NationStates Jolt Archive

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices. However, there is now a specter hovering over it in the form of the acceptance of gay males (and, possibly, females) into our nation's armed forces. Such a corrosive influence would simply serve to contaminate the military and degrade its moral foundation. As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole. Many would be infuriated by allowing Liberace into the sacred organization, tainting it beyond recognition. They would be disgusted at having a comrade would is fantasizing about him rather than fighting the enemy, thus imperiling the lives of all his fellow soldiers. Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.

http://www.flashgiochi.org/materiale-per-forum/immagini-old/img/Not.this.shit.again.jpg

http://www.flashgiochi.org/materiale-per-forum/immagini-old/img/Not.this.shit.again.jpg

I must say that you were very quick in posting that link; in fact, you didn't even bother to read and comprehend my entire post prior to spamming. That is low.

I'll stick with the Don't ask don't tell bit we have now.

your absolutly rite!!!!111 they shud get rid of teh blaks an teh wimins to!!!11 LOL!!!!!!!1

http://static.flickr.com/52/126951152_9985452c7a_m.jpg
I present you with the Neo-K Seal of Disapproval

I must say that you were very quick in posting that link; in fact, you didn't even bother to read and comprehend my entire post prior to spamming. That is low.

Actually no it is not low. It is accurate. This has been debated countless times on these boards.

Haven't there always been gays in the military?

I'll stick with the Don't ask don't tell bit we have now.

Would you like to have a gay man watching your butt instead of watching your back in the heat of battle?

Would you like to have a gay man watching your butt instead of watching your back in the heat of battle?
Mixed-gender battalions don't seem to have that problem.

I must say that you were very quick in posting that link; in fact, you didn't even bother to read and comprehend my entire post prior to spamming. That is low.

I have over 10000 posts in just over a year(well a few months over a year), do you really think I'm above spam?

And I did skim it, though I'll admit I didn't read it fully. The gist seemed to be "gays in military=bad", which is quite obviously false since most soldiers are mature enough not to care who the soldiers serving with them want to shag. At least I'd hope so if it were my miliaty in question. (I'm assuming you're talking about the American military, since you mentioned America in your post)

Mixed-gender battalions don't seem to have that problem.

But they ain't fags, main. God likes wominzs.

I must say that you were very quick in posting that link; in fact, you didn't even bother to read and comprehend my entire post prior to spamming. That is low.
Honey, reading your poll suffices to dig up a picture like that.

Oh and: I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices.

http://www.freesmileys.org/emo/happy021.gif

Would you like to have a gay man watching your butt instead of watching your back in the heat of battle?

Better than having a homophobe watching out for gay people who might look at him when he should be waching my back.

Would you like to have a gay man watching your butt instead of watching your back in the heat of battle?

Better that than an angry Christian suppressing his true homo-erotic desire (armed, no less).

Honey, reading your poll suffices to dig up a picture like that.

Yes, yes it does.
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Anabasis/Awjeez.jpg

your vastly behind in the times RC it was well established God was in fact an Englishmen by 1600 (also in my experience butch lesbians are not only hawt especially in uniform but also tough)

and here is how the British army does this:

first question I was asked when I walked into the career office:

"would you have a problem with sharing accommodation with homosexuals?"

I swiftly answered no and expanded on it by quoting cobra west’s post from the day before about if a soldier is afraid of gay people how could they possibly deal with combat?

If I had answered yes I would have been thrown out of the career office and told not to come back:)

Would you like to have a gay man watching your butt instead of watching your back in the heat of battle?

:rolleyes:

That's all I have to say to this post.

I'd like three (3) examples of situations where a soldier's homosexuality has prevented him or her from performing his or her duties as a soldier. Just three.

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices. However, there is now a specter hovering over it in the form of the acceptance of gay males (and, possibly, females) into our nation's armed forces. Such a corrosive influence would simply serve to contaminate the military and degrade its moral foundation. As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole. Many would be infuriated by allowing Liberace into the sacred organization, tainting it beyond recognition. They would be disgusted at having a comrade would is fantasizing about him rather than fighting the enemy, thus imperiling the lives of all his fellow soldiers. Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.
The military is a morally corrupt institution, thus homosexuals should fit right in.

Proclaiming the US military to be a sacred organisation is blasphemy. You should be ashamed of yourself.

RC, are you a part of the American military?
I'm gunna guess no.
You're a discriminating, homophobic, sad little man, and I hope you realise this some day.

The military is a morally corrupt institution, thus homosexuals should fit right in.

How are homosexuals morally corrupt, exactly?
Or is my sarcasm detector fucking up again?

I'd like three (3) examples of situations where a soldier's homosexuality has prevented him or her from performing his or her duties as a soldier. Just three.

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices. However, there is now a specter hovering over it in the form of the acceptance of gay males (and, possibly, females) into our nation's armed forces. Such a corrosive influence would simply serve to contaminate the military and degrade its moral foundation. As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole. Many would be infuriated by allowing Liberace into the sacred organization, tainting it beyond recognition. They would be disgusted at having a comrade would is fantasizing about him rather than fighting the enemy, thus imperiling the lives of all his fellow soldiers. Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.

The stupidity! The bigotry!

IT BURNS!!!!

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.
A chauvinist could say the same thing about women.

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.
We have examples of heterosexual male soldiers raping female Iraqis, yet no examples of homosexual male soldiers raping male Iraqis.
Why is this? Are homosexuals so cunning and clever that they smartly avoid criminal behaviour?

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them.

http://www.linenoiz.com/pics/funny/its_a_conspiracy.jpg

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.
So this is what I missed by avoiding your threads, eh?

Reminds me again of why I could never have a troll puppet - even if it's just made up it's still fucking disgusting.

Or is my sarcasm detector fucking up again?

I have seen many people mention this "sarcasm detector" in this forum. I inquired at various stores, such as Home Depot and Circuit City, for such a device, but to no avail. I was even ridiculed by some. Is it a software program? Is it some type of hardware? What is it, exactly? Is it just a myth, like ultra-intelligent robots?

How are homosexuals morally corrupt, exactly?

They're sinners and so are soldiers. So are the rest of us, to be honest.

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.
How can you be so stupid?

Mixed-gender battalions don't seem to have that problem.

no there far to busy fucking by the stories I've heard (hooray for dessert heat, yes I know my spelling :D )

Would you like to have a gay man watching your butt instead of watching your back in the heat of battle?

yes especially if he’s combat med or making flattering comments "why yes I have been working out do I really look that fabulous" :)

The military is a morally corrupt institution, thus homosexuals should fit right in.

But they might make the military look like its in the 21st century :eek:

does anyone else think it's time for a more capable troll?

this guy isn't nearly as entertaining as he should be.

im okay with it as long as they don't make a big deal of it.
like okay ur gay, good for you.

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.

And you would know this how? Mind reading? God told you? It's in the Bible? Maybe you're been in that position and know all about those "cravings", eh?

How can you be so stupid?
Cos he's a troll. See below.

I have seen many people mention this "sarcasm detector" in this forum. I inquired at various stores, such as Home Depot and Circuit City, for such a device, but to no avail. I was even ridiculed by some. Is it a software program? Is it some type of hardware? What is it, exactly? Is it just a myth, like ultra-intelligent robots?

Are homosexuals so cunning and clever that they smartly avoid criminal behaviour?

No, they are no more intelligent than their heterosexual counterparts (and probably less so). However, there are simply fewer of them in the military.

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.

You sir, are an idiot.

does anyone else think it's time for a more capable troll?

RealAmerica was my fave even though he was a troll he still managed to give a whole new argument for abortion which I have yet to see beaten (plus his last few threads about Orwell kept us all entertained for hours)

does anyone else think it's time for a more capable troll?

this guy isn't nearly as entertaining as he should be.

MTAE was entertaining because he'd take a reprehensible idea such as this and spiral it into unexplored territories of heartless intolerance, defending himself with increasingly totalitarian arguments.

RC, on the other hand, simply states a stupid idea, fails to back it up, fails to respond to any arguments, and fails to say anything new.

In other words, he fails.

I have seen many people mention this "sarcasm detector" in this forum. I inquired at various stores, such as Home Depot and Circuit City, for such a device, but to no avail. I was even ridiculed by some. Is it a software program? Is it some type of hardware? What is it, exactly? Is it just a myth, like ultra-intelligent robots?

