Daddy, if I finish terror-camp with honours, can I have my own nuke?

I supported it for purely selfish reasons...

*SHAMELESS PLUG*
Palentine Arms Inc. For your gun buying pleasure. From pop-guns to the Ma Deuce. We've got your Back. Cash and carry. We'll let you carry all the guns you've got the cash for.
*END of SHAMELESS PLUG*
Excelsior,
Sen Horatio Sulla
Enn
31-01-2006, 06:58
Repeal "Metric System "
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #24
Proposed by: Imperial Ravensburg

Description: UN Resolution #24: Metric System (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The United Nations,

OBSERVING that non-UN members outnumber UN members 3 to 1,

ASSERTING that the attempts of inforcing the "Metric System" caused the UN to claim jurisdiction over other nations are misguided, impractical, and illegal,

APPALLED at the extensive bureaucracy created by the "Metric System", which would be largely rendered ineffectual by the presence of non-UN navies, and the lack of legislation governing relations between these and UN navies,

DEPLORING that forcing a single system of measurment is ingnorant of other lands cultures and traditions,

DEPLORING the statement the the Metric system is "far superior", again showing ingnorance,

DISBELIEVING the Science of all nations has converted to the Metric System and poor nations would benifit as it will cost lage sums of money to convert all national systems,

FULLY CONDEMNING The "Metric System" for attempting to assert UN jurisdiction over international territory:

1. REPEALS "Mertic System";

2. IMPLORES the General Assembly to allow all nations to choose there own system of measurements.
I'm attempting to understand exactly what the presence of non-UN navies has to do with the metric system. So far I haven't come up with anything.

Also, if the UN isn't allowed a say over matters of "international territory", who is? Isn't the basic idea of NatSov about how the UN should keep to international affairs?
Flibbleites
31-01-2006, 07:05
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Big brown things

Description: We the people of the brown think it inhumane and outdated for mankind to speak many different Languages

we therefore propose that from now till the dawn of time English be the only Language to be spoke by human tongueThe author's name describes this proposal quite nicely, don't you think.

Category: International Security


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Big brown things

Description: We would like to begin by providing a background to this proposal. We come from a region known as the Global Region for Free Trade a fastly emerging region full of emerging nations of a vast (in size that is) and hugely varying (Forms of Government) variety.

We would like to bring to your attention the successful crime prevention programme implimented by the Federation of Perfetic Weasels whos new programme of crime prevention has resulted in a complete end to Crime within the Nation.

This programme we believe should be endorsed by the UN as a form of inter connected crime prevention strategy in the prevention of illegal immigration, drug trafficing and terrorism. Outlined below is our suggestion to the UN in using the existing technology and legislation used by the Weasels to the benefit of all mankind.

First we should use the idea within a reasonable sphere of Human Rights. The idea of implanting chips naturally is anti-thetical to this sphere however a system where by an individual has to use a code to make any transaction would do the same job as a chip and would prevent fraud and money laundering as only the individual would legally be allowed to know the code.

This is in many ways an expansion of the existing Chip and Pin legislation only in this legislation the State i conjunction with the UN would decide the code and an individual would have the same code for everything: credit, banking, etc.

We the people of Big Brown Things hereby submit this to your attention for debate. Multiple branding violations here.
Enn
31-01-2006, 07:18
Multiple branding violations here.
Interesting grammar as well. Who would have thought, "varying... variety"?
Gruenberg
31-01-2006, 14:32
I'm attempting to understand exactly what the presence of non-UN navies has to do with the metric system. So far I haven't come up with anything.

Also, if the UN isn't allowed a say over matters of "international territory", who is? Isn't the basic idea of NatSov about how the UN should keep to international affairs?
Erm...

That's an exact replica of the repeal of The Law of the Sea, which passed while you were away. I suspect, given the comments I got during that, he's doing that more as a piss-take than as a straight copy.
Flibbleites
31-01-2006, 17:17
Category: Free Trade


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Cataduanes

Description: Realizing that the Internet has presented itself as a valuable instrument of trade. The following Free Automated Regional Trade (FART)proposal is made.

1.Nations within regions will have free Internet trade rights with all nations in their region.
2.Nations within a region are not allowed to tax items that are purchased through the Internet. they may tax companies registered in each nation according to the taxation laws of that nation
3.Nations will have a right to regulate according to defense needs of each nation.
4.Nations are allowed to regulate pornographic material according to regional standards. These standards must be adopted and approved by the region within six months of this resolutions approvalI love the acronym for this one.:D
Cluichstan
31-01-2006, 17:42
I love the acronym for this one.:D

LMFAO! Nice catch! :D
Forgottenlands
31-01-2006, 17:59
I'm attempting to understand exactly what the presence of non-UN navies has to do with the metric system. So far I haven't come up with anything.

Also, if the UN isn't allowed a say over matters of "international territory", who is? Isn't the basic idea of NatSov about how the UN should keep to international affairs?

I THINK it has something to do with the idea of "well, if they don't use metric, then we can't use a common system" or something stupid like that (I'm guessing he's assuming all non-members are using Imperial).
Gruenberg
31-01-2006, 19:04
I THINK it has something to do with the idea of "well, if they don't use metric, then we can't use a common system" or something stupid like that (I'm guessing he's assuming all non-members are using Imperial).
No, it doesn't. As noted, it has to do with exactly copying the repeal of The Law of the Sea.
Forgottenlands
31-01-2006, 19:59
No, it doesn't. As noted, it has to do with exactly copying the repeal of The Law of the Sea.

*coughs*

I guess I should probably start reading resolutions at vote a bit more often....
Flibbleites
01-02-2006, 05:20
Category: Free Trade


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Jiberqaz

Description: The U.N. realizing that Digital Entertainment Piracy is running rampant should reintroduce regional encoding on Digital Media Formatted Discs (DVD, Blue Ray, HD DVD, etc).
This proposal would correct actions taken by this body when, for no reason, it voted to remove the regional codings from Digital Media (Resolution #5 and #125 which repealed previously stated resolution)

A: There was equipment before that allowed Region-less access to Digital Media regardless of encoding properties from said formatted discs, and there will be again.

B: Removing the regional encoding has allowed unlimited circulation of media, causing in some cases social unrest and outrage, not including rioting from a misinterpreted "Moc-umentary"

Regretting
C: The only reason that this resolution seems to have been passed was to help circulation from special interest groups in the Adult Entertainment Industry (All other entertainment was sold in multiple regions to begin with)

D: That it would cause a boost in the manufacturing and exports of some companies who manufacture Region-less Media Readers (Formatting for Blue Ray, HD DVD, DVD, UMD, SACD, etc.) causing economic benefits in the form of Import and Sales taxes.

E: That the populace would have to purchase separate equipment if they do not already own it. Someone needs to reread what resolution #5 did until it was repealed.
Forgottenlands
01-02-2006, 06:16
I love his claim in C
Fonzoland
01-02-2006, 11:35
I love his claim in C

Cluich is everywhere...
Cluichstan
01-02-2006, 13:54
Cluich is everywhere...

Sure am. ;)
Forgottenlands
01-02-2006, 17:49
Cluich is everywhere...

It might be you're just thinking of him all the time......

Or at least his phone service......
Fonzoland
01-02-2006, 18:09
It might be you're just thinking of him all the time......

Or at least his phone service......

Actually, I try to avoid it. I recently discovered some undesirable side effects. (Ooops, not supposed to mention it. Sorry.)
Cluichstan
01-02-2006, 18:35
Actually, I try to avoid it. I recently discovered some undesirable side effects. (Ooops, not supposed to mention it. Sorry.)

CPESL will gladly send you a complimentary lifetime supply of tissues for the side effects of its telephone services.
Fonzoland
01-02-2006, 18:36
CPESL will gladly send you a complimentary lifetime supply of tissues for the side effects of its telephone services.

Twas not what I meant, and you know it! :mad: Go and make love to Miss Pacman, will ya? ;)
Hou Mian
01-02-2006, 21:39
Two stuck out to me, and I wanted to share them before they were deleted.

Hooligan Act
A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.

"Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: BenHoke

Description: Purpose: To loosen up on gun control.
Reason: Listed in the First Amendment.
Argument: Guns don't kill people, dangerous minorities do.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sat Feb 4 2006 "

Between the Real Life reference (that they got wrong) and the somewhat trollish argument...

This one isn't prima facie illegal, but...

"War On Drugs
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Reb3ls

Description: We need to outlaw all illigeal substances from our great nations, it is demoralizing the population, all of our litercy rates would rise, we would have a stronger work force, we would have less killings and we might even be able to save money by not having to have as many police on duty to break up dope wars all started on the fact that they are easy to get."

Between the misspellings and the fact that they use the exact same argument as those who want to legalize drugs...
Enn
02-02-2006, 02:34
Re the War on Drugs proposal - I particularly like how we need to outlaw all illegal substances.
Ceorana
02-02-2006, 03:15
Re the War on Drugs proposal - I particularly like how we need to outlaw all illegal substances.
Sort of like "Illegal Logging".
Forgottenlands
02-02-2006, 05:40
Twas not what I meant, and you know it! :mad: Go and make love to Miss Pacman, will ya? ;)

I think she's too busy being chased.....

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6398155143211202686 <-- note: movie
Waterana
02-02-2006, 06:00
5 Moral Decrees

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: The Aantaarcticaa

Description: This proposal aims for the following to preserve moral decency :
1. Ban all strip clubs
2. Ban pornography
3. Ban gay/lesbian organizations
4. Ban Nudist beaches .
5. Ban the propagation of nudist beaches , gay/lesbian organizations , pornography , and strip clubs .

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Feb 5 2006
:rolleyes:


Stop Gay marriage

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Bla-blackia

Description: IN the bible and most other documents in history marriage is between a man and a women not a man and a man its wrong to give them this but in stead i propose that they be given "social contracts" so as not to mar marriage

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Feb 5 2006
:rolleyes: again.

Ban Homosexuality

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Broken Imperial Fleet

Description: As to rid the world and its people of this disgusting orientation forever.

1) All people caught engaging in homosexual acts or relations should be executed immediately.
2)All Clubs,Groups,Coos,etc. Shall be immediately destroyed and all members executed.
3)All loyal citizen who contribute to the demise of homosexuality shall be awarded for Good Citzenship.
4)Bounty Hunting is encouraged all homosexuals must be brought back alive to receive reward.
5)Citizens helping this orientation in any form or manner shall be sent to reeducation camps as to be reeducated in thee only orientation.
6)Further more mass genocide of Homosexuals is strongly encouraged.

This resoulution shall end all of our arguments and debates over homosexuality and its disgusting encroachment on our lives.


Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Feb 5 2006

The Troubled Times of Kalibara has not approved this proposal. [Approve]
:rolleyes: yet again.

I wonder how many passed resolutions this goes against.
Flibbleites
02-02-2006, 06:08
Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: All Businesses


Proposed by: The Aantaarcticaa

Description: Due to the pollution caused by Coal power plants , their damage to the ozone , and their hazzards towards human health , we need new ways of gathering energy . Solar energy is inefficient and water power plants cause wide spread flooding We should gather energy by nuclear power plants . This proposal aims for the following :
1. Shut down all non-nuclear power plants .
2. Countries that can not afford nuclear power plants , will be helped to do so by richer countries .
4. Increase energy production ; therefore , businesses will gain electricity at a cheaper cost . Would the author care to buy a 3?
Forgottenlands
02-02-2006, 06:16
Would the author care to buy a 3?

3. Realize this resolution is about as stupid as Promote Solar Panels and should be repealed
Gruenberg
02-02-2006, 06:18
I wonder how many passed resolutions this goes against.
Sillytopia reported this earlier (for 'grossly offensive', not contradiction), so I'll give it a go:

Sexual Freedom
Fair Trial
The Universal Bill of Rights
Due Process
Definition of Fair Trial
Universal Freedom of Choice
Habeas Corpus
Rights of Minorities and Women
The EON Convention on Genocide
Right to Self-Protection
Discrimination Accord
The Sex Education Act
and possibly some others
Flibbleites
02-02-2006, 06:19
3. Realize this resolution is about as stupid as Promote Solar Panels and should be repealed
Hey, you're not the author!
Enn
02-02-2006, 07:31
Stem Cell Research
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: The Golfers

Description: (ok give me a break if i totally botch this im new at this its my first one)

The Ferderation of The Golfers proposes to the Delegates the simple fact that Stem Cell Research will save us all

The Golfers

PRESENTS, as being a future doctor, that steam cell research will aid many lives.

