NationStates Jolt Archive


Silly and/or Illegal Proposals. zOMG!

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Neo-Anarchists
13-02-2005, 05:44
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Pizzleland

Description: This proposal would ban public nudity for UN Nations. Any violators would be immediatly executed for breaking the law.
:confused:
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Twice used trash cans

Description: Human rights should be outlawed.Only government officials should have rights.
Wow. That's going to get through.
Or not...
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Coker Cobra

Description: RESOLVED: THE UN MUST BE ABOLISHED. IT IS ANOTHER LINK IN THE WORLDWIDE CONSPIRACY TO HOLD DOWN DESERVING NATIONS OF THEIR RIGHTFUL PLACE.

TO THE QUESTION OF WHAT IT SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH, IT SHOULD NEVER BE REPLACED. LET EACH NATION RULE AS IT WISHES. IT'S NOT LIKE ANY NATION CAN AFFECT ANY OTHER NATION. (NO WAR, NO SANCTIONS IN THIS GAME ANYWAY)

UNLIKE MOST, HOWEVER, I PROPOSE THAT IT'S STAIN ON THIS UNIVERSE BE REMOVED VOLUNTARILY. NO COUNTRY WISHING TO CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THIS TRAVISHAMOCKERY WILL BE ACTED AGAINST IN ANY WAY.

FACT: THE UN SUCKS. IT IS RUN BY A GROUP OF PEOPLE WITH AGENDAS THAT USUALLY CONFLICT HEAVILY. THE TYRANNY OF THE MANY IS ENOUGH TO SUPPRESS THE FEW DISSENTERS.

FACT: TO SOME COUNTRIES, THE UN IS THE ONLY BODY THEY CAN DEPEND ON. TO HAVE THIS ORGANIZATION "STAB THEM IN THE BACK", BY FORCING THEM TO FOLLOW THESE "RESOLUTIONS", MANY THAT INFRINGE ON THEIR SOVEREIGN RIGHTS, IS NOT RIGHT.

FACT: THIS IS A VENTING BY MYSELF, AFTER LOOKING AT SOME OF THE PAST "RESOLUTIONS" PASSED BY THIS BODY.

OPINION: BURN, ROT, CORRODE, AND DIGEST IN HELL, UN.

This is the end of this resolution.

Note: DIE UN DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE (repeat DIE thirty-seven thousand times... I'm sure there's about a thousand (or less) UN members worth saving... Right? And I'm not about to type DIE thirty-seven thousand times, neither.)

P.S.: Please treat this Resolution seriously... it took me all of a thousand seconds to come up with.
Wow, that's pretty illegal.
Kamuras
13-02-2005, 05:56
wow...
Neo-Anarchists
13-02-2005, 08:14
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Free Garza

Description: No personal income tax rates shall exceed 40%, nor shall corporate income tax rates exceed 40%, nor shall capital gains be taxed in excess of 15%, nor inheritances be taxed in excess of 20%.
Umm, is that possible to implement?
Insequa
13-02-2005, 09:27
Yeah, I saw the "Die, UN Die" proposal, and laughed myself silly.

On the "Tax Ceiling" proposal, I'd probably withdraw from the UN right away. The Socialist Technocracy of Insequa doesn't use money - so to the UN, that appears as a 100% income tax.
TilEnca
13-02-2005, 14:30
Wow, that's pretty illegal.

Ya'think?
Neo-Anarchists
13-02-2005, 14:45
Ya'think?
I'm really rather surprised that someone would try to destroy the UN through a UN proposal, personally...

That, and the fact that it's mostly incoherent.
TilEnca
13-02-2005, 15:09
I'm really rather surprised that someone would try to destroy the UN through a UN proposal, personally...

That, and the fact that it's mostly incoherent.

I kind of like the fact it is "mild" - as if the destruction of the UN won't have that much effect :}
Neo-Anarchists
13-02-2005, 15:19
I kind of like the fact it is "mild" - as if the destruction of the UN won't have that much effect :}
I like this line too:
FACT: THE UN SUCKS. IT IS RUN BY A GROUP OF PEOPLE WITH AGENDAS THAT USUALLY CONFLICT HEAVILY. THE TYRANNY OF THE MANY IS ENOUGH TO SUPPRESS THE FEW DISSENTERS.
If everybody has "conflicting agendas", then who are these "many" mentioned in there? And who is it that "runs" the UN anyway, but everybody in it?

Oh, and that it says "FACT: THE UN SUCKS."
Who needs rationality?
:D
The Black New World
13-02-2005, 16:24
I hate FACT.

If it was a fact I wouldn't need it pointed out to me in an obnoxious way.

FACT: I'm presenting an opinion.

Giordano,
Acting Senior UN representative,
The Black New World,
Nargopia
13-02-2005, 16:27
FACT: I'm presenting an opinion.
Ouch, that makes my head hurt.
Neo-Anarchists
14-02-2005, 09:56
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Outlaw
Proposed by: The Anubian Dragon

Description: me must disallow gambling for good in the world!

what good does it bring us? it's only use is money! money is not the only thing that is important in this world.

religion and family values are what are important.

even for the poor, god is there for them.
for the rich, god is there for them.

where are we? gambling all our money away in casinos!
God gave us the ability to do work! and through that, god gave us money as a reward of work!

so we are practically wasting away a gift from god in risky gambles!

sometimes, these gambles can be dangerous!
this is why i think we should outlaw gambling immediately!

"who's with me!?" ;)

I am hoping the UN will see my point and join me in this fight against gambling. Thank you.

Yes, "Bad stuff man, BAD STUFF!" is actually the name of the proposal...

Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Shlaga

Description: All members of the United Nations will be required to remove all of their nuclear weapons.

The only thing that can come of weapons such as these is mass suffering and death, and they should have no place in warfare.
Therefore, all weapons of this classification shall be removed from member countries.
Well, try banning more than just nukes then. We've got worse stuff about...
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: The Bowens

Description: I belive people should be allowed to purchase any kinds of weapons on the intention of defending there home.
No laws on gun control
Who needs supportive reasoning?
Category: International Security
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Tycholand

Description: ALARMED BY international (organized) crime, The Democratic Republic of Tycholand hereby suggests finding the International Criminal DateBase, or ICDB for short. The ICDB will be a fully-automatic database, keeping track of wanted-criminals (that includes any terrorists as well) across the globe.

The ICDB:
-Let’s police in all ICDB-participating nations enter any wanted-criminals.
-Automatically registers if criminals (that includes suspect terrorists and terrorists) cross the border of a participating nation and
-Alerts custom officials for suspects.
-After the criminal is taken into custody, an extradition-process can begin to the nation where the particular criminal is wanted.

ICDB participants would have to:
-Install special software and hardware at international borders and ports of entry. (Think of land border-points, airports and harbours.)
-Realizing that not every nation has enough money to install the ICDB systems, a special United Nations Fund will be implemented, assisting with any financial trouble an ICDB-participant may have in implementing this system.

NOTING the benefits of this system, The Democratic Republic of Tycholand thinks it worthwhile to install this system.

Benefits:
-Prevents any future crimes that would have been committed if the ICDB wasn’t implemented.
-Makes it easier to catch terror suspects and actual terrorists.
-Travellers will feel safer.
So, what exactly is the ICDB? You've provided plenty of reasoning on what it will do, but have not yet stated what exactly it entails...
TilEnca
14-02-2005, 12:24
So, what exactly is the ICDB? You've provided plenty of reasoning on what it will do, but have not yet stated what exactly it entails...

Or how it got lost.
Komokom
14-02-2005, 15:01
" Silly Proposals: THE RETURN "

Like they ever left ...
Texan Hotrodders
14-02-2005, 15:04
" Silly Proposals: THE RETURN "

Like they ever left ...

The names and faces change, but it's the same old story.
Neo-Anarchists
14-02-2005, 15:07
The names and faces change, but it's the same old story.
The one with the rabbit and the man and the yellow house and the monsters?
No?
Didn't think so.
:D
Neo-Anarchists
14-02-2005, 16:08
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Greead

Description: THE PURPOSE of this act is that no one in the world is unemployed and at least works for 1 hour a week

for this to take place first there needs to be a variety of places/centres to assist unemployed citizens to find jobs or to help them set up jobs for themselves and others
- People with enough money have to set up businesses to increase number of vacant jobs available
- People with no skills can go to schools where they can retake exams, plus vacant jobs will be made with teachers to teach them
- people could take courses to become self-employed in areas needed

the following rules apply
-sick pay and holiday period increase
-fines for no work or not going to work
-can't leave job after signing contract for up to 6 months

FREEDOMS - the freedoms are,right of being able to pick hours, right of complaining about working conditions and pay
Wait, so everybody has to work?
Say goodbye to retirement and people who can't physically work...
Insequa
14-02-2005, 17:34
Hang on - doesn't that conflict with one of the child protection acts?
Neo-Anarchists
14-02-2005, 23:20
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Ye olde town

Description: men are alowd to have mor than one wife! we are fed up with seeing the same face every night, we want variety. however woman still must be loyal to their husband as adultery is punishable by tickling.
I'm hoping this is a joke...
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Short idiots

Description: I think when people enter a major buliding we need to have them have a strip search. This would include anyone age of 18 and up.
A bit extreme, I'd think...
Can you say "time-waster"?
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Short idiots

Description: As i go by I see so many Nations with bad civil rights. I my self am not one to brag BUT Even though I'm talking about my self I know I'm not the only one who has Rare or even Unheard civil rights. I belive that if we work togather and allow other kinds of people to work and go to school we can solve this problem so please for the children HELP!
:p
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Leicester haters

Description: Leic*ster city FC fans are always ruining the country. Face it. Nobody likes them. They are evil.
I suggest that all countries, states, etc., get rid of all LCFC fans.
They are useless mutated muppets.
Remember that nobody likes them.
ALL LEIC*STER CITY FANS SHOULD BE FORCED TO LIVE TOGETHER IN A SEPERATE COUNTRY WHERE THAY CAN NOT ANNOY OTHER PEOPLE


This view is shared with me and MILLIONS of people
Umm, where the hell is Leicester? I meant that both ICly and OOcly.
Also, might that be an illegal proposal of the sort that should be reported to the Moderators?
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Leicester haters

Description: face it, every1 hates leic*ster city football club and all it's fans. They are ugly, stupid and mutated.
We should prevent their diseaeses spreaing by kicking them out of each individual country, state, etc.
They have no moral decency. people will think of you as having no moral decency if you dont vote to get rid of these ******* ********.

Everyone hates these mutated idiots.
If you have any moral decency you will accept this proposal.
Wow, he dislikes them so much, he took the time to post two different proposals!
I suppose it needs a report...


Category: Free Trade
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Anti-Pop Culture

Description: This act is proposed to prevent the over-population of Starbucks franchise locations of all countries associated within the United Nations. The proposal includes but is not limited to locations inside supermarkets, inside department stores, drive-thru locations, and any other available retail location of a Starbucks Franchise.

The allowable number of Starbucks franchise locations in each city of each nation should be limited to no more than one franchise location per every 15,000 residents, and no more than one franchise location per every 5.5 square miles.
What is this "Starbucks" you speak of?
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: United British Islands

Description: As the world grows larger, there are more people, and when there's more people, there is a higher percentage that people won't disagree. When people disagree, people start wars. But in this day in age the with the technology to bring down a whole entire city even a country in a single bomb is out there. Smaller more radical groups are out there for their cause. They want to bring some free societies down. This act enables us to build our security our borders, keep nations safe. Buld up the defenses in ourarmers and at home with police forces. So people at home can feel safe at night. Even the homeless can feel a little safer. Come on People Think.
Well, might you tell us what exactly we can do against these terrorists?
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Free Garza

Description: Homosexual or lesbian activity by a married man or woman shall be considered adultery or marital infidelity as much as heterosexual activity, if such activity is performed without the knowledge or consent of the other spouse. Adultery in marriage shall henceforth be defined as any HIDDEN sexual activity with any person other than one's spouse, not counting masturbation, whether or not such activity can cause reproduction.
Umm, huh? Last time I checked, gay sex outside of marriage was considered adultery already...

Also relating to the person who wrote this proposal, Free Garza proposed 3 things relating to divorce that most likely could have been condensed into one.
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: Fatsos Bastardos

Description: Without guns there'd be no such thing as Texas, home of the true americans, and plus guns mean civilians have the right to eliminate the Criminal society. People who don't want guns are no good hippy's and nothing would be resolved, all i ask is that big fat nations like us should stick together!! Imagine going on a game like "Grand Theft Auto:San Andreas" without the use of a gun and plus without the use of guns we would be over-populated. PEACE OUT!!FAT POWER!!!
:rolleyes:

Wow. We have waaay too many not-too-well-thought-out proposals sitting about...
TilEnca
15-02-2005, 00:17
Leicester City is a football club. I could not tell you what league it is in, as I honestly don't care. And Leicester is somewhere in the middle of England. I think. For someone who lives here you would assume I would have a better grasp of geography :}

And - by the by - if we get rid of guns and get rid of Texas, I don't see it as a bad thing. No Dallas tv series for a start!!
Enn
15-02-2005, 05:39
I particularly like Texas, home of the true Americans
I'm on the other side of the world and it appears I know more American history than the proposer.
Neo-Anarchists
15-02-2005, 07:50
tegory: Repeal
Resolution: #43
Proposed by: Praeland

Description: UN Resolution #43: Legalise Euthanasia (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This measure is criminal in nature whereas it suggests the taking of lives. Euthanasia is still murder, whether the argument is religious or not. Medical technologies are currently increasing at such a rate that resuscitation, of individuals within coma-induced states, is in the near future.

It is not in the hands of the government, or the individual's family to make an informed decision to practice Euthanasia. All persons conflicted with illness, or otherwise have the ultimate say on their life. The government must protect its citizens lives at all costs.
Whether or not it takes lives does not matter, what matters is whether or not there is justification...
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Legalize
Proposed by: Bolongin

Description: Agree to the promotion of recreational drug usage, including all forms of natural hallucinogenics and recreational use of banned drugs for the exception of freebasing and "heavy" narcotics.Outban all drug laws in the vicinity, this will not induce violence but instead this will help us focus on our real crimes being commited.
"Heavy" narcotics?
"Outban"?
:confused:
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Leniniskova

Description: To guarantee to all the right to a free, quality public education from Pre-School through University. This would also guarantee the ability to recieve free, publicly funded vocational training. Nations would have the right to decide for themselves if religious education would be publicly funded.

Approvals: 2 (Great Maldovaria, Cofer)
Perhaps they'd care to read past resolutions?
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Bursch Kov

Description: I propose that all nations should be allowed to manufacture and posses weapons of mass destruction. Should this Resolution pass these weapons would only be fired under the agreement of the UN that the intended target is a threat to humanity and to eliminate the threat only. Anyone who should try to use a WMD without approval of the UN shall be hunted down and destroyed by the other nations WMD's and/or military forces.
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Bursch Kov

Description: I prpose that all countries should be allowed to manufacture and posses super weapons such as nuclear missiles and scud storms as long as they are only used after the UN agrees that the target is a threat. Anyone who does not comply shall be hunted down by all other countries super weapons and/oir military forces.
It's so important, it needs two proposals!
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #92
Proposed by: FallenAngels13

Description: UN Resolution #92: Humanitarian Intervention (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument:
Love that argument...
Nargopia
15-02-2005, 07:57
Originally Posted by Repeal "Humanitarian Intervention"
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #92
Proposed by: FallenAngels13

Description: UN Resolution #92: Humanitarian Intervention (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument:
Wow. That was quick.
Insequa
15-02-2005, 08:39
Now if only I could post a quote of the "Put LSD in the water" proposal... from memory it said that adding LSD to the water would help people to vote greener...
Flibbleites
15-02-2005, 08:42
Love that argument...
I can't argue with it.:D
Texan Hotrodders
15-02-2005, 16:59
I particularly like
I'm on the other side of the world and it appears I know more American history than the proposer.

Perhaps. Naturally, the question of whether Texans are true Americans is heavily dependent upon one's own definition of "American".

What concerned me was the fact that he seemed to think that eliminating guns would eliminate Texas, which is a landmass. I kinda doubt that eliminating guns would have any significant effect on the existence of a landmass.
TilEnca
15-02-2005, 17:50
Wow. That was quick.

And sums up all the sensible arguements against it :}
Makatoto
15-02-2005, 18:55
This is more fun than I would have thought. Though I suspect if I stop laughing I would be depressed by the stupidity of these... :)
Neo-Anarchists
16-02-2005, 04:15
And now for a new episode of Sill Proposals.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #43
Proposed by: Neopunis

Description: UN Resolution #43: Legalise Euthanasia (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Whilst We recognize the sensitivity of this issue it is precisely because of this sensitivity that we do not feel that the national sovereignty of U.N. nations should be overruled on an issue of this importance by a mere margin of 779 votes in 10,000. We ask those of you who feel strongly in favor of this issue to understand the will of those nations who cannot accept it and allow for this to be an issue left to the voters at a local level. While most, if not all nations, would likely agree that the wanton prolongation of life in a situation of great physical or psychological pain is unnecessary there is for many a great step from this to allowing the termination of a life that would not expire on its own, regardless of the will of the individual. It is a dangerous moral slope which is best left to the individual sovereignty of each of our peoples.
They should make people read a guide to fallacies before they post a proposal, as the Slippery Slope argument is one. Also, what the hell does margin of votes mean about it?
And why were two copies submitted?
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Chocolateistan

Description: We currently have laws on age restriction for Alcohol and Cigarettes, why not for the most dangerous of the 3, guns?
Perhaps you could actually say what they would be in the proposal?
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Flame From Hell

Description: I belive that there should be a police force in the nations of the UN. One police buildings every 5 to 10 miles from the next or that every city/town should have one. This will decrease the crime rate. Prisons should be on the outskirts of the city/town.
Some nations don't have any prisons to put on the outskirts.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #91
Proposed by: John Ashcroft Land

Description: UN Resolution #91: The Sex Industry Worker Act (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: SUPPORTING the fundamental principle that prostitution is immoral in all cases,

REALIZING that many of the governments throughout the world cannot properly regulate such a practice due to their own personal objections to prostitution and other immoral acts,

QUESTIONING if the proposed idea in Resolution #91 that the legalization of prostitution would result in a decrease of Sexually Transmitted Diseases,

We:

DECLARE prostitution to be an immoral act

REALIZE that government encouragement of such an act cannot possibly be good for our individual nations as well as the world as a whole

ENCOURAGE the many nations of the UN to strike down Resolution #91.
Immoral?
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: The Mystic Warriors

Description: the law would allow civilians to recieve a gun for self protection perposes. also such a law would destroy the steryotype that if your not a police officer and own a gun your a villan. it would also allow the people to defend them selves .
Well, perhaps you could post this law you seem to like here so that we can see it before we vote on it?
Just a thought.
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Short idiots

Description: I recently made the drug known as "pot" illegal in my nation. With "pot" illegal the economy improves and crime decreases, so if we have "pot" banned it will make for a better future.
Wow, reality hasn't interfered with those beliefs much.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #91
Proposed by: Mayvennia

Description: UN Resolution #91: The Sex Industry Worker Act (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: I'm not not going to make this all fancy just to make this look professional, but please read this anyway.
Prostitution Should Be Illegal! If a person wants to 'sell their body' let them sell it to a doctor for research! With the resolution to make prostitution legal, there would not only be a higher divorce rate, but abortion rate as well. Of course, abortion is legal in all UN states, but who among you would kill your own child? The divorce rate is aproblem as well. How many wives sit waiting by the front door worrying and waiting for their husbands to return, only to realize that he was having a 'good time'.
Also, how would crime go down? If anything, the crime rate would raise. The prostitutes would spend more of their greater income on booze and cigarettes; they get drunk/high, and commit crimes.
"A fool with no money can do nothing, but a fool with money will do anything he wants" give a prostitute money, the prostitute will spend on drinks/drugs, and need more, and because of the legalness of it, they'll gain more with no obstruction.
I've said it before, that this is anything but professional, but please, help lower crime.
:rolleyes:
Enn
16-02-2005, 05:53
Perhaps. Naturally, the question of whether Texans are true Americans is heavily dependent upon one's own definition of "American".

What concerned me was the fact that he seemed to think that eliminating guns would eliminate Texas, which is a landmass. I kinda doubt that eliminating guns would have any significant effect on the existence of a landmass.
Egad. Sorry, Texan, no offence intended. I probably was a bit out of line there, not in the best frame of mind myself. Your comment on that proposal was much better.
Neo-Anarchists
16-02-2005, 07:25
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize
Proposed by: Homo Sexuals

Description: If playing cards and only cards and yuo do not have enough money to match the pot, I would like to legalize that you may put up anyone of your family members to bet. If you lose, they will be a slave to the winner until you win them back. That is if you want them back.
:D
Enn
16-02-2005, 08:20
That one reminds me of a certain webcomic I read regularly.
Asshelmetta
17-02-2005, 02:29
None of these proposals can compete for silliness with our treatment of Pretenama.
Krioval
17-02-2005, 02:33
None of these proposals can compete for silliness with our treatment of Pretenama.

That was pretty bad, wasn't it? Poor Loratana. Talk about being scarred for life! I'd hate to have been threatened and almost obliterated because I was shaky on evidence involving secondhand cigarette smoke!
Frisbeeteria
17-02-2005, 03:21
None of these proposals can compete for silliness with our treatment of Pretenama.That was pretty bad, wasn't it? Poor Loratana. Talk about being scarred for life! I'd hate to have been threatened and almost obliterated because I was shaky on evidence involving secondhand cigarette smoke!
Enough with the gloating about your cleverness, both of you. You've got one topic devoted to it, and a couple others with legitimate mentions, but that's enough. Stop cross-posting about it.
Asshelmetta
17-02-2005, 04:47
Enough with the gloating about your cleverness, both of you. You've got one topic devoted to it, and a couple others with legitimate mentions, but that's enough. Stop cross-posting about it.
It's just afterglow.
This too will pass.
Krioval
17-02-2005, 06:08
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: TerraLibre

Description: Purpose:This purposal is to destroy the long held barriers on the human body. I.e. clothing; for centuries now mankind has been restricted from freedom to "let it all hang out" and to truely admire the differences and adversities of other peoples bodies.

Effects:In all United Nations memeber states clothing will be outlawed. With the obvious exception of nations who have cold climates. These States with cold climates will be required to create a warm "see through" or transparent material for their citizens to wear.

Because not only is mandatory nudity a positive force, but all that covering up and modesty is indecent. And don't forget all the money that we'll need to invent transparent fabric.
Neo-Anarchists
17-02-2005, 06:11
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: TerraLibre

Description: Purpose:This purposal is to destroy the long held barriers on the human body. I.e. clothing; for centuries now mankind has been restricted from freedom to "let it all hang out" and to truely admire the differences and adversities of other peoples bodies.

Effects:In all United Nations memeber states clothing will be outlawed. With the obvious exception of nations who have cold climates. These States with cold climates will be required to create a warm "see through" or transparent material for their citizens to wear.
Well, the one thing I can say is that the title is rather accurate.
Category: The Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Junanism

Description: This resolution is like the global library, only it can be reached from the confort of a person's home on the internet.
I'd sure like to see this proposal then...
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #86
Proposed by: Pie cookies

Description: UN Resolution #86: The Global Library (Category: The Furtherment of Democracy; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: No!!! There are certain things that should not be accessible to all nations it could cause huge problems just think about it!!!!!
Might you provide some sort of example?
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Coreypar

Description: We must outlaw all drugs. Drugs only hurt users. Drugs should only be used for medicine.
:rolleyes:
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Vegetarian Lifestyle

Description: RECOGNIZING that many countries spend a lot of money to invent and produce weapon systems, that operate from orbit or from space,

CONFIRMING that every Nation has the right to defend itself,

NOTICING that space weapons are a mean of attack rather and no mean of defense,

AND IN THE INTEREST of worldwide peace, hereby

CONDEMNS the development, production, distribution and proliferation of orbital/space weapon systems. Existing Systems shall be disarmed and put under UN observation.
How are they not defensive?
:confused:
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: The free carolinas

Description: The United Nations and its member states shall be empowered to regulate the use, placement, and existence of commercial Internet advertising applications including, but not limited to, pop-ups, pop-unders, adware, spyware, and spam.
This could hold promise if it actually had any content.
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Dingdomania

Description: Throughout history it is apparant that the majority of wars wether it be psycotic dictators or the power hungry leaders have all come about throught 1 thing RELIGION!!!

Without religion nothing would be titled EVIL!!

Look at world war 2... HITLER AND THE JEWISH NATIONS!

Hitler believed that because of their religious label, they were worthless, this however is untrue.

With the help of the united nations i hope to disperse, abolish and remove all Religions in the hope of creating a utopia.

I would also like to draw out the fact that wars come about and many types of arms are used. I propose that aswell as abolishing religion, Arms should also be abolished. That way if for some reason a war were to take place, then the number of injuries would be significantly lower.