Its a figure of speech though I'm sure you know that and you are just having fun getting people worked up!

Cos he's a troll. See below.

You're entitled to your opinion, but I'd be much obliged if you'd answer my question.

I have over 10000 posts in just over a year(well a few months over a year), do you really think I'm above spam?
Yes? :D

:fluffle:
I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices.
Hihihi!
http://www.freesmileys.org/emo/happy021.gif

However, there is now a specter hovering over it in the form of the acceptance of gay males (and, possibly, females) into our nation's armed forces. Such a corrosive influence would simply serve to contaminate the military and degrade its moral foundation.
Hahaha! http://www.freesmileys.org/emo/happy024.gif
As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole.
BWahahahahahaha!!! http://www.freesmileys.org/emo/happy097.gif
Many would be infuriated by allowing Liberace into the sacred organization, tainting it beyond recognition. They would be disgusted at having a comrade would is fantasizing about him rather than fighting the enemy, thus imperiling the lives of all his fellow soldiers.
BWAHAHAHAAHAHAAA!! *cough* Please! *cough* No more! *cough* You're killing meeeeehohohohoho!!! http://www.casual-gamers.de/cg/images/smilies/huepfen.gif
Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.
AAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAAAHAAA!!!

*Dies of laughter* http://www.gamigo.de/forum/images/smilies/totlach.gif


Um... No.

You're entitled to your opinion, but I'd be much obliged if you'd answer my question.

No one will answer your questions, Mr. Caucasia, until you post sensibly.

You're entitled to your opinion, but I'd be much obliged if you'd answer my question.

Says the troll who refuses to answer any cogent arguments... :rolleyes:

It's completely idiotic to think that no openly gay men or women should ever be able to serve in the military. However, i think that that change should take place after our military is done with iraq. 59% or more of all people in the military are opposed to gays being allowed to enter the military. This is a horrible thing to think but they are the majority in the military and in combat, its the needs of the majority over those of the minoritiy. I think it would be damaging to the U.S. war effort because of morale issues but that we would have serious problems if after we leave iraq we didn't change don't ask don't tell.

I have seen many people mention this "sarcasm detector" in this forum. I inquired at various stores, such as Home Depot and Circuit City, for such a device, but to no avail. I was even ridiculed by some. Is it a software program? Is it some type of hardware? What is it, exactly? Is it just a myth, like ultra-intelligent robots?

I've never laughed so hard on this forum, ever. My mum's giving me weird looks.
Let me explain to you, for fear of further embarassment-I'm actually starting to feel sorry for you.
As is the nature of NSG, some people on this forum are sarcastic. When somebody can't tell if someone's being sarcastic or not, they say "my sarcasm detector is fucking up."
I cannot believe you actually went looking for a sarcasm detector in stores. I pity you.
In fact, I can't believe it so much, that I'm gunna have to ask who the hell is your original nation. Who's puppet are you?

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices. However, there is now a specter hovering over it in the form of the acceptance of gay males (and, possibly, females) into our nation's armed forces. Such a corrosive influence would simply serve to contaminate the military and degrade its moral foundation. As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole. Many would be infuriated by allowing Liberace into the sacred organization, tainting it beyond recognition. They would be disgusted at having a comrade would is fantasizing about him rather than fighting the enemy, thus imperiling the lives of all his fellow soldiers. Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.

so you admit the US military is a christian and jew crusader army.

so you admit the US military is a christian and jew crusader army.

Oh good grief.

so you admit the US military is a christian and jew crusader army.

He's a troll.

I've never laughed so hard on this forum, ever. My mum's giving me weird looks.
Let me explain to you, for fear of further embarassment-I'm actually starting to feel sorry for you.
As is the nature of NSG, some people on this forum are sarcastic. When somebody can't tell if someone's being sarcastic or not, they say "my sarcasm detector is fucking up."
I cannot believe you actually went looking for a sarcasm detector in stores. I pity you.
In fact, I can't believe it so much, that I'm gunna have to ask who the hell is your original nation. Who's puppet are you?

I just had an epiphany! I know what puppt trolls hate gays so much!


It's cos they've had someone's hand stuck up their ass all their lives and they want it out!

You may all worship my genuis now.

Its a figure of speech though I'm sure you know that and you are just having fun getting people worked up!

Were all those other people also using it as a figure of speech? In my research into the issue, I unearthed a bona-fide sarcasm detector, which can be viewed at the below link. I was considering purchasing it, but no price was listed, which is a shame. It sounds like an amazing invention.

http://bsllabs.theumb.net/proddetail.php?i=113

I feel that the gays have the same rights to heed the call to defend or to serve for the nation. Remember the USA is a 100% volunteer military and gays have the right and honor to serve their nation as we all do.

No, they are no more intelligent than their heterosexual counterparts (and probably less so). However, there are simply fewer of them in the military.

Why can't you give me a straight answer?

Many apologies for pun.

so you admit the US military is a christian and jew crusader army.

Bloody hell. You listen to this troll?
You're as bad as him.

so you admit the US military is a christian and jew crusader army.

Oh......my........goddess.


We need to archive this thread.

You're entitled to your opinion, but I'd be much obliged if you'd answer my question.

Hypocrite! You didn't answer my question on the other thread: How long have you been taught by your mother for?

As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole.

Actually, 44% of american military personel almost never or never attend religious services. Another 21% only attend once a month. That really doesn't sound like an organization devoted to god.

I just had an epiphany! I know what puppt trolls hate gays so much!


It's cos they've had someone's hand stuck up their ass all their lives and they want it out!

You may all worship my genuis now.

:eek: You've worked it out!
*bows down to Ifreann* Ifreann is God.

Would you like to have a gay man watching your butt instead of watching your back in the heat of battle?

One assumes that a man that pays more attention to his libido in the middle of a combat zone is not soldier material. Regardless if the object of his affection is male, female or a passing dog.

Bloody hell. You listen to this troll?
You're as bad as him.

He actually is far worse for he can't listen to reason because he's now a muslim.

Were all those other people also using it as a figure of speech? In my research into the issue, I unearthed a bona-fide sarcasm detector, which can be viewed at the below link. I was considering purchasing it, but no price was listed, which is a shame. It sounds like an amazing invention.

http://bsllabs.theumb.net/proddetail.php?i=113

You're derailing your own thread. How's about taking your discussion on sarcasm detectors to another thread and try to respond to everyone here.
So we can laugh more at your irrational fear of the gay

Were all those other people also using it as a figure of speech? In my research into the issue, I unearthed a bona-fide sarcasm detector, which can be viewed at the below link. I was considering purchasing it, but no price was listed, which is a shame. It sounds like an amazing invention.

http://bsllabs.theumb.net/proddetail.php?i=113

Yawn.

Why can't you give me a straight answer?

Many apologies for pun.

Many points for that, too.
*cant think of a pun to return fire*

This is the worst thread ever.

so you admit the US military is a christian and jew crusader army. ...

A match made in heaven! :fluffle:

I just had an epiphany! I know what puppt trolls hate gays so much!


It's cos they've had someone's hand stuck up their ass all their lives and they want it out!

You may all worship my genuis now.
I laughed. :p

Oh......my........goddess.


We need to archive this thread.
Very much so indeed.

Then again - nah. It'll just egg them on. :rolleyes:

Hypocrite! You didn't answer my question on the other thread: How long have you been taught by your mother for?

I have been taught by my mother since I was born. Well, I don't mean that literally. She was quite tired after giving birth and did not immediately begin instructing me. A better statement would be that I have not been taught by anyone but my mother, and occasionally, my father.

He actually is far worse for he can't listen to reason because he's now a muslim.

And muslims can't listen to reason?
Don't drag yourself down to his level.

Oh......my........goddess.


We need to archive this thread.

Yeah. It's the only thread I've ever died laughing in. *Wipes tear from eye* :)

I have been taught by my mother since I was born. Well, I don't mean that literally. She was quite tired after giving birth and did not immediately begin instructing me. A better statement would be that I have not been taught by anyone but my mother, and occasionally, my father.

*pokes*
Stop it, back to your silliness. Don't make me get the gays after you ;)

And muslims can't listen to reason?
Don't drag yourself down to his level.