PROOF that steam cell research will aid in fightin many dibilitating diseases that plauge our nations at this very minute with out a cure

DEFENDS that yes it will allopw women to have abortions, but abortions happen one way or another, so the fact is why not use the condemed fetus' for a good cause

CLOSES with the fact that is this: yes, we will all fie eventually, but if we research this area we will increase life span and make our world a better place.
OKay, I'm trying not to be too harsh, given the first line (and yes, that is the first line).
Aside from the branding, there are some rather interesting typos here. I never knew how good steam cell research is. Plus we will all fie eventually, so,
Fie on you!
Flibbleites
02-02-2006, 07:34
OKay, I'm trying not to be too harsh, given the first line (and yes, that is the first line).
Aside from the branding, there are some rather interesting typos here. I never knew how good steam cell research is. Plus we will all fie eventually, so,
Fie on you!
Good Lord, there's a spell check on the fraking submission form why the hell didn't they use it.:headbang:
Gruenberg
02-02-2006, 07:36
Good Lord, there's a spell check on the fraking submission form why the hell didn't they use it.:headbang:
It wouldn't actually have caught 'steam cell'.
Flibbleites
02-02-2006, 07:38
It wouldn't actually have caught 'steam cell'.
I know, but it would have caught some of the spelling errors.
Gruenberg
02-02-2006, 07:40
I know, but it would have caught some of the spelling errors.
Yes.

I've actually noticed something. I don't suppose it's an attempt to get a second 'right to abortion' through, to dodge the repeal?
Enn
02-02-2006, 07:41
Yes.

I've actually noticed something. I don't suppose it's an attempt to get a second 'right to abortion' through, to dodge the repeal?
Well, the women will only be allopwed to have abortions, so that changes it. Fie on them.
Flibbleites
02-02-2006, 07:43
Well, the women will only be allopwed to have abortions, so that changes it. Fie on them.
Well I'd hope that only women would be allopwed to have abortions.:D
The Most Glorious Hack
02-02-2006, 09:41
I never knew how good steam cell research is.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v251/Tindalos/Random/steam.jpg
The world can be saved through STEAM!
St Edmund
02-02-2006, 11:32
Originally Posted by End Unemployment
Category: Political Stability

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Cadian Marines

Description: Unemployment, which causes severe social instability will be greatly reduced if all persons that are physically and mentally eligable for military service be drafted into the military.

And what about those nations that don't have a military?

And note that despite its title it doesn't just draft the unemployed, it drafts everybody!
St Edmund
02-02-2006, 11:34
It wouldn't actually have caught 'steam cell'.

or 'fie'...
The Most Glorious Hack
02-02-2006, 11:49
Wow... Proposal list is only 2 pages long right now. Me an' Update dun hit it hard.
Forgottenlands
02-02-2006, 13:32
I would love to know how it wouldn't be duplication to pass a stem cell research resolution between resolution 2 and 82.
Flibbleites
02-02-2006, 17:50
I would love to know how it wouldn't be duplication to pass a stem cell research resolution between resolution 2 and 82.
Because the text talks about steam cell research.:p

Category: Free Trade


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Superiala

Description: This Assembly,

Calls upon all nations to have their Internet services regulated by a UN department. This in term will mean that domain name servers and IP-pools will be controlled externally by the United Nations if a dispute should take place. This also means that Internet top-level domains can be distributed to their rightful owners. In stead of being sold to the highest bidder, because the suffix sound cool in English. This opens up more local trade in domain names and web-space. And thus creates technology jobs in countries which are underdeveloped. Also a UN-controlled Internet gives more privacy to the net user.
This resolution is also to prevent Internet misuse by countries who make money out of practices such as spamming, spoofing and fraud. Countries not prosecuting spammers could be fined or even cut-off from the internet. This could save millions in terms of data-traffic. Also a UN organisation of professionals could boast the advancement of new Internet technology such as IPv6 and other things alike.

We feel that the Internet should be a part of services controlled by the UN, just as the IMO controls the commercial shipping and the IATA/ICAO controls commercial aviation.

Regards,

The UN mission of the Constitutional Monarchy of Superiala
Let's see, three RL references, a branding violation and a possible miscategorization.
Flibbleites
03-02-2006, 06:06
Category: International Security


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Stwarspite

Description: Recognizing that there are bans on the use of biological weapons

Realizing that both hostile nations outside of the UN exist and it is very easy to resign from UN or simply break the law

Proposing, therefor, that if any nuclear or biological weapon is used from OUTSIDE the UN any or all UN nations may launch powerful arms on that nation, however, if the weapon of mass destruction is launched from INSIDE the UN that nation shall immediately be ejected from the UN and thus falling into the category of nations outside of the UN

Proposing, also, that any nation within the UN with more than two armed (not for research) weapons of mass destruction be immediately ejected

Preventing, thus, nuclear war and ultimately the destruction of the worldIllegal, game mechanics.

Category: International Security


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Romanism squared

Description: the entire united nations would not be able to stop any county from gaining nuclear or worse weapons of destruction. Every country would be able to do what they would like if that be nuclear weapons so be itWhat?:confused:
Gruenberg
03-02-2006, 06:07
What?:confused:
Sounds to me like an attempt at Nuclear Armaments.
Flibbleites
03-02-2006, 06:08
Sounds to me like an attempt at Nuclear Armaments.
That was my first thought but it's worded so poorly that it could be just about anything.
Cluichstan
03-02-2006, 06:09
Even teddy bears. ;)
The Most Glorious Hack
03-02-2006, 06:31
Even teddy bears. ;)I've seen Screamers. I know the truth about teddy bears!
Flibbleites
04-02-2006, 06:11
These two aren't nesicarily silly but the fact that they're right nest to one another in too funny not to put here.
Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Uranium Mining


Proposed by: Nunsios

Description: It has come to my attention is a dirty "habit" that we still practice today. It is a dirty substance used for nuclear energy that takes 200 years to lose its radioactive potency. Unless we do something now, many nations wull become dependent on this fuel and later would be reluctant to change. Another problem with the continuation of "nuclear fuel" is that it hurts UN RESOLUTION 18 which assures a cleaner environment and advancement of new energies. It cannot be done unless we do the following:

1.Outlaw Uranium Mining
2.Subsidize new Industries Involving Hydrogen energy and subsidize scientific research.
3.Outlaw nuclear energy
Category: Free Trade


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Capital Hillbillies

Description: We the people of Capital Hillbillies feel that nuclear power is a safe and efficient form of energy. We have come up with four reasons why it should be used. [1] It is cleaner than most methods but more efficient than solar and wind powered energy source of energy. [2] It provides jobs for the jobless. [3] It will have the companies that produce other forms of energy[oil,coal,natual gas,etc.] compete with each other, driving down the overall cost. [4] It will have some safty measures keeping it a safe way of keeping energy cost low.

Category: Repeal


Resolution: #18


Proposed by: Roundhousekickistan

Description: UN Resolution #18: Hydrogen Powered Vehicles (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Resolution does make several good points about Hydrogen vehicles and the environmental effects of them. It is obvious that they are easier on the outdoors that we all treasure.

However, these vehicles have a definite downside. Water, what hydrogen is made of, is immensley cheaper and easier to get than petroleum. For the sake of our economies, hydrogen cars must not be mandetory. The petroleum industry is a staple in most societies, and if they are removed or hindered, the economy will suffer.

Instead, we must be more conservative with petroleum. Vehicles will be made that get more miles to the gallon. This will greatly reduce emissions and also be less hard on the environment.Hydrogen is made out of water, huh.

Category: International Security


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Gattuso

Description: I am trying to repeal Un Resolution #78. This is a repeal of resolution #1 Fight Against Axis Of Evil. This Evil must not be allowed to grow. We must destroy it before it becomes a bigger problem. if it continues to grow, trying to fight it will be like trying to move a one-ton brick with a twig. If we do wait than our economies will be crushed and our military depleated. no good can come from ignoring this. Crush it now before it goes out of the UN's controlJoin the fight for freedom, equality and peace. You cannot repeal repeals.

Category: International Security


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Broken Imperial Fleet

Description: This proposes the reduction of all nuclear arsenals
and usage,construction,and disposal

1)all nuclear arsenals containg 2,000 warheads or more shall be reduced to 1,500 warheads
2)Nations who are RECOGNIZED by the UN may only construct nuclear weapons all other nations who construct nuclear weapons shall be treated not as an ally but an enemy
3)all plutonium production shall be limited to 30 pounds a year.
4)all nations shall decrease all Uranium mining by 35% as the insure a nation does not create nuclear weapons
5)all nations shall have annual visits by the UN to inspect facilites and no inspectors shall be denied acess to anywhere except to a reactor
6)destruction of warheads shall be done on a nations own budget and supervised by the UN.
7)Waste and destroyed warheads shall be place in an area where it cannot affect:water sources,humans,animals,vegetation,local industry,commercial industry,local agriculture,etc.
8)usage of nuclear weapons shall be used only when launched upon or if the agressor is overwhelming to a nation
9)Nuclear Testing may only be done in areas approved by the UN
10)Silos shall be limited to 45 per nation and mobile nuclear missle sations can only consist of 200 vehicles
11)Nuclear ordinance dropped from aircraft shall maintain a strict no more than 10 kiloton bomb and all ordinance shall be limited to 300
12)all smaller nuclear ordinance should be verified by the UN and monitored closely as not to violate a nations quota on nuclear weapons I believe that clause 2 is attempting to affect non-member nations, plus it's in the wrong category.
Ceorana
04-02-2006, 06:20
You cannot repeal repeals.
I think I posted this before in this thread, but anyway, here's my ideal resolution:

Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "Repeal "UN Taxation Ban"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Flibbleites
04-02-2006, 17:24
Category: Political Stability


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Andreasland

Description: We need more money, more jobs, more food, and so on... then er need political stability.Uh, ok.:rolleyes:

Category: Political Stability


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Ferria

Description: WHEREAS, the spacial body currently designated as "Pluto" is substantially smaller than all other bodies considered to be planets, and

WHEREAS, much international law rests on the specific definitions of terms, and

WHEREAS, the colonization and exploration of space is certain to play an ever-larger role in nations the whole world over,

BE IT RESOLVED by the United Nations here assembled that: "Pluto" is hereafter deigned to not be a planet, and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that "Pluto" is therefore exempt from all international law regarding planets. So, who wants to tell them (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/page=display_region/region=pluto) that there no longer a planet?
Forgottenlands
04-02-2006, 20:17
So, who wants to tell them (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/page=display_region/region=pluto) that there no longer a planet?

Did they actually declassify it? I heard that they acknowledge Pluto no longer meets the requirements, but that they chose to keep it classified as a planet since it is understood by so many as being a planet.

But that was like....4 years ago....
The Most Glorious Hack
04-02-2006, 21:57
Did they actually declassify it? I heard that they acknowledge Pluto no longer meets the requirements, but that they chose to keep it classified as a planet since it is understood by so many as being a planet.Its official designation hasn't changed, and will probably never change. It's on the cusp of the Kuiper belt, but there's no hard and fast rules on what is and isn't a planet. Hell, they can't even completely designated between a Brown Dwarf star and a supermassive Jupiter-like planet.

Sedna doesn't change anything. It's smaller than Pluto and far enough out to be a member of the Oort Cloud with an orbit that ranges from 76 to 928 AU (lil' lopsided, hey?)

"Xena" is the biggest risk to Pluto's standing as Xena is further out and larger than Pluto, but nobody's sure if it should count as a planet. Of course, if it doesn't count, then Pluto is at a greater risk of losing its status as a planet, unless they incorporate a maximum distance for planets that Pluto is within.
Irish Nations of Meame
04-02-2006, 22:47
No offence to MB, really, but seeing this on the UN happenings just made me laugh so hard:

1 minute ago: The proposal "Death of Max Barry" was removed from the floor.

Imagine "Repeal "Death of Max Barry"".
Cluichstan
04-02-2006, 23:06
Imagine "Repeal "Death of Max Barry"".

Zombie Max Barry? :eek:
Yelda
04-02-2006, 23:55
BAD BAD BAD BAD

A resolution to legalize or outlaw gambling.


Category: Gambling


Legalize/Outlaw: Outlaw


Proposed by: Mooz Kow Body

Description: NO ITS ADDICTIVE AND CREATES CRIME. BAD ITS NUTTY AND POOR.
This proposal is BAD BAD BAD BAD.
Gun-ho like Rambo

A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.