JOIN ME IN CREATING A UTOPIAN PLANET!!!
As though that would solve anything?
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #61
Proposed by: Local CHRISTIAN lands

Description: UN Resolution #61: Abortion Rights (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Recent science studies have proven that life starts at the time of conception.

Images of babies in the womb have shown them to look like tiny babies with heads,arms,legs,and eyes.

Therefore we as mankind should find it barbaric to do such a practice.


If we kill a small defenseless human in growth what kind of people are we?

There is no need for population control as the entire world's population can gfit in texas.


For those of you who believe that it is a glob of gelly then prove it.

It is not a womans right since it is not her body that is destroyed.
I laughed for ten minutes at this one.
Nargopia
17-02-2005, 06:17
There is no need for population control as the entire world's population can gfit in texas.
Oh come on, Neo. You're telling me that this isn't a convincing argument? :D
Flibbleites
17-02-2005, 06:55
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Vegetarian Lifestyle

Description: RECOGNIZING that many countries spend a lot of money to invent and produce weapon systems, that operate from orbit or from space,

CONFIRMING that every Nation has the right to defend itself,

NOTICING that space weapons are a mean of attack rather and no mean of defense,

AND IN THE INTEREST of worldwide peace, hereby

CONDEMNS the development, production, distribution and proliferation of orbital/space weapon systems. Existing Systems shall be disarmed and put under UN observation.I read this one and thought, Where's DLE when you need him?
Nargopia
17-02-2005, 07:54
I read this one and thought, Where's DLE when you need him?
Where has DLE been recently? When I joined, it seemed every new post on every new thread was his. Now it's a rarity to see an occasional appearance. :(
Neo-Anarchists
17-02-2005, 08:01
Where has DLE been recently? When I joined, it seemed every new post on every new thread was his. Now it's a rarity to see an occasional appearance. :(
I think we need to set up a DLE beacon!
Neo-Anarchists
17-02-2005, 11:22
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Adamercos

Description: The world today is a dangerous place, sad but true. It is in the best interests of the world if a UN backed plan to recruite more army, navy and air force personel in every region and nation that belonged to the UN. This would mean that every regime would have sufficient neutral UN military to protect there own shores from invasion. This could mean a safer place that would have instant access to any problems that acoure. I Offer that every nation should have a perminent UN base on its land for the UN army, navy and air force.And have an increase in all sectors of the UN's armed forces by 1,000 men. I propose this as a way of instantly sorting out any troubles that may accoure in a nation or region. Only those nations who agree to have it will of course have this but with the aid of UN propoganda it should spread and make the world a much safer place.
:D
That's just a wee bit illegal...
Neo-Anarchists
17-02-2005, 14:45
Category: The Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Tyrannt Destroyers

Description: it should be hereby declared compulsary for all un nations who stance is for democracy to endorse one another as to unite the democratic nations world wide. this can go some distance as to bring strength in numbers. any nation not sound in its democratic ways may be declined an endorsement by approval of a panel to be determined. it is the desire of this nation to unite for strength in numbers.
Well, you see, there are these things called "regions"...
Neo-Anarchists
17-02-2005, 21:26
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: The Cassiopeia Galaxy

Description: LSD is a deadly Drug that can Kill and cause The User to see things that aren't There.

The UN must

1, Ban it's use

2, Fund Local Law enforcement so they can stop LSD Dealers from Saleing the Deadly Drug.

3, To Teach all People about the Dangers of LSD and how to say no to it.
No facts were harmed in the writing of this proposal. Nor, for that matter, even touched!
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Alexander mackay

Description: first we should ban guns
only people should have guns are milliarty and poilce
gun should stop being traded between countrys and the un should have overall control of guns
Okay, why?
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Cheqeslovakia

Description: Cheqeslovakia feels it is unnessacary for an invading force to enter or bomb a civilian area unless they are positively sure that it would bring about the end of the invasion hastely and with less loss of innocent life.
e.g finding a war criminal or destroying a infostructure or building vital to the opposing military force.

Under no surcumstances should a nation destroy or threaten to destroy a civilian infostructure or building unless there are active insurgents or terrorists holding the building for hostile reasons.
Wha the fuck is an "exacuation"?
Or "surcumstances", or an "infostructure"?
Makatoto
17-02-2005, 21:32
I'm not so bored as to look these up myself, so I'll congratulate you guys on doing a great job finding these 'gems' for us! :)
Nadkor
17-02-2005, 21:40
this threads brilliant

thank god i never submitted a proposal for it to be ripped apart...


EDIT: thats a lie, under a previous nation i proposed one about GWB being a war criminal...got 14 angry telegrams within an hour. that was amusing.
Neo-Anarchists
17-02-2005, 22:40
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #91
Proposed by: Kreen

Description: UN Resolution #91: The Sex Industry Worker Act (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Recalling The Sex Industry Act

1. Prostition is immoral and should not be promoted.

2. Ever heard of STD's? well no matter the amount of regulations they will still run rampant, how long does an HIV check up take? Only about 24 hours but how mauny times could a prostitute have sex in that time? Also it takes about six months for the anti-bodies which are used for the scan to show up making the test faulty and possibly incorrect?

3. Legalizing prostitution is another way if increasing illegal drug use. This affects not only the populace but also the economy, who wants to find a factory worker who has a part time job as a gay stoned prostitute? Medical studies show that people who have low self esteem are more likely to take drugs, and what is prostitution but a way of saying you have low self esteem.

4. Big bussiness/corporations, and CEOs already take advantages of loopholes in the tax structure, what makes you think that Pimps and prostitution will be any different?
:D
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Promote
Proposed by: Homo Sexuals

Description: Need I say more??????
Yes.
Communist Collectives
17-02-2005, 22:56
So, what exactly is the ICDB? You've provided plenty of reasoning on what it will do, but have not yet stated what exactly it entails...

Just to point out that the member has actually explained the proposal. Read more carefully...


International Criminal DateBase, or ICDB for short. The ICDB will be a fully-automatic database, keeping track of wanted-criminals (that includes any terrorists as well) across the globe.


However, generally, I agree that the vast majority of proposals are utterly ridiculous, if not illegal, and in many cases deliberately disruptive to the smooth operation of the UN.
RomeW
18-02-2005, 00:56
Category: The Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Junanism

Description: This resolution is like the global library, only it can be reached from the confort of a person's home on the internet.

One more reason to need the library, I take it...

EDIT- Nothing- NOTHING- will ever top the "moo" proposal. That will forever remain the dumbest proposal I've ever seen.
Flibbleites
18-02-2005, 07:33
I found one!

Category: Social Justice


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: The Prince of Tyrus

Description: We at the Theocracy of The Prince of Tyrus believe that stupidity is infecting our God's barren earth with increasing virility.
This proposal is proof of this statement.
We believe that obese people should no longer be able to complain about the width seats, nor force other citizens to inhale when they walk past to avoid the stench and just to squeeze past.Who wrote this proposal, Simon Dean? (for those of you who don't know, Simon Dean is a WWE superstar who hawks a line of weight loss products called the Simon System and constantly calls the audience members fat)
We believe that the ugly have for too long dominated the ranks of the middle and lower classes, and for far too long attracted morbidly curious looks.I don't know, I've see some ugly rich people too.
We believe the ranks of the socially undesirable should be thinned a little, if not eradicated completely.
OK, you first.:D
We understand that this infestation is an ongoing problem and will need significant funding and regulation to ensure that the population doesnt decrease.Infestation? They make it sound like they have fleas or something.
We propose that stupid, ugly and obese citizens should be sent to special "Purging Camps" where a last chance effort to become 'one of us' is forced during an intense 2 week training course.Right, obese people are supposed to lose the weight in only two weeks.:rolleyes:
Those that pass will be readmitted to the population pending 6 month reviews for the next 10 years. Those that fail will be removed from the population, and recycled into goods and services that actually better mankind, as opposed to dragging it down into the filthy degenerate DNA soup that is to become Earth's future.I've said it before and I'll say it again. It's people! Soylent Green is people!
RomeW
18-02-2005, 09:43
I've said it before and I'll say it again. It's people! Soylent Green is people!

Is that your favourite movie, or just your favourite line, out of curiosity?

Thanks for pointing that out. My other nation (BitingReality) would have had a field day with that one, but that proposal is still disturbing...
Neo-Anarchists
18-02-2005, 14:39
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Weezulbub

Description: Anybody can state their own opinion on anthing wherever, whoever and whenever.
I thought we had that covered already?
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Spankwood

Description: All things considered, huge gatherings take place at baseball games, football games and such. I just think we need to take some extra security measures to prevent these from being a terrorist target. I'm not saying full lock down every time a questionable character walks in, im just saying maybe, more officers in the dugout or around the restrooms. There are thousands of people at theses games, i just dont want the badguys to gain a better hand than they already have.
Well then, perhaps you'd care to write a proposal about it instead of just telling us?
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Outlaw
Proposed by: Coreypar

Description: Gambling Should not be allowed to walk the cities any longer. How many have gotten the issue of children gambling. That should not even be a problem.
I kinda doubt that gambling is "walking" your cities...
Wingen
18-02-2005, 14:47
lollersaurus
Flibbleites
18-02-2005, 16:39
Is that your favourite movie, or just your favourite line, out of curiosity?

Actually neither, that was just the second time in recent memory I've seen proposals calling for the dead to be used to make the living's lives better.
Neo-Anarchists
18-02-2005, 17:06
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #91
Proposed by: Planet Yakadoo

Description: UN Resolution #91: The Sex Industry Worker Act (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This is wrong! Revote.
How about no.
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Fatsos Bastardos

Description: Banning guns would mean crime would be reduced by a massive percentage and the economy bettered. It would also mean hunting being inable as the only other means are just barbaric.

It would mean your population's would grow by vast amounts to cause more issues. If their wasn't any guns their wouldn't be any riots or wars.

Look, all I'm saying is please approve my proposal to improve all our nations.PEAS OUT!!- CHOCOLATE IN!!!!
I just love the title of this. "Ban crime".
"BAN CRIME!!!! IT'S BAD!!!"
Beautiful Yalaluxurios
19-02-2005, 07:33
I cant find it now but i once saw a proposal something like this:

----------------------------------------

GUNS SUCK!!!!!!!
BAN GUNS NOW

----------------------------------------
Flibbleites
19-02-2005, 07:40
Here's a keeper:D


A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Fritz von Splurgenhof

Description: PROBLEM: The average height of individuals in various countries is greatly varied. This leads to an unfair advantage in trade of certain comestibles.

FOR EXAMPLE: In agriculture, particularly the growing of fruit trees. The orchards of nations whose average height is larger than normal may be forced to grow taller, lower yield trees so as to save their employees from bad backs from bending down to pick fruit.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE: In the building trade, the nations whose height average is lower will be at a significant economic advantage as houses and dooorways will be built smaller and therefore use less materials and therefore be cheaper to build. This will also have a nock-on effect on the building materials industry.

There are many other such problems which lead to an unfair global marketplace.
THEREFORE in the interests of a FREE AND JUST TRADE ARENA, we would request that all nations, through either genetic modification, compulsory use of the rack, hanging weights from feet or some other scientifically proven method, would ensure that all individuals were 6"4 tall.
A vote for this proposal is another step towards economic justice.
I'd feel sorry for any nation's whose population are comprised of only midgets if this were to pass.

And here's another
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use


Decision: Legalize


Proposed by: Harpenden

Description: I think that UN Delegates should be able to choose whether or not it wants herion leagal in it's region
I believe the word you're looking for is heroin.

I think this one is one of the funniest environmental proposals I've ever read
Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Woodchipping


Proposed by: James Ellis

Description: It is obvious that many people care not about the state of the world. Scientific research has proven that cutting down trees leads to loss of animal ilfe and global warming. Widespread deforestation may not have adverse effects in our lifetime, but we have a duty to care for this planet in order that it may be a hospitable place for future generations.

In order to combat this, the Holy Empire of James Ellis suggests that trees should be given rights

In order to assist us in thinking about the rights of trees, I propose that all trees should be given names, such as Steven, Edward or James Ellis. This will help us to think of trees as individuals, which of course they are.

Once this is done, we may be able to understand that trees, as a part of the natural world have intrinsic rights to exist. They are created, along with us, and thus we have no justification for mindlessly slaughtering them. Deforestation will henceforth be seen as the crime of genocide.

A vote for the rights of trees is a vote for a better world.
Deforestation is genocide?:rolleyes:
Enn
19-02-2005, 07:43
Here's a keeper:D
Originally Posted by Height Uniformity

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Fritz von Splurgenhof

Description: PROBLEM: The average height of individuals in various countries is greatly varied. This leads to an unfair advantage in trade of certain comestibles.

FOR EXAMPLE: In agriculture, particularly the growing of fruit trees. The orchards of nations whose average height is larger than normal may be forced to grow taller, lower yield trees so as to save their employees from bad backs from bending down to pick fruit.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE: In the building trade, the nations whose height average is lower will be at a significant economic advantage as houses and dooorways will be built smaller and therefore use less materials and therefore be cheaper to build. This will also have a nock-on effect on the building materials industry.

There are many other such problems which lead to an unfair global marketplace.
THEREFORE in the interests of a FREE AND JUST TRADE ARENA, we would request that all nations, through either genetic modification, compulsory use of the rack, hanging weights from feet or some other scientifically proven method, would ensure that all individuals were 6"4 tall.
A vote for this proposal is another step towards economic justice.

I'd feel sorry for any nation's whose population are comprised of only midgets if this were to pass.
What about places populated by giants? Do we resort to chopping off people's legs?
Flibbleites
19-02-2005, 07:47
What about places populated by giants? Do we resort to chopping off people's legs?
You know, I never noticed that they don't say what to do with those people who are too tall.
Asshelmetta
19-02-2005, 07:50
OK, quick opinion poll:

Would it be wrong of me to lob a series of nukes at James Ellis?

What about a telegram spam campaign? Would that be OK?
Nargopia
19-02-2005, 07:52
OK, quick opinion poll:

Would it be wrong of me to lob a series of nukes at James Ellis?

What about a telegram spam campaign? Would that be OK?
Hmmm...? A series? Maybe. Try just one and see what his reaction is.

As for a spam campaign, what do you have in mind?
Texan Hotrodders
19-02-2005, 07:57
OK, quick opinion poll:

Would it be wrong of me to lob a series of nukes at James Ellis?

What about a telegram spam campaign? Would that be OK?

Nukes are legal and fun. A spam campaign, however, might get you deleted.
Asshelmetta
19-02-2005, 08:02
Nukes are legal and fun. A spam campaign, however, might get you deleted.
What if I only organized the spam campaign, but let other nations do all but 1 of the spam?
Texan Hotrodders
19-02-2005, 08:04
What if I only organized the spam campaign, but let other nations do all but 1 of the spam?

I don't know. I guess we should ask the Mods for a ruling on that question.
RomeW
19-02-2005, 08:17
^LOL@Flibbelites. The tree rights one was the funniest- eventually, we'll outlaw the killing of plants and animals, leaving us nothing to eat. I sympathize with the main idea of environmentalism (to improve the environment), but some of the things they present are impossible to implement/enforce (for one, how do you plan on stopping wolves from eating deer or that same deer from eating plants?).

The tree one also reminded me of one episdoe of "Dinosaurs" when Earl changed into a tree after a lightning strike. Man, was that a funny show...
Neo-Anarchists
19-02-2005, 16:03
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: New Unfoundland

Description: I propose dear members of the United Nations, that we have enforce the requirement of having a telescreen device located in every room in every building in every city of our countries. These would not only provide an entertainment value unseen for generations for the occupants, but also make sure that no instigators and traitors lurk among us, so that they may be caught out so fast that they would not get the chance to even consider carrying out any crimes against our states.
1984, anyone?
Also, this guy submitted two of this proposal, for some odd reason.
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: The Scottopian Islands

Description: Spyware, Spam, Popups should be illegal

I) They are annoying and always cause Hassal
II) They can be distracting if you are trying to do something
III) (ive been here) Your on the last level of a good game and your game is disrubited by a warning, or false avertisment, or a popup, and when you delete these annoying things, you go back to your game, which can frezze the computer, and you might be dead, lost, or game over
IV) Its wrong to invade someones personal computer. Some people keep live journals, and there are even some online journals that only the person with the password can get, and people with spyware can find your most intermost secrets and things like that, and bank account numbers, lottery tickets, and things that you dont want happening to you.

V) I just hate them

Thank you, Scotto from The Allied States of the Scottopian Islands
Okay, good, how about you write a proposal?
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: The Scottopian Islands

Description: Black, Mexican, Asian, White, Indian, Male, Female, whatever you may be, there should be no Sexist, Racest, or religious remarks that can be harmful to a persons self being, ethier physically or emotionly. just stop it people, ok.
"just stop it people, ok."
:p
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #4
Proposed by: The Scottopian Islands

Description: UN Resolution #4: UN taxation ban (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: If the UN doesnt collect taxes, then it would rely on nations giving donations, and donations wont come from every nation. As long as the taxing is under 7% of that nations income, then it will be ok, and if that nation is struggling, then the UN Delegates can vote to see if that nation needs help from the International Communtiy and the UN. Extra money given to the UN will be ok
This "The Scottopian Islands" guy is cracking me up!
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize
Proposed by: BlanchardF

Description: Gambling using coin slots, card tables or just betting on races is an enjoyable activity many play. Others may choose to outlaw this, but i persist that we legalize it.
A person's decision to gamble and take a chance with their own money is their own choice, let them keep gambling legal!!!!!
Pehaps, if you used fewer exclamation points.
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Promote
Proposed by: Oei

Description: Drugs are no drugs as people think they are. They just change your point of view. The effect has been observed in Oei and appears very interesting: in The Most Serene Republic of Oei the excessive use of all kinds of drugs has lead to a serenity of our leader that is unheard of. Last week he still had peoples head chopped off, now he grants them the freedom to take their own lifes.

The current mental state of our otherwise so violent ruler is something the Most Serene Republic of Oei sees as the optimum mental state for every worldleader, and so absolutely necessary, and since every individual is potentially a worldleader, we state the following:

Every citizen under the laws of the United Nation must be able, preferably forced, to use drugs on at least a weekly base to improve mental stabily and political health for all coming generations.
Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot?
"Drugs are no drugs"?
"Preferably forced"?
No thanks...
Oh, and he submitted it twice too.
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: James Ellis

Description: It is well known that people find it difficult to make decisions concerning ethics and morality. For example, debates still rage about euthanasia and abortion.

This resolution therefore proposes to train people in moral decision making in order to assist those facing difficult decisions. Just as a person who delivers milk is called a milk man, and a person who delivers letters is a postman, so too a person who makes moral decisions for other people is a moral man.

In the interest of moral decency, civil freedoms must be restricted, and what better way to do this than to have people payed to make decisions for people. Of course this would not be compulsary for all those who find ethical decision-making a challenge, but the option would be open to all who can't be bothered to think for themselves.

Moral Men are the future!
Hell no!
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: All Businesses
Proposed by: James Ellis

Description: As of now, the word "environment" is to be defined as all-inclusive i.e. to include humans. This is because there is no justification for viewing humanity as apart from the natural world. Not only have we evolved from nature, we belong to it and find our home in it.

With this new definition in mind, there can be no doubt that caring for the environment should be a priority. For if we fail to care for the environment, we fail to care for each other. Polluting the world, for example, by burning fossil fuels or dropping litter, is equivalent to polluting our own bodies, for example by smoking or taking drugs.

If we care for ourselves and each other, we must care for the environment.
:p
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Dabomb1027

Description: I have one question to ask which will prove why this should be passed. Why should other people be allowed to chose whether a girl who gets raped should have to go throught the pains of having a child. It is not really killing a life and is also jeopordizing another.
Proposal: this proposals says that that abortion should be allowed in all U.N. countries
Perhaps you could write a proposal?
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Mucilania

Description: We, the States Members of the United Nations,
Concerned about the serious world drug problem,

1. Reaffirm our unwavering determination and commitment to overcoming the world drug problem through domestic and international strategies to reduce both the illicit supply of and demand for drugs;

2 we renew our commitment to adopting and reinforcing comprehensive national legislation and strategies to give effect to the provisions of those conventions, ensuring through periodic reviews that the strategies are effective;



3. Recognize with satisfaction the progress achieved by States, both individually and working in concert, and express deep concern about the new social contexts in which the consumption of illicit drugs, particularly of amphetamine-type stimulants, is taking place;

4. Welcome the efforts of the wide range of people working in various fields against drug abuse and are encouraged by the behaviour of the vast majority of youth who do not consume illegal drugs, and decide to give particular attention to demand reduction, notably by investing in and working with youth through formal and informal education, information activities and other preventive measures;

5. Affirm our determination to provide the necessary resources for treatment and rehabilitation and to enable social reintegration to restore dignity and hope to children, youth, women and men who have become drug abusers, and to fight against all aspects of the world drug problem;

6. Call upon the United Nations system and invite the international financial institutions, to include action against the world drug problem in their programmes, taking into account the priorities of States;

7. Call for the establishment or strengthening of regional or subregional mechanisms, and invite those mechanisms to share experiences and conclusions resulting from the implementation of national strategies ;

8. Express deep concern about links between illicit drug production, trafficking and involvement of terrorist groups, criminals and transnational organized crime, and are resolved to strengthen our cooperation in response to those threats;

9. Call upon our communities, especially families, and their political, religious, educational, cultural, sports, business and union leadership, non-governmental organizations and the media worldwide to actively promote a society free of drug abuse, especially by emphasizing and facilitating healthy, productive and fulfilling alternatives to the consumption of illicit drugs, which must not become accepted as a way of life;

10. Decide to devote particular attention to the emerging trends in the illicit manufacture, trafficking and consumption of synthetic drugs, and call for the establishment or strengthening by the year 2008 of national legislation and programmes giving effect to the Action Plan against Illicit Manufacture, Trafficking and Abuse of Amphetamine-type Stimulants and their Precursors, adopted at the present session;


These are new and serious promises which will be difficult to achieve, but we are resolved that such commitments will be met by practical action and the resources needed to ensure real and measurable results;

Together we can meet this challenge.
Sorry, drugs are legal here.
Nargopia
19-02-2005, 17:15
The tree one also reminded me of one episdoe of "Dinosaurs" when Earl changed into a tree after a lightning strike. Man, was that a funny show...
Not the momma! Not the momma! Oh, the memories...
The left foot
19-02-2005, 17:19
I wanted to submit this, but my region deligate screamed his head off at me :(

RECONGIZING the inferiority of red, orange, purple, green, yellow,and most colors.

OBSERVING the popularness of blue

URGES the UN to make blue it’s official color.

UNDERSTANDING each nation would be able to decide on it’s colors unaffected.

PROMOTING the transference of all UN material to a shade of blue unless unfeasible for a justified reason.

i just thoght UN resolutions would better on blue stationary.

GO BLUE!
Gwenstefani
19-02-2005, 17:25
OK, quick opinion poll:

Would it be wrong of me to lob a series of nukes at James Ellis?

What about a telegram spam campaign? Would that be OK?

How about an army of beavers?
Armed Enforcers
19-02-2005, 17:40
I wanted to submit this, but my region deligate screamed his head off at me :(

RECONGIZING the inferiority of red, orange, purple, green, yellow,and most colors.

OBSERVING the popularness of blue

URGES the UN to make blue it’s official color.

UNDERSTANDING each nation would be able to decide on it’s colors unaffected.

PROMOTING the transference of all UN material to a shade of blue unless unfeasible for a justified reason.

i just thoght UN resolutions would better on blue stationary.

GO BLUE!

The color blue has been shown to increase the amount of UV light that enters your eyes. It also increases squinting. That's why they have those blue-block sunglasses that eliminate blue from your vision and make it a sort if grayish-purplish color.
The left foot
19-02-2005, 17:53
Meh, most of the Un deligtes are already old squinty and don't get much sun. S o they'll get a little more cancer. It's the price of looking good in blue. Its worth it!
Skinny87
19-02-2005, 17:58
One more reason to need the library, I take it...

EDIT- Nothing- NOTHING- will ever top the "moo" proposal. That will forever remain the dumbest proposal I've ever seen.


Sorry to interrupt. What is the 'moo' proposal?
RomeW
20-02-2005, 07:07
Not the momma! Not the momma! Oh, the memories...

LOL. I actually had the "Baby" doll and that was one of the things he'd say (it was one of those wind-up toys). He's probably one of television's funniest babies (and the most violent).

Sorry to interrupt. What is the 'moo' proposal?

I forget what it was repealing, but it was a repeal proposal that argued simply "moo". It was in an earlier edition of the "silly proposals", posted in the thread "What Makes a UN Gnome Cry?" started by The Most Glorious Hack.
Neo-Anarchists
20-02-2005, 11:36
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: BLACKGRUE

Description: The current affair of some nations being technologically advanced and others being primitive is unacceptible as the "elite" nations have little-or-no reservations against exploiting, annexing, or downright annihilating the weaker nations, and the quality of life in the weaker nations is far below acceptible levels.