Most muslims I'm sure can listen to reason however, in most of my debates with him, he has been so caught up in his religion that he failed to see points being made.

He actually is far worse for he can't listen to reason because he's now a muslim.

:eek: http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=1643082

Anyway, this thread has sort of derailed off the track and crashed. It started with a poorly constructed post about the US army being a force of Christianity and religion without corruption *cough* and the affects of recruiting homosexuals and women, and after the first posters blew bullet holes into it and the Poll Yes' severely outweight the Nos he appears to have tried to hide the fact that hes losing with distractions about Sarcasm Detectors.

so you admit the US military is a christian and jew crusader army.

:rolleyes:

I don't find anything wrong with lesbians in the military. I'll need a camera though.

I have been taught by my mother since I was born. Well, I don't mean that literally. She was quite tired after giving birth and did not immediately begin instructing me. A better statement would be that I have not been taught by anyone but my mother, and occasionally, my father.

You sir, have just been rumbled.Hoisted by you own petard (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12095993&postcount=1)
In the link you claim to have heard that we came from unicellular organsims on the first day of your 9th grade biology class. However now you say you have always been taught by your mother (apparantley a funamentalist Christain who wouldn't even suggest that we came from unicellular organisms). Your inconsistency confirms the already obvious fact that you are a fraud. Checkmate.

It's completely idiotic to think that no openly gay men or women should ever be able to serve in the military. However, i think that that change should take place after our military is done with iraq. 59% or more of all people in the military are opposed to gays being allowed to enter the military. This is a horrible thing to think but they are the majority in the military and in combat, its the needs of the majority over those of the minoritiy. I think it would be damaging to the U.S. war effort because of morale issues but that we would have serious problems if after we leave iraq we didn't change don't ask don't tell.

Don't make me get the gays after you ;)

too late, there here there Queer (this is the signal to spam this thread with disturbing pictures of men)

http://newsfromrussia.com/images/newsline/02.08.05_gays.gif

http://web.ukonline.co.uk/bingo275/doom/wonder-woman.jpg

Checkmate.

Caucasia got served a spicy dish of defeat.

It's completely idiotic to think that no openly gay men or women should ever be able to serve in the military. However, i think that that change should take place after our military is done with iraq. 59% or more of all people in the military are opposed to gays being allowed to enter the military. This is a horrible thing to think but they are the majority in the military and in combat, its the needs of the majority over those of the minoritiy. I think it would be damaging to the U.S. war effort because of morale issues but that we would have serious problems if after we leave iraq we didn't change don't ask don't tell.

This is a foolish way to go about things. How many soldiers opposed integration in the 60s? Besides, adhering to the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy is harming us in a very big way right now. How many soldiers and specialists (especially translators) have been booted simply because of their orientation?

too late, there here there Queer (this is the signal to spam this thread with disturbing pictures of men)

http://newsfromrussia.com/images/newsline/02.08.05_gays.gif

http://web.ukonline.co.uk/bingo275/doom/wonder-woman.jpg

As you wish:

http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/7633/hasselhofflove7qq.jpg ;)

The militarys of Britian and Canada, and half a dozen more, allow gays in their military, and they have not had any problems, if america was not stuck up they would see this, and its not gods will to be in the military as one of the 10 commandants is thou shall not kill, so try and excuse that one, and people are mature enough that during battle or training to focus on that, and if u knew anything sex in the military on a base is prohibitied, to EVERYONE, their are rules in place for "straight" people and your just have to accept the fact that the world is changing and if you cant move on, then to bad for you.

This is a foolish way to go about things. How many soldiers opposed integration in the 60s? Besides, adhering to the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy is harming us in a very big way right now. How many soldiers and specialists (especially translators) have been booted simply because of their orientation?

I'm not saying that we shouldn't intergrate open gays into the armed services. We just shouldn't compromise our already fragile efforts on something as trivial as being allowed to say that you are gay. When we are at peace then there will be no reason to not do it. Those translators obviously weren't very committed to the U.S. military b/c they easily could have just not said anything.

You sir, have just been rumbled.Hoisted by you own petard (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12095993&postcount=1)
In the link you claim to have heard that we came from unicellular organsims on the first day of your 9th grade biology class. However now you say you have always been taught by your mother (apparantley a funamentalist Christain who wouldn't even suggest that we came from unicellular organisms). Your inconsistency confirms the already obvious fact that you are a fraud. Checkmate.

You are not overly astute, are you? Although I am taught by my mother at home, I still have to go to school. The state sets a basic curriculum to which all schools have to adhere. I believe that basic biology was a mandate, but I am not certain; perhaps my mother simply wished to broaden my horizons. In any event, during 9th grade, my mother did teach me biology. I see no inconsistency or contradiction there. Checkmate to you, sir!

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices. However, there is now a specter hovering over it in the form of the acceptance of ****** males (and, possibly, females) into our nation's armed forces. Such a corrosive influence would simply serve to contaminate the military and degrade its moral foundation. As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole. Many would be infuriated by allowing Chris Rock into the sacred organization, tainting it beyond recognition. They would be disgusted at having a comrade would is fantasizing about fried chicken rather than fighting the enemy, thus imperiling the lives of all his fellow soldiers. Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.

Or change "gays" to Jews. Or to Hispanics. Or Asians. Switch a few words/names around to make it fit, and you've got the same argument, which should immediately sound foolish to you.

You sir, have just been rumbled.Hoisted by you own petard (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12095993&postcount=1)
In the link you claim to have heard that we came from unicellular organsims on the first day of your 9th grade biology class. However now you say you have always been taught by your mother (apparantley a funamentalist Christain who wouldn't even suggest that we came from unicellular organisms). Your inconsistency confirms the already obvious fact that you are a fraud. Checkmate.
Pwned!
You are not overly astute, are you? Although I am taught by my mother at home, I still have to go to school. The state sets a basic curriculum to which all schools have to adhere. I believe that basic biology was a mandate, but I am not certain; perhaps my mother simply wished to broaden my horizons. In any event, during 9th grade, my mother did teach me biology. I see no inconsistency or contradiction there. Checkmate to you, sir!
Yeah, no dice. You just got busted.

so you admit the US military is a christian and jew crusader army.

Unfortunately, for a long period of time, it has not been such an army. However, since the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, we are edging towards the holy dictate of spreading Christianity to the most horrifying corners of the world where uneducated and impious heathens abound. I hope that one day it will be what you describe so that the glory of the Crusades can again be reveled in.

Yeah, no dice. You just got busted.

No dice? Perhaps you need a refresher course on the concept of homeschooling (no pun intended). Although I do not attend a large school, we nonetheless have classes and grades still do apply. I can't simply say that I'm in 12th grade if I feel like it, even if I am the only student taking a particular course.

Or change "gays" to Jews. Or to Hispanics. Or Asians. Switch a few words/names around to make it fit, and you've got the same argument, which should immediately sound foolish to you.

Ah, the naive optimism of youth. *wipes tear from eye*

Unfortunately, for a long period of time, it has not been such an army. However, since the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, we are edging towards the holy dictate of spreading Christianity to the most horrifying corners of the world where uneducated and impious heathens abound. I hope that one day it will be what you describe so that the glory of the Crusades can again be reveled in.

You mean return to the days where being Christian was something one should be ashamed of ?

Nah. I quite like that it finally is starting to become a religion people can be proud to adhere to.

No dice? Perhaps you need a refresher course on the concept of homeschooling (no pun intended).

Couldn't step to the punmaster, eh? How PUNfortunate for you.

Oh God, that was terrible.

Ah, the naive optimism of youth. *wipes tear from eye*

Hm. Maybe instead of a general "you," I should have put "anybody with any sanity whatsoever."

Unfortunately, for a long period of time, it has not been such an army. However, since the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, we are edging towards the holy dictate of spreading Christianity to the most horrifying corners of the world where uneducated and impious heathens abound. I hope that one day it will be what you describe so that the glory of the Crusades can again be reveled in.

Once again, 44% of military personel almost never or never attend religious services. Another 21% only attend once a month. That is not a religious organization.

Hm. Maybe instead of a general "you," I should have put "anybody with any sanity whatsoever."Of course, anybody with any sanity whatsoever wouldn't need to replace "gay" to begin with. :p

However, since the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, we are edging towards the holy dictate of spreading Christianity to the most horrifying corners of the world where uneducated and impious heathens abound.