Category: Gun Control


Decision: Relax


Proposed by: Mooz Kow Body

Description: Let us get gun-ho everyone. Relax and shoot something. We do not need gun laws and ill tell yall why. If you were in a room full of people and everyone had a gun then you would be the last one to shoot, but if there was only one gun and it was in your hand then it would not be a problem. This is my point less death for fear of their own life.
Let's not.
Flibbleites
05-02-2006, 06:08
Zombie Max Barry? :eek:
Why not, there are zombie forum accounts.:D

Category: Repeal


Resolution: #110


Proposed by: HP Obsessors

Description: UN Resolution #110: United Nations Security Act (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: NOTING that this resolution allows states "the right to construct and utilize any and all weapons that are necessary to defend their nation from attack" except where previously restricted.

NOTING that the wording of this document prevents any restrictions from being placed on any new weapons thay might be developed in the future.

ENCOURAGES the repeal of this resolution that gives states much too broad capabilities for contructing weaponry.Apparently the authors didn't take the time to realize that the UNSA has one of the easiest work-arounds ever in a UN resolution.
Waterana
05-02-2006, 12:32
Repeal "END BARBARIC PUNISHMENTS"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal


Resolution: #41


Proposed by: The Aantaarcticaa

Description: UN Resolution #41: END BARBARIC PUNISHMENTS (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Resolution #41 goes against the religious ideologies of sovereign , conservative , theocratical , or iron fist nations . the outlawing of ideologies is illegal in the UN,after all . Christian theocracies , for example , religiously believe in the violent punishment of pedophiles . Therefore , Resolution #41 contradicts the Resolution of Religious Tolerance that was passed in the UN .

Approvals: 1 (Noctaurus)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 121 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Feb 8 2006
:rolleyes:

Promote a Clean World

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Uranium Mining


Proposed by: Nunsios

Description: It has come to my attention that UN RESOLUTION #18 cannot be carried out unless Uranium Mining is Outlawed. Uranium is used for nuclear energy purposes,furthermore, it takes 200 years for the radioactivity to level. UN RESOLUTION #18 promises a cleaner environment and advancement of hydrogen energy, but while we have Uranium what makes nations willing to put forth maximum effort in search of cleaner fuel. Some Nations have economic interest with Uranium fuel and are not willing to spend money for new fuel. I propose the following.
1.Uranium Mining be outlawed
2.Subsidies for scientific research, new fuel, and a better way to dispose of the already existing Uranium.


Please support Resolution Paradigm shift in Fuel

King Colbert II

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Feb 8 2006
Personally, I'd rather get rid of resolution 18.

Disarm now

A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.


Category: Global Disarmament


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Oranienburg

Description: because we all spend lots of money on arms, our tax is raised all the time!

lets all be intelligent and spend this money on more important matters!

therefore i would like to sugest we all stop spending money on arms now!

allthough we will lose some money because the arms industrie will fall apart, our economies will all florisch!

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Feb 8 2006
What about those nations where the arms industry is the economy?
Quaon
05-02-2006, 13:53
Gay Rights
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Chandonia

Description: RECOGNIZING that minorities need protection,

ACKNOWLEDGING that some anti-discrimination laws persecute comedians who mean no malice,

PROPOSES the following:

It shall be an offence to discriminate against a person because of their sexuality, discriminating being defined as the act of denying someone the rights or oppurtunities that another slightly different group would get on the basis of their beliefs or sexuality without good reason.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Feb 8 2006


:rolleyes:
Palentine UN Office
05-02-2006, 20:43
Gay Rights
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Chandonia

Description: RECOGNIZING that minorities need protection,

ACKNOWLEDGING that some anti-discrimination laws persecute comedians who mean no malice,

PROPOSES the following:

It shall be an offence to discriminate against a person because of their sexuality, discriminating being defined as the act of denying someone the rights or oppurtunities that another slightly different group would get on the basis of their beliefs or sexuality without good reason.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Feb 8 2006


:rolleyes:

Has this one been deleted yet? I haven't checked the proposals yet.
Flibbleites
05-02-2006, 22:44
Category: Political Stability


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: The Aantaarcticaa

Description: Labor Unions divide the government , lead to violent protests , and other commotions of the calendar . they should be made illegal and banned . This proposal is not outlawing any ideologies but only protecting the political stability of a nation .You guys just had to repeal Right of Labor Unions didn't you.

Category: International Security


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Desert Storm Iraq

Description: As the UN tries to promote World Peace we can't ignore that there are Rogue nations out there that stand in our way. The only way we can defeat these nations is by massively increasing military budgets in all UN members. Once we are able to remove these global threats, we will finally be able to promote World Peace.Ant one else think that this reads like the old "Fight the Axis of Evil?"

Category: International Security


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Utilitarius Maximus

Description: In an effort to combat security threats to the U.N. and its members, a proposition is now being brought up which requires the following:

-A United Nations military will be created to provide for the welfare and security of all member nations
-The newly created military will be headed by 5 generals. Each of the five generals will be picked from their individual nations. The five nations with the largest military may send one general to lead the U.N. military.
-Member nations must contribute 10% of their military force to the U.N. military. Those who were formally serving for their nation's military but are reassigned to the United Nations military are not under the jurisdiction of their home nation.
- Those conscripted to UN military service are to serve 2 years during peace time and 4 years during a time of war. At the completion of their service, U.N. military members will return to their home nation's military.
- Member nations may have militaries of their own but must realize that with the UN military in place, the national militaries are to be used in conjunction with the police to provide internal law and order.

As the United Nations should be working as one coherent body, so should the military strength of the nations within it. With the formation of the United Nations Military, all member nations will be protected by a singular military force that will be in the best interests of the United
Nations and the members within it. The centralization of the United Nations' military forces will allow for a more organized fighting force and more military success should conflict reach a nation of the United Nations. Read the rules.
Sillytopia
06-02-2006, 01:10
Right to Bear Arms
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: The Pachyderms

Description: NOTING that people across the world partake in the pastime of hunting, and that many people enjoy displaying trophies of successful hunts in their home,

NOTING that many people across the world enjoy lucrative occupations as professional hunters and taxidermists,

NOTING that for the purposes of this proposal, "Bear" will be defined as any creature that is a member of the family Ursidae,

PERMITTING the legal possession of bear arms, legs, and heads by citizens in UN member states,

PROHIBITING the prosecution by UN member states of citizens possessing, preparing, or displaying bear arms, legs, and heads in their homes,

PROHIBITING the passage of legislation to outlaw the preparing, possession, or display of bear arms, legs, and heads on private property,

REALIZING that in some areas bears are endangered,

ALLOWING the waiver of this resolution in UN Member states where bears must be protected by law if they are to flourish

Funny guy.
Jey
06-02-2006, 02:35
Instatement of the PATRIOT ACT

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.


Category: International Security

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Manan the Great

Description: RECOGNIZES an increase in the authority of the government with a sole purpose of diminishing terrorism.

ASSERTS that a citizen's safety from terrorism is deemed more important and vital than a citizen's privacy.

Therefore, STATES that the people's privacy can and should be sacrificed for increased government authority required to obstruct terrorism.


GIVES the government permission and authority over the following:
1)Surveillance and authority to intercept electronic communication relating to terrorism.

2)Surveillance and authority to intercept wire and oral forms of communications relating to terrorism.

3)Authority to share relative criminal information with intelligence agencies.

4)Authority to a seizure of Voice Mail, messages and any other form of communication through which terrorism-related material is transmitted.

5)Authority to access all records, private or public, relative to terrorism.


AFFIRMS that all surveillance be limited to the confines of terrorism.

I don't know where to begin. :headbang:
Jey
06-02-2006, 02:38
Repeal "Free education"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal

Resolution: #28

Proposed by: Union Canada

Description: UN Resolution #28: Free education (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION #28 (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant)shall be struck down and rendered void.

UN resolution #28 is commendable because it provides the chance for free education to be brought to all students who want to get an education.

However, it should be repealed because it is too broad in its one line statement that all students under 18 should have free education. There should be another resolution created to ensure that there are standards and quidelines to be followed by U.N nations but still allow them to do 'Free Education' through there own systems, but to ensure that there are no loop holes or wiggle room for nations to squeeze by, so they can't provide Free Education if a new resolution is created.

Why this resolution should be repealed is that:

(1) There are no standards set out by this resolution for individual UN nations.
(1a) For example there are no standards to what kind of education these students need to receive, even if they are inadequate to get an adequate education

(2) Some nations are not able because of their economic situation to pay for Free Education for people below 18. This resolution doesn't make mention to that.

(3) The resolution is unclear about which level of education should be provided for free under the age of 18.

(4) Some United Nations nations have non-human species that may not have the same lifespan as a human. And Free Education resolution makes no mention of any kind of free education for these species.

Repeals Resolution #28 "Abortion Rights"

heh...heh heh :rolleyes:
The Pachyderms
06-02-2006, 12:32
Funny guy.

Too bad the moderators have no sense of humor. :(
Gruenberg
06-02-2006, 12:36
Too bad the moderators have no sense of humor. :(
It's not that. It's that that joke got old pretty much when guns were invented...in fact, when bears were invented. It's even listed in the Proposals Rules thread as "stupid proposals you shouldn't submit". :rolleyes:
Cluichstan
06-02-2006, 13:35
Too bad the moderators have no sense of humor. :(

Assuming that's the first stupid proposal you've submitted, you've got one more freebie. The third one gets you booted out of the UN.
Czechotova
07-02-2006, 03:01
Dog Day Afternoon
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Youstepoff

Description: Resolve that one afternoon per year be set aside for purpose of spending time with a dog. It can be a big dog, a small dog, a bull dog, a sheep dog, or snoop doggy dog.

Approvals: 0



cant think straight.....*wrestles self frantically* stupidity overload!
[NS]Mirg
07-02-2006, 04:36
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: The new kings

Description: In this world of nations imposing unending cruelty upon there people a international civil rights act MUST be enacted. UN members must bring this world the necessary morals to bring it out of the dark ages of secret police and unending pain.

Approvals: 1 (Benfinan)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 121 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Fri Feb 10 2006
I'm fairly certain that this isn't even remotely funny. However, the sheer vague uselessness of the whole thing puts me at a loss...
I think I'm going to have to re-read those children's books, and learn how to think intelligently again...
Wurble woible, wobleewee?
Irish Nations of Meame
08-02-2006, 16:24
Whereas, UN Secretary General Max Barry has maintained peace in the world,

Whereas, UN Secretary General Max Barry has assisted in the devolpment of nations.

Therefore, be it resolved that the nations of the UN comend UN Secretary General Max Barry for his service.

I found this in the forums somewhere. First "Death of Max Barry", now this?
Gruenberg
08-02-2006, 16:26
I found this in the forums somewhere. First "Death of Max Barry", now this?
We don't generally put proposals in the forums in this thread. It defeats the point, and it's not really in the spirit of things.
Jey
09-02-2006, 03:45
Business Betterment Act

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: All Businesses


Proposed by: Spatulater

Description: Allow all businesses open rights to all available land, including, but not limited to, forests, national parks, lakes, and rivers. The purpose of the bill is to improve the economy of the world.

Approvals: 1 (Gerkistan)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

No..it won't. :confused:
Frisbeeteria
09-02-2006, 05:25
FCS free trade
A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.

Category: Free Trade
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Burberys

Description: limbs of the united nations, I prince of Burberys propose the free trade for the Federal Commonwealth Society. This resolution would guarantee the development of the industry for the more little nations as my principato.questa important resolution a greater foreign inflows of capital that would invest the they capital in the zones less developed than the Commonwealth and in all the economically weak zones. The development of the industry assures not only money for the state, but better social state then hospitals, schools, university and much other still. The [free] betraied would go to guarantee a more sure stability not only social but even political in when are demolished the customs ties that imposes too strong taxes to the single states proposes so the demolition of the customs duties in the [commonwealth] at the beginning as base initiative to then perhaps widen to the other regions this commerce type, surely more easy for the more poor nations. I thank all the limbs of the united nations for the attention to me turned and excuse for my modest English, the prince of Burbery Matteo 1
I recognize this as something written by someone with English as a second (or third) language ... but ... what the heck was "limbs of the united nations" supposed to be? I'm at so much of a loss, I coulnd't even delete it. Anyone?
The Most Glorious Hack
09-02-2006, 05:48
Maybe he was trying for "members" and picked the wrong appendage?
Cluichstan
09-02-2006, 05:57
I just don't want him addressing my member...
Menchekia
09-02-2006, 08:40
Maybe he was trying for "members" and picked the wrong appendage?

LMFAO.

Okay, you made me spit my soft drink with that one. I was thinking something alone the same lines but not so eloquently put....
Waterana
09-02-2006, 08:52
Well that proposal is no less confusing than this FCS RMB post. I've read it several times today, and still can't make any sense out of it..