The obvious solution is to create a UN technology council that would distribute all non-military technology to the weaker UN member nations. As for military technologies none shall be distributed unless it's been in the council for a period of 10 years which shall maintain the security of the larger, more powerful nations while still giving the smaller, less advanced nations defence against opression.
I thought the bit about the weapons was funny...
10 year old weapons won't help too much against oppresion wit the latest in firepower, I would think...
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Anyaei

Description: "We need more guns!" says local gun salesman Mike Holbert.
we need these guns beacuase crime is high and we NEED to defend our selfs from these criminals!

"No way!" says senate member Jahan. we have our local police force and they will take care of all of us if we let them but WE ARE NOT so they can't help or defend us.

"Why can't the people who want guns buy them and the people who don't want to don't have to. therefore people can takecare of themselves and the cops can cake care of the community. Is that really so wrong?
I think this guy has "proposal" and "issue" confused.
:D
Category: International Security
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Bonai

Description: I FOR ONE BELIEVE THAT BY HAVING ARMS OUR COUNTRIES FEEL SAFE.BUT WITHOUT THEM OUR COUNTRY IS COMPLETELY DEFENSELESS.AND BY HAVING ARMS WE KEEP JOBS FOR SOME OF OUR PEOPLE WHERE AS IF WE DID NOT HAVE THEM SOME OF OUR PEOPLE WOULD CAUSE OUR HOMELESS POPULATION TO GO UP.SO AS FOR ME I BELIEVE WE NEED TO BUILD BIGGER AND BETTER ARMS.AND TRY TO TRAIN OUR YOUNG HOW TO OPERATE THEM SO THEY WILL STAY IN SCHOOL AND WANT TO LEARN MORE OF OUR GOVERNMENT WAQNT TO BE THE NEXT GENERATION OF WORLD LEADERS AND KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING WITH IT.
STOP TYPING IN ALL CAPS AND MAYBE I'LL READ PAST THE FIRST SENTENCE.
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Wattos

Description: RECONIZES that every UN membery nation's citizens are also members of the UN.

HEREBY they should be allowed to travle, work, and live in any other UN member nation without discrimination.

SIGNIFIES that every UN member's citizen will become a citizen of the UN. Thus they will be able to travle, live, and work in any other UN member nation, as long as they are following that nations laws, and the laws of the UN.
:D
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #3
Proposed by: Haris Najam

Description: UN Resolution #3: Education For All (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: less crime
better long term affects on economy/country
What the hell?
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #19
Proposed by: The Chrisland

Description: UN Resolution #19: Religious Tolerance (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: More devout nations should not be presured to keep the peace with a more immoral and corrupt nation to reinstate a more religious government.
One of my puppet nations would have a field day with that if I switched this one out of the UN and it in...
:p
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: Leicester haters

Description: Since my last two proposals failed I made a new one.

Everyone should agree that everyone deserves the right to self-protection. What better way is there to defend yourself than having a gun.

There are also may other proposals trying to relax gun control so that shows that many ordinary UN members support this.

So...everyone should be allowed to buy guns for their own 'self-protection'
Write an argument, maybe?
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Upper Strathyclyde

Description: Deaths caused by the misuse of firearms is rising, and crime rates with it. The following proposal states a solution for the control over the civilian use of firearms.

I.The only personnell permitted to own and carry a firearm are on-duty military personell and civil service agents. These guns should be registered, and have the latest trigger-lock technology, allowing only a certain fingerprint to fire the gun.

II. All military and civil service agents before being able to carry and fire a weapon, must pass a standerdised government test on the use and maintanence of firearms. After passing such a test, personell must take a course on the ability to use such guns.

III. All citizens must give up their weapons and firearms. If decrotive (ex. and ornamental musket) the citizen must bring it to a local police station to have it checked, and must prove that it is impossible to use as a firearm. After proof has been given, the citizen shall recieve a license for an ornamental firearm. All non-citizens may not own any type of gun, ornamental or not. However, citizens and non-citizens may own ornamental swords, or any other kind of non-firing weapon.

IV. All incoming imports shall go through an inspection to prove no illegal weapons are being smuggled in.
a. To cut down on smuggling, all airports, ports, stations and all other public transportation must be equipped with metal detectors, and X-Ray scanning equipment.

V. Any civilian caught in the possession of an unregistered firearm shall pay a fine of 2000 local credits, and face interrogation. If foung guilty in such an interrogation, he/she shall stand trial. If found guilty, the minimum is 15 years without parole.
That should have been ended with "Choose this, and watch your crime rates skyrocket!"
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #61


Proposed by: The United Nathans

Description: UN Resolution #61: Abortion Rights (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The UN,

ACKNOWLEDGING that the only differences between an unborn child and an infant who has left the womb are age and location,
Not really,
RECOGNISING that no human being owns another, hence that no mother has the right to decide to have her child killed, and that abortion practices are repulsive,

RECOGNISING also that abortions are traumatic to potential mothers and can lead to serious depression afterwards, as well as being damaging to the mother's reproductive system, in many cases leading to later infertility when a child is wanted,
Depression? You think carrying the child to term would make her feel better?

ACKNOWLEDGING that the grounds of disability leading to abortion are seroiusly flawed, as it is insulting to disabled members of society, who are as valuable to any community as any able-bodied person in most ways, to tell them that they have a low quality of life,

RECOGNISING that sexual relations between those who do not want a child are irresponsible and that resulting conception is entirely the couple's fault, and not the young child's - meaning that the punishment of death should not be laid on the child,

and INSISTING on the sanctity of human life,
Sanctity?
Where?
repeals UN resolution #61 'Abortion Rights' as an immoral and senseless resolution.
Kelssek
20-02-2005, 12:26
Sorry if someone else grabbed these already.

There's only one? When did this happen??


Freedom of movement for worker

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Mikodom


If I ever meet Gambling I'll break his legs so he'll never walk again. Problem solved.


Ban Gambling

A resolution to legalize or outlaw gambling.
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Outlaw
Proposed by: Coreypar

Description: Gambling Should not be allowed to walk the cities any longer. How many have gotten the issue of children gambling. That should not even be a problem.

Approvals: 7 (Coreypar, WZ Forums, Pencil Suckers, Rossovstan, Cihlar, Gaiah, New Happyworld Land)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 139 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Mon Feb 21 2005
United Libertaria
20-02-2005, 15:54
I still think my Every Child Gets A Lolipop Act was a great idea. So was the World Cannibalism Fund. I think there are people who would pay the price of their own lives to feed the world.

Seriously, I have reintroduced the Global Library. I would appreciate support.
Neo-Anarchists
20-02-2005, 19:22
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: Popezilla

Description: I think that kids should be allowed to carry personal guns. They must have some kind of personal training. They are also required to have a permit. Kids should have guns because they need some kind of protection against rapists, gangs, and other things that are harmful to children.

Kids who violate this proposal shall face serious consequences such as:
1) Death Penalty
2) Life in Penal Colony
3) Community Service in Old Folks Home
4) Beat-Down by Chief Enforcer Joshiz0 in Region LiKnolliums!
:rolleyes:
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Metranda

Description: Many nations throughout the world control just about every aspect of their people's lives. What their job is, what they vote for, even HOW THEY FEEL.

In the sense of governmental decency I hereby propose:

1) That Dictatorships be transformed in each region of the world into any other form of rule that allows its people to make at least A decision on their own.

2) That any nation shall not have an income tax rate of 80% or more; that the people may have money of their own, that it all not go to the government.
Huh...
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Metranda

Description: UN Resolution #16 "Elimination of Bio-Weapons" is a very imperative resolution.

However, I propose that the strength of this act be increased, and that the following occurs:

1) Uranium mining be banned in all nations under the basis that Uranium can be used to create weapons with about the same impact as a bio-weapon.

2) That each nation dedicate 3-5% of its income to environmental programs as to increase the biological status of itself.

With these increased steps on Resolution #16, the world will be a safer and cleaner place for all.
This has little or nothing to do with Resolution 16, on top of the fact that you can't really change passed resolutions.
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Maltese Falcon

Description: As the UN Delegates and Members appear to be of sound mind, we question why there is a continual movement to enact resolutions and then turn around and repeal them again. This resolution hereby rescinds all previous resolutions, and allows us to start again.
:D
Beautiful Yalaluxurios
20-02-2005, 22:27
Meh, most of the Un deligtes are already old squinty and don't get much sun. S o they'll get a little more cancer. It's the price of looking good in blue. Its worth it!
hay, ley oof oz' deligits, we is col tow!!!
Neo-Anarchists
20-02-2005, 22:34
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Tresanda

Description: Governments with good economy rank should aid poor governments with money, raw materials and other donations.
Say, that's a good idea. You should write a proposal about it!
Flibbleites
20-02-2005, 22:37
Category: Recreational Drug Use


Decision: Promote


Proposed by: Unlasting Joy

Description: It's like food you choose not to like. How do you know it's bad if you dont try it? But why im trying to pass here is not that you should try drugs rather to use it for your own creativness. Mary Jane has brought us great minds such as J.R. Tolkien and the Beetles. If Mary Jane can help us through our writers blocks and give out brilliant ideas which we could never come to on a sober basis then I say we should pick up the joint and puff to creativness. Let the people decide for themselves wether or not it should be used for creative process. (p.s. this isnt a joke. I think this would be a good resolution, so dont just dismiss this 'cause im talkin' about weed.)
Marijuana brought us J.R. Tolkien and the Beetles, just don't get them confused with J.R.R. Tolkien and The Beatles. I also like how the author claims that this proposal is not a joke, when he can't even get names right.
Neo-Anarchists
20-02-2005, 22:43
Marijuana brought us J.R. Tolkien and the Beetles, just don't get them confused with J.R.R. Tolkien and The Beatles. I also like how the author claims that this proposal is not a joke, when he can't even get names right.
Maybe it's possible the marijuana inspired him to write this resolution?
:p
The left foot
20-02-2005, 22:48
Sorry if there are DUPLICATES i didnt wanna read this whole tread again

Repeal "Required Basic Healthcare"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal


Resolution: #17


Proposed by: Schordic
Repeal "End slavery"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #6
Proposed by: The Chrisland
Description: UN Resolution #6: End slavery (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The individual nations should decide for themselves whether or not to abolish slavery. Democracy in ancient Greek means people power or government. The Chrisland does not support slavery but it does support the right to choose the rout a rout for their nation. If a country gets to zealous about slaves and masters, eventually the people will abolish slave labor. Instead of forcing nations to do the rigt thing(opinion) we should let them figure this out on their own. Perhaps we can regulate the treatment of enslaved peoples.
Approvals: 4 (Iznogoud, Mno kee Terbel, WZ Forums, Al-Zar)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 142 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Wed Feb 23 2005

I’ll enslave you so hard it will make your rabbits hurt. *shakes fist”

Repeal All Resolutions
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.

Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Maltese Falcon
Description: As the UN Delegates and Members appear to be of sound mind, we question why there is a continual movement to enact resolutions and then turn around and repeal them again. This resolution hereby rescinds all previous resolutions, and allows us to start again.
Approvals: 2 (Pyrodex, Grays Harbor)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 144 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Wed Feb 23 2005
Ummmmm game mechanics?


Repeal "MANDATORY RECYCLING"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #13
Proposed by: Pyrodex
Description: UN Resolution #13: MANDATORY RECYCLING (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: In many cases, it takes more for energy to "recycle" paper than it does to create it from trees, and under current UN management laws, trees are plentiful and a wholly renewable resource, not in danger of annihilation.

Also, there is no specification of what kind of "batteries" are to be recycled. Many small, cheap batteries are not recyclable.

Paper, Glass, and Aluminum are harmless to the environment, and can be disposed of without harming nature. If disposed of properly, batteries are harmless as well.

This resolution is poorly worded, gives no instruction on how "recycling" is to be carried out, and therefore has no power.
Approvals: 2 (Pyrodex, Grays Harbor)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 144 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Wed Feb 23 2005
“Paper, Glass, and Aluminum are harmless to the environment, and can be disposed of without harming nature. If disposed of properly, batteries are harmless as well.”

Ummmmm who told you that?

In many cases, it takes more for energy to "recycle" paper than it does to create it from trees, and under current UN management laws, trees are plentiful and a wholly renewable resource, not in danger of annihilation

wait so let me get this straight you want to repeal The current management laws that make trees plentiful to kill them and you are supporting this by saying that it won’t matter because we have trees? Ever heard of Cause and effect?

Note this was proposed by a person called pyrodex which is a substitute for gun powder. Hmmmmmmmmm

Stay At Home 'Mary Jane'
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.

Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Legalize
Proposed by: Civil Cow
Description: The Disputed Territories of Civil Cow feel that marijuana should be like cigarretes, in which ways that it is legal if you are 20, that it only be done in areas which allow it. And only in confined areas so smoke does not reach outside.

RECOGNISING that it will cause harm to young children if they are near it

SOLVING many health related problems
Approvals: 1 (Memorial Park)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 145 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Wed Feb 23 2005
Hear the cows? I think they’re saying “Moo”

The Global Currency Act
A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.

Category: Free Trade
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Templarnia
Description: IN AN EFFORT TO:
i: Increase global commerce
ii: Reduce the hassles of international travel

THE PEOPLE OF TEMPLARNIA propose that the UN enact a resolution setting a global currency, that is common to all UN member nations.
Approvals: 2 (Wattos, Ghidora)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 144 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Wed Feb 23 2005
Game mechanics and if it is a UN currency how is that global. Not all countries are Un and not all Un are on planets.

Right to Creative Thinking
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.

Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Promote
Proposed by: Unlasting Joy
Description: It's like food you choose not to like. How do you know it's bad if you dont try it? But why im trying to pass here is not that you should try drugs rather to use it for your own creativness. Mary Jane has brought us great minds such as J.R. Tolkien and the Beetles. If Mary Jane can help us through our writers blocks and give out brilliant ideas which we could never come to on a sober basis then I say we should pick up the joint and puff to creativness. Let the people decide for themselves wether or not it should be used for creative process. (p.s. this isnt a joke. I think this would be a good resolution, so dont just dismiss this 'cause im talkin' about weed.)
Approvals: 0
Status: Lacking Support (requires 146 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Wed Feb 23 2005
That’s the fifth pothead with a M.O.S.S. proposal I have read today. Im not dismissing it cause its about wee. I’m dismissing it cause it is a moss proposal.

Social Aid
A resolution to reduce income inequality and increase basic welfare.

Category: Social Justice
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Tresanda
Description: Governments with good economy rank should aid poor governments with money, raw materials and other donations.
Approvals: 1 (Incarnatia)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 145 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Wed Feb 23 2005

Okay ill give you a penny a clump of iron and a rock. Have fun.

Repeal "Required Basic Healthcare"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #17
Proposed by: Schordic
Description: UN Resolution #17: Required Basic Healthcare (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Noticing that this resolution was in fact replaced by "Replacement for RBH", this resolution is therefore null-and-void. This action should have been done awhile ago, and is cluttering up UN space.

President Thorlath III
The Freedom Fighter Republic of Schordic
Approvals: 1 (Flibbleites)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 145 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Wed Feb 23 2005
So wasting a week of vote time and adding another amendment somehow makes it take up less space. Say what?

That’s it so far. Have fun reading these 6 pages
Flibbleites
20-02-2005, 22:59
Repeal "Required Basic Healthcare"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #17
Proposed by: Schordic
Description: UN Resolution #17: Required Basic Healthcare (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Noticing that this resolution was in fact replaced by "Replacement for RBH", this resolution is therefore null-and-void. This action should have been done awhile ago, and is cluttering up UN space.

President Thorlath III
The Freedom Fighter Republic of Schordic
Approvals: 1 (Flibbleites)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 145 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Wed Feb 23 2005
So wasting a week of vote time and adding another amendment somehow makes it take up less space. Say what?

That’s it so far. Have fun reading these 6 pages
Speaking as the first approver (is that even a word?) of this proposal I must speak up and say that I don't feel that this one qualifies as silly. This resolution is redundant and, as mentioned, was already replaced by the resolution "RBH Replacement" therefore repealing "Required Basic Healthcare" is just cleaning up the past resolutions.
Neo-Anarchists
20-02-2005, 23:04
Speaking as the first approver (is that even a word?) of this proposal I must speak up and say that I don't feel that this one qualifies as silly. This resolution is redundant and, as mentioned, was already replaced by the resolution "RBH Replacement" therefore repealing "Required Basic Healthcare" is just cleaning up the past resolutions.
Yeah, I agree. I saw that one, and at reading the title it sounded silly, but after actually reading the proposal it makes sense.
The left foot
20-02-2005, 23:22
I guess your right. I just don't feel that it is justified to waste a week voting so that a redudant resolution can be repealed. It just seemed silly to me that to stop it from "taking up un space" it another ammentment repealing it will be added and So in other word if this passed the resolution will take up more "UN space"
Flibbleites
21-02-2005, 07:16
Here's one that qualifies primarily due to the title.
Category: Political Stability


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Bettong

Description: Description: Proposal-
To set up a covert Terrorism Committee.

Power to Include:

1) To allow local and International Authorities to enter communities which are acting in a seditious manner towards a UN government.

2) To allow a person who is not a ranking member of a UN Government to be arrested on suspicion of Terrorism by the aforementioned government who acts
a) in a seditious manner – indicating possible support for terrorist cells
b) who breaches or is believed to of breached any local or regional laws - indicating an active intent to destabilize local and regional government.

for an indefinate amount of time.

3) Instigate an act of Terrorism or Advise public of an act of Terrorism (real or feigned) within a Nation as a means of motivating the public to be compliant to local authoritioes.


The Committee is to meet once a month to determine where Terrorist activities are to be best used to for propaganda to encourage harmonious population control within UN governments as well as increaing multi-lateral communication with regard to terrorist activity.
Neo-Anarchists
21-02-2005, 16:52
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize
Proposed by: Noth1ng

Description: i think in a modern world the "dog fight" should be legal, and should be seen like a regular sport like karate or kung-fu.

we should give dogs the same right to fight against other dogs like humans fight.. since our existence the human history is made from fights and battles.

why dont have dogs the same right t fight?
"lets free the dogs fights"
Well, maybe no?
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Free Garza

Description: Income taxes shall be limited to 40% of both personal wages and corporate income, recognizing also that individuals have wages and earnings NOT income. Personal earnings shall NOT be called income.
This guy is persistant, I've seen this on about 3 or 4 times already.
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Freedomsville O Brian

Description: NOTICING that War continues on in today's world, and that there are governing bodies who send adults, young or old, married or otherwise off to fight in war; this resolution

URGES that those governing bodies in all countries of the U.N. accept the Congressional War Policy which bequests

1.) ALL children of those memebers who make up the parliament or government to sign up for any branch of the armed services.

2.) ALL soldiers within any branch of military power are to be used during a war effort, and ALL soldiers are to be used at the same time.

3.) ANY child of the governing citizens' body not willing to fight for his/her country should be placed in imprisonment during the duration of such wars.

FURTHERMORE this proposal is designed to show common citizens that the leaders of a nation are willing to be the first to help defend it.

DESIGNED to keep governing bodies from hastefully going to war and

EMPHASIZING that wars be fought more quickly to avoid such long drawn out stagnations resulting in more bloodshed.
:rolleyes:
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: Woodchipping
Proposed by: Starscreamkavu

Description: To outlaw, under pain of death, the blatant destruction of the rainforests. Global Warming is around the corner. It is time to make our stand against it. Many species have already gone extinct because of our unrelenting siege of the rainforests; we cannot stand for this! Many more are endangered, and even more are approaching that category. We ourselves will soon qualify. We must stop this. Before it is too late.
Perhaps you should write some guidelines?
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #43


Proposed by: Hapax Legomenon

Description: UN Resolution #43: Legalise Euthanasia (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The Holy Empire of Hapax Legomenon-

RECOGNIZING - The controversy behind euthanasia

SEEING - That the vote for and against this resolution had marginal distinction, and therefore perhaps a revote was needed but never given
Why in the name of the Goddess does everyone use that as an argument?
Here's a hint to everybody:
IT DOESN'T MATTER!
AFFIRMING - That many controversial topics should be left to the choices of individual nations

AFFIRMING - That free people should have a choice in all matters of their lives

YET STILL RECOGNIZING - That those suffering of a life-threatening illness as well as those closest to them may not be in the right mental condition to make a decision of euthanasia
I like that. That wold be a great way to twist words to make a repeal.
ALSO NOTING - That the nation of Grande has ceased to exist
What in the nine Hells does that have to do with anything?
FINALLY NOTING - That this proposal is filled with many argumentative fallacies specifically the fallacy of ad misericordiam, and when stripped of these is really an argument of the freedom of murder
I'm really liking how in an argument based entirely around how people suffer unnecessarily, you wave your hand and dismiss it as ad misericordiam. Oh yeah, and should people not be able to die if they want to? I don't see how you can justify that.
PROPOSES: That "Legalise Euthanasia" be repealed
Over my dead body.
Neo-Anarchists
21-02-2005, 21:00
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Pointless Islands

Description: 1 Whereas, millions of poeple die yearly from common

2 Viruses and bacteria that can be easily cured, and,

3 Whereas, the potential to save millions of lives may lie

4 In simply creating a basic health standard, and

5 Whereas, this simple health standard can be maintained

6 With very basic medical care centers located across

7 UN Member Nations,

8 Therefore, be it resolved by the United Nations here

9 Assembled that United Nations members be required to

10 Mandate a basic health standard within their countries,

11 And be it further resolved that the United Nations use

12 Foreign aid to help third world countries developed the

13 Aforementioned rights.

14 We as a race have the right to basic health, therefore

15 Let us pass this resolution to save many from problems

16 As simple as a common fever.
What is with the numbering and odd linebreaks?
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: James Ellis

Description: In the interest of reducing barriers to free trade and commerce, it seems an appropriate course of action to adopt a single unified currency throughout all united nations regions. In this way, everything will become so much simpler and easier, especially as the problem exchange rates will be overcome.

Obviously, different nations are at different stages of the economic cycle, and so it is unrealistic to think that it will be an easy transition to make. But, with a bit of effort, it should lead to economic advantages and better and easier trade and commerce.
Somehow, I think that messes with game mechanics too much to be legal. Am I right?
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: James Ellis

Description: I propose the construction of a large network of underground, and in some cases, underwater, railways in order to allow easy imports and exports from country to country.

It is well known that ferrying goods or transporting them by lorry is slow. Yet if this high-speed railway network were to be established, it would lead to a much better trade and commerce system between countries. Moreover, no one would see them, thus they would not be sores on the landscape.

This is a necessary and fundamental step in reducing the barriers to free trade and commerce.
Ellis seems to have forgotten that we all aren't on Earth.
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing
Proposed by: James Ellis

Description: There are just too many cars in the world now! It's time, for the sake of the planet, that this should stop. Therefore, I propose that all car manufacturing companies must be closed down, and instead, those involved with making cars will unite and join a world-wide project to construct a new type of environmentally friendly type of transport.

Think of all the people who must be involved in automobile manufacturing. If they all worked together in some global company, then it would not take long before some new mode of stunning and safe transport system was designed which did not rely on fossil fuels.

This is the future!
:D
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Free Garza

Description: Any citizen of any member nation who is 16 or above may take a plurality or wives or husbands, or take as many concubines as they please, provided that such spouses or conucbines are 16 or above and give their free consent.
What about other races?
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: The free carolinas

Description: The United Nations and its member states shall be empowered to regulate the use, placement, and existence of commercial Internet advertising applications including, but not limited to, pop-ups, pop-unders, adware, spyware, and spam.
This guy again...
Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing


Proposed by: Aloradoona

Description: We must limit the circulation of the most polluting vehicles on the roads today!

These gas-guzzling monsters are a hazard to the environment, to the driver and to the motorists with whom they share the road.

Plans include banning SUVs from city centres during peak pollution periods. Owners of SUVs in city centres will have their parking permits revoked.

Lets keep the off-roaders, off the road!
:rolleyes:

Also, what is up with this "James Ellis" and "Free Garza"?
Both of them write proposal after proposal after proposal, some of Free Grza's only being one line of text.
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 00:43
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #9
Proposed by: Fatsos Bastardos

Description: UN Resolution #9: Keep The World Disease-Free! (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Let's make it certain that people's keep their personal hygeine.
:confused:
RomeW
22-02-2005, 01:38
What is with the numbering and odd linebreaks?

Perhaps he's trying to be poetic?

Somehow, I think that messes with game mechanics too much to be legal. Am I right?

I'm not a mod, but yes you are. It changes what people can do with their nations (such as set what their country or their currency is called) and thus falls under "game mechanics violation".
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 04:20
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Backstabers

Description: I wish to propose 2 things..