Yeah, I hear church attendance soared in Fallujah, Baghdad and Kabul last Christmas.

Of course, anybody with any sanity whatsoever wouldn't need to replace "gay" to begin with. :p

Touché.

Unfortunately, for a long period of time, it has not been such an army. However, since the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, we are edging towards the holy dictate of spreading Christianity to the most horrifying corners of the world where uneducated and impious heathens abound. I hope that one day it will be what you describe so that the glory of the Crusades can again be reveled in.

Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you. And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other.

But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you.

Thou shalt not kill.

:confused:

:confused:

Oh please. As if God and Jesus are important aspects of Christianity.

http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q100/TheSteveslols/ThreadDerailers.jpg
And here's one I made in 2-3 mins with MSPaint :)

I actually laughed out loud at that one.

*hands Ifreann a box of special cookies*

Oh please. As if God and Jesus are important aspects of Christianity.

yes everyone forgets the holy spirit…..BOO! :D

and this thread needs to die

I actually laughed out loud at that one.

*hands Ifreann a box of special cookies*

Yay!
*eats cookies with glee*

Oh please. As if God and Jesus are important aspects of Christianity.

Well, God is. Until he goes soft in the New Testament.
Worshippers: Hey, God! You used to be cool! You let us kill people and be assholes and stuff!
God: Hey, I'm still cool! Just don't judge and kill people and stuff.
Worshippers: Lalalalalalala! We can't hear you! Let's just do what he said before instead.

... This is why I'm glad to be a Pastafarian. We don't HAVE holy wars. :D

yes everyone forgets the holy spirit…..BOO! :D

You mean "Nobody expects..." ;)

This explains it all:
http://www.proud2serve.net/img/hystericals.jpg

Ah, the naive optimism of youth. *wipes tear from eye*

Let me taste your tears! Your tears are so yummy and sweet!

Unfortunately, for a long period of time, it has not been such an army. However, since the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, we are edging towards the holy dictate of spreading Christianity to the most horrifying corners of the world where uneducated and impious heathens abound. I hope that one day it will be what you describe so that the glory of the Crusades can again be reveled in.

And tell me - what makes them heathens?

I must say that you were very quick in posting that link; in fact, you didn't even bother to read and comprehend my entire post prior to spamming. That is low.
I think his response proved that he did indeed understand you.
Would you like to have a gay man watching your butt instead of watching your back in the heat of battle?
I would have hoped a highly trained member of the armed forces would be able both to admire my physique and dodge bullets, frankly.
Better than having a homophobe watching out for gay people who might look at him when he should be waching my back.
Absolutely correct.
I have seen many people mention this "sarcasm detector" in this forum. I inquired at various stores, such as Home Depot and Circuit City, for such a device, but to no avail. I was even ridiculed by some. Is it a software program? Is it some type of hardware? What is it, exactly? Is it just a myth, like ultra-intelligent robots?
It's bundled in with the standard package of reading and comprehension skills.

Ask your mother.
How can you be so stupid?
... Ask his mother. O_O
You're entitled to your opinion,
Oh yes, and you are entitled to yours. It is your assumption that we are entitled to your opinion that is the problem, here.
You sir, have just been rumbled.
... Owned.
You are not overly astute, are you? Although I am taught by my mother at home, I still have to go to school. The state sets a basic curriculum to which all schools have to adhere. I believe that basic biology was a mandate, but I am not certain; perhaps my mother simply wished to broaden my horizons. In any event, during 9th grade, my mother did teach me biology. I see no inconsistency or contradiction there. Checkmate to you, sir!
So you went to a school where the only teachers were your mother and, sometimes, your father? If you are home schooled, you do not have to attend a school at all... At least, not where I come from. In any case, she certainly failed in broadening your horizons...

Well, now I have satisfied myself with the troll, quite frankly, I do not see how RuleCaucasia's fascist, bigoted, white-supremacist, anti-homosexual, xenophobic argument really suggests anything other than increasing the number of gay soldiers in the army? After all, if they are the scourge of existence as you advocate, why are you not imploring your government to use them as fodder? It would save your fascist, bigoted, white-supremacist, anti-homosexual, xenophobic good Christian blood from being spilled... ¬.¬

Let me taste your tears! Your tears are so yummy and sweet!



And tell me - what makes them heathens?

Because their imaginary friend has a different name than his does.

You are not overly astute, are you? Although I am taught by my mother at home, I still have to go to school. The state sets a basic curriculum to which all schools have to adhere. I believe that basic biology was a mandate, but I am not certain; perhaps my mother simply wished to broaden my horizons. In any event, during 9th grade, my mother did teach me biology. I see no inconsistency or contradiction there. Checkmate to you, sir!

Well that doesn't actually seem to be the case now does it? After all:

I have been taught by my mother since I was born. A better statement would be that I have not been taught by anyone but my mother, and occasionally, my father.

In case you're unaware, you said that you have not been taught by anyone but your mother, meaning you would never had gone to school.

yes everyone forgets the holy spirit…..BOO! :D

and this thread needs to die

In my younger and more vulnerable years my father gave me some advice that I’ve been turning over in my mind ever since.

“Whenever you feel like criticizing any one,” he told me, “just remember that all the people in this world haven’t had the advantages that you’ve had.”

He didn’t say any more, but we’ve always been unusually communicative in a reserved way, and I understood that he meant a great deal more than that. In consequence, I’m inclined to reserve all judgments, a habit that has opened up many curious natures to me and also made me the victim of not a few veteran bores. The abnormal mind is quick to detect and attach itself to this quality when it appears in a normal person, and so it came about that in college I was unjustly accused of being a politician, because I was privy to the secret griefs of wild, unknown men. Most of the confidences were unsought—frequently I have feigned sleep, preoccupation, or a hostile levity when I realized by some unmistakable sign that an intimate revelation was quivering on the horizon; for the intimate revelations of young men, or at least the terms in which they express them, are usually plagiaristic and marred by obvious suppressions. Reserving judgments is a matter of infinite hope. I am still a little afraid of missing something if I forget that, as my father snobbishly suggested, and I snobbishly repeat, a sense of the fundamental decencies is parcelled out unequally at birth.

And, after boasting this way of my tolerance, I come to the admission that it has a limit. Conduct may be founded on the hard rock or the wet marshes, but after a certain point I don’t care what it’s founded on. When I came back from the East last autumn I felt that I wanted the world to be in uniform and at a sort of moral attention forever; I wanted no more riotous excursions with privileged glimpses into the human heart. Only Gatsby, the man who gives his name to this book, was exempt from my reaction—Gatsby, who represented everything for which I have an unaffected scorn. If personality is an unbroken series of successful gestures, then there was something gorgeous about him, some heightened sensitivity to the promises of life, as if he were related to one of those intricate machines that register earthquakes ten thousand miles away. This responsiveness had nothing to do with that flabby impressionability which is dignified under the name of the “creative temperament.”—it was an extraordinary gift for hope, a romantic readiness such as I have never found in any other person and which it is not likely I shall ever find again. No—Gatsby turned out all right at the end; it is what preyed on Gatsby, what foul dust floated in the wake of his dreams that temporarily closed out my interest in the abortive sorrows and short-winded elations of men.

My family have been prominent, well-to-do people in this Middle Western city for three generations. The Carraways are something of a clan, and we have a tradition that we’re descended from the Dukes of Buccleuch, but the actual founder of my line was my grandfather’s brother, who came here in fifty-one, sent a substitute to the Civil War, and started the wholesale hardware business that my father carries on to-day.
Source: http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/f/fitzgerald/f_scott/gatsby/chapter1.html

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices.

BWA-HAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!!!

*gasp* *inhale*


BWAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

*gasp* *inhale*

BWAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHaahahaaa.... *passes out*

Hahahaha! What a most excellent response! Great Gatsby, awesome...

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices. However, there is now a specter hovering over it in the form of the acceptance of gay males (and, possibly, females) into our nation's armed forces. Such a corrosive influence would simply serve to contaminate the military and degrade its moral foundation. As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole. Many would be infuriated by allowing Liberace into the sacred organization, tainting it beyond recognition. They would be disgusted at having a comrade would is fantasizing about him rather than fighting the enemy, thus imperiling the lives of all his fellow soldiers. Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.