18 hours ago The Principality of Burberys

salutes to all the commonwealth I wanted ask if you are of accord for a resolution UN for the free trade for the west pacific does bright ideas?

I swear that is the post word for word.

First Giggsy and co, then an invasion attempt, then a mass puppet flood, and now this. Our region is certainly attracting more than its fair share of strange people lately :p.
Sillytopia
09-02-2006, 08:57
Repeal "Protect Historical Sites"
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #15
Proposed by: MojoHojo

Description: UN Resolution #15: Protect Historical Sites (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Aware of the lack of authority given to the United Nations to protect these historical sites; and

Understanding the soveriegnty of each nation to determine how to protect its own historic sites;

1. Herby repeals Resolution #15.
Mmmm...herby...

Promote World Peace
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Desert Storm Iraq

Description: As the world is becoming a more dangerous place filled with evil nations, UN member nations must fight whenever necessary in the interests of peace. This means that UN members must work on building lots of new weapons. Only if we greatly increase military budgets in all UN member nations, we will finally be able to promote world peace and enhance global security.
Fine logic.

Next, an interesting approach to repeal and replace:

Repeal "Outlaw Pedophilia"
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #22
Proposed by: The EGI

Description: UN Resolution #22: Outlaw Pedophilia (Category: Moral Decency; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Noting that U.N. resolution #22 defines pedophilia as “The act of sexual molestation of a pre-pubescent minor.”
Recognizing that this resolution only applies to pre-pubescent minors, and not adolescents and post-pubescent minors.
Proposes that this resolution be repealed so that it can include all minors, regardless of physical maturity.
Then

Outlaw Pedophilia
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: The EGI

Description: For the purpose of this resolution, a minor will be defined as any person under the age of 18.

RESOLVED, That the act of sexual molestation of a minor is hereby outlawed in all UN member nations.

Ban Depleted Uranium Ammo
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Xarvinia--Wurtemburg

Description: The Kingdom of Xarvinia--Wurtemburg,

RECOGNIZING this body's previous efforts to control global arms dealing;

NOTING WITH GRATITUDE the many disarmament bills passed by this body;

NOTING WITH CONCERN the pervasive use of depleted uranium ammunition;

NOTING WITH GRAVE CONCERN the additional health risks to both combatants and victims caused by depleted uranium ammunition;

REQUESTS that the United Nations ban the use of depleted uranium ammunition;

SINCERELY HOPES that the member states recognize the dangers of depleted uranium;

RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS that sanctions be placed on all nations using depleted uranium ammunition;

THANKS the committee for its time.
Branded. And what committee?
Krankor
09-02-2006, 15:35
cant think straight.....*wrestles self frantically* stupidity overload!

Due to high radiation levels on the planet Krankor, we have no actual dogs per se, but be have dog-chicken hybrids. Does the "Dog Day Afternoon" resolution count for them?
Irish Nations of Meame
09-02-2006, 20:18
Due to high radiation levels on the planet Krankor, we have no actual dogs per se, but be have dog-chicken hybrids. Does the "Dog Day Afternoon" resolution count for them?
It only states a few dogs...
Flibbleites
10-02-2006, 17:29
Category: Global Disarmament


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: UnitedCapitalists

Description: We as a global community must put a foot forward to extinguish the use and production of Nuclear Weapons. Having these weapons of mass destruction will cause those that have them to use them if forced to. This has dire consequences such as Nuclear winter and total Armmageddon.

We should strive to do these things:

1. Disarm and destroy all nuclear weapons including those in production.

2. Shut down their manufacturing plants.

3. Ban the use of nuclear materials that are not for providing power in Nuclear Powerplants and used in powering space-crafts and space vehicles for the use in space exploration and colonization.

For thus we prevent a global catastrophe caused by humans and to ensure the future existence of future generations of humanity.Someone needs to read the passed reslutions.

Category: Repeal


Resolution: #64


Proposed by: Fleurs de Soliel

Description: UN Resolution #64: Tracking Near Earth Objects (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: I agree the global community should work in conjunction with each other to share information relating to potential hazardous trajectories that may result in global destruction. However, near earth objects (ie.comets and asteroids)that may POTENTIALLY collide with the earth does not require additional amounts of spending and the boosting of military and police budgets. We have far too much need right at home here on our planet. One only has to examine the continued spread of diseases such as HIV/AIDS (epidemic in several regions of our world) and the inability of many nations to obliterate poverty and starvation amongst our most vulnerable world citizens. Perhaps the creation of less "space junk" in the form of bans on technological waste (ie. satellite refuse)could be considered and legislative responses formulated. We need only look around us to see threats to our continued survival here on earth, much less waste our time on threats from the galaxies within our vast universe. Instead of promoting a culture of fear, in terms of planetary defense requirements, it would be far more beneficial to spend more of our resources on caring for the "needy" in our global village.:rolleyes:
Sillytopia
10-02-2006, 17:47
:mp5:
Every person to have a gun
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Babster

Description: this proposal makes everyone able to have a firearm - even children

every one will have protection

so even if a maniac has a gun, you have on too to make it even

lets make the world violenter!!!!!!
:sniper:

Also...'Tighten'?
Hou Mian
11-02-2006, 05:44
Repeal "Ban Single-Hulled Tankers"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal


Resolution: #11


Proposed by: Happy Merry Jolly Land

Description: UN Resolution #11: Ban Single-Hulled Tankers (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: It doesnt matter if single or double hulled tankers are banned, it wont make any difference transporting the oil. this is an online simulation game, and it is not possible to have an oil spill in this world. voting on this proposal is a win-win situation.

Approvals: 2 (Happy Merry Jolly Land, Merasia)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Besides metagaming...:rolleyes:
Grand Maritoll
11-02-2006, 05:55
Besides metagaming...:rolleyes:

Sort of a god-modding metagaming hybrid. I love those things :p
Frisbeeteria
11-02-2006, 06:34
I could always point out that his UN membership is equally imaginary ...
Flibbleites
11-02-2006, 07:49
Category: International Security


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Industrious Geeks

Description: Considering the unstable nature of world affairs throughout history, and the necessity for peace-keeping, and the maintenance of world trade, an international UN police force is hereby established for the following purposes:

1) ONLY for peace-keeping and halting of genocide or related activities
2) ONLY for pursuing individuals recognized (by majority UN vote) as international or war criminals.

Action by the UN police force must be taken by majority UN resolution vote. Police forces drawn from member states and under UN command.Hey Industrious Geeks, maybe you should be industrious geeks and read the proposal rules.

Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Windurst1

Description: RECOGNIZES that many nations do not approve of abortion while others do.

AWARE the nations that do not approve of abortion are displeased with being forced to by the UN or laws passed by the UN making them.

DECLARES that nations decided for themselves if Abortions are legal or Illegal in their nations.You should probably wait until the vote is finished before submitting this.
Waterana
11-02-2006, 14:39
LSD and Tryptamin as medicin

A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use


Decision: Legalize


Proposed by: Taoziland

Description: Will make LSD and tryptamins legal as medicination under supervision from a terapeut, psychologist or a speciallt trained session leader.

Effects:

MENTAL HELTH and wealth will boost in a nation

CRIME rate will fall

SOCIAL AND WELFARE funds will raise

Approvals: 1 (Taoziland)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Tue Feb 14 2006
I think this nation needs to worry more about its education budget, seems illiteracy is a severe problem.
The Most Glorious Hack
11-02-2006, 19:50
Isn't a "terapeut" a kind of fish?
Oneiro
11-02-2006, 22:17
The Welsh Firearms Act 2006

A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.


Category: Gun Control


Decision: Relax


Proposed by: South Swansea

Description: Quite contrary to popular belief, it is a well known fact that guns save lives.

South Swansea proposes to make firearms compulsory to all nations in the UN, therefore making it a safer and happier place.

Let us all trvel forward into the 21st century, with guns an integral part of civilised society.

Together, we can work magic, and clear up crime for good, without speanding vast amounts of tax money on policing.

Make the right decision.

Regards, His Majesty PJ Singleton, South Swansea. Yeah! Guns save lives! Just the other day, I saw an AK jumping in front of a speeding bus that was trvling at at least 90mph to stop it from colliding with this darling old lady.
Flibbleites
12-02-2006, 05:55
Category: International Security


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Desert Storm Iraq

Description: As the world is becoming a more dangerous place filled with evil nations, UN member nations must fight whenever necessary in the interests of peace. This means that UN members must work on building lots of new weapons. Only if we greatly increase military budgets in all UN member nations, we will finally be able to promote world peace and enhance global security.:rolleyes:

Category: Global Disarmament


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Willing Subjects

Description: When nations possess weapons designed only to attack other nations, such as ICBMs, it increases the already tense security balance of the world.

Further, other nations are threatened by possession of offensive weapons, and must increase their own forces in order to be secure.

A ban on offensive weapons would allow all nations to reduce their armies to a small defense-only force and save a great deal of money in so doing.

Therefore, a ban on all purely offensive weapons shall be established. All such weapons in existence shall be scraped or destroyed.

All money saved due to cuts in military spending shall be used to shift industries away from such weapons and then, after said transition is complete, to developing industry to make up for any economic backlash.

NB: Nuclear weapons are not strictly offensive due to second-strike abilities and their status will be unaffected.Well, it's a good thing that nuclear weapons are unaffected as if they were then this one would contradict Nuclear Armaments.
Palentine UN Office
12-02-2006, 20:59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Limit Offensive Weapons
Category: Global Disarmament


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Willing Subjects

Description: When nations possess weapons designed only to attack other nations, such as ICBMs, it increases the already tense security balance of the world.

Further, other nations are threatened by possession of offensive weapons, and must increase their own forces in order to be secure.

A ban on offensive weapons would allow all nations to reduce their armies to a small defense-only force and save a great deal of money in so doing.

Therefore, a ban on all purely offensive weapons shall be established. All such weapons in existence shall be scraped or destroyed.

All money saved due to cuts in military spending shall be used to shift industries away from such weapons and then, after said transition is complete, to developing industry to make up for any economic backlash.

NB: Nuclear weapons are not strictly offensive due to second-strike abilities and their status will be unaffected.


Well I'm against this one. It will hurt my nation's economy. Armament manufacturing is the main business of the Palentine.:D
Flibbleites
12-02-2006, 22:19
Category: International Security


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Duglando

Description: All nations should have the ability to create nukes for themselves. It could help their economy and national security.It's been done.:rolleyes:

Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Maltestan

Description: Euthanasia will be mandatory for all citizens over the age of 75. We urge all countries to help relieve their elderly from indignity and suffering.:rolleyes:
Cluichstan
12-02-2006, 22:25
Hmmm...mandatory euthanasia, eh? Can we start with the guy who proposed it?
Flibbleites
12-02-2006, 22:28
Hmmm...mandatory euthanasia, eh? Can we start with the guy who proposed it?
Only if he's 75 or older.
Yelda
12-02-2006, 22:31
Hmmm...mandatory euthanasia, eh? Can we start with the guy who proposed it?
Only if he's "over the age of 75". Of course, it doesn't specify 75 what, so that might be a usable loophole.
Cluichstan
12-02-2006, 22:34
Only if he's "over the age of 75". Of course, it doesn't specify 75 what, so that might be a usable loophole.

Score! :cool:
Quaon
12-02-2006, 23:00
Only if he's 75 or older.
The Giver, anyone?
St Edmund
13-02-2006, 12:58
Defying The Deniers

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.

Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Salafi Iraqistan

Description: This resolution deals with imposing penalties for those who deny the authenticity of a genocide against any group regardless of race, religion, or geography.

This resolution:
Emphasizes that the justification for or denial of the crime of genocide is problematic and that it is spreading, particularly in the third world.
Expresses great concern that government officials, too, are opting to justify-or deny-the occurence of genocide, thus violating principles of decency, in addition to principles of international peace and/or justice.
Condemns any justification for or denial of genocide regardless of race, religion, or geographic location of the persecuted people(s) in question.
Calls upon all member states to impose whatever penalties deemed necessary, from fines to capital punishment, for the justification for or denial of the occurence of genocide, be it current or historical.
Demands corporal or capital punishment for any individual, be it an ordinary Joe or government official, who blatantly refers to any form of genocide as a "myth", or part of a "global plot" on the part of the persecuted people(s) in question.
Seeks to improve relations between the world's ethnic and religious groups by any means necessary.

Turki al-Sharif
UN Ambassador The Islamic Republic of Salafi Iraqistan.