1) Trade should no longer be a free and protected service.
2) Raids on caravans of traders, transport ships, cargo planes, and etc. should no longer be illegal.
Private enterprise should be employed to secure cargo. Thus creating more jobs.
Loads o' fun!
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Noxx

Description: International currency

To have an interrnational currency would make trading and traveling a lot easier. If the whole world would use the same money the world would not only be better but also smaler, why not?
Hey, that's the second one today!
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #7
Proposed by: Conservative Democrats

Description: UN Resolution #7: Sexual Freedom (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Sexual Freedom proposes unnecessary protection in privacy from the state, which needs to know personal information for national security, and also prohibits state interest in privacy in a household for instances such as murder cases, when that information may be necessary in order to bring murderers to justice.

It is also evident that this proposal does not only prohibit the interest of the state in matters such as sexual freedom, but ANYTHING that goes on under roof of two or more consenting adults, which would include illegal drug and gambling operations.

I urge the UN to repeal this resolution.
:confused:
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Korstan

Description: The Indentured Servitude Resolution will create a better program for Capitolism to surive in today's low income world.

1) Any person in debt of a large amount will be held accountable for his/her debt.
2) Corporations will employ those who owe money to pay it back by working off their debt to the company.
3) After their services are completed they are to be given a chance to work for that company.


This resolution will in turn increase profits amongst corporations and nations of socialist qualities.
What is "Capitolism"?
RomeW
22-02-2005, 04:58
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Backstabers

Description: I wish to propose 2 things..

1) Trade should no longer be a free and protected service.
2) Raids on caravans of traders, transport ships, cargo planes, and etc. should no longer be illegal.
Private enterprise should be employed to secure cargo. Thus creating more jobs.
Loads o' fun!

Well, from a nation called "Backstabbers". what did you expect?



Category: Free Trade
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Noxx

Description: International currency

To have an interrnational currency would make trading and traveling a lot easier. If the whole world would use the same money the world would not only be better but also smaler, why not?

Hey, that's the second one today!

Probably from a new nation who still hasn't realized that this UN isn't the same as the real UN. *sigh*



Category: Repeal
Resolution: #7
Proposed by: Conservative Democrats

Description: UN Resolution #7: Sexual Freedom (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Sexual Freedom proposes unnecessary protection in privacy from the state, which needs to know personal information for national security, and also prohibits state interest in privacy in a household for instances such as murder cases, when that information may be necessary in order to bring murderers to justice.

It is also evident that this proposal does not only prohibit the interest of the state in matters such as sexual freedom, but ANYTHING that goes on under roof of two or more consenting adults, which would include illegal drug and gambling operations.

I urge the UN to repeal this resolution.

:confused:

Me too.



Category: Free Trade
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Korstan

Description: The Indentured Servitude Resolution will create a better program for Capitolism to surive in today's low income world.

1) Any person in debt of a large amount will be held accountable for his/her debt.
2) Corporations will employ those who owe money to pay it back by working off their debt to the company.
3) After their services are completed they are to be given a chance to work for that company.


This resolution will in turn increase profits amongst corporations and nations of socialist qualities.

What is "Capitolism"?

LOL...I didn't know there was a religion surrounding the main government building.
DemonLordEnigma
22-02-2005, 05:04
DLE has a religion based around an egotistical athiest android that some farmer dug up out of his backyard, so I'm not surprised.
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 20:31
Time for the latest installment of Silly Proposals!
And boy is this a good one!

Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Morguson

Description: Description:Eliminate Corporal Punishment
Reason:For a better community and human liberation
Eliminate Death penalty
-Even the worst people can become forgiven
Eliminate Life in Prison
You do that, sir. I'm keeping my prisons, thank you very much.
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Eric Marx

Description: Did you know that milkmen have feelings too? Don't you think that you could do just a little bit more to be kind to your milkman after all he/she does get up early every morning to provide you with a world famous drink? Just a smile would do.

I propose it should be made obligatory to smile at your milkman has he or she always smiles at you.
:p
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Death49

Description: Proposal: Guns for the citizens will be banned from being used against Governmental Officals, Police, Military etc.

Reason: How would you like it if a citizen in your nation resists arrest and fires at the police or starts up their own milita and eventually causes the collapse of your government. In the search for furthering Government control over its citizens, Guns should be limited to certain individuals.

Note: The Right to bare arms will not be taken away from citizens, just certain groups who should not be allowed to handle Guns.

How Will a Government be able to remove citizens from their homes in the middle of the night if they are all carrying Guns?
Isn't it sort of illegal already to use guns against anybody?
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: No Smiles

Description: Lets allow cocaine into our world. Come one, everybody loves a little blow. You gotta ride the white horses every once in a while so lets allow it
Such a convincing argument!
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Short idiots

Description: No more sex. SEX is bad. it is just like crack
Well, it would solve many of our problems, seeing as half the other races around would die out. More room for us!
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #91
Proposed by: Nireva

Description: UN Resolution #91: The Sex Industry Worker Act (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Lets see what this resolution did..


RECALLING resolution #46 "Legalize Prostitution" and the repeal of that resolution,

Already repealed.


AFFIRMING in accordance with the above mentioned resolution that each person has the right to decide over their own body, and has the right to sell ther body if they decide to, without government interference,

Shouldn't drugs be allowed then? No they aren't. In most of nations.


ASSUMING an increase in Sexually Transmitted Diseases, as well as an increase in crime, and higher pressure on police, in a situation where prostitution is illegal,

Well. Now the doctors get the pressure. Is that better? No, victims may die becose of that.
And I don't mean prostitutes, I other people, like someone who die in car accident, and doctors can't do their job well becose of prostitutes.


ACKNOWLEDGING that health risks exist, even with legal prostitution,

Agreed. Health risks are high. Altought, smaller in illegal prostitution, as there wouldn't be as many prostitutes.


1. DECLARES prostitution legal throughout the UN: any person who is mature ,and capable of making their own decisions may become a prosititute,

Thought they could then have their decision about drugs, and start using them? No. They don't. At least in most of nations. Like said before.


2. EMPHASIZES that legalizing prostitution must coincide with regulation from the government, such as health and safety and other employment legislation, just like any other profession,

More money from government, and many better ways to spent it. Like creating real jobs?


3. RECOMMENDS nations that want to limit prostitution to tackle the issue by its roots and create education and social programs that will give more choice to people who might want to become a prostitute,

Agreed. And many nations are doing that. But. How about, if they don't want prostitution at all? You can have them, even if this is repealed.
But, you must have them, if this is not repealed.


4. REQUESTS all nations to stimulate a clean and attractive working environment for prostitutes, and advises cooperation with the sex industry to renovate old "illegal" prostitution areas in towns and cities,

Clean an attractive? Again more money from government, which could be spent creating real jobs, so no one would need to prostitute to get money.


5. CONDEMNS child abuse and slavery in accordance with earlier UN resolutions (End slavery, Child Labor, Outlaw Pedophilia, The Child Protection Act, Ban Trafficking in Persons, etc) and advises strong punishments against people involved with these despicable crimes that explicitly are not covered by legal prostitution.

At last, something clever.


So, why this had to get passed? I have no idea, as the 5th point is already in use. Even if this is repealed.

Well. This legalizes, or should we say FORCES, prostitution, but, even without this resolution, you could have prostitutes in your nation.
But lets assume, that you don't want prostitution, this resolution FORCED you to allow it.
This just has so many things wrong with it that I don't know where to start.
Neo-Anarchists
22-02-2005, 23:25
Category: International Security
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: USSR 2

Description: it is only a matter of time before life is found outside the Earth and with our space travil technology it looks like these lifeforms will be finding us first.

but the question is will this life be friendly will it want peace, will it want to live on our world and learn about the Human race there is a slim chance it could happen, unfortunatly there is a stronger chance that these alien lifeforms will force the landing of an army on earth maybe to inslave the human race our maybe to destoy the earth. THIS IS A RISK WE CAN NOT AFFORD TO MAKE !

1. so i say we conbind our skills and man power to create an earth army in times of crisis, no matter who is at war is at war with who at the time, we sould come together as one to protect the Earth. one Earth one giant nation.

2. 2nd we should try and stop these invaders from even landing on the Earth by building Earth defences which would consist of 12 space stations circling the earth, all equiped with powerful lazer conons and state of the art space travil technology. better to be safe than sorry.

who knows after working together it could bring the world closer to world peace maybe even actieving it.
:D
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Rovamania

Description: I think that all civilians should be banned from having any type of gun at all. This would decrease the risk of gun based crimes, and the risk of police officers or soldiers being shot by civilians. Arms manufacturing companies would also be able to focus more on making law enforcement and military arms rather than arms for civilian use.
Which would make it so only law enforcement and criminals would have guns, and only powerful guns.
Fun fun fun!
RomeW
23-02-2005, 00:16
An astronomer once pointed out that all anyone can see from space is barren land (and, well, The Great Wall of China, but that's different). Thus, aliens probably would pass by Earth, see nothing, and move on. The "Independence Day"-like event just simply won't happen.
DemonLordEnigma
23-02-2005, 00:34
An astronomer once pointed out that all anyone can see from space is barren land (and, well, The Great Wall of China, but that's different). Thus, aliens probably would pass by Earth, see nothing, and move on. The "Independence Day"-like event just simply won't happen.

Not even the Wall can be seen from space, according to the last thing I saw NASA say about it. Apparently, it's a myth that has been propagated for several decades with no one realizing it is such.

From space, all planets look barren. Any intelligent alien race would actually investigate if they saw or detected water.

Edit: Oh, the lights of some of our larger cities can be seen from space. Those would be a dead giveaway to an alien race.
RomeW
23-02-2005, 01:00
Not even the Wall can be seen from space, according to the last thing I saw NASA say about it. Apparently, it's a myth that has been propagated for several decades with no one realizing it is such.

Really? Interesting...I wonder what we saw before. The human eye can be a trickster, though (which explains the cannals on Mars).

From space, all planets look barren. Any intelligent alien race would actually investigate if they saw or detected water.

Edit: Oh, the lights of some of our larger cities can be seen from space. Those would be a dead giveaway to an alien race.

Well, that would be assuming the alien race has a use for water or lights. You never know- an alien race may depend on gold to breathe, and may abhor water. My personal belief is that if we were to come across an alien race, they would exhibit characteristics that we would not recognize, probably even to the point where the conditions for their life would threaten a human's. The "humanoid" idea only comes because that's all we know, but there's the catch- that's all we know. There could be something radically different out there, something that we never thought could actually live- we just haven't found it yet.
DemonLordEnigma
23-02-2005, 01:08
Really? Interesting...I wonder what we saw before. The human eye can be a trickster, though (which explains the cannals on Mars).

Actually, I think it's due to the myth being around before people went to space. The minds of the astronauts merely did the rest.

Well, that would be assuming the alien race has a use for water or lights. You never know- an alien race may depend on gold to breathe, and may abhor water. My personal belief is that if we were to come across an alien race, they would exhibit characteristics that we would not recognize, probably even to the point where the conditions for their life would threaten a human's. The "humanoid" idea only comes because that's all we know, but there's the catch- that's all we know. There could be something radically different out there, something that we never thought could actually live- we just haven't found it yet.

If they are capable of space travel, they're likely to know that some lifeforms require water to exist. A planet with as much water as ours has would automatically be of interest then, even if just for the possibilities. When they approached, the obviously artficial items in space and the lights that are obviously not natural would be big hints.
RomeW
23-02-2005, 01:28
Actually, I think it's due to the myth being around before people went to space. The minds of the astronauts merely did the rest.

I'll have to verify this, but this is a plausible explanation.

If they are capable of space travel, they're likely to know that some lifeforms require water to exist. A planet with as much water as ours has would automatically be of interest then, even if just for the possibilities. When they approached, the obviously artficial items in space and the lights that are obviously not natural would be big hints.

Maybe, maybe not. Remember, just because they are able to go across space doesn't mean that they would have seen everything or know everything about the Universe. Just how we've had nautical ships for thousands of years but (depending on your interpretation) only knew of North America for roughly a thousand years- we had the capabilities to go long distances but we didn't know everything about our planet right after gaining those capabilities; and, hey, an alien may think those lights are natural- remember, it all boils down to a chemical reaction, which can be natural (although they may gather that it isn't because of what is surrounding us).

Though, regardless, even if aliens would know of our existence, I doubt they'd want to "do something about us", at least the way it's presented in the movies. I mean, if they're looking for resources there's plenty in the Solar System, and all theirs for the taking. Plus, we've done a pretty good job at destroying our planet, so who knows how much worth it has to aliens? I also doubt that an intelligent alien force would just simply mindlessly attack us when we haven't provoked them nor tried to (though, mind you, that's pretty much what the Europeans did in North America). I don't know- I'd like to think an advanced alien society wouldn't target a puny planet like Earth when there are more likely bigger and better fish to catch in the Universe.
DemonLordEnigma
23-02-2005, 01:38
I'll have to verify this, but this is a plausible explanation.

It's how I explain it.

Maybe, maybe not. Remember, just because they are able to go across space doesn't mean that they would have seen everything or know everything about the Universe. Just how we've had nautical ships for thousands of years but (depending on your interpretation) only knew of North America for roughly a thousand years- we had the capabilities to go long distances but we didn't know everything about our planet right after gaining those capabilities; and, hey, an alien may think those lights are natural- remember, it all boils down to a chemical reaction, which can be natural (although they may gather that it isn't because of what is surrounding us).

That would work if Earth wasn't out in the middle of nowhere. We're pretty much in a dead zone when it comes to life. If they come here, they're probably experienced.

Though, regardless, even if aliens would know of our existence, I doubt they'd want to "do something about us", at least the way it's presented in the movies. I mean, if they're looking for resources there's plenty in the Solar System, and all theirs for the taking. Plus, we've done a pretty good job at destroying our planet, so who knows how much worth it has to aliens? I also doubt that an intelligent alien force would just simply mindlessly attack us when we haven't provoked them nor tried to (though, mind you, that's pretty much what the Europeans did in North America). I don't know- I'd like to think an advanced alien society wouldn't target a puny planet like Earth when there are more likely bigger and better fish to catch in the Universe.

I agree. Earth, as a planet, is at best a curiousity. And that's it.
RomeW
23-02-2005, 01:58
That would work if Earth wasn't out in the middle of nowhere. We're pretty much in a dead zone when it comes to life. If they come here, they're probably experienced.

True, but the question is, "why would they come?" I'd think an advanced alien civilization would do a lot better exploiting what's around them than some little planet on the edge of the Milky Way. Heck, if what scientists are saying is true (that the conditions that allow for an "Earth" is so small that's only likely a galaxy would have just one "Earth" of their own, if that), then it makes an interstellar voyage of that magnitude not worthwhile. They'd have better success plumbing their own backyard than going to some galaxy to subdue a little planet.

Though I want to know DLE, do you believe humans, if they ever go to space, will try to push around the aliens like the Europeans did to the rest of the world in the 19th century? Or would we show more respect this time?
Neo-Anarchists
23-02-2005, 02:12
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Mists of Alverdia

Description: All guns should be completely removed from the public.

Guns help to create an unsafe society, in which there are more crimes, murders, etc., committed.

This decrees that guns only have a place in the military and law enforcement (in extreme cases only so as they would not easily be stolen) and do not need to be used by civilians for any reason.

With the high quality standards of our nations there is no need to use them for hunting. Hunting is merely a sport now, and an unnecessary one at that. Plenty of food is provided by farms and hunting is simply wasting food. And the food cannot always be cleaned properly as if it were regulated by FDA. Besides, people would still be able to continue hunting with bows and arrows.

Hereby, there is a COMPLETE BAN ON GUN OWNERSHIP by citizens not involved in the armed forces or law enforcement.

Note:Law enforcement only refers to police officers.

-The Society
The bit in bold is the silly part. The military only having weapons "in extreme cases"?
No thanks.
RomeW
23-02-2005, 02:23
The bit in bold is the silly part. The military only having weapons "in extreme cases"?
No thanks.

Extreme cases, eh?

"Men. Today we face the biggest battle of our lives. We're going to storm their beaches, take their fortress and claim the land in the name of our great nation! They may have artillery, missiles, tanks, machine guns and cannons, but that's okay, because we have our fists. Let's go get 'em boys!"

*shakes head*
The left foot
23-02-2005, 03:17
I dont care if that passes im keeping my "gunpowder powered metal centrifugal cylinder high velocity expulsion device" :mp5:
DemonLordEnigma
23-02-2005, 04:24
True, but the question is, "why would they come?" I'd think an advanced alien civilization would do a lot better exploiting what's around them than some little planet on the edge of the Milky Way. Heck, if what scientists are saying is true (that the conditions that allow for an "Earth" is so small that's only likely a galaxy would have just one "Earth" of their own, if that), then it makes an interstellar voyage of that magnitude not worthwhile. They'd have better success plumbing their own backyard than going to some galaxy to subdue a little planet.

Keep in mind science also used to say the giant squid is a physical impossibility and has a bad track record when it comes to getting what is and what isn't physically possible on a topic at first. Take what they say with an ocean of salt on this one.

Though I want to know DLE, do you believe humans, if they ever go to space, will try to push around the aliens like the Europeans did to the rest of the world in the 19th century? Or would we show more respect this time?

Humanity? Respect? Please. It wasn't that long ago the U.S. was having race riots because of people being treated unfairly due to their skin color. I seriously doubt humanity will improve farther in the next century than it has in the previous 10,000 years.
Crydonia
23-02-2005, 04:52
This one is'nt so much silly, as downright hilarious, I cracked up laughing when I read it. The author does'nt leave any doubts what his/her feelings are :D.

Repeal "Protect Historical Sites"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal


Resolution: #15


Proposed by: Drunkatopia

Description: UN Resolution #15: Protect Historical Sites (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Isn't this a decision that each individual country should decide for itself?

We, the intoxicated people of Drunkatopia, feel these resolutions are becoming entirely too @#$%&* intrusive and that the UN has no @#$%&* business making resolutions that don't effect the world has a whole.

If we want to tear down or convert a @#$%&* Buddhist temple into a @#$%&* Pizza Parlor then that’s our @#$%&* business (for @#$%&* sake, we don’t have drug laws here and have some severe cases of the munchies!!!!).

Approvals: 3 (Mno kee Terbel, RichyWorld, WZ Forums)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 143 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Fri Feb 25 2005
Enn
23-02-2005, 06:29
True, but the question is, "why would they come?" I'd think an advanced alien civilization would do a lot better exploiting what's around them than some little planet on the edge of the Milky Way. Heck, if what scientists are saying is true (that the conditions that allow for an "Earth" is so small that's only likely a galaxy would have just one "Earth" of their own, if that), then it makes an interstellar voyage of that magnitude not worthwhile. They'd have better success plumbing their own backyard than going to some galaxy to subdue a little planet.

Though I want to know DLE, do you believe humans, if they ever go to space, will try to push around the aliens like the Europeans did to the rest of the world in the 19th century? Or would we show more respect this time?
Hope you don't mind me adding my opinion. I think that humans would probably be respectful of an alien society, provided that such a society was extremely advanced militarily. The respect wouldn't last long, of course, only until humanity had come up with some method of countering the military advantage. Then it would be business as usual.
As to what would happen if humans came into contact with a peaceful alien society, I really wouldn't want to know.
Flibbleites
23-02-2005, 06:35
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Calculators

Description: NOTICING: That there is a sex difference between men and women where women wear women's clothes and men wear men's clothes.

RECOGNIZING: That some men amight want to wear ladies clothes and not be considered a transexual. And the other way around for women.

THINGS PROPOSAL WILL CHANGE:
1. One toilet for all sexes.

2. No women's clothes or men's clothes just clothes. So a man can wear a ladies G-string without being considered a weirdo. And women can wear a man's boxers (for example).

3. No more sex discrimination in jobs. (if so there will be severe punishment).
In reference to point 2, if I find out that a guy is wearing a ladies G-string, I'm going to consider him a weirdo and I don't give a damn what the UN says about it.
Enn
23-02-2005, 06:45
THINGS PROPOSAL WILL CHANGE:
1. One toilet for all sexes.

2. No women's clothes or men's clothes just clothes. So a man can wear a ladies G-string without being considered a weirdo. And women can wear a man's boxers (for example).

3. No more sex discrimination in jobs. (if so there will be severe punishment).
1. With the notable exception of port-a-loos, no-one will ever use a joint toilet. They just won't.
2. Agreed with Flibbleites.
3. What about things like actors? Are you seriously suggesting we can have a male Lady Macbeth, or a female Romeo? How's that going to work?
Flibbleites
23-02-2005, 06:49
3. What about things like actors? Are you seriously suggesting we can have a male Lady Macbeth, or a female Romeo? How's that going to work?
I don't know, back in Shakespeare's day all the parts were played by men.
Nargopia
23-02-2005, 06:50
3. No more sex discrimination in jobs. (if so there will be severe punishment).

"Severe punishment?" I'm shaking in my pumps.
Nargopia
23-02-2005, 06:52
I don't know, back in Shakespeare's day all the parts were played by men.
Yeah, and what did the men have to do to play the part of a woman? Get his genitals removed.
Enn
23-02-2005, 06:55
I don't know, back in Shakespeare's day all the parts were played by men.
Somehow knew someone would point that out. But would it be acceptable today?
In any case, the Lady Macbeth I mentioned wasn't meant to be Shakespeare's, instead Shostakovich's. You know, the opera. I'm really not sure there'd be many men willing to audition for an operatic soprano solo.
RomeW
23-02-2005, 08:21
Keep in mind science also used to say the giant squid is a physical impossibility and has a bad track record when it comes to getting what is and what isn't physically possible on a topic at first. Take what they say with an ocean of salt on this one.

I'm not one to say that science is bad and can't ever be trusted, but this is one of those things I hope they're wrong about- I mean, I'd hate to be alone in this galaxy.. :S

Humanity? Respect? Please. It wasn't that long ago the U.S. was having race riots because of people being treated unfairly due to their skin color. I seriously doubt humanity will improve farther in the next century than it has in the previous 10,000 years.

Hope you don't mind me adding my opinion. I think that humans would probably be respectful of an alien society, provided that such a society was extremely advanced militarily. The respect wouldn't last long, of course, only until humanity had come up with some method of countering the military advantage. Then it would be business as usual.
As to what would happen if humans came into contact with a peaceful alien society, I really wouldn't want to know.

I agree slightly more with Enn because I'll agree that we'll give respect to people who are "better" than us, though it's nice to know I'm not the only one who thinks the way that I did- and it's something I fear, actually. Who knows what can of worms we'll be opening once we try to dominate the aliens? Do we really want to know? That is, of course, assuming we don't destroy ourselves first.
Neo-Anarchists
23-02-2005, 09:45
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Outlaw
Proposed by: Anti-Republics

Description: if we can outlaw gambling to all that means that the world would be a safer and less corupt place but at the rate we are going if people keep gambling they will drive nations down and that world economy down with. i say if we can stop gambling now we might be able to streghten the worlds future
Regards Anti-republics
:confused:
Neo-Anarchists
23-02-2005, 22:22
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #82
Proposed by: The Cassiopeia Galaxy

Description: UN Resolution #82: Stem Cell Research Funding (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Stem Cell Research is to costly, millions of Dollars wasted. and The Stem Cell are to come from Aborted Fetis! also Stem Cell research is one step away from Human Cloneing

I ask my fellow UN Members to repeal this Act of Funding Stem Cell Research and Ban it for good!
Perhaps it's a good idea to know what you're talking about before writing a proposal.
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Fritz von Splurgenhof

Description: PROBLEM: Appart from the obvious moral implications of taking a human life, thousands of lives are lost in wars every year and this can lead to all kinds of social problems.
FOR EXAMPLE: The economy may be permanently affected when people do not come back from war to work at their old jobs due to their death.
THEREFORE: I propose that some kind of war games simulation be set up, to which all nations in the UN must be assigned. Therefore all wars would be carried out virtually and there would be no need for loss of life or a need to devote budgets to millitary spending.

THIS IS NOT A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE NATURE OF THE NATION STATES GAME. IT IS A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE HOW COUNTRIES FIGHT WARS WITHIN THE VIRTUAL WORLD CREATED BY NATION STATES.

Sorry for shouting, I just don't want to have another of my proposals deleted.

Yours Faithfully
Grand Duke Fritz von Splurgenhof
Umm, huh?
:confused: :confused: :confused:
Neo-Anarchists
24-02-2005, 03:33
This one is absolute pure genius:
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #4


Proposed by: Smurfenstein

Description: UN Resolution #4: UN taxation ban (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Governments should not be allowed to stop collecting taxes simply because the country belong to a loose association of nations. This is outrageous and outdated.
Looks like somebody has no idea what they're talking about.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #91
Proposed by: Missouri YIG

Description: UN Resolution #91: The Sex Industry Worker Act (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: REALIZING THAT:
1) Prostitution is a despicable act that is degrading to the female gender.
2) Prostitution is an act that can ultimently get one, involved in the field of work, killed.
3)Prosititution is an act that can spresd STD's, not only to both parties involved, but to any children the woman may choose to have. (as there is no way to provide a "clean" or healthy work environment)
4) Prostitution is an act that distroys the sanctity of sexual intercourse and it intended purpose.
5) Sexual Intercourse is not a "toy" in which you go have it with someone you don't know every night.
6) In an effort to give our youth a happy, healthy, and prosperous life, prostitution is an act that can ultimently corrupt a child's life and have it take a turn for the worse.