If you seriously think that the military is "morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices" then you obviously have never even been inside a locker room, let alone served in the military. :p

In case you're unaware, you said that you have not been taught by anyone but your mother, meaning you would never had gone to school.

I'm sorry, perhaps I needed to be clearer. What part of homeschooling don't you understand? I consider it to be school; it's not leisure time spent at home watching TV and eating popcorn. I learn various bits of information while I'm at school, not while at home. What would you rather I call it?

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.

wow. ur statement is so retarded this must be one of those borat-esque jokes. but i have a feeling it isn't, which makes me all the more ashamed/sad that you're from the same country as me.

:confused:

Yes, we should love our enemies. We should love them enough to save them from eternal damnation by converting them to Christianity.

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices.

Rape by invading soldiers.

I'm sorry, perhaps I needed to be clearer. What part of homeschooling don't you understand? I consider it to be school; it's not leisure time spent at home watching TV and eating popcorn. I learn various bits of information while I'm at school, not while at home. What would you rather I call it?
'Home', I think. The point of 'homeschooling' is that you are 'schooled' at 'home'. You do not attend a 'school' as such.

I would have hoped a highly trained member of the armed forces would be able both to admire my physique and dodge bullets, frankly.

:fluffle:

Yes, we should love our enemies. We should love them enough to save them from eternal damnation by converting them to Christianity.

I thought the whole point of Christinaity was that it is a choice.
You choose to embrace it and you are saved. You choose not to, and are damned.

Forcing people to believe or die is an insult to God.

Frankly, I found The Fourth Holy Reich (the Nazi poster I debated a while back) to be more entertaining, and certainly more rational.

And please do not call the US military a crusading Christian & Jew army. The Crusaders murdered Jews as well.

Oh, and the sixth commandment is "Do not murder" - killing is OK in certain circumstances:
He is trying to kill you or another innocent
He is a condemned criminal and you are the executioner

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices. However, there is now a specter hovering over it in the form of the acceptance of gay males (and, possibly, females) into our nation's armed forces. Such a corrosive influence would simply serve to contaminate the military and degrade its moral foundation. As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole. Many would be infuriated by allowing Liberace into the sacred organization, tainting it beyond recognition. They would be disgusted at having a comrade would is fantasizing about him rather than fighting the enemy, thus imperiling the lives of all his fellow soldiers. Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.

http://www.thefunnybone.com/vstuff/bagdog.gif

*snip*

Scince when has any military been moraly pristeen. They kill people.

You mean "Nobody expects..." ;)

I wasn't expecting the Spanish inquisition *hopes they don't have a rack*

Because their imaginary friend has a different name than his does.

Actually, they do. Translate Allah into English and it means God. Doesn't it? Or am I misinformed. Again.

Anyway, this troll shoule be treated like the hobbits in lord of the rings. Put in a sack and beaten :p

:fluffle:
Heheh.

Actually, they do. Translate Allah into English and it means God. Doesn't it?

That's correct. Arab Christians pray to "Allah" as well.

BWA-HAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!!!

*gasp* *inhale*


BWAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

*gasp* *inhale*

BWAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHaahahaaa.... *passes out*

That was very much my reaction to that statement. If he weren't a completely made up persona I'd love to see him join the military and find out how terribly wrong he is. I spent 4 years in the US Army and I can tell you that if anything the military is rather less "pure" than the populace as a whole.

BWA-HAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!!!

*gasp* *inhale*


BWAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

*gasp* *inhale*

BWAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHaahahaaa.... *passes out*

(Joins LG)

ROFLCOPTER!
LMAONADE!
LOLLERGASM!
LOLLERCAUST!
LOLLERCOASTER!

And finally, the laugh of Don Kanonji from Bleach:

BO-HAHAHAHAHA!

Scince when has any military been moraly pristeen. They kill people.
That was my point as well.

Unfortunately, for a long period of time, it has not been such an army. However, since the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, we are edging towards the holy dictate of spreading Christianity to the most horrifying corners of the world where uneducated and impious heathens abound.
Wow, you really are profoundly misinformed, aren't you? I bet you live somewhere like Kansas.

I don't think gays should be allowed in combat. The people fighting in the military currently are mostly heterosexual males and I'm betting theres a fair number of homophobes too. Putting all these people together would only add awkwardness and tension that shouldn't be there. Also gays' having sexual feelings for their fellow soldiers could be a distraction and possibly having them prefer the safety of some soldiers over others could be a big problem on the battlefield.

I'm sorry, perhaps I needed to be clearer. What part of homeschooling don't you understand? I consider it to be school; it's not leisure time spent at home watching TV and eating popcorn. I learn various bits of information while I'm at school, not while at home. What would you rather I call it?

If you are taught by your mother at home, you do not go to a school because you are home-schooled. You however, claim to be homeschooled by your mother all of your life, but also say you heard that we came from unicellular organisms in your the 9th grade biology class. This is inconsistent. You are lying.

If you are taught by your mother at home, you do not go to a school because you are home-schooled. You however, claim to be homeschooled by your mother all of your life, but also say you heard that we came from unicellular organisms in your the 9th grade biology class. This is inconsistent. You are lying.

Maybe his mom was a schoolteacher?

Nahhhhhhhhhhhh.

THOU LIEST!

What? But if we let teh gayzorz into the military, the entire institution will collapse into a nonstop anal orgy! That's not what our founding fathers wanted! Except for Franklin!

If you are taught by your mother at home, you do not go to a school because you are home-schooled. You however, claim to be homeschooled by your mother all of your life, but also say you heard that we came from unicellular organisms in your the 9th grade biology class. This is inconsistent. You are lying.

He did make quite a differentiation between being at home and being at school at home, maybe he meant a biology class at home. Although He obviously got his crazy views from his mother and I dont know why she would teach molecular biology if she doesnt believe it. I bet shes like the mum in Carrie.

But theres no need to call the poor messed up guy a liar. I was doing some sociology thing and I read that roughly a third of our personality and behaviour is influenced by our parents, a third by our peers and a third by our school environment. In this guys case all 3 thirds are his mother.

http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q100/TheSteveslols/ThreadDerailers.jpg
And here's one I made in 2-3 mins with MSPaint :)

Nice :)

But why did you use MSPaint? :confused:

But theres no need to call the poor messed up guy a liar. I was doing some sociology thing and I read that roughly a third of our personality and behaviour is influenced by our parents, a third by our peers and a third by our school environment. In this guys case all 3 thirds are his mother.

You're obviously a nice guy, but there really is no need to defend this person, he is blatantly a troll (and quite probably MeansToAnEnd at that, considering his join date is so soon after MTAE's last post). All the threads he has posted have been nothing but controversial wind-ups. None of the information he posts fits together. On the other hand I do feel sorry for someone who gets kicks out of annoying people, because one of these days, someone's going to snap and punch him in the face. Hard.

Everyoen should be allowed in the military and bisexuality should be encouraged. Relationships should be allowed to flourish and thus you get a more effective fighting unit. Your personnel will be willing to that extra mile if they know it's a loved one their protecting. Or at least that's what the greeks thought, and they were pretty damn tough. They also left babies on hillsides. I'm not so keen on that idea.

Unfortunately, for a long period of time, it has not been such an army. However, since the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, we are edging towards the holy dictate of spreading Christianity to the most horrifying corners of the world where uneducated and impious heathens abound. I hope that one day it will be what you describe so that the glory of the Crusades can again be reveled in.
Your name is "RuleCaucasia". That suggests that you find racial superiority acceptable.
You like the Crusades. They were utter shite. You cannot kill people and remain a true Christian, that is hypocritical in the extreme.
You are also maybe the most bigotted person ever. Even MTAE had some taste. You do not.

Gays should be allowed in the military. They make perfectly good soldiers, and wouldn't be susceptable to enemy distractions like naked women running across the street or something. I dunno. But they should be let into the army.

Yes, we should love our enemies. We should love them enough to save them from eternal damnation by converting them to Christianity.

Your love hurts. Stop it.

Nice :)

But why did you use MSPaint? :confused:

PSP was taking too long to start and I got impatient.