Approvals: 2 (Benfinan, Maxovia) Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals) Voting Ends: Thu Feb 16 2006

Assumes every claim of genocide to be genuine?
Flibbleites
13-02-2006, 17:44
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Assrammistan

Description: Public beatings and executions on pay per view. Dont mess with the government!:rolleyes:

Category: International Security


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Phato Nam

Description: 1. RECOGNISING that UN Proposal #92 is fully lawful and just, and that actions must be taken to free oppressed people in the Middle East, as well other parts of the world;

2. ACKNOWLEDGING that The Universal Bill of Rights (UNP #26) states that “All human beings must not be subjected to torture or to cruel or inhuman treatment or punishment”

3. STATING that Muslim insurgents all around the world torture and execute persons declared “unfit” to their warped vision of Islam

4. ARGUING that these radicals need serious consideration either in the court of law or the battlefield

5. CALLS FOR the governments of the United Nations to seek out and destroy or contain certain individuals who break the Universal Bill of Rights or are called to be dealt with by the Humanitarian Intervention Resolution, especially those who cling to Islam as a shield to guard them against threats of other parties

5-B. ALSO CALLS FOR the Nation of Islam to concede the locations, names, and (or) information concerning the whereabouts of any person, place, or organization that is concerned with bringing terror against any person, place, or thing. Repeay after me, NS=/=RL.

Category: Repeal


Resolution: #14


Proposed by: Andreasland

Description: UN Resolution #14: CHILD LABOR (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: so we know it wil be done ;)Wow, now there's a great arguement.:rolleyes:

Category: Global Disarmament


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Chabintona

Description: Global Disarmament by 35% over the next 5 years of "Un-Conventional" weaponsGood thing they didn't define "Un-Conventional" weapons.;)
Flibbleites
14-02-2006, 05:16
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #14


Proposed by: The magic herb

Description: UN Resolution #14: CHILD LABOR (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: CONCERNED about the inequality that this resolution creates in the area of human rights.

DISGUSTED at the quality of the wording

KNOWING (not believing, b/c I know for sure) that the resolution is flawed b/c it only considers few jobs, what about children in fast food resturants, getting third degree burn? The resolution neglects to take any of this into its focus.

THEREFORE, it is proposed that Resolution #14 be overturned on the above grounds. The proposal's that short and the author couldn't spell out the word "because.":rolleyes:
Jey
15-02-2006, 00:49
Removal of Radical Islam Act

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.


Category: International Security

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Phato Nam

Description: 1. RECOGNISING that UN Proposal #92 is fully lawful and just, and that actions must be taken to free oppressed people in the Middle East, as well other parts of the world;

2. ACKNOWLEDGING that The Universal Bill of Rights (UNP #26) states that “All human beings must not be subjected to torture or to cruel or inhuman treatment or punishment”

3. STATING that Muslim insurgents all around the world torture and execute persons declared “unfit” to their warped vision of Islam

4. ARGUING that these radicals need serious consideration either in the court of law or the battlefield

5. CALLS FOR the governments of the United Nations to seek out and destroy or contain certain individuals who break the Universal Bill of Rights or are called to be dealt with by the Humanitarian Intervention Resolution, especially those who cling to Islam as a shield to guard them against threats of other parties

5-B. ALSO CALLS FOR the Nation of Islam to concede the locations, names, and (or) information concerning the whereabouts of any person, place, or organization that is concerned with bringing terror against any person, place, or thing.

Heh..NS does not = RL. :rolleyes:
Makaar
15-02-2006, 12:43
Banning of drugs
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Only1rebel

Description: imagine a teenager indroduced to drugs at his highschool, do we want the future of our country to be surrounded by a substance that harms(kills as well) many men and female? but its getting out of control! the drug market is a problem not only for a humans health but for the local law enforcement, these drug dealers are bringing in many gang wars and fights.
Tobacoo is a many favoured "drug" among many people including some of you. so here is my proposal:

1. BANNING of harmful drugs with the exception of medical drugs
2. Raising more law enforcement to stop these drug wars.
3. raising of the age of tobacoo products.

1. Drugs kill many men and female. There isn't a smilie to express the idiocy of that sentence.

2. Where does one draw the line between harmful and medical drugs? Medical drugs can be just as harmful if overdosed or used incorrectly.

3. Raising the age of tobacco products? No! I won't smoke anything that's over 3 years old!
Makaar
15-02-2006, 12:50
Education Act
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Hume Victoria

Description: In order to boost the education of the nations in the UN, I therefore propose an education act.
RECOMMENDS- A committee to study and propose education policies in all nations.
URGES- All nations to adopt high school requirements for all citizens.
RECOMMENDS- All nations to fund free college tuition for all students of their nation.

Recommends? Urges? More recommends? What does this resolution do other than recommend things?
Flibbleites
16-02-2006, 04:52
Category: Political Stability


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Shutlandia

Description: During a time of crisis the "leader" of the country would be able to take total control, this would incur in all UN Proposal's being disposed of to deal with the crisis. Of course this means you must inform your UN Delegate or if you are a UN Delegate you must Step-down for the time being until crisis is resolved, if you do not step-down and rule by decree this can incur in serious action being taken by the UN. Illegal, game mechanics.

Category: The Furtherment of Democracy


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Maddys

Description: The creation of an International Organization of Democracy is crucial to increase democratic freedoms.
This organization should be created in order to gather all democratic countries and fight for common interests against dictature.

1) All democratic nations may be members;

2) One nation = one vote, on the voting of hipotetic proposals that ANY member of this organization can make in order to increase democratic values;

3) All members should defend democracy and vote/make proposals that they think being good for each and every democratic member;

4) Members should NOT offend dictature nations or its politicians, we want to make in a pacific way.


Concluding this, the IOD, if used with sense of citizenship and freedom will definitely contribute to an increase of democratic values in all world, all regions, all nations so we can protect each other from dictature and one day, who knows, end with it.Gee, does this mean that we should have written a proposal before forming the NSO?

Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Scotts and Lyon

Description: Recognizing that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people should have equal rights with benefits in reference to couples as do heterosexual couples.

Upon acceptance of this resolution:

1.) Nations that are members of the United Nations must allow for homosexual, bisexual and transgender couples to have a civil union.

2.) Religious organizations will not be forced to wed any couple they wish not to tie in a civil union.

3.) The term "civil union" will apply, because the fact is it is not a traditional marriage.

4.) Same sex couples will receive the same benefits, tax credits, exemptions and equal financial and social rights such as hospital visitation just as heterosexual couples.

5.) Adoption rights will be given to same sex couples.

Amendments to this bill may be added as necessary.In reference to the last line, no you can't amendments are illegal.
The Most Glorious Hack
16-02-2006, 12:33
Ban all black markets
A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.

Category: Social Justice
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Clinic

Description: I think we should ban all black markets because let's we as a nation open up a business and we sell things like military weapons, then another nation sells weapons under the table by 65% of the price we sell them. why let the other nation steal our profit because they lie and cheat? WE SHOULD BAN BLACK MARKETS!Black Markets are, by definition, illegal!

Approvals: 12 (Desert Storm Iraq, Al Tira, New Hamilton, Ni hon, Paddan Aram, Nukingtons, Alexandrian Ptolemais, Darwinnaria, Arendias, Trinidad n Tobago, The Legendary Rodent, Davane)12 people supported this! ARGH! :headbang:
James_xenoland
17-02-2006, 03:04
Recreational Drug Legalization

A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use


Decision: Legalize


Proposed by: Jey

Description: The UN,

ACKNOWLEDGING that many citizens of UN states wish to consume recreational drugs for many purposes,

AFFIRMING that all people have a right to their own body,

CONSIDERING that responsible recreational drug use harms only the individual user,

BELIEVING that criminalization of recreational drugs is an ineffective and unjust deterrent,

RECOGNIZING that responsible cultivation and preparation of certain plant-based drugs for personal consumption does not create public health hazards,

SEEKING to legalize consumption of these plant-based drugs where it does not involve direct physical harm to others,

1.DEFINES as recreational drugs for the purpose of this resolution: Amanita muscaria, Cannabis, Coffee, Ergot, Kava, Mescaline-containing cacti, Psilocin- and psilocybin-containing fungi, Qat, Salvia divinorum, Tea, Tobacco,

2.LEGALIZES in UN states the possession, cultivation, and preparation of said drugs, given these activities do not directly and physically harm others,

3.LEGALIZES in UN states the consumption of said drugs on private property, with the owner's consent, and public property, with the appropriate authorities' consent,

4.STRONGLY URGES states to illegalize the practice of deceiving or coercing others into using said drugs, except when administered legally for medicinal purposes by an authorised individual,

5.PERMITS member states to:

I)Place age restrictions on the activities described in Articles 2 and 3, to a maximum of the national age of majority,

II)Restrict individuals under the influence of said drugs from operating vehicles and heavy/dangerous machinery, pursuing occupational labor, or performing any acts in which being under the influence of said drugs could immediately, directly, physically harm others,

III)Give law enforcement authorities the right to detain - at their discretion but subject to other applicable laws and with the utmost respect for individual freedom of expression and conscience - any individual or group under the influence of said drugs who:

a)Cause significant public disturbance, with the intent or effect of causing physical injury, property damage, or severe distress to others,

b)Put others at significant risk of physical injury,

6.ESTABLISHES the UN Drug Commission to:

I)Monitor the medical safety of said drugs,

II)Advise on further issues concerning recreational drug laws,

III)Call for the seizure or destruction of known contaminated recreational drugs,

7.AFFIRMS that this resolution affords intoxicated persons who physically harm others no protection from prosecution and sentencing under applicable laws,

8.NOTES this resolution does not cover the administration of said drugs for medicinal purposes by health workers,

9.URGES all states to further relax their drug laws, by expanding the definition of recreational drugs to other substances, and creating a legal framework under which they may be legally procured,

10.REQUESTS that states support organizations and initiatives for voluntary rehabilitation of those affected by drugs, education on responsible drug use, and prevention of illegal and harmful acts resulting from drug use,

11.URGES states to ensure that their populations have easy access to scientifically accurate, value-neutral information concerning the effects of drug use, and that suppliers of said drugs are not allowed to make false claims about them.

Co-Authored by: _Myopia_
:|
Cluichstan
17-02-2006, 03:44
Y'know, james...I'm extremely tempted to lay into you for posting that here (despite my opposition to that proposal), but I'll leave the fun of doing so to someone else for a change.
[NS]Bazalonia
17-02-2006, 05:25
Gee, does this mean that we should have written a proposal before forming the NSO?



Nah... the NSO is just not a UN recognised organisation... but still, it is still illegal... Nations cannot be on UN mandated organisations... :P
Only1rebel
17-02-2006, 07:19
1. Drugs kill many men and female. There isn't a smilie to express the idiocy of that sentence.

2. Where does one draw the line between harmful and medical drugs? Medical drugs can be just as harmful if overdosed or used incorrectly.

3. Raising the age of tobacco products? No! I won't smoke anything that's over 3 years old!

........ *ahem* well i may have missaid it... buuuuuuuuut all i got to say is... eat bullets!

:mp5: :sniper: :mp5: :sniper: :mp5: :sniper: :mp5: :sniper: :mp5: :sniper:
Cluichstan
17-02-2006, 13:47
Those damn smileys really need to be removed from the list. Have you ever noticed that only tards and nooblets (and the horrible combinations of the two) are the only ones who use 'em?
Quaon
17-02-2006, 13:55
Those damn smileys really need to be removed from the list. Have you ever noticed that only tards and nooblets (and the horrible combinations of the two) are the only ones who use 'em?
Or you should have to have at least 100 posts before you can use 'em.
Cluichstan
17-02-2006, 14:00
Or you should have to have at least 100 posts before you can use 'em.

Those with more than 100 posts rarely, if ever, use them.
Frisbeeteria
17-02-2006, 14:00
Or you should have to have at least 100 posts before you can use 'em.
Make that one million.
Cluichstan
17-02-2006, 14:02
Make that one million.

OMGooses! You would restrict my freedom to post stupid smileys! You facist!

:sniper: :mp5: :gundge: :sniper: :mp5: :gundge: :sniper: :mp5: :gundge:








Heh...sorry, had to (and yes, "fascist" was misspelled on purpose). :p
Flibbleites
17-02-2006, 18:35
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: The Wandering Nomads 2

Description: This proposal recognizes that the smallest functioning human has equal rights.

Having an abortion before the first 40 days is murder. That is when the embryo starts to have brain waves. Which, if you don't what that means. It means that the baby is alive and functioning.

But, 18 days into the pregnancy the baby starts to have it's own blood. So, it would be killing a person in a vegetable state after that. Since, Euthanasia is legal, and the pregnant woman is fine with it then I belive she should could get an abortion.