REQUESTS that all UN members acknowledge the "dangers" of protitution and repeal UN Resolution #91.
Hmm, it seems like this person didn't actually read the proposal before deciding it was EEEVIL.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #59
Proposed by: Potomacia

Description: UN Resolution #59: The 40 Hour Workweek (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument:
Noting that this resolution was passed by an extremely thin margin,

The General Assembly of the United Nations hereby:

1. Repeals Resolution #59
I like that reasoning.
Oh wait, nevermind, that's not even a reason.
The Cat-Tribe
24-02-2005, 04:27
I know this is posted above, but I love how this guy learns from experience:

Originally Posted by War Games
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Fritz von Splurgenhof

Description: PROBLEM: Appart from the obvious moral implications of taking a human life, thousands of lives are lost in wars every year and this can lead to all kinds of social problems.
FOR EXAMPLE: The economy may be permanently affected when people do not come back from war to work at their old jobs due to their death.
THEREFORE: I propose that some kind of war games simulation be set up, to which all nations in the UN must be assigned. Therefore all wars would be carried out virtually and there would be no need for loss of life or a need to devote budgets to millitary spending.

THIS IS NOT A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE NATURE OF THE NATION STATES GAME. IT IS A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE HOW COUNTRIES FIGHT WARS WITHIN THE VIRTUAL WORLD CREATED BY NATION STATES.

Sorry for shouting, I just don't want to have another of my proposals deleted.

Yours Faithfully
Grand Duke Fritz von Splurgenhof

Quote:
THINGS PROPOSAL WILL CHANGE:
1. One toilet for all sexes.

2. No women's clothes or men's clothes just clothes. So a man can wear a ladies G-string without being considered a weirdo. And women can wear a man's boxers (for example).

3. No more sex discrimination in jobs. (if so there will be severe punishment).


1. With the notable exception of port-a-loos, no-one will ever use a joint toilet. They just won't.
2. Agreed with Flibbleites.
3. What about things like actors? Are you seriously suggesting we can have a male Lady Macbeth, or a female Romeo? How's that going to work?


1. [Not that I want to defend the proposed resolution, but ...] Ever been on an airplane, bus, train? Crowded stadium?
2. I wonder what the implementation woud be? Prison time for using the word "weirdo" or staring too long?
3. Been commented on enough.
Neo-Anarchists
24-02-2005, 04:43
-snip-
It was the same guy that proposed a while ago to make all people the same height.
:p
Neo-Anarchists
24-02-2005, 08:32
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Eternal kingdom

Description: Drugs is one of the worlds most popular thing for young and aged people. We must take ban all drugs and here are the reasons:

1. Drugs cause brain damage.
2. Drugs may cause death.
3. Drugs can immobolize you.
4. Drugs can inbrace are futur.
5. Drugs can create cancer and many other diseases.

These are the main purpose to ban drugs but theres many more reasons.
Judging by the complete lack of sense and the terrible spelling, I'd bet that dugs "inbraced" his/her "futur" already.
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Eternal kingdom

Description: People must help the regions and nations in struggle so that earth is a place were people are close enough equil.
:confused:
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing
Proposed by: Eternal kingdom

Description: We must do something to keep earth clean and safe, as weel have less polution in the world. To do this we must only use are feet and non-puluting vehicils. In this way we will find once more pure air on earth and an healthy world.
"Environmental forests" as opposed to non-environmental ones?
:confused:
RomeW
24-02-2005, 08:35
THIS IS NOT A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE NATURE OF THE NATION STATES GAME. IT IS A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE HOW COUNTRIES FIGHT WARS WITHIN THE VIRTUAL WORLD CREATED BY NATION STATES.

THOSE CAPITALS WILL REALLY GO OVER WELL WITH THE UN, DON'T YOU THINK?
RomeW
24-02-2005, 08:37
"Environmental forests" as opposed to non-environmental ones?
:confused:

I'd also love to find a vehicle that doesn't pollute.
Neo-Anarchists
24-02-2005, 08:45
THOSE CAPITALS WILL REALLY GO OVER WELL WITH THE UN, DON'T YOU THINK?
Because we all know that when you use caps lock, whatever you type is 15 times more true!
Neo-Anarchists
24-02-2005, 08:46
I'd also love to find a vehicle that doesn't pollute.
I still really liked "Dugs can inbrace your futur." the best.
RomeW
24-02-2005, 08:58
Because we all know that when you use caps lock, whatever you type is 15 times more true!

YOU SHOULD HAVE PUT THAT IN CAPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/end caps lock]

I still really liked "Dugs can inbrace your futur." the best.

LOL...I loved that line for another reason: it seems to state a positive effect of drugs (that they'll "embrace your future"), thus contradicting his own proposal. Thus, it becomes silly for two reasons instead of one.
Neo-Anarchists
24-02-2005, 12:55
Another batch of genius proposals!
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Legalize
Proposed by: Joedabo

Description: The world needs drugs. Without drugs we would not have a class system and without a class system, society would be in anarchy. I think that all class C drugs should be legalised for recreational use. Cannabis should be sold instead of nicotine, it is not as adictive and you get a fun effect from it. Steroids give you muscles and shrink your testicles but that is a price some may want to pay. Tranquilizers help you sleep at night. These drugs should be freely, or at a small price distributed to the public. These drugs do not do that much harm and they would ensure that the police are not wasting their time on stupid teenagers that are caught in parks smoking a joint.

We need this, not just for the UN but for the world.
Wow, that's funny! I hadn't known that drugs were the only reason we haven't fallen into chaos!
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Englandtopia

Description: So long has the human emotion been confined to the closed spaces of our houses. We should be able to express our love for eachother where ever and whenever we like. The main argument is that children will see them, well children need to learn sometimes in there life!
I demand that you legalise and enforce public showing of love for eachother, either kissing or to the extreme of sexual intercourse.

We Are Only Mammals!
:confused:
The Cat-Tribe
24-02-2005, 16:11
Talk about impeccable logic:

Repeal "Hydrogen Powered Vehicles"
A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution


Category: Repeal
Resolution: #18
Proposed by: Slimby

Description: UN Resolution #18: Hydrogen Powered Vehicles (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This resolution is impractical. Hydrogen is used as a fuel already but it is used in spacecraft. This would mean that should automobiles use hydrogen as fuel all vehicles would travel at enormous speeds, with no real method of braking.

Also, it has to be remembered why hydrogen is used in spacecraft. This is because it is highly explosive. If oil based fuels were not already dangerous enough you would be replacing them with a fuel which is more explosive and requires less heat to ignite.

Whilst Slimby RECOGNISES that this would reduce pollution it is purely idealistic thinking with to many shortfallings that these vehicles cannot be created.

Approvals: 1 (Radona)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 145 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Feb 27 2005
Texan Hotrodders
24-02-2005, 16:15
Talk about impeccable logic:

My head hurts after reading that. Hydrogen = fast & no brakes? :eek:
Neo-Anarchists
24-02-2005, 16:17
My head hurts after reading that. Hydrogen = fast & no brakes? :eek:
They seem to think hydrogen fuel=rocket cars.
Damn, after reading that I want a rocket car...
Texan Hotrodders
24-02-2005, 16:24
They seem to think hydrogen fuel=rocket cars.
Damn, after reading that I want a rocket car...

Actually, you probably don't. They tend to be...unstable.
Pterodactylus
24-02-2005, 22:01
http://img84.exs.cx/img84/9607/gunsgunsboom6jo.png

The title is hilarious.
Neo-Anarchists
25-02-2005, 01:30
If I could gain nourishment off inanity and ignorance, I would never have to eat. But until I learn to be a psychic vampire, here are some more silly proposals.
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: The Fredricks

Description: I suggest that all countrys shuold have the same type of money to make traveling easer. It would also unite the world and make it smaler. It wold be a lot easer to compare workers sallry to.
This is like the third person to propose one of these this week.
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing
Proposed by: Aldoar

Description: As we know the fast and increasing consuming/raising farm animals are destroying our water suplies and in a few years all of our suplies will be at the end! so what will we do? will we continue to eat animals and refuse the beneficts of a vegetarian alimentation?
Now, that may only seem mildly silly, but look at the industry it affects:
Automobile Manufacturing.
Since when do you farm in car factories?
:confused:
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Babbabooey

Description: the right to marry as many people as one wants
:p
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #43
Proposed by: Benignant Neglect

Description: UN Resolution #43: Legalise Euthanasia (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This resolution violates the right to life of those who have died by euthanasia. In many cases, this privilege has been abused, especially by those offering said "professional medical advice." This resolution allows for too much room for improper usage as well, which also endangers the lives of those "suffering."

I move to repeal this resolution immediately on the grounds that it contains no measures guaranteeing the rights and protection to life for those who may be euthanized against their consent or wishes, as they battle life-threatening diseases. I also move to repeal this resolution because it is entirely based on emotional appeals, and laws are supposed to be based on logic and reasoning, not emotions.
Hmm, when I read "Legalize Euthanasia", I couldn't wuite find where it's so open to abuse...
And how do you "violate the right to life" of people who are dead?
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Feiticeiro

Description: As all we know, use p2p it's a civil right.
So i sugest that p2p to be allowed in all the UN country members.
:confused:
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Tievan

Description: SEEING that corporations use underpaid-, child- and even slavelabour, to manufacter numerous products.

SEEING that workers are abused and beaten, if their work is flawed.

SEEING that workers are forced to work untill late in the evening, and without vacation, or even breaks.

SEEING that poor workplace security causes thousands of victims each year.

DEMANDING that this has to be stopped.

DEMANDING flat 8 hour workdays and 5 day workweeks, globaly, on all sectors.

DEMANDING a minimum vage, that all companies must pay their workers, and wich have to be rised after 2 years service.

DEMANDING stop to child labour, DEMANDING that under 15 year-olds cannot be hired to heavy physical work that contains usage of machinery, only customer service, or light storage work and DEMANDING that no person under 18 is to work in heavy industry.

DEMANDING ethical treatment of workers. The employers, as well as the co-workers, are not allowed to assault a worker, physically nor mentally.

DEMANDING 6 weeks worth of vacation, that can be split up BY THE WORKER throughout the year. The employer will have the right to discuss and negotiate the time of the vacation.

DEMANDING that the pregnant and seriously ill are allowed to stay out of work, untill they are working fit again.

DEMANDING better healthcare and better, safer working conditions.

DEMANDING extra pay to those who work longer than the regulated 8 hours.

DEMANDING this on all countries, and in all trades.

DEMANDING of closing down all plants, factories, plantings and offices and other workplaces that fail to meet these DEMANDS.
Hmm, most if not all of that has already been covered.
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Eternal kingdom

Description: today kids from 10 to 16 smoke drugs like weed or cigarretes. For them smocking is a great thing, but it isn't. When kids smoke their lungs becomes infected and it may cause death by diseases like cancer or even brain disruption this is why us, nations and regions, must colie and ban this abuse.
:rolleyes:
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #81


Proposed by: Waju

Description: UN Resolution #81: Definition of Marriage (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: RECOGNIZING that marriage is an institution that differs not only from country to country, but culture to culture.

CITING that marriage was an institution that has been proven to have existed since human society has developed

RECOGNIZING that marriage has evolved differently in different areas


THIS RESOLUTION calls for the repeal of United Naitons Resoltuion #81 "Definition of Marriage"

IN FAVOR OF a resolution that would protect, not define, the instituion of marriage.

CITING that marriage laws, customs, and practices are not universal.

EXPOSING the clause that states that, "FURTHER RECOGNIZES all nation's right to expand this definition beyond species borders as the individual governments see fit." as a loophole to bypass animal protection laws.
-CITING that the intentions or wishes of animals to marry humans cannot be determined


THE NOMADIC PEOPLES OF WAJU call for all nations to repeal this resolution in favor of another.
This one is here because of the rather funny misunderstanding in the end, wher s/he thinks the proposal was designed specifically to allow bestiality with that clause.
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #91


Proposed by: Kreen

Description: UN Resolution #91: The Sex Industry Worker Act (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Recalling the Sex Industry Act

1. Prostitution has been considered immoral by many and should not be promoted.

2. Ever heard of STD's? Well no matter the amount of regulations they will still run rampant, how long does an HIV check up take? Only about 24 hours but how many times could a prostitute have sex in that time? Also it takes about six months for the anti-bodies which are used for the scan to show up making the test faulty and possibly incorrect?

3. Legalizing prostitution is another way if increasing illegal drug use. This affects not only the populace but also the economy, who wants to find a factory worker who has a part time job as a gay stoned prostitute? Medical studies show that people who have low self esteem are more likely to take drugs, and what is prostitution but a way of saying that you have low self esteem.

4. Big business/corporations and CEOs already take advantages of loopholes in the tax structure, what makes you think that Pimps and prostitution will be any different?

5. Resolution #91 denies the right of all nations to decide for themselves whether they want prostitution to be legal.

THEREFORE, THIS PROPOSAL HEREBY RENDERS RESOLUTION #91 TO BE NULL, VOID, AND IRRELEVANT IN ALL UN MEMBER NATIONS.
Mein Gott in Himmel, I could swear I've seen this exact same proposal thrice before.
Category: Gun Control


Decision: Tighten


Proposed by: International Crap

Description: Guns are nothing but a dangerous and leathel weapon! Why then is it legal in certain countries for a man to walk down the street with a gun in his hand?

Guns do nothing but harm people! There are many people carrying a gun who do not fully-understand the power and the danger of the weapon! As soon as the power is not apprietiated, lives are lost!

In certain areas you can find a gun shop on street corners where you can walk in, purchase a gun, and walk out again, fully-armed! Anybody can get a hold of a gun which is why I propose they are banned!

I do indeed realize that the banning of guns will not end the problem, but it will be a start!
eg, drugs are banned but people still aquire and use them. But lets imagine that these drugs were legal! Eeverybody would have them and the death rate will be catastrophic! The same will happen with the guns! If they are banned the situation will be immensly impsroved untill, eventually, thay are non-existent!

Now it is extremely easy to get hold of a gun! But I never thought that a bank would offer you one! That's right, a ban can offer you a gun to join their bank! Now they will give you the gun as soon as you sign up for the account! They will give it to you over the counter, fully-loaded! That would, of course, allow the bearer to use the gun to brake into a vault!

It's a world that nobody wants, but nobody is willing to change it! Ban the guns for a safer tomorrow!
:rolleyes:
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #6


Proposed by: Canada 60 Years Back

Description: UN Resolution #6: End slavery (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Being for or against slavery is very much a personal decision. Though seen as an archaic form of mass labor, it has many merits and is greatly effcient

RECOGNISING: That slaves need basic rights (food, shelter etc) and those MUST be provided

BELEIVING: that NO child under ANY circumstances should be born into slavery, unless he/she commits a crime, then shall be sent back to parent's owner

Many multi-national companies hold their poorly paid employees in far worse conditions than the Greek, Roman, Egyptian, Chinese, or Southern slave owners kept their slaves

Slaves must be purchased from criminals, no regular person shall be sold as a slave

Slave owners MUST NOT hit, torture, or burtally torture their slaves

Individual UN nations may not choose to use this resolution
I like how the last line sort of makes it a little bit illegal.
Flibbleites
25-02-2005, 07:27
Hmm, when I read "Legalize Euthanasia", I couldn't wuite find where it's so open to abuse...
And how do you "violate the right to life" of people who are dead?

Actually If I remember correctly right after this was passed there was a nation that was abusing this resolution in such a way that they basically killed off a lot of their population. I wish I could remember the nations name, if anyone can think of it let me know.


Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Eternal kingdom

Description: today kids from 10 to 16 smoke drugs like weed or cigarretes. For them smocking is a great thing, but it isn't. When kids smoke their lungs becomes infected and it may cause death by diseases like cancer or even brain disruption this is why us, nations and regions, must colie and ban this abuse.Don't you realize how great it is to smock? I know I like to smock stupid proposals.:D

Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Uranium Mining


Proposed by: The maker Iluvatar

Description: In Reaction to the Repeal of act 86 I propose that all nations contribute to a World library to further educate those who have no acces to any others also i propose The contibuting nations will send there best peace of written literature/work to the library to be placed on display to show the greatnes of all cultures and nations.

Bennefits: Will bring all nations closer to each other through the strive for education. As time and technology progreses we wil be able tyo expand the content of the library and the way of storing and researchig in it
First off, I'd love to see the logic behind this being an envrionmental resolution let alone one which affects uranium mining. Secondly the author apperently can't even spell library. And finally the author thought this proposal was so nice that they proposed it twice the second time catagorized under Furtherment of Democracy/Strong.

Category: Repeal


Resolution: #75


Proposed by: Mugopia

Description: UN Resolution #75: The Nuclear Terrorism Act (Category: International Security; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Nations should have the right to own nuclear weapons for better self protection!And where in the resolution does it say that we can't have nukes?


Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Nowitzkland

Description: The Death Penalty is wrong and should not be used to hold people in jail for life:
I: Most of our countries and regions are against euthenasia

II: Jail is a place of rebirth, it is there to send you out into the world as a better person.

III. I declare that the maximum sentence in all countries must be 30 years, and this must be only for treason.

IV. 25 Years for First Degree Murder

V. Robbery 10 Years

VI. Children should never get more than 10 years, a child does not have the brain capability to realize what they are doing.

VII. The exception to this rule is rape, all those who rape must have to spend life in prison. No execution or anything, just rot away. Because people they have raped are scared for life.

Please realize the importance of this, and put yourself in this position.
A robbery and your locked up for 30 years, doesnt make sense! Follow me and do the right thing, for all those who are wrongly jailed.Fine all murderer in my nation will now be charged with raping a person of their life and can recieve life inprisonment :rolleyes:

Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing


Proposed by: Elanos

Description: The pollution caused by automobiles affects the citizens of every nation in the world. As a result, it is only fair to give a global, rather than national, incentive to reduce automible use.

The revenues from this tax will be used for global environmental efforts, with a focus on repairing the damages caused to the environment by mining and drilling operations.Say it with me everybody, illegal under the resolution "UN taxation ban"
Krioval
25-02-2005, 07:33
THEREFORE, THIS PROPOSAL HEREBY RENDERS RESOLUTION #91 TO BE NULL, VOID, AND IRRELEVANT IN ALL UN MEMBER NATIONS.

If something is made null, doesn't that imply that it's also void? Further, I think that once something is essentially annihilated, the issue of relevance is effectively made moot.
RomeW
25-02-2005, 07:48
Actually If I remember correctly right after this was passed there was a nation that was abusing this resolution in such a way that they basically killed off a lot of their population. I wish I could remember the nations name, if anyone can think of it let me know.

Joccia. I know because I participated in the thread and talked with him for a while. I think how he got around the Resolution was the clause allowing someone else to pull the plug (I think the doctor), so his nation simply had about 30,000 people (including prostitutes and homeless people) declared "sick" and euthanized.
Flibbleites
25-02-2005, 07:50
Joccia. I know because I participated in the thread and talked with him for a while. I think how he got around the Resolution was the clause allowing someone else to pull the plug (I think the doctor), so his nation simply had about 30,000 people (including prostitutes and homeless people) declared "sick" and euthanized.
Thank you, I knew sombody would remember.
RomeW
25-02-2005, 07:58
Thank you, I knew sombody would remember.

You're welcome. It was one of the very first RP's I really took part in.

Say, do you remember what day was your first post? I noticed you joined the same month I did. I started the 22nd of January.
Flibbleites
25-02-2005, 08:04
You're welcome. It was one of the very first RP's I really took part in.

Say, do you remember what day was your first post? I noticed you joined the same month I did. I started the 22nd of January.
No I don't. I remember that the first resolution I voted on was Internet Advertising Pop-ups but all I can remember about when I first posted was that it was before the move to Jolt, back when we had to fight the forums in order to do anything.:D
Enn
25-02-2005, 08:28
I vaguely remember back then. The first one I voted on was the Euthanasia resolution, but that was with another nation. I think my first as Enn was Fair Treatment of Mentally Ill. God, it seems like such a long time ago now.
RomeW
25-02-2005, 08:34
No I don't. I remember that the first resolution I voted on was Internet Advertising Pop-ups but all I can remember about when I first posted was that it was before the move to Jolt, back when we had to fight the forums in order to do anything.:D

Ah, yes, the days of having quintruple posts...now replaced by the days of "Jolt just ate my message!"
Crydonia
25-02-2005, 11:05
Public Nudity Ban

A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Rajinistan

Description: This is an act to declare a ban on public nudity and its effect on the public. This is a health issue as well as an educational and mental issue. This i ask for on three points of arguments:

-it affects the minds of young children who may witness this action
-it provides an opportunity for people to be unequal
-it opposes the concept of human domination of the planet by copying animalistic behaviour.

I will enjoy seeing any responses and await any comments/complaints.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 146 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Mon Feb 28 2005

Just found this little gem. I honestly can't see how nudity affects the "health, education and mental" of the public.

point 1 - How, except to make them more open, aware and tolerant

point 2 - :confused:

point 3 - Humans only started wearing clothes in the caveman days to protect ourselves from the cold. In my opinion, humans don't have the right to "dominate" the planet, and we are just as much animals as any other mammel. Of course this whole point either ignores other sentient species in NS, or does'nt apply to them.
Ecopoeia
25-02-2005, 13:06
Ah, yes, the days of having quintruple posts...now replaced by the days of "Jolt just ate my message!"
Ah, but the forum was so much prettier.

The absurd pop-ups resolution was my first vote as well, I think. Eco was born just before Xmas.

*gets misty-eyed*

Ah, I remember the good ol' days of Joccia and Collaboration, Berkylvania and Enodia, Lubria and MitsubishiSonyLockheed...
Thamiel
25-02-2005, 13:59
I particularly like the current proposal, he says he wishes to end beaurocratic red tape and delays, and yet he is tieing the governemts down with more of it. the repeal of the education act he is saying is just a formality, resolutions since have essentially covered what that act covered, so what does it matter?
RomeW
25-02-2005, 23:45
Ah, but the forum was so much prettier.

The absurd pop-ups resolution was my first vote as well, I think. Eco was born just before Xmas.

*gets misty-eyed*

Ah, I remember the good ol' days of Joccia and Collaboration, Berkylvania and Enodia, Lubria and MitsubishiSonyLockheed...

Prettier, yes. Though I'd rather have a fast forum than a pretty one.

I miss Enodia. Whatever happened to him?
Goobergunchia
26-02-2005, 02:59
Pffft, you newbies never got to vote on my resolution. The days of me, Stephistan, The Global Market, and other old-timers. ;P

And so the Electorate of Enodia fell to the darkness of Reality. (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=326384) Enodia being the NSer that never got on IRC that I most wanted to get on said medium of instant communication. I still miss him. :(

This has been an OOC post.
RomeW
26-02-2005, 06:10
Pffft, you newbies never got to vote on my resolution. The days of me, Stephistan, The Global Market, and other old-timers. ;P

And so the Electorate of Enodia fell to the darkness of Reality. (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=326384) Enodia being the NSer that never got on IRC that I most wanted to get on said medium of instant communication. I still miss him. :(

This has been an OOC post.

I see. Now that I see it again, maybe I did read that...hmnnn.

No, I never voted on your proposal...oh well. As far as Stephistan and The Global Market go, I've seen them around.
Kelssek
26-02-2005, 11:14
Since I was not flamed immediately after my last contribution, I assume you all enjoy my posts here and will thus force-feed you poor sods the following quality proposals.


Well, I'm convinced...


Repeal "Education For All"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #3
Proposed by: Ariatria

Description: UN Resolution #3: Education For All (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: You don't know me


...yep, I certainly am.


You Don' Me

A resolution to legalize or outlaw gambling.
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize
Proposed by: Ariatria

Description: If you don't me then you suck so know me


Now this is just dumb. In the real world you'd have to kick out all the countries which actually matter in the UN - the USA, Russia, France, the UK, China, India, Pakistan, maybe Israel and North Korea too. And North Korea provides endless entertainment value, so no way they should be kicked out.


Weapons Inspections

A resolution to slash worldwide military spending.

Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Smurfenstein

Description: To maintain world peace, the United Socialist States of Smurfenstein would like to propose a bill that would:
-Have mandatory weapons inspections every five to ten years
-Impose that if a country has nuclear arms, they are forced to leave the UN and/or totally disband their nuclear weapons program
-Require a country to shut down its weapons program if it(the weapons program) comes to harm another nation

This resolution would also help the environment, as radiation emissions would be seriously watched by the UN if this bill gets passed.