Bismilah! NO! You will not feed the troll!
Feed the troll!
Bismilah! You will not feed the troll!
Feed the troll!
Will not feed the troll. Feed the troll!
Will not feed the troll. Feed the troll!
Will not feed the troll. Feed the troll!
O-o-o
No, no, no, no, no, no, NO!
- From the song "Trollian Rhapsody"

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices.

And I have always regarded the Post Office as a morally pristine institution. Doesn't make it so.

Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.

But if they were gettin' it on in their foxholes, surely the 'excessive burden of discomfort' would be greatly reduced - particularly after they're done sperming each other. No?

Frankly, I found The Fourth Holy Reich (the Nazi poster I debated a while back) to be more entertaining, and certainly more rational.

And please do not call the US military a crusading Christian & Jew army. The Crusaders murdered Jews as well.

Oh, and the sixth commandment is "Do not murder" - killing is OK in certain circumstances:
He is trying to kill you or another innocent
He is a condemned criminal and you are the executioner

Hell, the Crusaders mudered other CHRISTIANS for God's sake. The Latin invaders captured Constantinople during one of the Crusades from the Byzantines for no fucking reason other than to make money. And during the others, they went to Jerusalem and just killed ANYONE, Christian, Jew, Muslim, what have you.

http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q100/TheSteveslols/ThreadDerailers.jpg
And here's one I made in 2-3 mins with MSPaint :)http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/7913/hijackedimagecopy2ts4.png
I have no idea why I just made that image. Comments appreciated. I was also thinking of phrases such as -
- Derailers take it to a higher level
- Derailers take it to a whole new platform

Hell, the Crusaders mudered other CHRISTIANS for God's sake. The Latin invaders captured Constantinople during one of the Crusades from the Byzantines for no fucking reason other than to make money. And during the others, they went to Jerusalem and just killed ANYONE, Christian, Jew, Muslim, what have you.

You know you've lost the war when your army turns around and sacks your own fucking capital.

Anyone wanna make a picture out of that? Cause I'm too lazy to.

Bismilah! NO! You will not feed the troll!
Feed the troll!
Bismilah! You will not feed the troll!
Feed the troll!
Will not feed the troll. Feed the troll!
Will not feed the troll. Feed the troll!
Will not feed the troll. Feed the troll!
O-o-o
No, no, no, no, no, no, NO!
- From the song "Trollian Rhapsody"

That is certainly an "interesting" song (to remove any ambiguity by my usage of punctuation, I placed the word "interesting" in quotes to convey the sense that I do not find it peculiar in a positive way; rather, I find it rather weird and lacking in taste and rhythm). However, I believe you made it up. I investigated the matter on Google, but, surprisingly, my query turned up no results whatsoever!

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Trollian+Rhapsody%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Did you perhaps mean "Trillian Rhapsody" as the search engine helpfully suggested?

That is certainly an "interesting" song (to remove any ambiguity by my usage of punctuation, I placed the word "interesting" in quotes to convey the sense that I do not find it peculiar in a positive way; rather, I find it rather weird and lacking in taste and rhythm). However, I believe you made it up. I investigated the matter on Google, but, surprisingly, my query turned up no results whatsoever!

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Trollian+Rhapsody%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Did you perhaps mean "Trillian Rhapsody" as the search engine helpfully suggested?

Are you OK? I mean, have you locked your meds in a cabinet or something and cannot get at them?

If you are taught by your mother at home, you do not go to a school because you are home-schooled. You however, claim to be homeschooled by your mother all of your life, but also say you heard that we came from unicellular organisms in your the 9th grade biology class. This is inconsistent. You are lying.

Each day (excluding most weekends), I wake up at 7:00 in the morning, eat breakfast, and go to school. Where is my particular school? In my own house. Is it a learning institution? Yes. Am I assigned homework? Yes. Am I taught a particular course by a particular teacher? Yes. Why, then, can it not be considered a school? I have a feeling -- well, actually, it's more than a feeling, that most children who participate in homeschooling will claim that they go to school. And yes, my mother did teach me biology in 9th grade, although she took great care to ensure that the class conformed to the Bible, and taught only the bare essentials of evolution and presented a compelling argument for why Darwinism is flawed, but that's another matter.

Are you OK? I mean, have you locked your meds in a cabinet or something and cannot get at them?

I am not on any medication whatsoever, and I cannot see what in my post made you suggest something like that. Do you believe anybody who is not aware of every single obscure song in the English language deserves to be on medication?

And yes, my mother did teach me biology in 9th grade, although she took great care to ensure that the class conformed to the Bible

Ah well, it's not like you wanted to go to university anyway.

I am not on any medication whatsoever, and I cannot see what in my post made you suggest something like that. Do you believe anybody who is not aware of every single obscure song in the English language deserves to be on medication?

I assumed that you were on medication and have lost it. I was hoping to be of help.

I assumed that you were on medication and have lost it. I was hoping to be of help.

Oh, well, thank you for trying to help, but I assure you that no medication is prescribed to me. It's an interesting story, though, because the doctors told me that they did want to give me certain drugs for what they called "psychological problems," but my mother said that "we are who we are" and refused, and I've been fine ever since.

Oh, well, thank you for trying to help, but I assure you that no medication is prescribed to me. It's an interesting story, though, because the doctors told me that they did want to give me certain drugs for what they called "psychological problems," but my mother said that "we are who we are" and refused, and I've been fine ever since.

Oh wait, you're joking.

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.

Methinks the latent/homophobe protests too much...again...:rolleyes:

As long as they do their duty and fight, I don't care what sexual orientation they are.

When I first saw that you were back, and started yet another ridiculous thread, I tried my hardest to be simply entertained, and not post. However, upon reading this post:

Oh, well, thank you for trying to help, but I assure you that no medication is prescribed to me. It's an interesting story, though, because the doctors told me that they did want to give me certain drugs for what they called "psychological problems," but my mother said that "we are who we are" and refused, and I've been fine ever since.

I couldn't help myself. What on earth would compel you to tell NSG this? Especially in a situation where more than half the people reading your posts think you're a foolish troll?! I'm sorry my friend, you have opened yourself up to some serious flaming!

As to the original post, of course gays should be allowed in the military. Anybody meeting the physical requirements can join. I think you're forgeting the rigorous training, if not physical, than mental, that each soldier goes through. I should think that each soldier would have enough focus, and if failing at that, self disipline, not to 'oogle' their fellow soldiers during the heat of battle, regardless of gender or sexual orientation. Case closed.

RuleCaucasia, trolling like it’s 1959.

Oh, well, thank you for trying to help, but I assure you that no medication is prescribed to me. It's an interesting story, though, because the doctors told me that they did want to give me certain drugs for what they called "psychological problems," but my mother said that "we are who we are" and refused, and I've been fine ever since.
Get a dictionary. Under the definition of "fine" it'll say "not you at all".

I couldn't help myself. What on earth would compel you to tell NSG this?

One particular poster seemed quite insistent on the matter of medication, so I assured him that I am not, in fact, on any. However, I did feel it necessary to share the whole story instead of an abridged version. That would be almost like lying.

I have seen many people mention this "sarcasm detector" in this forum. I inquired at various stores, such as Home Depot and Circuit City, for such a device, but to no avail. I was even ridiculed by some. Is it a software program? Is it some type of hardware? What is it, exactly? Is it just a myth, like ultra-intelligent robots?

Oh Jesus... :D

Priceless stuff. I think MTAE's been reading up some on Jesussaves.... :D

One particular poster seemed quite insistent on the matter of medication, so I assured him that I am not, in fact, on any. However, I did feel it necessary to share the whole story instead of an abridged version. That would be almost like lying.

Nah, I'm convinced you're taking the mickey.

One particular poster seemed quite insistent on the matter of medication, so I assured him that I am not, in fact, on any. However, I did feel it necessary to share the whole story instead of an abridged version. That would be almost like lying.

The question was mostly rhetorical. By the way,...

Oh Jesus... :D

Priceless stuff. I think MTAE's been reading up some on Jesussaves.... :D

Case in point. Hi Pancake!

Each day (excluding most weekends), I wake up at 7:00 in the morning, eat breakfast, and go to school. Where is my particular school? In my own house. Is it a learning institution? Yes. Am I assigned homework? Yes. Am I taught a particular course by a particular teacher? Yes. Why, then, can it not be considered a school? I have a feeling -- well, actually, it's more than a feeling, that most children who participate in homeschooling will claim that they go to school.