This proposal...

1. Limits the time to have an abortion up to 40 days after conception.

2. Acknowledges that if you want an abortion that you should get it 18 days after conception.

3. Reminds that the consequences of an abortion.

4. Says that abortion after 40 days is murder and the performer of the abortion, and the mother of the unborn child should be tried for murder in a legal court.

4b. Unless, the mother had an abortion unwillingly and someone tricked her and performed the abortion, or held her against her will and performed the abortion while she was held down or sleeping.For crying out loud, there are already two abortion proposals in the queue, both of which are better writen than this one.

Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Akilopolis

Description: All Slavery should be abolished. Any issues that deal with slaves or the trading of human beings need to be either edited or deleted. Each person should be treated as an equal an no man, be he foreigner or of a different color should have to suffer the injustice of being slave to someone else.Too late and an attempt to rewrite issues through a UN resolution.
Cluichstan
17-02-2006, 23:12
=) i like smilies!!! -_- each more bullets!

:mp5: :mp5: :mp5: :mp5: :mp5: :mp5: :mp5: :mp5: :mp5:

Thus my earlier comment is supported once again. :rolleyes:
The Most Glorious Hack
17-02-2006, 23:23
Those damn smileys really need to be removed from the list. Have you ever noticed that only tards and nooblets (and the horrible combinations of the two) are the only ones who use 'em?Actually, I tried. I also tried to get the Post Icons removed. This was back when we were Beta testing the new layout (oy, you should have seen the first version...) as well as the forums. I believe the responce was "If you don't like them, don't use them."

Sigh.
Quaon
17-02-2006, 23:33
Actually, I tried. I also tried to get the Post Icons removed. This was back when we were Beta testing the new layout (oy, you should have seen the first version...) as well as the forums. I believe the responce was "If you don't like them, don't use them."

Sigh.
Can't you get them removed only for this forum?
Oneiro
18-02-2006, 00:52
Anti teror

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.


Category: International Security


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Moldavokia

Description: if one said country is atacked by another one then the country that was attacked may use nuculer weaponds against the attaking country and if the country that was attacked want to invade hase to ask the uns permission

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 124 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Mon Feb 20 2006
And that's just the spelling... I really can't work up the courage to get into the grammar and punctuation...
Cluichstan
18-02-2006, 00:58
And that's just the spelling... I really can't work up the courage to get into the grammar and punctuation...

I just read the words you bolded, and I can't get up the stomach to even read the rest of it.
Quaon
18-02-2006, 01:00
In a waste of time, I'll try and convert a few propasels to readable english.

Anti-terror

A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.


Category: International Security


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Moldavokia

Description: If one country is atacked by another one, the country that was attacked may use nuclear weapons against the attaking country. If the country that was attacked wants to invade the offending country, they have to ask for the UN's permission.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 124 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Mon Feb 20 2006
Cluichstan
18-02-2006, 01:06
Gah! My eyes! The goggles! They do nothing!
Quaon
18-02-2006, 01:13
Mandatory Universal Language
A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: The Furtherment of Democracy

Strength: Mild

Proposed by: Allied Alien Planets

Description:
- RECOGNISES each culture is entitled to their own language to define their heritage and roots,

- ESTABLISHES that all countries should have a link with each other through the aid of a common language,

- PROPOSES that this language will ultimately reduce time in negotiations, money and time spent on translation,

- REALISES that nations should also have their own individual language.

Approvals: 7 (Allied Alien Planets, The Wandering Nomads 2, Ronrovia, Benfinan, Da Pab, Alexandrian Ptolemais, Desert Storm Iraq)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 117 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Mon Feb 20 2006

And what, may I ask, will this language be?
Cluichstan
18-02-2006, 01:16
And what, may I ask, will this language be?

Klingon maybe?
[NS]Bazalonia
18-02-2006, 01:40
Klingon maybe?
Well... That language would

1. Decrease the arguments of a cultural war
2. Make nerds popular (as they can teach Klingon to others)
3. Make the world a much better place for nerds.

BTW.. yes I'm a nerd... but I don't know Klingon

:D
Oneiro
18-02-2006, 12:13
Ooh, another little gem...

Repeal "Sexual Freedom"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal


Resolution: #7


Proposed by: Only1rebel

Description: UN Resolution #7: Sexual Freedom (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: It is exsactly like gay rights!!! we repealed gay rights yet this still stands?? this should be repealed as well!!! come on! How bodys were'nt made for 1 man and another man!!! this is outrageous!!!

Approvals: 1 (Flibbleites)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 123 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Tue Feb 21 2006
Flibbleites
18-02-2006, 17:50
Category: International Security


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: PaxBritannia

Description: This is recognition that in this present day and age the threat of organised global terrorism.

To respond to this growing menace, the UN must form its own anti-terrorist organisation (UNATO) to combat the danger and spread of terrorist activity worldwide.

Article 1
All UN member states must contribute to UNATO by pooling resources (money, intelligence gathering and Special Forces) to help combat terrorism.

Article 2
UNATO is free to operate in all UN member states provided that all UNATO operations are carried out with the full knowledge and co-operation of the respective member states or states.

Article 3
UNATO can only carry out operations in non-UN member states with the express permission of the state in question and the regional delegate to the UN (if applicable).

Article 4
UNATO will be provided with its own HQ and facilities for centralisation and accountability to the UN.

Article 5
A Director will be head of UNATO and will be appointed by UN Security Council for a two-year term and is fully accountable for UNATO and its actions during his/her period of office.

Article 6
If during operations UNATO apprehends terrorism suspects then UNATO has the full authority to interrogate those suspects provided they do not infringe any UN Resolution during interrogation.

Article 7
All states, regardless of status, may put any reservation about the activities of UNATO to the Security Council and the UN must investigate those complaints.

Article 8
UNATO may withhold information for a period of five years if it is likely to put the lives of UNATO workers at risk from terrorist reprisals.

Finally, UNATO is essentially and centralisation of covert operations of UN member states in order to effectively counter the pernicious spread of global terrorism and the dangers that it poses to civilisation. This proposal has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down.

Category: Human Rights


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Hedonisia

Description: A Resolution that discourages all forms of political theocracy and prohibits radical religious regimes from branding government legislation with their specific doctrines, resulting in a strict enforcement of the Separation of Church and State.


ACKNOWLEDGING that all citizens possess Freedom of Religion,

AFFIRMNG that all citizens have the right to practice their individual faith regardless of popular opinion,

DRAWING UPON United Nations Resolution #19, "Religious Tolerance", ensuring worldwide human tolerance and a greater understanding of all faiths,

IN AGREEMENT WITH the United Nations Resolution #26, "The Universal Bill of Rights", article 1, stating: All human beings have the right to choose to worship any faith, and to change their religious beliefs at any time without punishment on the part of the state,

DEFINING the separation of Church and State as necessary legislation to protect the freedoms of the individual by denying the Government the right to regulate, endorse or put into action any bill, law, judiciary decision that has religious foundations,

NOTING that enforcing a Secular Government would be imperative to protecting the individual freedom of religion and ensuring that legislation passed remains UNBIASED and UNPREJUDICED against any one faith,

ADVISING that the lessons of history be reflected upon, which reminds us of civil unrest, persecution, wars,individual bloodshed and conflict of individual interests which results in stripping the individual of aforementioned "Basic Human Rights" as defined above,

PROPOSES that the Separation of Church and State be fully enforced in all government decisions including but not limited to

the following:

- Public Schools

- Charity Organizations

- Non-Profit State or Nationally endorsed welfare programs

- State or Nationally funded Hospitals or Rehabilitation Programs

- International Affairs

and

- Courts of Law,

REITERATES the importance of a Humanistic Society as it relates to maintaining a FREE WORLD and begs upon the intellect of each citizen to appeal to their leaders in SUPPORT of this proposed mandate, which calls upon The World to:

Abolish All Forms of Religion in Government.Won't somebody please think of the theocracies!
Pythogria
18-02-2006, 20:01
Actually, the second one's a good proposal. Keep religion out of government, law, war, schools, and police, thank you.
Quaon
18-02-2006, 20:13
Ooh, another little gem...
Why can't people actually read resolutions?
The Most Glorious Hack
18-02-2006, 21:58
Actually, the second one's a good proposal. Keep religion out of government, law, war, schools, and police, thank you.Aside from the fact that it tries to outlaw a political ideology (theocracy), and the fact that the Proposal actually doesn't do anything, and thus has a strength violation.

Oh, and the last line makes it seem more like a rhetorical rant as opposed to an actual law.
Jey
19-02-2006, 03:39
This last sentence...oh what a good laugh...



Category: Repeal

Resolution: #6

Proposed by: Militiaburg

Description: UN Resolution #6: End slavery (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: While slavery may seem cruel to radical leftists, slavery is not only wondeful, but necessary. First, it provides economic stimulus to both agriculturaland industrial nations lacking in capital to build their economy. slavery also guarantees housing, healthcare, food and clothing for a person for their entire lifespan. Besides, if they truly hate being slaves that much they can always run away.

Approvals: 12 (New Javert, Child Care Workers, Action Men, L33tists, Severidom, NewTexas, Desert Storm Iraq, Colgova, Dyslania, The Society of Orion, Noctaurus, Conservinamerica)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 112 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Mon Feb 20 2006
Pythogria
19-02-2006, 04:50
O_o

OK, that's just... No.
Quaon
19-02-2006, 14:43
Freedom of concious for childs
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Azarbad

Description: Notes that in many places, children are FORCED to attend religious ceremonies, participate in them, and profess faith, regardless of their personal feelings on that faith.

CONDEMNS this practice, and thinks that children should have the same freedom of religion guaranteed to adults.

So forth proposes that no child be forced to partake of any religious ritual, sacrament or ceremony, and not be forced to profess faith by anyone, including their parents.

Approvals: 29 (Ashohir, Montana Rojo, Child Care Workers, Krapulence, Tau Ceta, Thiran, Ronrovia, Fernetti, Taoziland, Benfinan, Firebert, Desert Storm Iraq, Colgova, Bordoria, Arbeitnehmerrepublik, Novo Sibirsk, Antonyism, Manussa, Agramerland, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, Abygon, Central Americas, Edgewood Dirk, Bane Maul, Pigdestroyer, Saorse, Kalibara, Bronzeland, Hylaria)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 95 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Feb 19 2006
Cluichstan
19-02-2006, 15:13
Freedom of concious for childs

I stopped reading there.
Pythogria
19-02-2006, 17:58
The idea for that proposal is good, but it needs editing. BADLY.
Gruenberg
19-02-2006, 17:58
The idea for that proposal is good, but it needs editing. BADLY.
Yes. It also needs not to ban, you know, circumcision. And baptism.
Quaon
19-02-2006, 20:03
Yes. It also needs not to ban, you know, circumcision. And baptism.
Well, circumision is also for medical purposes, so I think you could still do that. And really, if this was pasted, just invite a preist over to your house and ask him to bless some bottled water and baptize your baby.
Quaon
19-02-2006, 20:31
Hunting License
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.


Category: Environmental

Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing

Proposed by: The Wandering Nomads 2

Description: Dear Delegates,

~This proposal calls for the institution for a hunting license and seasons for game.

~Many species could become extinct if we do not implement this proposal soon.

~Each type of game should have a hunting season.
-It will be up to the Nation to decide what period each year or years that the animal could be hunted.
-If there is an overpopulation of the animal then, the nation can decide to lengthen the hunting season for that animal.
-Vice Versa, if the animal is endangered or at a low population the nation can shorten or put an end to that animal’s hunting season.

Approvals: 1 (The Wandering Nomads 2)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 123 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Feb 22 2006

How does that affect the automobile industry?
The Wandering Nomads 2
19-02-2006, 20:35
I forgot to change it to all industries. Sorry
Quaon
19-02-2006, 20:46
I forgot to change it to all industries. Sorry
But it doesn't effect all industries. It only affects hunting, so it should go under gun control.
Quaon
19-02-2006, 21:04
Repeal "Citizen Rule Required"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal

Resolution: #8

Proposed by: Ryno III

Description: UN Resolution #8: Citizen Rule Required (Category: The Furtherment of Democracy; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This resolution should be repealed, because Non UN member nations don't listen to the UN so not all nations grant self rule. Thus making this useless.