I'm felling more safe already!


Gun Control Violations

A resolution to tighten or relax gun control laws.
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Windward Steepes

Description: Violations of gun laws should be tightened so that those who believe that guns are wrong fell more safe knowing that there wont be as many violations


Sigh...

Cleaning up our acts!

A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.

Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: Fatsos Bastardos

Description: I propose that we ban drug-use alltogether and second-hand smoking aswell as making a more assaulting police force on dug-dealers & takers. This proposal means that all drugs will be banned.
OFFERS:
1. It will put crime down in our nations.
2. It will allow smoking of cigars and cigarettes only in our own homes causing better health.
3. Bettering of volcabulary.(tee hee!!)
4. Meaning your nation's economy will better due to money not being spent on drugs.
5. Drug-testing every 3 months in every medical centre.

Thank you for reading my proposal and contact me on further idea's if this proposal fails.


This is why I'm a socialist.


Repeal "End slavery"

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #6
Proposed by: Greendayia

Description: UN Resolution #6: End slavery (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: If my nation wants to have slaves why can't we? It helps develop economies and it is far from a "scourge".... If I want slaves I don't want the U.N. telling me I can't have them. I have the right to enslave anybody I want it is my nation...
Neo-Anarchists
27-02-2005, 04:24
Holy shit! I left for two days, and my thread is still alive!
That's a first!
:fluffle:

Anyway...

Category: Free Trade
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Khyshaak

Description: Seeing that many nations would benifit from free trade

Noting that trade helps everyone

Further noting that some nations may wish to protect their native industries

1. Calls for all trade barriers between nation in the same region to be reduced

2. Recognizes that if a majority of nations in a given territory vote against this resolution then it shall be null and void for that given region
It wouldn't be silly if it weren't for the fact that it doesn't really call for a specific action, and then violates game mechanics by trying to make it not affect some regions through a voting system.
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Kargan

Description: In recognizing that the world is becoming more dangerous, And that rogue elements among the global population are becoming increasingly violent, The Republic of Kargan proposes the introduction of a method to identify and track any human by way of a subdermal microchip.
Hey, it goes perfectly with that proposal "A Telescreen In Every Room"!
:D
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Tighten
Proposed by: Fatsos Bastardos

Description: DESCRIPTION: This will prevent use of guns for civilians but will still allow guns for the police.

OFFERS: It will reduce crime, yet again, and mean population growth due to lesser deaths. The police will have total control over the civilians and mean no more hunting which is a barbaric sport, and isn't even close to a real sport!!

OTHERS: It will make your nation's animals free to be eaten or frlic freely.

Thank you for your time!

If you have any ideas to improve my "Clamping down on crime" proposals, please contact me via telegram.

Fatsos Bastardos
Mr. President
UN member
Fat Guy
Umpa-Lumpa executer
Umm, huh?
:confused:
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #8
Proposed by: Northern Nukeland

Description: UN Resolution #8: Citizen Rule Required (Category: The Furtherment of Democracy; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This bill impeads on the sovereignity of all nations. The U.N as a body should not have the power to tell countries how to govern their people. That is a blatant breach of national sovereignity. If all nations had the same government the U.N would be the only government and that is never a good thing. That leans towards a world government new world order kind of thing.
Interesting leap of logic...
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Swift Current

Description: Seeing as there are many impovrished/homeless persons in the world, I believe that all persons who are citizens of any UN nation should have a minimum income of 25,000(national currency) per year. Anyone who makes more than this will not recieve the money, and anyone who has a job that pays less than this amount will have equalization payments made to them to bring them to 25,000, and people with no income should be paid this full amount. A major benefit to this would be the reduction (or perhaps elimination of homeless) and the elimination of social services such as welfare.
Wow...
:confused: :confused:
Category: Political Stability


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Old Imperial Phoenicia

Description: Many nations of the world have grown to a state in which their government's and people stand in a state of disrepair. There are many respectable people in each nation, but the common masses are not fit to rule themselves. This state makes a nation venerable and weak. I propose simple legislation that solve this problem. This legislation is made of up of two simple parts that are both very important to promote and secure a state of stability.

First, CENTRALIZATION OF THE GOVERNMENT; the masses are not fit themselves. The strong, the powerful, the intelligent, and the logical should rule over these these people justly, but properly. WIthout this, a nation may very well be consumed by civil war as different ignorant factions fight for power and rule. It is only natural for the proper government to rule and help its people in a way like a caring mother rules her own sweet little children.

Second, CREATION AND MAINTAINING OF A NATIONAL ARMY, this allows the strong central government to carry out its rule without civil war and other nations interfering. It is very important to have a national army so that a government may maintain a sense of national security. It would also create of rich and varied source of jobs for the people.

I beg of my noble colleagues to look inside of themselves and pass this legislation. For a better nation, for a better region, for a better UN, and for a better World, please pass this legislation.
:D
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Outlaw
Proposed by: MariSue

Description: Gambling should be outlawed for children 16 and Under
Well, I can't really argue against it...
Neo-Anarchists
27-02-2005, 04:51
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Swazz

Description: It has come to my attention to see countries not build a strong military. If you are a strong encomic powerhouse or begining to become one, shouldn't you defend it? So i ask for a more stronger stronger international security.
:confused:
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Death49

Description: Proposal: Very simply the fat people of a nation will be taxed if they are seen on the street with a bulging belly hanging out of their clothes.

Reasons:
1. It is disgusting to see lard-arses walking down the street anyway, but when they show their excess flesh to the world, well it makes me want to be sick.

2. Not only will it stop your nation from becoming a heaven for the fat people you will be able to raise taxes on those who do not cover up the blubber.

3. It will make your nation alot fitter, cleaner and better looking.

Won't someone think of the Children! and their future if they see that being fat is still being accepted by society.
:p
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #9
Proposed by: Damiea

Description: UN Resolution #9: Keep The World Disease-Free! (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: I do not think it should have the right to have a toliet, washbasin, one bathtub... For the fact that people should have the right to be opressed in anyway the crazy dictatorship decides. And the cost for vaccines are much to expensive... therefore just quarintining the citizens is much easier, also if a nation wants there people to die off easier and have much shorter life spans they should be aloud. If you people are truly corrupt governments... you would decide that this is the true way to go, the ability to withold certain rights...
:D
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #7
Proposed by: Rektanmaw

Description: UN Resolution #7: Sexual Freedom (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: This repeal:

RECOGNIZES:

That sex between man and woman is as natural thing and the way things are meant to be.

That sex homosexual activities and sex between man and animal is a perversion, which should not be encouraged by UN.

REPEALS:

The UN resolution #7, Sexual Freedom, which only encourages perversion withing the member states of UN.
:rolleyes:
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Teddy Bear States

Description: We As A World We Must Keep Thos Who Wish To Hurt Us At Bay Therefour We Must Boost Up Military Spending Cause If We Can't Stay Safe There Will Be No Tomorrow
:confused:
Flibbleites
27-02-2005, 07:13
Category: Free Trade


Strength: Mild


Proposed by: Faldawi

Description: It has come to the attention of the populace of Faldawi and thus to its Glorious Government that the people of our lands have no capacity to understand one another. While this in and of itself is difficult to resolve, the capacity for Technology to communicate has lessened to a degree the awful gulf that exists between Nations. However, both our people and our government are plagued with a terrible problem as technology moves forward. The existence of formats and the hellish nightmare that results when attempting to use them, even though the operation of such are entire build upon the same translation of ASCII code, has rendered a gulf between the information of each subsequent software generation, and even the software of separate nations. Clearly, our Nations deserve better!

THUS:

ACKNOWLEDGING Resolutions the Second, Fifth, Twenty-Fourth, Forty-Fifth and Sixtieth, and the effect that conflicting standards have upon these resolutions.Can't you just use numbers like everyone else?

OBSERVING the lack of uniformity among AC/DC adapter plugs, electrical outlets, computer components of all type, plumbing systems, light fixtures, the irregularity between software formats which store the exact same information, the ludicrous assertion that a format could not be easily translated from each new version, the existence of regional codes and ‘copyright’ protections that make any product completely unviable and the international trade that such lack of connectivity creates we…OK, show of hands. Whose nation's plumbing is connected to others nation's plumbing? And how do we get from talking about software to all of a sudden talking about plumbing anyway?

DECLARE that a Connectivity Board of reputable electrical, mechanical, and software engineers from many major nations be created to, during time not devoted to their own business, find a consensus as to the superior format in each area of connectivity. These would include all previous complaints as well as new issues that the Connectivity Board will upon occasion be consulted to verify the need of such regulations. All new methods will be presented to the Board while their owners still retain original rights, and any Universal Standard may be brought to review at any time with a simple petition of twenty citizen signatures. The Connectivity Board will also be granted the power to bring a company who, in any way, may be charged with inhibiting the free flow of a connection, be it software or firmware.

After declaring the Universal Standard, all production throughout the United Nations will be required to use this standard. Corporations who refuse will be allowed to appeal and, if they have a valid reason, can make an exception to the Universal Standard. Any exception will be qualified via the Connectivity Board. The incentives to become universally standard and thus open markets that were previously closed by difficulty of use will be apparent to any logical company, and the pressure from consumers to cater to the Universal Standard will surely wipe away any reservation.

Any corruption that becomes known within the board will be dealt with via the local court system, with a penalty of life-long license revocation. As products are only produced with the Universal Standard, it is clear that all plugs will be phased into use of the Universal Standard as their predecessors reach their life expectancy.

One by one, the old systems will give way to the new.But what about the plumbing, you bring it up and then never mention it again.
Neo-Anarchists
27-02-2005, 07:56
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #43
Proposed by: Kevin Islands

Description: UN Resolution #43: Legalise Euthanasia (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Euthanasia shall be prohibited for God's sake. God shall be the one who will end our lives and not those doctors. Doctors shall be expelled from their profession when they practice euthanasia. Patients committing euthanasia shall be condemned by God and the U.N. These doctors shall save lives, not ending them.
:rolleyes:
Neo-Anarchists
27-02-2005, 22:17
shut the hell up :mp5:
Who, me?
Did I say something to offend you?
Neo-Anarchists
28-02-2005, 01:05
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Jack scarlington

Description: This will advance our countries further into the future and it will bring more jobs more money and most of all these weapons will keep your countries safe from any harm what im asking is to make our countries better, safer, and stronger.
:D
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Ecalupe

Description: On November 7th at approxiamately 10:43 PM, 14 truck and car bombs exploded at the same time in a populated city near the Pacific, killing all the inhabitants in the city. Families grieved for their lost ones, while government officials argued to strengthen security to avoid terrorists.
:confused:
If that were written in Greek, it would make exactly the same amount of sense to me.
And I can't even understand the Greek alphabet, much less speak Greek.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Ecalupe

Description: Churches over the world are debating which religion is real and whose is fake. This led to protests and mass murders. Should we have only one religion?
:confused:
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Pusik IIII

Description: too many freedom will cause terrorist attack and civil war
The way this guy types reminds me of KOMPRESSOR.
RomeW
28-02-2005, 06:49
:confused:

Last I checked, proposals were supposed to demand something, not ask a question.
Neo-Anarchists
28-02-2005, 07:01
Last I checked, proposals were supposed to demand something, not ask a question.
Of course, that won't stop people from proposing questions! Or proposals that outline proposals and never specify what they really are!
RomeW
28-02-2005, 07:10
Of course, that won't stop people from proposing questions! Or proposals that outline proposals and never specify what they really are!

I don't mean for this to sound like a flame, but have you had too much coffee? Or are you really enjoying this thread?
The Pojonian Puppet
28-02-2005, 07:15
I'm rather amused by the "Sudden Terrorist Attack" one. I think if it passed, it would automatically declare a piece of history to suddenly spring into existence. At that point, people could use that piece of history as an example to propose other resolutions.
Actually, I'm not amused by that resolution at all. That's just downright creepy, that is.
Neo-Anarchists
28-02-2005, 07:26
I don't mean for this to sound like a flame, but have you had too much coffee? Or are you really enjoying this thread?
Actually, here's a thread explaining it:
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=401290
RomeW
28-02-2005, 07:36
OOC: I see. I know someone who is like that too. Is your case usually mild?
Neo-Anarchists
28-02-2005, 07:44
OOC: I see. I know someone who is like that too. Is your case usually mild?
I have bipolar disorder, and a pretty bad case, but this is a really really intense manic phase. It feels like a drug rush or something.

It seems to be winding down now, and I can type more easily and such. yay.
RomeW
28-02-2005, 07:50
I thought so. I didn't want to say anything in case you were sensitive to that.

Anyway, the person I know with it has a mild case of it. She's hard to deal with sometimes but now I've learned to let it slide.
Pterodactylus
28-02-2005, 14:11
I dug out the 'moo' proposal.

A proposal to repeal a previously passed resolution

Category: Repeal
Resolution: #79
Proposed by: Ajapan

Description: UN Resolution #79: Reformed Literacy Initiative (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: moo

Approvals: 1 (WZ Forums)
Status: Lacking Support (requires 141 more approvals)
Voting Ends: Thu Dec 9 2004

Classic stupidity.
RomeW
28-02-2005, 22:09
Ah, yes..."moo". Sometimes I wonder what people are thinking.

That reminds me: how many of these proposals are approved by WZ Forums? He sponsors everything, even the bad ones.
Neo-Anarchists
01-03-2005, 00:19
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: Leicester haters

Description:
What is the point in stopping people from using guns.
They can be used for many useful things such as defending yourself, making annoying people shut up and for solving problems in over-populated areas.

RELAX GUN CONTROL! It will help

What would happen if there was a war and people forgot how to use guns because the laws were not relaxed???
"Making annoying people shut up"?
:D
The left foot
01-03-2005, 00:25
Puppet I'm rather amused by the "Sudden Terrorist Attack" one. I think if it passed, it would automatically declare a piece of history to suddenly spring into existence. At that point, people could use that piece of history as an example to propose other resolutions.

Never underestimate the gnomes. They're out there whacting, Waiting. They wil come for you !!!!
RomeW
01-03-2005, 00:25
"Making annoying people shut up"?
:D

ROFLMAO...that is gold.
Flibbleites
01-03-2005, 08:28
And from the creating things out of thin air department we bring you this little beauty.
Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: All Businesses


Proposed by: Englandtopia

Description: My administration has of late have been experimenting with animal DNA and creating hybrids. Our scientists have been capable of milking 'Quphants'; an elephant size mammal which produces 98 times extra milk than a cow, this creature also consumes half the amount of food than should theoretically sustain the animal.

Inferior and embryonic countries would gain from cultivating this animal which is far cheaper than keeping cows and once again, produces vast more amounts of milk.

I am asking for this proposal to be passed to allow every country to fabricate hybrids so that lifes can be enhance. T'would also make astonishing and surprising breakthroughs which we cannot disclose at this time due to the risk of a national security breach as this information is not yet legal.

Let the world travel forward. Let the world experiment!

For an exclusive picture go to:
http://www.x-news.150m.com/Quphant.JPG
And believe me you don't really want to see what it looks like.
RomeW
01-03-2005, 08:36
Is it tubgirl or something like that?
Krioval
01-03-2005, 08:38
What is the point in stopping people from using guns.
They can be used for many useful things such as defending yourself, making annoying people shut up and for solving problems in over-populated areas.

Granted, "making annoying people shut up" is hilarious in its own right, but "solving problems in over-populated areas"?! Wow.
Flibbleites
01-03-2005, 08:46
Is it tubgirl or something like that?
Pictue a cross between a cow and an elephant.
The left foot
01-03-2005, 13:20
T'was not meant to be.
Pterodactylus
01-03-2005, 13:49
Another resolution with no sign of common sense.

Lisbon Reolution

A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Reino de Portugal

Description: Let's open the market to the world.

Approvals: 0

Status: Lacking Support (requires 147 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Fri Mar 4 2005
RomeW
01-03-2005, 19:10
Pictue a cross between a cow and an elephant.

*looks at picture*

Well...that's an interesting creature. Still, ICly I'd be very doubtful of its existence- I know it's an OOC source, but according to Robert L. Park's "Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science" (http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i21/21b02001.htm), which I find to be very logically sound and believable, the "Quphant" fails scientific valdiation since it's an "exclusive" find- if it really were the product of science, it wouldn't be exclusive but would be the product of many scientists (plus, no scientific finding should be "confidential").

It's also a badly Photoshopped drawing, but I'll let that slide as I doubt there are many here with Photoshopping skills that good.
The Cat-Tribe
02-03-2005, 00:04
I don't know where to begin with this one:

PUDNSQ
A resolution to restrict civil freedoms in the interest of moral decency.


Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Lombary-Genoa

Description: Press Unathorized to Divulgate National Security Questions


This resolution prohibits the press to divulgate national security questions in order to preserve the integrity of a nation.

In order to prevent corrupt governments to use the term "national security" to censure in a inadequated way the press, articles will come below to justify when this measure can be applyed.

ARTICLE 1)

Crime investigations details can only be revealed when this one ends.

ARTICLE 2)

When UN inspectors arrive in a contry to check the exhistence of chemycal or biological weapons presence, work rights, children rights, or any of this sort of inspection.

ARTICLE 3)

When a arrestment is to be made (in order to prevent the suspect of escaping)

OBS: THIS CAN ONLY BE APPLYED WHEN THE SUSPECT LOCATION IS CERTAIN, OTHERWISE HIS INDENTITY CAN BE REVEALED

ARTICLE 4)

When government operations (military or policial) are to be made

OBS: FOR THIS ARTICLE TO BE APPLYED, A UN COMITTE MUST BE NOTIFYED AND APROVVE THE ARTICLE APPLICATION

ARTICLE 5)

The presence of an extincted disease virus is located at a country region

OBS: UN MUST BE NOTIFYED
ETERNAL

TO ADD ARTICLES TO THIS RESOLUTION, ANOTHER ONE MUST BE MADE WITH THE NUMBER OF THE RESPECTIVE ARTICLE. THIS WOULD START WITH NUMBER 6 AND GOING AHEAD.

divulgate national security questions

is a divulgate some kind of flood control device? it could be important to national security

Crime investigations details can only be revealed when this one ends

When which one ends? That sentence?

BTW, it took me awhile to figure out how it was meant to read. Too the extent I understand it, the press is supposed to be forbidden from disseminating information in the circumstances set forth in each Article. OBS is an observation about how the Article would work.

When a arrestment is to be made (in order to prevent the suspect of escaping)

OBS: THIS CAN ONLY BE APPLYED WHEN THE SUSPECT LOCATION IS CERTAIN, OTHERWISE HIS INDENTITY CAN BE REVEALED

So when law enforcement wants to arrest (arrestment?) someone the press can't publish that if the police know for certain where hte suspect is. Otherwise, its OK for the press to warn the suspect so he can be sure to stay hidden. :confused:


When government operations (military or policial) are to be made

We definitely do not want the press to cover any political or military operations!!!

Saving the best for last . . .

The presence of an extincted disease virus is located a country region

Whatever an "extincted disease virus" is, we certainly do not want to warn the public about it.

I'm not sure if this is because we don't want people to know a disease is "extincted" because that would hurt pharmaceutical sales or because we want people to just die quietly from the "disease virus."
The Cat-Tribe
02-03-2005, 00:08
I love this one you posted Neo-Anarchists

Euthanasia shall be prohibited for God's sake.

God needs our help!! Euthanasia upsets her digestive system!
Engineering chaos
02-03-2005, 00:47
I guess your right. I just don't feel that it is justified to waste a week voting so that a redudant resolution can be repealed. It just seemed silly to me that to stop it from "taking up un space" it another ammentment repealing it will be added and So in other word if this passed the resolution will take up more "UN space"

Looks at current proposal being voted on :headbang:
Crydonia
02-03-2005, 03:59
Education For All

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Mists of Alverdia

Description: Acknowledging that a recent repeal was launched claiming that Education for all was redundant (that being the only strong arguement).

Stating that education should be provided for all peoples under the age of 16 to provide nations with higher standards and tain our children proper behavior in society.

Everyone under the age of 16 must be provided with an education. Education is a right.

Approvals: 2 (Ceskeland, Callisdrun)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 145 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Fri Mar 4 2005

Umm, did'nt we just repeal this?:rolleyes::D

It also seems that the author does'nt know about the Free Education resolution that is still well and truly in force.
Flibbleites
02-03-2005, 08:14
Repeal arguments are almost always good for a laugh.
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #2


Proposed by: Zen Unbounded

Description: UN Resolution #2: Scientific Freedom (Category: Free Trade; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Science has brought us nuclear weapons, cloning and spam [of both the canned and internet varieties]. Science must not be unfettered -- we must fetter it!

In the early days of NationStates, when the wheel was needing to be invented, Resolution #2 made sense. But in the dangerous world of today, the leaders of nations must bring scientists to heel. Save the Planet! Repeal Resolution #2, the deviously misnamed "Scientific Freedom" resolution!Am I the only person who actually likes Spam (the meat product not the junk e-mails)?

Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: All Businesses


Proposed by: Golden Saucer

Description: seeing that lots of nations are destroying the national animal's homes, every natione should give up 45% of their lad for their national animal.
I'm not giving up 45% of my nation's boys to my nation's national animal. In fact I fail to see how this would help.
Neo-Anarchists
02-03-2005, 08:21
Repeal arguments are almost always good for a laugh.
Am I the only person who actually likes Spam (the meat product not the junk e-mails)?
I don't like the meat, but I use the junk emails to make poetry with the random words they throw in at the end to slip the spam past filters.
Wanna see some?
Too bad that you don't, I'm showing you anyway!
Duplicable indicate dramatists,
seventieth irreconcilable nadia revisionaries.
Pliant receptacle,
Error! Fibonacci Mazda.
Smack, cockleburr, Chairman Close,
butterfield daybed.
Badminton baffle,
chartroom instinctual.
Newspapermen anglican barton boa.
Fate soft beloit widget,
blot headlight,
Odysseus anaerobic strawflower.
Cody Crockett, Edward Dispensary,
swore dragon
Taxonomic wildlife,
Charlemagne poop reflectorland.
Cyprus alyssum Cornelia,
Unisex scampattack!
Elusive burnout rerouted.
Waco Councilwoman Coralberry.
Alistair, Bavaria! Beauregard au changecomic.
Courtesy opine umber,
Oscillate,
Absorb,
Coerce.

All I do is add punctuation and linebreaks, and end up with this wonderful nonsense! Spam does have a use!
RomeW
02-03-2005, 08:53
Am I the only person who actually likes Spam (the meat product not the junk e-mails)?

I've eaten SPAM...it's not that bad...

...though ask me to eat it every day and I'd say no in an instant.
Flibbleites
02-03-2005, 09:01
I've eaten SPAM...it's not that bad...

...though ask me to eat it every day and I'd say no in an instant.
I wouldn't want it every day either.
Neo-Anarchists
02-03-2005, 09:47
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Celiaville

Description: The OC is a television show that is brainwashing the minds of the people of not only Celiaville, but many other countries. We propose in removing the OC from television. When the OC is removed from the countries afflicted a number of improvements will occur:

- Literary and Numeracy rates will increase as research has indicated that those who watch the show regularly have suffered from declining literacy and numeracy levels. Removing the show from television will also help increase high school graduation as well, as teenagers are now able to keep up with the curriculum.

- Violence will decrease, as teenage girls will no longer have to fight against each over arguments such as "who is hotter?"

- The economy of the countries afflicted by the OC will improve substantially as people who watch the show will no longer be influenced by the affluent of the OC and bankruptcy will decrease.

- Self esteem will also improve in countries where the OC is viewed as people will no longer have to compare themselves with the likes of Mischa Barton or Ben Mckenzie.

We urge in not just countries where the OC is viewed, but all countries to rally together to prevent this show from spreading around the world.
:p
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Eden Oasis

Description: ISPF (International Security Police Organization) is an organization that would make sure that nations that are Treating there people right are protected by other near by nations that civil right are in the dump. It is protecting other countrys from becomeing invaded. also the ISPF will take care of countrys conflics so they do not spill into other countrys.
Man, he can't even stick to the proper acronym for the whole proposal...
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize
Proposed by: Kalamazuhatia

Description: Children are going to gamble one day, why don't thay start earlier? It would be better for the economy of all nations because if young people won more cash, then they would spend it on the goods of that region
:D
Vastiva
02-03-2005, 10:13
Ban ammendments to legalize
A resolution to ban, legalize, or encourage recreational drugs.


Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Outlaw
Proposed by: The Father-Land

Description: This ammendment would outlaw all illegal drugs and ban all future proposals to legalize them within the U.N. Drugs are dangerous and ruin lives.

Approvals: 5 (WZ Forums, Iznogoud, Tupackia, New Secundus, Zhukhistan)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 142 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Thu Mar 3 2005

So we make that which is illegal even more illegal then it was before?

:confused:
Aeruillin
02-03-2005, 11:00
So we make that which is illegal even more illegal then it was before?