If you can't see the difference between a school with classes and actual education* and teachers and principles, and being homeschooled by your mother, there's something wrong with you. Oh wait! You do know, you're just pretending for your troll alter-ego.

*nothing against homeschooling as a whole, just this case
And yes, my mother did teach me biology in 9th grade, although she took great care to ensure that the class conformed to the Bible, and taught only the bare essentials of evolution and presented a compelling argument for why Darwinism is flawed, but that's another matter.

The same mother who told you Vietnam was fought to stop Christian persecution told you with all seriousness that we evolved from unicellular organisms? Inconsistent
I'd also like you to explain what sort of person saturates everything they post with controversy - and nothing else, who isn't a troll.

I'm sorry, perhaps I needed to be clearer. What part of homeschooling don't you understand? I consider it to be school; it's not leisure time spent at home watching TV and eating popcorn. I learn various bits of information while I'm at school, not while at home. What would you rather I call it?

You're not in a SCHOOL building. When THE VAST MAJORITY of people say SCHOOL, they mean THE PLACE. You dig, Jackson?

Now, as uber-Christian as you are, and therefore your parents, why in Your God's Green and only Six-Thousand-Year-Old Earth would your mother tell you about evolution at all? Sounds red-snapperish to me.

time for some gay pride videos though I'm going to stick with television (I despise AMV's so this is a special treat):

Queer as folk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV4wm45bpyk)


L word (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EcxQYdPdLQ&mode=related&search=)

the lesson of both these shows? that gay people are just like you or me they love there not rampant sex fiends and there not out to get you nor do they want you

so I fail to see why sexual orientation has anything at all to do with life or religion

lets hope I stop being so sentimental soon :P

PSP was taking too long to start and I got impatient.

I was just thinking that you had used the Motivator online. Quick and easy :)

http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/7913/hijackedimagecopy2ts4.png
I have no idea why I just made that image. Comments appreciated. I was also thinking of phrases such as -
- Derailers take it to a higher level
- Derailers take it to a whole new platform
Yay! I've started a trend!
time for some gay pride videos though I'm going to stick with television (I despise AMV's so this is a special treat):

Queer as folk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV4wm45bpyk)


L word (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EcxQYdPdLQ&mode=related&search=)

the lesson of both these shows? that gay people are just like you or me they love there not rampant sex fiends and there not out to get you nor do they want you

so I fail to see why sexual orientation has anything at all to do with life or religion

lets hope I stop being so sentimental soon :P

What are you doing?

Proper arguements have no place in this thread. This thread is for us to be amused at RC's apparent fear of homosexuals and how totally off topic the thread has gone. Even RC has gone off on a total tangent.

I was just thinking that you had used the Motivator online. Quick and easy :)

What's this then?

time for some gay pride videos though I'm going to stick with television (I despise AMV's so this is a special treat):

Queer as folk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV4wm45bpyk)


L word (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EcxQYdPdLQ&mode=related&search=)

the lesson of both these shows? that gay people are just like you or me they love there not rampant sex fiends and there not out to get you nor do they want you

so I fail to see why sexual orientation has anything at all to do with life or religion

lets hope I stop being so sentimental soon :PI don't know about you, but I'm certainly not like those queers. I don't have an iPod so unlike them I don't have a constant backing track to my life. :(

OK, lemme try to end this.

RC: You are not funny. You have never been funny. You never will be funny. Now please discard your troll and tell us who your main is.
Thank you.

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices.

the first problem you have is your initial assumptions. if you work on those a little you may find your mind opened to a whole host of new, little elightenments, so that one day even you may become a real boy and not some wooden puppet with the minister's and the general's hand up your arse.

Why...would your mother tell you about evolution at all?

I wished to take the SAT II examination in biology, and evolution was a core component of that test. Luckily, with her coaching, I was able to score a "5" on it.

A chauvinist could say the same thing about women.


HAHAHAHAHAHA I LOVE THIS!!! Are you one of those feminazis i always here about? or are you an uneducated male? You go from a subject about gays (which obviously has nothing to do with women) and then you bring sexism into it. And you didnt say chauvinist males you just said chauvinists so you're blatantly accusing certain men of being chauvinists when it wasnt even called for. And now i bet i get fifty posts from people stating something that refutes ONE of my points then claiming that im stupid and that you all have superior intelligence and that i should grow up.


From the order of the holy snipers :sniper:

What's this then?

Here you go! http://flagrantdisregard.com/flickr/motivator.php

And now i bet i get fifty posts from people stating something that refutes ONE of my points then claiming that im stupid and that you all have superior intelligence and that i should grow up.


From the order of the holy snipers :sniper:

To be honest, people don't need to refute your points. The fact that you used the word "feminazi" and the sniper emoticon pretty much tells us all we need to know.

If you can't see the difference between a school with classes and actual education* and teachers and principles,

Actually, my mother, although she is not a principal is quite principled. They are words which are commonly misused, so you should take care. It's tricky.

The same mother who told you Vietnam was fought to stop Christian persecution told you with all seriousness that we evolved from unicellular organisms?

As I previously stated, she also expounded upon, at length, how that common scientific conception is flawed. Nonetheless, she informed me that it would most likely be on the SAT II subject test and that I would need to know of it, despite its being false. Our educational system is quite dead-set against religion, so it's always a struggle for us, but we have to do the best with what we've got.

RuleCaucasia: I don't know if you're really MTAE or not, but regardless, you're awesome; I haven't laughed this hard in weeks. Don't stop.

They don't engage in their disturbing actions when cameras are on them; they are cleverly furtive in masking their desires until they are alone, with a good-looking male soldier in front of them. At that point, they become mesmerized by their perverted cravings and the complexities of combat slip their mind, thus endangering their entire squad.

Make love, not war.

Actually, my mother, although she is not a principal is quite principled. They are words which are commonly misused, so you should take care. It's tricky.

You can't even spell parrot.

Make love, not war.

What a hippy! :D ;)

Yay! I've started a trend!


What are you doing?

Proper arguements have no place in this thread. This thread is for us to be amused at RC's apparent fear of homosexuals and how totally off topic the thread has gone. Even RC has gone off on a total tangent.Since when does using fiction to prove a point constitute a proper argument?

Having never actually watched queer as folk, I seem to remember hearing that the program was just thinly veiled excuse to show softcore gay pornography on a terrestrial channel.

*Yays with Ifreann*

Oh my. I haven't laughed that much in quite a while. :D

I wished to take the SAT II examination in biology, and evolution was a core component of that test. Luckily, with her coaching, I was able to score a "5" on it.
You got... a 5... on the SAT II? Mind boggling. I didn't even think that was possible.

What's this then?

Here you go! http://flagrantdisregard.com/flickr/motivator.php

He did the work for me :fluffle:

HAHAHAHAHAHA I LOVE THIS!!! Are you one of those feminazis i always here about? or are you an uneducated male? You go from a subject about gays (which obviously has nothing to do with women) and then you bring sexism into it. And you didnt say chauvinist males you just said chauvinists so you're blatantly accusing certain men of being chauvinists when it wasnt even called for. And now i bet i get fifty posts from people stating something that refutes ONE of my points then claiming that im stupid and that you all have superior intelligence and that i should grow up.


From the order of the holy snipers :sniper:

Sexism and homophobia/heteronormativism are equivalent.

Saying 'chauvinists' implies no particular gender. There are chauvinistic females. Look at the cowardly Christian women who want to stay pregnant, barefoot and in the kitchen, ignorant. Regardless, it doesn't follow that Rhaomi was calling any particular person or number of people 'chauvinists'.

So, I've refuted all of your points. Haven't denigrated your intellect or your mental age yet.

But I will now, you mentally stunted child.

I don't know about you, but I'm certainly not like those queers. I don't have an iPod so unlike them I don't have a constant backing track to my life. :(

You must need new batteries or maybe your having some very emotional moment all the time (I suggest a gun battle)

Make love, not war.

a mass sex orgy with hard line Muslims in Iraq, I would love to see how fox could spin that :D

He did the work for me :fluffle:

I'm nice like that! :fluffle:

(Course, I had it on another forum, so it wasn't all that hard to get. :D )

Pfft, RC hasn't really been making me laugh. The argument isn't very well developed. It's just too slapstick for my mood at the moment. I want something darker.You can't even spell parrot.This, however, did make me laugh. :D

Pfft, RC hasn't really been making me laugh. The argument isn't very well developed. It's just too slapstick for my mood at the moment. I want something darker.This, however, did make me laugh. :D

Stolen straight from Jesussaves.