Approvals: 3 (Pope Lexus X, CDA5, The Wandering Nomads 2)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 121 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Feb 22 2006

...
Cluichstan
20-02-2006, 00:14
By that reasoning, we should repeal all of the resolutions.
Gruenberg
20-02-2006, 00:15
By that reasoning, we should repeal all of the resolutions.
*limbers up*
Flibbleites
20-02-2006, 05:51
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Aaron Graf

Description: Women for too long have experienced the horrible side effects of backwards ultra-religious nations trying to control their uteruses. This bill seeks to eliminate certain myths told, the following are listed below:

* That abortion causes breast cancer- Actually there was a study done in Denmark which keeps accurate medical records of all it's citizens and found that abortion has no significant link to breast cancer.


* Post Abortion Stress Syndrome- This is not even a psychological term, if you check the the American Psychological Association you will find it is not. The term was created by radical religious groups trying to instill fear into women seeking abortion. Although this has been the most widely believed. Ronald Reagan tried getting his like-minded surgeon General C. Everett Koop to do a study to find women who had suffered from abortions. To everybody's surprise, they found no significantly large number of bad psychological effects relating to abortion, the main emotion they found was relief and those women who they did find who had psychological repurcussions already had their own problems beforehand

* A big lie told by anti-choicers is that teenage girls do not yet know what to do with their reproductive organs and should have parental consent in order to have an abortion. - Teenage girls are the most vulnerable in the world, particularly minorities. It is hypocritical to impose parental consent laws for teenage girls seeking abortions. The underlying argument behind this is that a parent should control their child. Yes this may be true, but in situations where that child could become a parent, her parents should have no say in this case. And the court bypass usually doesn't work.

This bill seeks to do things not only for womens rights to have an abortion but also to require governments to provide free day care for poor women who seek to carry a pregnancy to term. The following will be listed:

1. The Morning After Pill should be sold over the counter to anybody seeking it who had unprotected sex, especially if they are victims of rape.

2. That all forms of birth control be available cheap in all drug stores and covered in all prescription plans.


3. No government can outlaw or limit abortion rights. Abortion is not allowed to be forced, nor will it be allowed to be something to take away. Through all terms of the pregnancy, and for whatever reason, a decision regarding a womans body should be left between her and her physician.

4. All nations who have abortion legalized can no longer take part in descriminatory "parental notification/consent laws". If a girl does not want to tell her parents about being pregnant, it says something about her parents, not the girl.

5. For low income women who become pregnant, but wish to bring a child to term, all governments within the UN body should do the following things. 1. Provide free medical care throughout the pregnancy for this woman 2. Pay for courses in school that could help this woman get a better job and eventually be independent and able to function on her own without help from her government 3. Provide free, taxpayer funded, yet effecient day care facilities for these women.

6. No health insurance provider can use the "conscience clause" to get out of fully and equally funding womens access to birth control and abortion. Remember, these people are PAYING for you to cover them IN CASE SOMETHING HAPPENS.A week or so is too long?

Category: Global Disarmament


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Antonoria

Description: 1. To therefore limmit and reduce the amount of Nuclear Arms in all UN countires

2. To therefore set up an International commission thats regulates the amount and size of Nuclear Weapons any UN country may posses

3. To therefore ban the contibution, trade, and sales of any Nuclear device from one country to another,

-To therefor ban technological advanced UN members
from supplying Nuclear reactors,excess arms, or
enriched substances to other UN membersin return
for oil, agricluture, coputer hardware,
textiles,money, or any other profitable product.

4. To set up a global comitte of UN members, that will use diplomacy to settle disputes between 2 UN members with Nuclear capibilites.

5. To hearby ban within the territory of all UN members, the underground testing of Nuclear weapons.

6. To therefore st up a UN watchdog agency that will watch over all UN members with Nuclear capabilites and to make sure all are in compliance with UN code

7. To therefore impose a UN code of Regulations that will be composed with UN members consent, and will regualte Nuclear reactors and all non weapons realted Nuclear capabilites

The power Nuclear capabilities is a very big one. It can be harnesed for both good and bad. But in todays world its evil tendencies have been brought out. It is our duty as UN members to safeguard this power, and bring peace to the countries we represent as UN membersSomeone call the grammar and spellig nazis, this one needs work badly.

Category: Human Rights


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Neo-Communist Russia

Description: RECOGNIZING: that suicide bombers are a direct result of colonialism

REALIZING: that terrorism cannot exist without hatred of colonialism

ATTRIBUTING: the increased number of suicide bombers to the War on Terror

BELIEVING: that War on Terror will continue on indefinetly

SEEKING: to withdraw troops in foreign nations

1. NOTES: that all previous take-overs are null and void
2. DEFINES: "take-over" as an active invasion and eventual control of a foreign nation
3. CREATES: a commission to prevent modern colonialism: i) prevents nations from controlling others
ii) allows invaded nations to defend themselves iii) requires all nations to prevent the violent take-over of other nations
4. STRONGLY URGES: all nations to cease the War on Terror
5. PERMITS: would-be suicide bombers to live
6. PROPOSES: that life is the most important right
7. AFFIRMS: charged terrorists will be freed at once
8. REQUIRES: all nations to establish laws to prevent the infraction of life
9. URGES: nations to protect neighboring nations if under attack
10. SEEKS: to prevent suicide bombings by eliminating colonialismAnd proposals like this are exactly why the UN should have voted to pass the Anti-Terrosism Act.
Cluichstan
20-02-2006, 14:59
And proposals like this are exactly why the UN should have voted to pass the Anti-Terrosism Act.

Oyez! :D
Quaon
20-02-2006, 15:01
A week or so is too long?

Someone call the grammar and spellig nazis, this one needs work badly.

And proposals like this are exactly why the UN should have voted to pass the Anti-Terrosism Act.
The first oneis okay.
Gruenberg
20-02-2006, 15:02
The first oneis okay.
But there are two queued proposals on abortion already. What's the point of trying until they pass or fail?
Flibbleites
20-02-2006, 18:32
But there are two queued proposals on abortion already. What's the point of trying until they pass or fail?
Not to mention this line
Women for too long have experienced the horrible side effects of backwards ultra-religious nations trying to control their uteruses.
For crying out loud "Abortion Rights" has only been repealed for about a week and we already have someone saying that is too long.:rolleyes:
Bahgum
20-02-2006, 22:26
Silly proposal...the return. It would be nice if they did return, properly done one's that is, inflatable gandalfs, hippos, camel bartering.......

ooooooh, maybe we should write one, or two even, topics anyone?
Fonzoland
21-02-2006, 00:27
Dunno, freedom of grumpiness? Or a UN comittee to rank species according to average adult size?
[NS]Bazalonia
21-02-2006, 03:17
A larger carpark for the UN building/offices?

The Prohibition of Walking(hopping instead)

Promotion of Advertising (A resolution to encourage advertising about advertising)

Big Toe Freedom (A resolution to give human rights to big toes and demand that all beings with a "big toe" (defined as the largest appendage on a foot, hoof, or other similiar body part) free their big toes from slavery by chopping it off

Legalise Legal Drugs ( a resolution to ensure that legal drugs have the right to be legalised within all UN member nations (legal drugs defined as drugs that are not prohibited by law in any UN member nation)

Promotion of World Unity (A resolution that promotes World Unity by saying everyone is litterally everone else... ie there is only one entity

That's enough silly ideas for now
Menchekia
21-02-2006, 09:03
Silly proposal...the return. It would be nice if they did return, properly done one's that is, inflatable gandalfs, hippos, camel bartering.......

ooooooh, maybe we should write one, or two even, topics anyone?

I take it you missed the recent Right to Bear Arms? So you could own a bear arm.....
St Edmund
21-02-2006, 11:15
Repeal "End Slavery"

Category: Repeal

Resolution: #6

Proposed by: Militiaburg

Description: UN Resolution #6: End slavery (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: While slavery may seem cruel to radical leftists,


The government of St Edmund doesn't usually consider its members to be "radical leftists", but...
Flibbleites
22-02-2006, 05:22
Category: International Security


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Matheou

Description: This resolution calls for the immediate withdraw of Turkish occupational forces from the Republic of Cyprus.
Calls upon all members to denounce the thirty year occupation of the republic of Cyprus by Turkish forces.
Urges the return to normalized conditions between Greek and Turkish Cypriot Communities.
Urges the removal of the green zone and all other barriers limiting freedom of movement and freedom of trade between the northern and southern regions of Cyprus and the re-opening of Nicosia International Airport.
Urges the dismantlement of the Turkish Cypriot regime and the formation of a federal government representative of the rights and interests of all Cypriot people.
Urges that all illegal and imported immigrants return to their places of origin and the return of all land to those parties whom have legitimate rights prior to the 1974.
Urges that all parties allegedly involved in conspiracy, illegal arms sales and mass murder be held subject to trial by the international criminal court.
Recommends that this resolution be adopted without objection as a standard for all states having illegal occupational forces within their borders which continue to threaten state sovereignty and international security. I'm guessing that this is just one big RL reference.
Fonzoland
22-02-2006, 05:31
I love the title...
Ceorana
22-02-2006, 05:53
I love the title...
The Ceorana Detterration Corps is ready to assist the UN in dettering foreign occupation, sir.
Flibbleites
22-02-2006, 18:13
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Vergennes

Description: This proposal seeks to reaffirm any and all civil rights legislation. This proposal provides for the equal treatment of all living persons regardless of Race, Ethnicity, (ALANA) status. This proposal also seeks to affirm equal treatment for the LGBTQQIA community as well, regardless of
-sex (male, female, transexual, intersexuals etc.)
-gender (man, woman, androgynous etc.)
-sexual orientation (wherever you fall on the Kinsey Scale)

This proposal will
1-legalize marriage of any two people regardless of sex, gender or race.

2-Provide equal civil rights for all married couples

3-Criminalize any form of discrimination against any of these communities. From the use of derogatory words toward the queer community and racial organizations to hate crimes, any act of discrimination will be punishable with jail time

4-Any nation within the UN violating said proposal shall be found in contempt and expelled from the United Nations of the Nation States.Wow, both duplication and game mechanics at the same time. Not to mention one of the worst titles I've ever seen.
Flibbleites
23-02-2006, 06:29
Category: Global Disarmament


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: The Omnipotent Biscuit

Description: APPALLED at the high rate of civilian casualties caused by Anti-Personnel land mines,

DEPLORING the mutilation and death these mines inflict both during and long after military action,

CONVINCED that they are cruel and unnecessary in the course of any conflict,

DEMANDS that the international community take action to stop this slaughter,

CALLS ON the members of the NationStates United Nations to:

A) Unilaterally stop the use, purchase, manufacture and stockpiling of these hideous weapons,

B) Remove any anti-personnel land-mines in their territory

ESTABLISHES a Land-mine Decommission and Removal Committee to give financial and technical aid to countries having difficulties in complying. It's been done.

Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Uranium Mining


Proposed by: Greenwestern

Description: This proposal will work against the use of nuclear power in the world and focus on renewable or inexhaustible resources in an effort to prevent global warming. It will ban the use of nuclear weapons, encouraging old fashioned ways of war such as catapults and bows and arrows. It will also ban the use of nuclear power plants, replacing them with large wind turbines.Not only is this an environmental proposal, it's also a disarmament one, which makes it two, two, two proposals in one.
Cluichstan
23-02-2006, 13:46
It's been done.

Not only is this an environmental proposal, it's also a disarmament one, which makes it two, two, two proposals in one.

"You got your environmental in my disarmament!"

"You got your disarmament in my environmental!"
Skeletonics
24-02-2006, 02:09
Funding for housing

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights

Strength: Strong

Proposed by: Clinic

Description: i have almost 600 million people in my nation. i am sure other nations have more. so we need money the house all the people. if we don't then what wil we do? what will those people who have no home do?

I haven't seen any other proposal as silly as this one... and amazingly it hasn't been pulled down...
Some people should seriously read the rules before putting up proposals....:rolleyes:
The Beltway
24-02-2006, 02:13
Stop the UN Tyranny A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: The Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Turtleback

Description: Recognizing:

That the need for a global governing body is essential to the welfare and well being of all nations, both member and non-member.

-AND-

That such a body must have power to decide upon legislation both by means of vote of the members, and the penultimate step of deciding which pieces of proposed legislation are suitable for vote

Grieving
That only delegates have the power to submit proposals in areas where delegates do not always, if at all, honor the requests of their regions.

-AND-

The untimely death of proposed legislation for the further causes of gender equality, which the UN claims to have previously enshrined

We propose
That any active member nation of the UN (active being defined as voting on more than 1/2 of all legislation from the time of acceptance into the UN until 20 votes for a nation have been recorded) be given the right to submit proposals

-AND-

That the UN:
A) give readily accessible proof of the enshrinement of the equality of gender and race
-AND-
B) allow proposed legislation that seeks to further emphasize said equality, ESPECIALLY when the aforementioned enshrinement of equality laws is unclear to member nations.