:confused:

In fact, the proposal is illegal because it intends to limit the future power of the UN. No resolution can make any decisions regarding future proposals.
Flibbleites
02-03-2005, 16:26
Category: International Security


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Shiwaddywaddy

Description: As the world balances precariously, between War and Famine. I propose a new way of removing 3rd world debt and creating harmony between nations.
An event paving the way for inter personal relations between countries and also helping our fellow man get him/herself out of the proverbial poo.
Leaders of all countries will unite on the 24th of July to Partake in “Gallagher’ll Sort The World Out Royal Rumble”, a wrestling event never witnessed before as leader takes on leader until there is only one. The Crowned Champion will receive a coffer of money supplied by the greater nations, giving all a fair chance to help their country in times of turmoil or simply more money for “ Governmental Issues”
Come one come all to the greatest event ever held. Wars solved without bloodshed ( Well not much) Aid relief for the poorer countries can be discussed as a group of sportsmen rather than emissaries of death.
Go on you know you want too.
All I can say is, LET'S GET READY TO RUMBLEEEEE!:D

Category: Recreational Drug Use


Decision: Promote


Proposed by: Wheat Crunchies

Description: Not many people have taken splif smoke via a dog and into their drug end.....
This needs to be corrected. With the UN's support I will start supplying the world with the apparatus and dog's are freely available from many kennels.
This will enable the world to be a happier place for all (apart from the dogs)
Can anyone even understand what the author is talking about?:confused:
Neo-Anarchists
02-03-2005, 17:07
Can anyone even understand what the author is talking about?:confused:
I think the author has been smoking that "Canabliss" "via a dog into his drug end".
Skinny87
02-03-2005, 17:17
That scares me on so many levels...
Neo-Anarchists
02-03-2005, 18:34
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Promote
Proposed by: Coodness

Description: All recreational drug should be replaced with chhese. It is good for the environment, the body and the soul.Make cheese not war!
Have you been smoking too much "cheese"?
Category: Political Stability
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: VictorieuxFrankreich

Description: Anti-Terrorism and Conspiracy
-----------------------------------------
Problem: In today's society people are creating many acts of terrorism. These acts of terrorism are hurting the morality and economy of many countries.
-----------------------------------------
Soultion: Without proper government Licensure, individuals may not gather in groups larger than five (5).
What the fuck?
:confused:
That would cause sooo many problems.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #12
Proposed by: SteelerWorld

Description: UN Resolution #12: Gay Rights (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Gay marriage should not be allowed. This goes against what the bible and Reggie White says. If a person what to be with another of the same sex fine. But, the should not be allowed to unite like a man and a women.
Who is Reggie White?
The Cat-Tribe
02-03-2005, 18:57
Who is Reggie White?

Former US National Football League star, retired and recently deceased. Also, extreme homophobe noted for his inflamatory and racist comments. (Mr. White was black.)

Here is an article giving an example:

Packers' White discusses 'sin' homosexuality in speech

CBS SportsLine wire reports
March 25, 1998

MADISON, Wis. -- Most people invited to speak to the Wisconsin Legislature give five minutes of pleasantries, get a few moments of applause and go home.

Lawmakers weren't expecting the earful Reggie White had in store for them Wednesday.

They thought the Green Bay Packers star and ordained minister came to talk about his community work and a recent trip to Israel.

White did, but his nearly hour-long speech also included remarks on homosexuality, race and slavery that turned the Assembly's applause to stunned silence.

White said the United States has gotten away from God, in part by allowing homosexuality to "run rampant."

Homosexuality is a sin, and the plight of gays and lesbians should not be compared to that of blacks, White told lawmakers.

"Homosexuality is a decision, it's not a race," White said. "People from all different ethnic backgrounds live in this lifestyle. But people from all different ethnic backgrounds also are liars and cheaters and malicious and back-stabbing."

White said he has thought about why God created different races. Each race has certain gifts, he said.

Blacks are gifted at worship and celebration, White said.

"If you go to a black church, you see people jumping up and down because they really get into it," he said.

Whites are good at organization, White said.

"You guys do a good job of building businesses and things of that nature, and you know how to tap into money," he said.

"Hispanics were gifted in family structure, and you can see a Hispanic person, and they can put 20, 30 people in one home."

The Japanese and other Asians are inventive, and "can turn a television into a watch," White said. Indians are gifted in spirituality, he said.

"When you put all of that together, guess what it makes: It forms a complete image of God," White said.

White said later that his comments were about coming together as a society and were not meant to stereotype the races.

"This is the first time I've been at a loss for words," Assembly Minority Leader Walter Kunicki, D-Milwaukee, said after White's speech. "You can still tell from the tension in the room that much of this was offensive."

White was invited to speak by Assembly Speaker Scott Jensen, R-Waukesha.

Jensen called White's comments about homosexuality "disappointing." Homosexuality is a genetic predisposition, not a decision, Jensen said.

Rep. Tammy Baldwin, a Madison Democrat and the Legislature's only openly gay member, said she disagreed with White's remarks, but as a lawmaker believed in putting aside personal feelings to promote a "healthy debate."

CBS SPORTS spokeswoman Leslie Ann Wade declined to comment on White's speech or whether his remarks would affect his chances for a studio analyst's job. White has auditioned for a commentating job at the network.

CBS fired football analyst Jimmy "The Greek" Snyder in 1988 for saying that blacks had been "bred from slavery" to make better athletes.

"CBS doesn't accept bias from any of its announcers of any kind," Wade said.

White declined to comment on whether he will leave the Packers before the 1998 season.


So, the NS UN should definitely do whatever Reggie White would have wanted!!
Neo-Anarchists
02-03-2005, 21:40
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #43
Proposed by: Lombary-Genoa

Description: UN Resolution #43: Legalise Euthanasia (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: No one can predict when will die. If someone is suffering a lot and the probability of death is high, euthanasia is not to be applyed.
Medicine today is making a lot of progress. Perhaps many of this "high probable deaths" could be avoided with this progress as new medications, ilness causes, cures and treatments are discovered.
If someone is suffering a lot, you are suppose to give this person pain medication, you are not suppose to kill this person.
Death is supposed to be NATURAL!
If a nation government thinks differently it has the righ to legalize euthanasia but it is not suppose to be apllyed to all countries as a UN law.
Yes. death is supposed to be natural. That's why we don't extend people's lives beyond their time and their desires in hospitals...
Oh wait.
Category: Gun Control
Decision: Relax
Proposed by: Slaggartia

Description: SEEING that the bill to self-defense has been passed

It is only logical to let these people have mor effective defense!

This bill will relax gun control.
What is with the title?
:confused:
Neo-Anarchists
03-03-2005, 03:00
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: JimWim

Description: Women should not be allowed out in public without someting covering their face. Women should be beaten daily by their husbands to keep them under control. Any woman who cheats on their husband gets the death penalty.
Fuck no.
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Sickining niceness

Description: A target be set to decrease the level of arnaments in our member nations by 60% over the next three years.There is no need for so many countries to posess so many weapons, excuses are given "But we might be invaded". This lie must be challanged, who would dare to attack a mamber of the most powerful group of nations in the world? If one of us was to attacked, all other nations of the UN would sweep down upon the aggressor.

Remove 60% of UN weapons in the next 3 years.
What the heck?
I haven't seen that happen in many wars yet...
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Mists of Alverdia

Description: All individiuals must wear undergarments in public unless nudity is legal. If they are wearing any article of clothing it must be accompanied by underwear.
:confused:
Vastiva
03-03-2005, 03:59
In fact, the proposal is illegal because it intends to limit the future power of the UN. No resolution can make any decisions regarding future proposals.

Its an almost - it could legally state "All recreational drugs are illegalized and no subsequent resolution can legalize them" - because technically you could not pass a resolution overturning a former resolution without repealing the prior resolution.

However, as stated, it is illegal, yep.
Neo-Anarchists
03-03-2005, 05:16
Category: Political Stability
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Old Imperial Phoenicia

Description: Many nations of the world have grown to a state in which their government's and people stand in a state of disrepair. There are many respectable people in each nation, but the common masses are not fit to rule themselves. This state makes a nation venerable and weak. I propose simple legislation that solve this problem. This legislation is made of up of two simple parts that are both very important to promote and secure a state of stability.

First, CENTRALIZATION OF THE GOVERNMENT; the masses are not fit themselves. The strong, the powerful, the intelligent, and the logical should rule over these these people justly, but properly. WIthout this, a nation may very well be consumed by civil war as different ignorant factions fight for power and rule. It is only natural for the proper government to rule and help its people in a way like a caring mother rules her own sweet little children.

Second, CREATION AND MAINTAINING OF A NATIONAL ARMY, this allows the strong central government to carry out its rule without civil war and other nations interfering. It is very important to have a national army so that a government may maintain a sense of national security. It would also create of rich and varied source of jobs for the people.

I beg of my noble colleagues to look inside of themselves and pass this legislation. For a better nation, for a better region, for a better UN, and for a better World, please pass this legislation.
"Tyranny(For You)".
Oh Goddess above, I just looked back at the proposal queue(sp?) and he's submitted it 3 times in quick succession
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: The Sickle

Description: All Nations should have the power to have slaves within. It is their choice to choose after all many great countrys were built off of it.

This is not pinpointing indivduals out for example whites with black slaves, Mexicans with native slaves so on so fourth.

Thanks
Czar Vagner
No.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Orhacism

Description: The mentally disabled (from hereon in called mental for simplicity's sake) have sucked up government funds for too long. Many non-mental people suffer, because funds that could be devoted to the betterment of all are thrown away on people that can't provide anything. This proposal will cut all funding to mental people. Unless the family or an outside organization provides support for the mental person, the government will carry out an execution style "release" of the mental person, as soon as the disabilities are noticed.
Too bad plenty of "mental" people have been very smart...
There go half your artists, musicians, and scientists.
Asshelmetta
03-03-2005, 05:30
I was going to submit a resolution to ban anti-jaywalking resolution, but after reading this thread...

I just can't compete with the insanity here.
Flibbleites
03-03-2005, 06:14
Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Mists of Alverdia

Description: All individiuals must wear undergarments in public unless nudity is legal. If they are wearing any article of clothing it must be accompanied by underwear.
If this passes I want to be the one to check and make sure all the ladies are in compliance.;)

Category: Free Trade


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Roisin Marie

Description: This benefits all women out there. this is a proposal to remove the taxes on handags and shoes. this would allowe freer trade for countries whose livliehoods depend of exporting handbags, but are unable to make enough money due to import dutes on foreign handbags.Let me get this straight, it only affects handbags and shoes and the strength is "Significant.":confused:

Category: Recreational Drug Use


Decision: Legalize


Proposed by: Bigit Warriors

Description: I propse to leagalize the use of marijuana anywhere you want because its the cool thing to do and people like thank you .
Wow, great reason. :rolleyes:
Makatoto
03-03-2005, 17:26
Pro Stabilisation movememnt
Category: Political Stability
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Old Imperial Phoenicia

Description: Many nations of the world have grown to a state in which their government's and people stand in a state of disrepair. There are many respectable people in each nation, but the common masses are not fit to rule themselves. This state makes a nation venerable and weak. I propose simple legislation that solve this problem. This legislation is made of up of two simple parts that are both very important to promote and secure a state of stability.


You're right, it does encourage tyrrany, but at least it makes any democratic nation old and wise!
Free Gimps
03-03-2005, 19:51
Dissolving the UN would be interesting to say the least. I shudder to think of the chaos that would insue.
Neo-Anarchists
03-03-2005, 22:53
I've got some good ones today:
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #22
Proposed by: Dankoslavakia

Description: UN Resolution #22: Outlaw Pedophilia (Category: Moral Decency; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Firstly, as it is citizen's right to thier own religious policies, WHATEVER they may be, we must give citizens thier rights.
Secondly if people are truly free to capitalism in all ways, they shuold be able to sell themselves, at least at a minimum age where they are conscious of what they are doing.
Pedophilia is a main source of income in many of our nations and is necessary to sustain stability, therfore the law against it shuold be repealed
Pedophilia is your main source of income?
:eek:
Somehow I doubt that...
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Kejott

Description: Each country within the UN must not allow hate groups to exist. Increased police budgeting for rounding up these groups would be required.
Or not...
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #20
Proposed by: Windycindy

Description: UN Resolution #20: 'RBH' Replacement (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: It is not anyone's right to take from some and give to others.

One of the worst children's heroes of all time was Robin Hood, who implied that it was moral or OK to steal or show violence toward people because they have more than others.

Healthcare is not a right, but a priviledge. It is a commodity just like anything else in that it has cost involved to have high quality.

Healthcare and taking care of the less fortunate should be left for the private sector. If soneone believes strongly enough in helping someone, let them use thier resources, not the resources of others. Social welfare is stealing with the threat of violence (jail time).
Because we all know that the poor are just poor because they're lazy!
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Peace-Loving States

Description: THE UNITED NATIONS,

TAKING NOTE of all preceding United Nations resolutions, including Rights and Duties of UN States, Reduce Black Market Arms Sales, The Nuclear Terrorism Act and Humanitarian Intervention,

SEEKING to achieve peace and stability in the world,

BELIEVING that United Nations member states have a responsibility to act as leaders in the cause of peace,

HOPING for an end to all violence and aggression,

NOTING the need for occasional force pursuant to the Humanitarian Intervention resolution,

TAKING NOTE of the need to reduce the trend toward nuclear proliferation without creating instability vis-à-vis the threat of rogue non-member states,

1. FINDS that United Nations member states are obligated to exercise their ability to decline the existence of a state of war with another United Nations member state except for force mandated by a United Nations resolution;

2. DECLARES ACCORDINGLY that United Nations member states are prohibited from initiating force against another state except as authorized pursuant to the Humanitarian Intervention resolution or similar mandate in international law;

3. RESOLVES that any lawful use of force amongst United Nations member states shall involve neither the deployment of nuclear weapons nor threat of such deployment;

4. DEMANDS that United Nations member states limit their nuclear arsenals to levels absolutely necessary to defend against the threat posed by non-member states in possession of weapons of mass destruction.
:eek:
If that is limited non-aggression, I shudder to think of what it would be without limits!
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Samteriai

Description: I think it should be compulsory to have elections because phsycotic dictators like myself need elections
if u have any thoughts on this topic telegram me
:confused:
Category: Environmental


Industry Affected: All Businesses


Proposed by: Orgiastic Ecstasy

Description: Given the forthcoming global water shortages caused by irrigation methods, water table contamination, population growth etc., it is proposed that work is undertaken to start melting the polar ice caps and harvesting the resulting fresh water and putting it into storage facilities.

This will help avoid future 'water wars' and will ensure that in future there is adequate water for all.
I'm just going to ignore the whole "WE AREN'T ON EARTH!!!" bit for now.
Okay, we won't be having any water wars, BECAUSE HALF OF US WILL BE DROWNED! It's not like you can control where all the water goes, is it?
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #43
Proposed by: Kevin Islands

Description: UN Resolution #43: Legalise Euthanasia (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Euthanasia shall be prohibited for God's sake. God shall be the one who will end our lives and not those doctors. Doctors shall be expelled from their profession when they practice euthanasia. Patients committing euthanasia shall be condemned by God and the U.N. These doctors shall save lives, not ending them.
Guess what?
Your argument is pathetic.
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Mithandir

Description: if all criminals were shot they would not waste our taxes on jails and the up keep of them

if the doves amongst you say that it is against human rights then take into account that the amount of money spent on upkeeping the jails of Texas, would be enough to solve the 3rd world debt of 14 countries, and provide enough food for the poorest regions of africa

also im sure the victims of the criminals would more than be happy to see them get their commupance

thefore i propose that all criminals will be shot.
Or no.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #9
Proposed by: AKLT

Description: UN Resolution #9: Keep The World Disease-Free! (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Free of lethal diseses ... vote now!!!!
Free the world, unite together!!
What the fuck are you talking about?
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: McFat666

Description: if you all join the region of Jonas then we can take over the world. we also tollerate everyone except fundmental religious people such as christians
That's called spam.
TilEnca
03-03-2005, 23:57
Pedophilia is your main source of income?


I think it deserves an award for the most original reason to repeal the resolution!
THE SACRED LEAF
04-03-2005, 04:04
Originally Posted by Drug legalisation
Category: Recreational Drug Use
Decision: Legalize
Proposed by: Bolongin

Description: Agree to the promotion of recreational drug usage, including all forms of natural hallucinogenics and recreational use of banned drugs for the exception of freebasing and "heavy" narcotics.Outban all drug laws in the vicinity, this will not induce violence but instead this will help us focus on our real crimes being commited. :fluffle:


I really think this should be taken seriously, the only people who would not agree with drug law repeal are people who claim to be experts on the subject,
when in actual fact they know very little,which is clear by some of the ridiculouse reasons they use to keep drugs illegal.
Neo-Anarchists
04-03-2005, 04:36
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #6
Proposed by: The Cassiopeia Galaxy

Description: UN Resolution #6: End slavery (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Slavery should be alowded in all Nations. it is good for the Economy and can help young Nations become economic Superpowers. UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION #6 should be repealed once and for all!
The catch here being that it's a blatant human rights violation...
Neo-Anarchists
04-03-2005, 12:48
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #71
Proposed by: The Chavs

Description: UN Resolution #71: Sustainable Energy Sources (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Doing this means that industry loses out big time, so governments run out of money, which means a bad economy for all nations, so that means the taxes go up, resulting in drop of population
...because we all know that business is more important then the environment...
Neo-Anarchists
04-03-2005, 14:00
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Englandtopia

Description:
I propose that every nation in the UN contribute money to the SNFATAATPSE (Space Navy For Alien Threat And Asteroid Threat Plus Space Exploration)

If the nations contribute even just a little of money we will be able to run a space agency to prevent destruction from ufo's or asteroids and help further exploration into deep space.

This would further our sciences of different planets and increase our security.
*ksssht*
Dude, what the fuck, over.
*kssssht*
Resistancia
04-03-2005, 15:13
besides from that resolution being quite bizzar, how can we a) be sure the alien race is hostlie before landing, and b) garentee that the weapon system will actually scratch, let alone destroy the alien fleet. damn, that guy needs to be beemed up and lost in space
Resistancia
04-03-2005, 15:53
Freedom to sell limbs
A resolution to reduce barriers to free trade and commerce.


Category: Free Trade
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: 25 Arundel Avenue

Description: the sell limbs proposal = people who have lost limbs for whatever unfortunate reason should (if they have the cash) have the ability to buy limbs off willing sellers for a reasonable sum

ummm.... anyone wanna buy my pinkie for a gil?
Neo-Anarchists
05-03-2005, 01:12
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Fatsos Bastardos

Description: THIS PROPOSAL STATES THAT THE FOLLOWING WILL HAPPEN IF APPROVED:
1. Everyone should own a house(except imigrants), thus letting more room on streets to move about.
2. Their houses shall contain at least,the following,: A toilet, a shower, a sink, a refigerator, a cooker, a bed & a fireplace. This will keep all our citizens in good health allowing reproduction to increase our nation(s).
3. Money shall be spent mainly on the Police/Army, to keep the streets safe, and Hospitals, to keep citizens in good health,.
4. Every citizen should be allowed to own a vehicle, on the basis that they agree.
5. Abortion should only be carried out on extreme cases such as the mother could die.
6. People will have the choice of wearing clothes or not.
7. Drugs can only be used if a perscription is written and the known drug is a form of medication.
8. Poetry will be funded in order to make our nation(s) more intelligent and more expressful.
9. Everyone should have a job otherwise execution will be knockin' at their door.
10. Minimum wage for a job is £250 and baseball player(s)/football player(s)/soccer player(s) and any other sport players will be offered the minimum wage and cannot increase it.
11. No-one can have more than 1 job otherwise they will be sentenced to jail for benefit fraud.
12. Glasses can be purchased for free if you need them.
:rolleyes:
No thanks.
Category: Gambling
Legalize/Outlaw: Legalize
Proposed by: Leicester haters

Description:
What is wrong with gambling, nothing!
Only a small minority of people believe that gambling is wrong.
Gambling is also a lot of fun and can help millions of people.
It can help people throw away money
It can help people become rich
If kids gamble they can develop a career in gambling
This would help because their parents would not have to worry about them finfing a career.

So lefalize gambling.
"Lefalize" it?
:confused:
Category: International Security
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Josie lovers

Description: This will allow nuclear weapons in all countries in order to insure safety of the country. However you should not be able to just bomb people because you feel like it.
Or not!
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Josie lovers

Description: everyone who is the above the age of 14 should have sex whenever they want.
:confused:
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Mists of Alverdia

Description: Abortion shall be legal for any woman who has been raped, and will have a child because of it.
Does anybody read the passed resolutions?
:headbang:
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #94
Proposed by: European atlantis

Description: UN Resolution #94: Right to Self-Protection (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: this means people might kill people when they try to do more minor crimes.
so it will be a danger to everyone becouse people might use it as an excuse to injure or even kill somebody.
Hmm, somebody who seems not to have read the official thread.
Category: International Security
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Markismygod

Description: To ensure peace and the elimination of war and loss of life therefrom, it is proposed that all future conflicts between member nations be brought before the UN and decided between the differing nations by Rock, Paper, Scissors. The outcome to be decided by the best 2 out of 3.
:D
Hey, it works!
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Retsi

Description: REALISING: That most people under the age of 18 are unable to make rational decisions when pressured by peers.

RASING: The age of sexual consent to 18 in countries where it is under that age.

IMPORTANT:THIS WILL NOT AFFEC THE AGE OF CONSENT IN COUNTRIES WHERE THE AGE OF CONSENT IS OVER 18.

AND: giving more funding to create programmes that will educate on the risks of sexually transmitted infections.
:rolleyes:
This again...
Category: Political Stability
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: The Daemons

Description: Prevent the people who disagree with your government from speaking their minds, have them locked up for fun. Become corrupt today!
:rolleyes:
RomeW
05-03-2005, 01:32
I think it deserves an award for the most original reason to repeal the resolution!
^. I don't think I've ever seen anyone defend pedophilia, let alone for that reason.

I also like the "Rock, Paper, Scissors" proposal. :D
Asshelmetta
05-03-2005, 03:05
I endorsed the Sex for all straght[sic] people resolution.

And there was a particularly retarded repeal of Sex Workers Industry Act to which I gave a thorough TG fisking. I wish I'd saved the TG before sending.
Neo-Anarchists
05-03-2005, 04:10
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Eternal kingdom

Description: These days kids from all over the world have bad education and we should do something about that lets make free schools so that kids can have an education now!!!
Four words:
READ. THE. PAST. RESOLUTIONS.
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Death49

Description: 1. The Government of the nation should have the right to choose to harvest organs from the "Unwelcome" members of their nation.
This would include: Political Activists
: The Homeless
: Prisoners
: Those whom the government deems to be troublemakers
: Convicted Terrorists

The Organ donation would not have to come from all of these sets of social rejects, just the ones the Government chooses to harvest from, if the Government of the nation so wishes to conduct this mass Organ donation.

Reasons:
1: Organ donation would never be a problem, there would always be a healthy supply.
2: It would discourage Political rebellion.
3: It would discourage Crime.
4: It would encourage those who are homeless and most likely unemployed to find jobs, thus making the nation economically stronger.

:headbang: :headbang: :headbang:


On a different note, this topic has exceeded 2000 views! Yay!
Pterodactylus
05-03-2005, 17:33
I think it deserves an award for the most original reason to repeal the resolution!

I disagree. NOTHING will beat the mighty 'moo' proposal.

Hilarious proposals though. Like this one. Keep 'em coming, noobs!

Security And Welfare

A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.


Category: Human Rights


Strength: Significant


Proposed by: Diggy Doc

Description: The Nations Of Sprayen Dog propose, after much debate and delegation with its subordinate nations,

That:

Every man and woman:

1. Unless other conditions hamper, consume at least their daily portion of carrots (Vitamin A) as recommended by the delegation of nutritionalists from Sprayen Dog and other regions, as being 4 15g servings per day so as to improve and keep healthy the continually declining vision issues in the world today. If the resolution is passed, the home government of every worldwide nation shall provide the carrots to the citizens to meet the basic need, mentioned earlier as 4 15g servings. If the citizen should so desire to consume more than the provided amount, they may do so at their own expense.

2. Over the country’s age of majority is allowed to take a test regarding the ownership of firearms. The test would include a responsibility agreement that would state that if the person were to ever possess a firearm, they would only utilize the firearm to the extent of the country’s laws concerning firearms whether they would be used for self-protection, murder or hunting. If the applicant has passed the test with over 92%, the applicant shall receive for their personal use, to the extent of the laws, a .22 gauge rifle.

3. Would have basic, easily accessible health care and medication if their condition is 100% critical, and their HMO or health care plan does not provide the necessary basic medication to heal their condition. The hospital time would be paid by the government, as would the bed and doctor fees. Food required while in hospital would be provided at the patient’s expense.