Approvals: 4 (Turtleback, Novo Sibirsk, Desert Storm Iraq, The Wandering Nomads 2)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 119 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Feb 26 2006



It not only is a mechanics violation, but also is trying to do two things at once; meanwhile, isn't B) meaningless?
[NS]Bazalonia
24-02-2006, 02:18
Grieving
That only delegates have the power to submit proposals in areas where delegates do not always, if at all, honor the requests of their regions.


Umm... I'm no delegate and I've submitted a proposal
The Beltway
24-02-2006, 05:00
Ban on high powered weapons
A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.


Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Nikocujo

Description: While gun control has been a hot topic over the years, Neither side can can stable footing in the fight to arm or disarm. Should Assault/ .50 Caliber rifles be banned to Cicilians. Once and for all, should the right to own a high powered weapon be a given right or should the government give clearence to civilians after complete background checks?

1. Over time it has become easier and easier to purchase high powered rifles without the written express of the government.

2. However, a man has the right to bear arms to protect himself or his family in a time of crisis or to protect his land.

3. The guns that would be included are the following:

Offensive weapons - machine guns, short barreled rifles (less than 16" in length) and shotguns (barrels less than 18" in length or overall length less than 26"), other weapons which fire a projectile and have a barrel 6/10th of an inch or greater in diameter, bombs, grenades, mines, poison gas, rockets with more than four ounces of propellant, ballistic knives, exploding shells and similar items.

Dangerous weapons - devices designed primarily for use in inflicting death or injury including, but not limited to, offensive weapons, pistols, revolvers, other firearms, daggers, razors, stilettos, switchblade knives, or any knife with a blade exceeding five inches.


Which is it, should governments strike down a right to men to ensue safety, or are basic rights and privelages ripped away from people a breech of the right to arm himself?


Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 123 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Feb 26 2006
Pick a side!
Irish Nations of Meame
24-02-2006, 08:32
Grieving
That only delegates have the power to submit proposals in areas where delegates do not always, if at all, honor the requests of their regions.

Should be:


Grieving
That only delegates have the power to approve proposals in areas where delegates such as WZ Forums always, if at all, approve proposals.

Sillier, but true.
Cluichstan
24-02-2006, 13:33
I haven't seen any other proposal as silly as this one... and amazingly it hasn't been pulled down...
Some people should seriously read the rules before putting up proposals....:rolleyes:

http://test256.free.fr/UN%20Cards/apprentice8py.jpg
Hirota
24-02-2006, 14:15
the classics are still the best, way back in december 03:

HIPPOS ARE BIG

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Architeuthis

Description: WHEREAS the participants of the NationStates forum, while quite noisy, do not accurately represent the vast majority of the NationStates players, and;

WHEREAS said vast majority of players unequivocably support the Freedom of Humor for all, and;

WHEREAS hippos are indeed quite large,

I hold this truth to be self-evident...

HIPPOS ARE BIG.

Approvals: 132 (1 Infinite Loop, Francos Spain, Themanistan, Pancake_pl, Xaqon, Tarrican, Apuent, Benlandia, Butthole, Hill People, Slowmo, Arctopia, Mikaelsdaman, Rensel, Helfania, Hagge, Sulon, StovjestovqueX, Cesspit III, Towarzysz Gomulka, Wordem, The Pyrenees, Communist Rebels, Wintermute, Loopyland II, Cutetopia, Beanbag Chairs, St Lafayette, Avalonian Angels, Lamoni, Xeaon, Scotland and Jamaica, Tyrantar, Morphesia, Gormith, Hebrew National, Goldfish Addicts, New North Balwyn, Boblovia, Haida Gwaii, Hedgetopia, Broadbeam, Quite, Libertanica, Doovidle, Assassinopants, Salty Water, Kowdom, Dudemonkeys, Genetic manipulated, Hampster Squared, The Cymreg, Allund, Big Santa, Azbakwurds, Unholy Anarchy MK2, Guevara Rocha, Assasinated Beauty, Adstarion, Petohdom, WNDRBRA, Boaravia, Wyzata, Tremaine, Andinostan, Tara TheGreate, Motala, KelDa, Michopolis, Fruztya, Conrado, BillyDean, Estolad, Nucular, Oplep, Isanistan, Of Fur Traders, Britannian, Squigy II, Mundainia, Bananadine, Endolantron, Arinim, Why and wy not, Goosetnam, Squatia, The Judean Front, Schizophonica, Total Desolation, The All Powerfull Berg, Cheshire and Ted, Ravens Ait, Saturnzero, Kzagblech, The Orion Nebula, Norion, Klonor, Marradon, Ishkari, Anhinga, Polo de la hago, Knootoss, Christ the Messiah, Patalano, Clownfish, Canadagua, Christopher IV, NDak, Fundamentalist Monkies, Nenuial, Valentria, Penguin Troopers, Republican Britain, Whats it to you, Nucleo, Northfiels, Caesarea, Evil puppies, Isfulabul, Saido, Port Coquitlam, Excessive Firepower, The Maple Leaf, Brandiland, APV, New Dorkland, Camarolina, Feces-flinging Monkey, Kings World, Charney, WonderShroomLand, Canine Despotism)
Ceorana
24-02-2006, 14:40
The Bikini Bill

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Leigh barnard

Description: All women aged between 18 and 35 who pass the 'Looks test' shall be legally bound to wear only a bikini on all days of the year where the temperature exceeds 18C, on days where the weather drops below this level additional heat can be generated by the addition of a wolly hat and mittens.

Approvals: 2 (Saxanglia, Phthisis)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 122 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Mon Feb 27 2006
:headbang: :rolleyes: :p
Fonzoland
24-02-2006, 14:46
Do not dare to forget uncle Gandalf! (Too lazy to search for it though.)
Cluichstan
24-02-2006, 15:56
Do not dare to forget uncle Gandalf! (Too lazy to search for it though.)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v335/JimRad-Mac/ns/gandalf.jpg

I've got it bookmarked. ;)
The Wandering Nomads 2
24-02-2006, 21:43
Everyone who votes for the bakini bill is a pervert and can't get anything from a girl.
Jey
24-02-2006, 22:18
Everyone who votes for the bakini bill is a pervert and can't get anything from a girl.

Hey!

http://test256.free.fr/UN%20Cards/values.jpg

:rolleyes:
The Most Glorious Hack
24-02-2006, 22:20
Everyone who votes for the bakini bill is a pervert and can't get anything from a girl.Luckily, I voted for the bikini bill.
Coronado Del Marr
24-02-2006, 23:52
Do not dare to forget uncle Gandalf! (Too lazy to search for it though.)


Moo:p
Quaon
25-02-2006, 02:51
Promotion of Kabaddi
A resolution to increase democratic freedoms.


Category: The Furtherment of Democracy

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: ShivaShiva

Description: The United Nations,

RECOGNISING that Kabaddi is the best sport in the world,

RECOGNISING ALSO the importance of breath-holding in personal development,

ALARMED that many nations have not even heard of Kabaddi, and of those that have, some have made it illegal, and others have even renamed it Akabusi, or allow acoustic fouling,

RESOLVES:

RULE ONE - That every child be allowed to play kabaddi at school daily.

ALSO - That offices provide mandatory kabaddi training at 3.37 p.m. at least once a week.

- That kabaddi testing be a mandatory part of job application.

- That all national flags shall henceforth include a picture of a kabaddi player.

- That Akabusi and acoustic fouling be put back in their proper place.

This will increase democratic participation and human wellbeing and reduce infant mortality and the price of basic foodstuffs.


Co-authored by Piotrish and Ajax 95.

Approvals: 6 (Czechotova, Phthisis, Arendias, Inflatable Furniture, Crushing Despair, Desert Storm Iraq)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 118 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Feb 26 2006
;)
Inflatable Gandalf
25-02-2006, 02:57
Do not dare to forget uncle Gandalf! (Too lazy to search for it though.)
Who could forget me?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v379/Kyronia/1a02bc60.jpg (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=423234)

(click the pic)
Fonzoland
25-02-2006, 03:09
Who could forget me?

Brilliant sig! :D
Yelda
26-02-2006, 18:09
The Inflatable Gandalf Act was funny, but I still like the Mad Sheep Railgun Proposal (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9273407&postcount=867) best.
Frisbeeteria
27-02-2006, 02:15
Creation of UN Security Counci
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Quiland

Description: I call for this body to exercise it's power and forcebally remove from power nations with despotic rulers of and race, color, or creed, who violate human rights in any manner, way, shape, or form.
1. This resoulution would allow the creation of a UN coalition of willing nations who will rid the world of genocidal despots
2. Military action would only be considered or used in the situation of a 2/3's vote for it in the newly created security council
3. This law would create a UN Security Council, that would be made up of all willing UN member nations who wish to sit on it, and the council would be the UN watchdog on global security and vote to authorize or not authorize by a 2/3's vote either way, military action against a nation percived as a threat by the council.
4. This bill would also request from Max Barry and Nation States, the creation of a war section of the game Nation States so this global security aspect of or world could be played out for real.

In Conclusion the Creation of UN Security Council Bill, will empower the UN to look out for nations who can't look out for themselves, to overthrow genocidial leaders, and allow us to play out war situations on this already faboulous Nation States game

Approvals: 1 (Desert Storm Iraq)
Yeah, that's really the title, and yeah, calling for a complete rewrite of the game was put in as Human Rights / Mild. Yay! for people who read the rules / forums / FAQ.
Zyzz
27-02-2006, 03:20
Freedom!!

A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.


Category: Social Justice

Strength: Significant

Proposed by: Amarica101

Description: we who the peopel need justice and liberty and some country dont have it

Approvals: 3 (Desert Storm Iraq, Benfinan, Arendias)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 121 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Wed Mar 1 2006

Never has there been a proposal more worthy of this topic.
Oneiro
27-02-2006, 16:44
Prevention

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Finchville

Description: I wish to propose teh restriction of peoples rights to go out after 8pm at night because it causes children and the youth to go to bed and then they are less likely to take such drugs as speed and other such recreational drugs that give the children energy.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 124 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Thu Mar 2 2006
I'm amazed that these people even manage to breathe...
Cluichstan
27-02-2006, 17:05
I'm amazed that these people even manage to breathe...

I'm saddened that they do.
Fonzoland
27-02-2006, 17:05
I'm amazed that these people even manage to breathe...

Give the guy a break can't you see he is obviously trying as hard as possible to kick his nasty speed taking habits and this resolution goes a long way in helping him do it because everybody knows that you only take speed when you are feeling tired after 8pm at night and should really be in bed sleeping but the government doesn't let you go to bed early and that is bad

EDIT: Yey, post 2000! :)
Flibbleites
28-02-2006, 03:32
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #4
Proposed by: Trinitron Tower

Description: UN Resolution #4: UN taxation ban (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Any functioning body must need funding from its memebers.

Without proper funding, the UN cannot and will not able to carry out its presumed duties as an international commutiny.So the UN is an "international commutiny" (emphasis mine) that explains a lot.

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #130
Proposed by: Squeakyland

Description: UN Resolution #130: Global Food Distribution Act (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The General Assembly of the United Nations,

1. RECOGNISING tne role of protectionism in ensuring the viability of farming in less developing countries (ensuring supplies of local good quality healthy food);

2. ACCEPTING that sales tax on food is a useful way for governments to raise revenue, particularly on luxury items thereof;

3. NOTING the absence of any measures in resolution #130 to ensure food is healthy and of good quality, hence allowing more prosperous UN members to flood the markets of less prosperous nations with poor quality and/or unhealthy food;

4. UNDERSTANDING that farm subsidies, and protectionism to maintain prices, help ensure acceptable living standards for farmers and so encourage food production

REPEALS Resolution #130, Global Food Distribution act.What's silly about this one, it was submitted seven times, hey Squeakyland, you only need to hit the submit button once.

Category: The Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: United Liberties

Description: Too long has the UN been leaderless, and therefore, capable of being mired in scandal without a single figurehead to impose regulation on the issues that have garnered idle support by the masses.

This is a declaration, hoping to impose a more structured body of the UN, with an elected Supreme Chancellor that will preside over the UN and ensure the validity and justice of the issues brought before the UN.

We urge you to see the point made in this issue, and to call out a leader worthy to free the UN from mindless motion-passing.:rolleyes:

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Keymon

Description: i propose that we abolish all human rights. they only get in the way of tyrannial governments who don't care about their population. humans don't have rights, so why should we say that they do. other animals don't have rights so why should we. people are just for tormenting.Yet another person who tries to abolish human rights with the human rights category.