Approvals: 4 (WZ Forums, Benignant Neglect, Gaiah, The Derrak Quadrant)

Status: Lacking Support (requires 144 more approvals)

Voting Ends: Sun Mar 6 2005

The first part is...weird. Carrots?
Neo-Anarchists
05-03-2005, 22:54
Repeal "Legalise Euthanasia"]Category: Repeal
Resolution: #43
Proposed by: Bspa

Description: UN Resolution #43: Legalise Euthanasia (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Based upon the fact that no person has the right to take any other person's life. This resolution is also in violation of resolution 26 articles 4 and 5. This article allows a person to kill themselves! This resolution is cruel and inhumane, it is the natural instict of a human to survive and press on. This resolution allows a person other than the one with the medical illness to end life. I can maybe see this resolution as humane if the patient and only the patient agrees to the euthanasia. I murder s what you want then goahaid keepthe bill. But if you believe in life, liberty, and human right then you will repeal this resolution!
Funny, believing in those rights is exactly why I support it. You don't know what you're talking about.
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Vincent B

Description: I. To give every child under the age of 18 the right to a free education.
II. If passed United Nations Resolution #95 (Repeal "Education For All") shall be proclaimed null and void immediately .
You didn't even read the fucking resolution, did you?
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Droard

Description: 1.Many people mutter obscenities at our childrens expense, withdraw free speech and ensure a safe and mild upbringing for our children.

2.Enforce a ban and fine on swearing and racist langauge.

3.For second offenders place in a rehab clinic to asses and then deal with their lack of decency.
No way.
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Lantavi

Description: RECOGNIZING the ineffiency of currency conversion.

NOTING the use of a national currency as a form of self-expression.

EMPHASIZING the need for ease of international transactions.

This proposal enacts in all member nations the use of a single currency, the skittle-me-timber, for international transactions. Intranational transactions will remain unchanged, and the member nations' national currencies will remain in use for such transactions.
:headbang:
Not another one of these...
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #10
Proposed by: Maximum Depreciation

Description: UN Resolution #10: Stop privacy intrusion (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: We must repeal this resolution for the safety of our nations. with this in place how can we insure the safety of our people from suspected terrorists who would gladly destroy governments and nations without care for the loss of life they will cause. We must be allowed to keep track of all personal information to preserve national security and to prevent our nations slipping into an uncertain world of fear and danger.
:rolleyes:
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 04:46
Category: Political Stability
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: LovAmore

Description: The United Nations is a body consisting of a world filled with Chaos. The body of the UN is supposed to strive for world peace and tranquility. The Nation of LovAmore suggests that we, as a governming body in the world, call for an elimination of regions with less than 20 members. This is because the world already has enough regions. We are supposed to strive for social justice and world peace, we can't do this with hundreds of small, independent regions, not willing to conform. To achieve world peace, we must call on the UN to dissolve these small regions and encourage the joining of the larger, more progressive regions. These larger regions are making progress, not the small, ineffective ones. LovAmore calls on the world to join, and unite in a march for world peace. Support our proposal.
with great respect and compassion
-LovAmore
:headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:
Not only is that so illegal it's not even funny, it also has nothing to do with the UN, and is based on a false premise!
Asshelmetta
06-03-2005, 05:24
I endorsed the Sex for all straght[sic] people resolution.

And there was a particularly retarded repeal of Sex Workers Industry Act to which I gave a thorough TG fisking. I wish I'd saved the TG before sending.
Score!!!

The reply to my TG

Congratulations,

you are the most stupid guy I never met in NationStates. Don't forget that it's only a game.
Flibbleites
06-03-2005, 07:21
Congratulations,

you are the most stupid guy I never met in NationStates. Don't forget that it's only a game.I doubt that, I'm sure that there are stupider people out there that they haven't met.
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 07:21
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #12
Proposed by: SteelerWorld

Description: UN Resolution #12: Gay Rights (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Reasons to have this resolution repealed: The resolution claims discrimination. This could not be further from the truth.

The bible defines marriage as the unity between man and a women. It further goes on to condem homesexuality. However, my feeling is if someone whishes to practice this that is up to them. However, they should not be able to unite in marriage.

I ask all member nation to make gay marriage illegal and outlaw it.
Because we all know we have to do everything the Bible says.
:rolleyes:

On top of the fact that repealing this won't make it illegal...
Asshelmetta
06-03-2005, 07:29
Because we all know we have to do everything the Bible says.
:rolleyes:

On top of the fact that repealing this won't make it illegal...
The funny part is that steelerworld wasn't trying to be funny.

He probably thought this proposal would get the 146 resolutions in a snap, and be enacted by acclamation.
RomeW
06-03-2005, 08:55
The first part is...weird. Carrots?

Interesting. I didn't know that carrots would solve all the world's problems, and, hey, if Diggy Doc will provide the carrots, I'm all for it.

However, the third part of his proposal is illegal, since it's already been covered before.
Resistancia
06-03-2005, 09:20
what is it with WZ Forums? they seem to aproove everything, including the deemed illegal proposal Act of Revision that i submitted!
RomeW
06-03-2005, 09:46
what is it with WZ Forums? they seem to aproove everything, including the deemed illegal proposal Act of Revision that i submitted!

This mystery has haunted us for as long as we'd known. Don't worry, you're not the only one dumbfounded by the entity known as WZ Forums.

(I speculate WZ Forums may be using a script to multi-endorse, but I don't want to take a definitive stance because I don't have any hard evidence for this, since this would be a serious accusation).
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 22:20
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: All Businesses
Proposed by: Mosh pit men

Description: So we got to the Moon.
We are capable of going further.
Why haven’t we?

This planet is getting increasingly crowded every year.
If we went back to the Moon we could set up governmental research stations to research terraforming, which would then help us reach Mars.
And when we get to Mars we build the Solar System’s first terraforming station and in a couple of years Bob’s your uncle we have another 144,800,000 km2 (144.8million km2) of land to use.

In agreeing this resolution:
• Your nation must use at least 3% of all tax collected to reach the Moon once more and then on to Mars.
• Your nation also must send people – not robots – to the Moon and Mars.
• The Moon and Mars will be divided up on a first come first serve basis so that the more eager nations will get better areas of land.
• At least a quarter of the entire population or your nation must be sent to the Moon and/or Mars within the century. This will make Earth a nicer place to live and improve the current problem of pollution.


Of course as time energy and money is being spent on this project many businesses will suffer but new businesses will pop up all over the place once people are spread out over 1,564,000,000 km2 (1.564 billion km2) of the galaxy.

And who knows maybe human being will spread further.
Our planet isn't crowded, but thanks for the concern. And what is this "Mars"?
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Mild
Proposed by: Old Canaan

Description: The present resolution,

RECALLING "Free Education", implemented August 19, 2003,

NOTING that the above mentioned fully covers pre-university education,

ADMITTING that the current pre-university curricula is extremely rigid and does not properly stimulate or reward intellectual traits like ingenuity, perspicacity or intuition,

DECLARING itself in favour of modern methods of teaching and learning, and against undermining the importance of new technologies in the process of education,

RECOGNIZING the quality of the turn-based strategy computer game series "Heroes of Might and Magic", created by New World Computing, published by 3DO and currently owned by Ubisoft,

EMPHASIZING the series' remarkable ability to develop the flexibility of the player's mind while nevertheless requiring the use of solid logic and analytic skills,

DEEMING it psychologically inoffensive in terms of violence, language and ideology,

ESTIMATING that the cost of implementing the present resolution will be close to neglectable,

REQUESTS that "Heroes of Might and Magic" becomes an optional subject in the school curricula.
:confused:
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Celiaville

Description: The OC is a television show that is brainwashing the minds of the people of not only Celiaville, but many other countries. We propose in removing the OC from television. When the OC is removed from the countries afflicted a number of improvements will occur:

- Literary and Numeracy rates will increase as research has indicated that those who watch the show regularly have suffered from declining literacy and numeracy levels. Removing the show from television will also help increase high school graduation as well, as teenagers are now able to keep up with the curriculum.

- Violence will decrease, as teenage girls will no longer have to fight against each over arguments such as "who is hotter?"

- The economy of the countries afflicted by the OC will improve substantially as people who watch the show will no longer be influenced by the affluent of the OC and bankruptcy will decrease.

- Self esteem will also improve in countries where the OC is viewed as people will no longer have to compare themselves with the likes of Mischa Barton or Ben Mckenzie.

We urge in not just countries where the OC is viewed, but all countries to rally together to prevent this show from spreading around the world.
:headbang:
Well, at least this is the second time they've submitted this. Hopefully with a few more they'll be out of the UN.
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Vanazu

Description: In the last few years ABC-weapons often became a way of political acting. These circumstances could not be accepted by the UN-members.
The only way to solve this fundermental problem is the prohibition of this cruel and terrible mass destruction weapons.
With accepting this resolution every member of the UN engage not to build any ABC-weapons.
If a country has already built ABC-weapons, they have to be destroyed under control of the UN.
What is an "ABC-weapon"? And if I do have some, why should I give them up?
Category: Global Disarmament
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Little India

Description: Since civilisation began, the world of NationStates has been carved up by individual nations and alliances of overwhelming power. For too long have small, defenceless nations been left exposed to the horrors of unending wars and horrendous battles, with genocide and ethnic cleansing in one region and nuclear war in others, it is time we learned to solve our problems using words, not hands.

1. PROPOSES that a NationStates-wide cease-fire should be implemented for a ten-year period to help war-torn countries rebuild their ageing and corrupt infrastructure.

2. SUGGESTS that ALL weapons should be banned in order to keep the cease-fire.

3. EXPECTS all military training in ALL countries to cease, in the interests of promoting global peace
NB: this does not extend to national police forces, as the Dominion of Little India and the Allied Imperial States of New Italy realises that it would be impossible to run a country with no police force.

4. REQUIRES a consul from each nation and an ambassador from each region (can be the UN delegate) to meet once every six months at the UN headquarters to monitor the cease-fire's progress.

It is time that we stopped fighting to solve our problems. Stop killing, stop invading, and stop bombing. May we look forward to a brighter, peaceful future.
Wow, not only is that amazing boneheaded, it's really illegal too.
Category: Environmental
Industry Affected: Automobile Manufacturing
Proposed by: Gyrotopia

Description: It's quite simple. We ban the use of gasoline in cars forcing people to use electric cars. Therefore eliminating the need to purchase millions of gallons of gasoline we all pay. It also helps the environment by eliminating car polution. A drastic change to electric cars may shock the economy so we introduce it slowly limiting the amount of oil sold per year. People will be forced to adapt and buy electric cars. With less oil per year we limit the amount of gas you can purchase a year as well. Each citizen will have to scan in in order to purchase oil. The purchase will be recorded and you will be told how much oil you have left. This also limits driving time forcing people to use public transportation and airplanes more often again helping the economy grow and prosper. It's voluntary so you don't have to ban oil if you don't want to.
It was odd to begin with, but the last sentence is really the clincher.
:p
Flibbleites
06-03-2005, 22:37
Our planet isn't crowded, but thanks for the concern. And what is this "Mars"?Actually there's a region called Mars.

What is an "ABC-weapon"? And if I do have some, why should I give them up?My guess is Atomic Biological Chemical, and if I'm right then B is aready banned.

It was odd to begin with, but the last sentence is really the clincher.
:pWho is even using gas anymore anyways? After all according to UN resolution #18 "Hydrogen Powered Vehicles" all our cars must run on hydrogen.
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 22:41
Actually there's a region called Mars.
Oh, so I suppose s/he wants us all to move there for some reason or other...
:D
Flibbleites
06-03-2005, 22:48
Oh, so I suppose s/he wants us all to move there for some reason or other...
:D
The question is, do the residents want all of us to move there.
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 22:50
The question is, do the residents want all of us to move there.
Well, that won't matter once the UN mandates it!
Hee. Can anyone say "massive invasion"?
:p
Flibbleites
06-03-2005, 22:52
Well, that won't matter once the UN mandates it!
Hee. Can anyone say "massive invasion"?
:p
I don't care what the UN says my main nation is NOT moving. I'll send my puppet but that's all.
Neo-Anarchists
06-03-2005, 22:56
I don't care what the UN says my main nation is NOT moving. I'll send my puppet but that's all.
If it helps the UN, I'll send all my puppets!
Yay for region overcrowding!
Flibbleites
07-03-2005, 07:11
Here's a name I never thought would end up on this list.
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #13


Proposed by: Vastiva

Description: UN Resolution #13: MANDATORY RECYCLING (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Litter makes jobs.
:confused:
Category: Repeal


Resolution: #12


Proposed by: Vastiva

Description: UN Resolution #12: Gay Rights (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Strong) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: Everyone should be miserable and left-handed. Especially in marriage.What does gay rights have to do with left handedness?
Neo-Anarchists
07-03-2005, 07:16
Whoa, what in the nine Hells does Vastiva think s/he is doing?
:confused:
RomeW
07-03-2005, 07:20
It's probably a form of protest of which I don't blame Vastiva for doing. Reading some of the filth presented on these forums could make anyone go crazy...
Resistancia
07-03-2005, 07:21
i thought it was an odd moment when Vastiva and I agreed on the 'oil ban' proposal...... this just confirms that

also, wouldnt all these 'ban fat' or 'tax fat' proposals be illegal? they go against the UBR, Rights of Women and Minorities, and, amazingly enough, Gay Rights resolutions.
Neo-Anarchists
07-03-2005, 07:27
i thought it was an odd moment when Vastiva and I agreed on the 'oil ban' proposal...... this just confirms that

also, wouldnt all these 'ban fat' or 'tax fat' proposals be illegal? they go against the UBR, Rights of Women and Minorities, and, amazingly enough, Gay Rights resolutions.
That's why they're in the silly proposals list.
Neo-Anarchists
07-03-2005, 07:30
Reading some of the filth presented on these forums could make anyone go crazy...
Ah, it's probably a really good thing I'm already crazy then.
RomeW
07-03-2005, 07:35
Ah, it's probably a really good thing I'm already crazy then.

Well, at least it keeps everything in perspective... :D
Neo-Anarchists
07-03-2005, 07:37
Well, at least it keeps everything in perspective... :D
Or rather, keeps it healthily out-of-perspective.
:D
Resistancia
07-03-2005, 07:37
has anyone been booted for the ban/tax fat proposals yet?
RomeW
07-03-2005, 07:40
Or rather, keeps it healthily out-of-perspective.
:D

Right. I think. Now I'm going to go crazy...
Vastiva
07-03-2005, 08:40
Whoa, what in the nine Hells does Vastiva think s/he is doing?
:confused:

I have achieved my goal of (a) getting on this list with (b) "legal but stupid" repeals.

As for the second one quoted, it's a very lame bit of humorously misreading the proposal. "Gay Rights", "Miserable Lefts". Har har har.
Neo-Anarchists
07-03-2005, 08:43
As for the second one quoted, it's a very lame bit of humorously misreading the proposal. "Gay Rights", "Miserable Lefts". Har har har.
:D
I can't believe nobody got that earlier.
RomeW
07-03-2005, 10:00
I have achieved my goal of (a) getting on this list with (b) "legal but stupid" repeals.

As for the second one quoted, it's a very lame bit of humorously misreading the proposal. "Gay Rights", "Miserable Lefts". Har har har.
Ah, I see...impressive.
Neo-Anarchists
07-03-2005, 10:49
Category: The Furtherment of Democracy
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Awesome Possumia

Description: Long has man awaited the day when animals can evolve into beings of greater intelligence. That day shal become reality with the installment of Microsoft Intellicaps. These hats produce brain power to smarten animals.

How does this affect democracy? Well, with the greater intelligence, animals can vote in society to increase the accuracy of votes. Everything has an opinion, shouldn't it have a right to express it?
:confused:
Category: Free Trade
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Kevin Islands

Description: A reSolution to eliminate the burdens and costs associated with electronic mail spam by prohibiting the transmission of all unsolicited commercial electronic mail to persons who place their electronic mail addresses on a national No-Spam Registry, and to prevent fraud and deception in commercial electronic mail by imposing requirements on the content of all commercial electronic mail messages.

Be it enacted by the United Nations:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Resolution may be cited as the `SPAM Resolution'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Empire of Kevin Islands finds the following:

(1) Electronic mail is an increasingly valuable tool for personal and commercial communication. Unsolicited commercial electronic mail (UCE), commonly known as spam , however, has become an impediment to efficient electronic mail use and creates problems for all types of users and organizations, including Internet Service Providers, individual users, and corporate organizations.

(2) UCE often contains objectionable, fraudulent, and offensive content. The Empire of Kevin Islands reports that over 60 percent of all UCE contains false, misleading, or deceptive information. Nearly one-fourth contains sexually explicit imagery. Parents have little ability to prevent these images from reaching their child's electronic mail in-box.

(3) Consumers increasingly ignore or delete legitimate commercial messages as they face an ever increasing amount of UCE. If the vitality and force of the Internet and electronic mail are to be preserved as a tool for commercial communication, UCE must be curbed.

(4) UCE is also a severe financial concern. Lost productivity, increased spending on technology systems and personnel, and personal frustration are some of the costs associated with UCE.

(5) Despite the increasing deployment of anti-spam services and technology, the number and size of spam messages are growing faster than ever. In 1999, the average electronic mail user received just 40 pieces of UCE per year. In 2003, the number is expected to pass 2,500. Experts estimate as much as 70 percent of electronic mail traffic qualifies as UCE.

(6) Existing anti-spam service solutions alone are insufficient to stop the growth of spam . Despite the fact that Internet Service Providers spend millions of dollars each year on research, filtering and other anti-spam software, and larger servers to deal with the ever expanding volume of UCE, current technology alone cannot control the spam problem.

(7) Laws does not specifically address UCE and leaves law enforcers and consumers with inadequate redress for the problem.

SEC. 3. PURPOSES.

The purposes of this Resolution are to--

(1) preserve electronic mail as a vital tool in interstate commerce by--

(A) reducing the costs associated with UCE;

(B) reducing the amount of UCE; and

(C) eliminating false, misleading, and deceptive content in all commercial electronic mail; and

(2) give consumers control over their in-boxes.

PROPOSED BY EMPEROR KEVIN "THE GREAT"
The Great Empire of Kevin Islands
REGIONAL LEADER
UNITED STATES OF GREAT NATIONS
It might be nice if you actually had the resolution address the issue, might it?
:confused:
Vastiva
07-03-2005, 11:08
Wow.

That's simply amazing.

A piece of spam about spam.
Neo-Anarchists
07-03-2005, 11:10
Wow.

That's simply amazing.

A piece of spam about spam.
It's one of the longest proposals I've ever seen that doesn't actually say anything.
Neo-Anarchists
07-03-2005, 23:05
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Significant
Proposed by: Gyrotopia

Description: The adding of war to the game. First you declare war on a country. There is no backing out unless you want to take the ban from the region. You then inform your UN delegate and the other nations delegate if you're from different regions. The opposite (if there is an opposite) delegate gives you 4 numbers between 1-20. The object is to guess your opponents 4 numbers. You then telegram your delegate with guesses. You take turns. If you lose you are banned from your region. If a delegate attacks or is attacked a UN member agreed on by both parties is chosen. If a delegate loses he must leave the nation. You may have one ally who will recieve 2 numbers. He can help guess but if he loses e is not effected. I think instating war will not only bring more members in, but add a little fun to the game.
:headbang: :headbang: :headbang:
Category: Moral Decency
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Jimbob the Jingoistic

Description: Everyone knows that people are at their most vunerable late at night, especially women who are walking along the streets alone.

In order to combat crime that takes place at night, I propose a curfew for all people, with the obvious exception of police, who would enforce that everyone observed it, and arrest anyone who was seen out of their houses after a certain time.

The time for the curfew would have to vary according to the month - for winter and autumnal months, the time would be earlier as the daylight hours are less.

This may seem unreasonable, but it is an important step in combatting crime. Nor would it put an end to parties and people having fun. In order that this may be implemented successfully, we would have to make it so that the curfew only affected people who were walking the streets at night. Travelling by any other mode than by foot would be acceptable, and hence allowed.

But we must put a stop to people walking around at night alone or even with a group of friends. Peoples lives depend on it.
Well, some criminals have cars. Oops! There goes you idea.
Category: Repeal
Resolution: #81
Proposed by: SteelerWorld

Description: UN Resolution #81: Definition of Marriage (Category: Human Rights; Strength: Mild) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The UN HEREBY :

DEFINES marriage as the civil joining of a member of any nation with any other member of any nation, regardless of race, religion, color, or any other characteristic, with the exception of age; Gay marriages would be banned under this.

RECOGNIZES age of the individual(s) as a just reason for not recognizing marriage, as per Article One of the Child Protection Act;

This would keep the old version the same with the exception of banning gay marriage.
Gah, this SteelerWorld chap again.
RomeW
07-03-2005, 23:24
Does the Microsoft Intellicap even exist?
Bahgum
08-03-2005, 00:16
Our Glorious Leader has read this thread with interest and has instructed the most magnificent venerable order of the flat cap to resume UN proposal writing duties.

By Eck.
Sir Albert ambassador t'Un and chief pie taster.
Neo-Anarchists
08-03-2005, 00:34
Does the Microsoft Intellicap even exist?
*shudders*
I hope not...
Asshelmetta
08-03-2005, 00:50
Does the Microsoft Intellicap even exist?
If it did, I'd have to support Jeianga's Animal Rights proposals.
Neo-Anarchists
08-03-2005, 08:20
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: Jordallia

Description: Before the warring factions appeared a stranger, dressed in magnificent robes, with a staff with an end of shining light. All fighting ground to a halt as all eyes looked to the stranger.
The strange man explained that this senseless war must end. This killing needlessly, this backstabbing, these countless battles where nothing is gained, the land is scarred and millions die.
We must unite. Together, we must combine our strengths to make up for our weaknesses. With our people truly cooperating, there will be no obstacle our tehnology can overcome, no quandry our science can't resolve. We must all work for the Greater Good.
But then we must go further. Slowly, and then faster, our empire shall expand, creeping further into the galaxy. Worlds shall be colonized, and the stars themselves shall be reforged in the cause of the greater good.
Together, we shall advance. Together, we shall bring unity to the entire universe.
That would be an okay RP. That doesn't mean it's a good proposal though.
:p
By the way, what's this "paving of the greater good"? Are we going to turn it into a parking lot or something?
Category: Human Rights
Strength: Strong
Proposed by: John Bernhardt

Description: Recognizing the increasing number of irresponsible corporate practices in food industries, especially fast food.

This resolution tries to put an end to unethical corporate practices in the fast food industry and help end obesity.

How it works:

Buisnesses shall no longer allowed to blatantly target groups under the age of 18 in marketing schemes trying to sell products related to fast food.

Requires every fast food eatery to post nutritional information and warnings near the cash register. It must also be able to be seen.

Requires government schools to provide healthier foods and promote healthier eating practices and exercise.
This resolution isn't particularly stupid or anything. What confounds me is, why in the name of the Goddess was it labelled a strong Human Rights proposal?
:confused:
Flibbleites
08-03-2005, 08:21
Does the Microsoft Intellicap even exist?
If it does, it'll crash every 5 minutes and require weekly security updates.:D

Anyway on the the proposed sillyness.
Category: Human Rights


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: Jordallia

Description: Before the warring factions appeared a stranger, dressed in magnificent robes, with a staff with an end of shining light. All fighting ground to a halt as all eyes looked to the stranger.
The strange man explained that this senseless war must end. This killing needlessly, this backstabbing, these countless battles where nothing is gained, the land is scarred and millions die.
We must unite. Together, we must combine our strengths to make up for our weaknesses. With our people truly cooperating, there will be no obstacle our tehnology can overcome, no quandry our science can't resolve. We must all work for the Greater Good.
But then we must go further. Slowly, and then faster, our empire shall expand, creeping further into the galaxy. Worlds shall be colonized, and the stars themselves shall be reforged in the cause of the greater good.
Together, we shall advance. Together, we shall bring unity to the entire universe.:confused:
Category: Moral Decency


Strength: Strong


Proposed by: New Eras

Description: We the people of the nation New Eras residing in the Christian Alliance region, on this 7th of March in the year 2005, submit this resolution to the United Nations. The resolution shall invoke the following:

Section 1. Defintion of human life- Life shall begin after concepttion whereas a human egg has been fertalized and has the capability to grow into further stages of development.

Section 2. Right to life- All humans beings, whether born or still in the stages of fetal growth, hereby have a right to life and continue to grow and prosper, and said right will not be revoked unless stated circumstances are present.

Section 3. Life, in any stage of devlopment in the womb, shall not be destroyed unless the following conditions exist:
A) The life of the mother is in danger.
B) The woman has been been proved to have been raped.
C) The child has a significant chance of retardation or inability to live a normal life, whereas both the mother and father agree it is in the best interest of the child not to be born.

We now submit this resolution in the effort to improve human morality and protection to the United Nations, whereas if approved, will go into effect immediatly. Apparently someone hasn't read the rules on repeals yet.