I wished to take the SAT II examination in biology, and evolution was a core component of that test. Luckily, with her coaching, I was able to score a "5" on it.

Heh. That was slightly more subtle than some of your "I'm a wacky troll" quotes. You're improving, little one. ;)

HAHAHAHAHAHA I LOVE THIS!!! Are you one of those feminazis i always here about? or are you an uneducated male? You go from a subject about gays (which obviously has nothing to do with women) and then you bring sexism into it. And you didnt say chauvinist males you just said chauvinists so you're blatantly accusing certain men of being chauvinists when it wasnt even called for. And now i bet i get fifty posts from people stating something that refutes ONE of my points then claiming that im stupid and that you all have superior intelligence and that i should grow up.


From the order of the holy snipers :sniper:

Actually, what she meant was that there are plenty of women in mixed units, yet they seem to have no problem staying focused on the mission rather than, say giving into their baser impulses. If it works for them how come it couldn't work for gays?

Remember kids, to assume is to make an ass out of you and...well in this case maybe just you.

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices. However, there is now a specter hovering over it in the form of the acceptance of gay males (and, possibly, females) into our nation's armed forces. Such a corrosive influence would simply serve to contaminate the military and degrade its moral foundation. As you might know, the military contains a higher proportion of soldiers devoted to God's word and dedicated to ensuring its spread than America as a whole. Many would be infuriated by allowing Liberace into the sacred organization, tainting it beyond recognition. They would be disgusted at having a comrade would is fantasizing about him rather than fighting the enemy, thus imperiling the lives of all his fellow soldiers. Such an excessive burden of discomfort should not be placed upon our fighting men.

Ha. Hilarious. Have you ever been in the military. One, there have ALWAYS been gays in the military. I knew several. Two, in my unit, the vast majority of the men had a competition when we were in California for an exercise where they added up the weights of all of the women they nailed. Highest number wins. The guy who won did so by picking up the heaviest woman in the bar every night and they all had a great time laughing about it. Yeah, pristine.

The things that make the military great have nothing to do with sexual purity, thank God.

Meanwhile, this is just a rant against gays. As a very wise man once said, let he who is without sin...

What a hippy! :D ;)

Well, what's better: males kissing each other, or killing each other?

The answer seems pretty obvious to me. :)

I'm nice like that! :fluffle:

(Course, I had it on another forum, so it wasn't all that hard to get. :D )

I love the Motivator :)

http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/431/spammers0mr.jpg


http://www.gamigo.de/forum/images/smilies/diablotin.gif http://www.gamigo.de/forum/images/smilies/umleitung.gif http://www.gamigo.de/forum/images/smilies/augenbrauen.gif http://www.gamigo.de/forum/images/smilies/ot.gif http://www.gamigo.de/forum/images/smilies/mecker.gif

Stolen straight from Jesussaves.What? The parot bit or the stuff that RC has been spouting?

Here you go! http://flagrantdisregard.com/flickr/motivator.php
:fluffle:
Since when does using fiction to prove a point constitute a proper argument?

Having never actually watched queer as folk, I seem to remember hearing that the program was just thinly veiled excuse to show softcore gay pornography on a terrestrial channel.

*Yays with Ifreann*

Meh, I made my point. I wasn't arsed clicking the links anyway, I've been doing other thinks.

Actually, my mother, although she is not a principal is quite principled. They are words which are commonly misused, so you should take care. It's tricky.



As I previously stated, she also expounded upon, at length, how that common scientific conception is flawed. Nonetheless, she informed me that it would most likely be on the SAT II subject test and that I would need to know of it, despite its being false. Our educational system is quite dead-set against religion, so it's always a struggle for us, but we have to do the best with what we've got.

Oh, it is not. Nothing I ever learned in school addressed my religion in any way. It's just focused on science and doesn't care a wit for what an individual religion believes. I'm sorry if your religion needs the involvement of the government. Mine, Christianity, has no such need and in fact, my savior, Jesus Christ, advocated a personal relationship and a seperation of Church and State.

:fluffle:

My, aren't I popular today! :fluffle: ;)

You know you've lost the war when your army turns around and sacks your own fucking capital.

Anyone wanna make a picture out of that? Cause I'm too lazy to.

Here you go! http://flagrantdisregard.com/flickr/motivator.php

Here you go then:
http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/8856/thecrusadesmotivatorxo9.jpg

Well, what's better: males kissing each other, or killing each other?

The answer seems pretty obvious to me. :)

Interesting enough, killing actually made into the Law (the ten commandments) and sexuality did not. Hmmm....

I find it interesting that a person would suggest that having sex with men is somehow less moral than killing other people for political gains.

a mass sex orgy with hard line Muslims in Iraq,

Gay sex for peace. Two birds with one stone.

I would love to see how fox could spin that :D

"Saddam's Weapon of Mass Destruction: Homosexuals"

My, aren't I popular today! :fluffle: ;)

Teh Spammers are filled with nothing but love - and spam, but also love. At least fluffles. And love. Or chocolate. Maybe more chocolate than love. But let us not forget the fluffles! Or spam. The good kind of spam. :)

And spam... well, spam is... Spam is...

http://memepedia.info/images/6/65/Awecat.jpg

:D

http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/431/spammers0mr.jpg

Hey, I've got that one too! Here, let me participate with the posters!

http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i48/Lordgreyii/ThreadHijackposter.jpg

Teh Spammers are filled with nothing but love - and spam, but also love. At least fluffles. And love. Or chocolate. Maybe more chocolate than love. But let us not forget the fluffles! Or spam. The good kind of spam. :)

And spam... well, spam is... Spam is...

http://memepedia.info/images/6/65/Awecat.jpg

:D

I think that cat in the background is Hitlercat.

Teh Spammers are filled with nothing but love - and spam, but also love. At least fluffles. And love. Or chocolate. Maybe more chocolate than love. But let us not forget the fluffles! Or spam. The good kind of spam. :)

But... I don't like chocolate... :(

I do accept cookies though!

Sexism and homophobia/heteronormativism are equivalent.

Saying 'chauvinists' implies no particular gender. There are chauvinistic females. Look at the cowardly Christian women who want to stay pregnant, barefoot and in the kitchen, ignorant. Regardless, it doesn't follow that Rhaomi was calling any particular person or number of people 'chauvinists'.

So, I've refuted all of your points. Haven't denigrated your intellect or your mental age yet.

But I will now, you mentally stunted child.

She said thats what chauvinists would say to FEMALES.

Definition of chauvinist:chauvinist - a person with a prejudiced belief in the superiority of his or her own kind

Now a woman couldn't be a chauvinist towards another woman because that contradicts the definition. I was mainly having a stab at the fact that she randomly interupted a thread about homosexuality and the military to post about chauvinist males and their sexist statements. I'm merely saying wait your turn. I wish i had one of those "oh shit not this again" links i would have used it. Also someone posted this:

Originally Posted by Arj barker
And now i bet i get fifty posts from people stating something that refutes ONE of my points then claiming that im stupid and that you all have superior intelligence and that i should grow up.


From the order of the holy snipers

To be honest, people don't need to refute your points. The fact that you used the word "feminazi" and the sniper emoticon pretty much tells us all we need to know.
__________________


So i was right about at least one thing. Who feels the need to demean someone else for having idiotic arguments by using an idiotic argument and not even backing it up?

She said thats what chauvinists would say to FEMALES.


ABOUT women, not TO women.
I don't think they'd live very long if they said it TO women.

stuff

See the quote button, down there on the right? Learn to use that, it'll make your posts readable.

Hey, I've got that one too! Here, let me participate with the posters!

http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i48/Lordgreyii/ThreadHijackposter.jpg

You know that I made that one, back in the day? :)

You know that I made that one, back in the day? :)

Really?

You know that I made that one, back in the day? :)

Really?! I bow to you sir. It has been a usefull weapon of choice in many a forum situation.

Actually, what she meant was that there are plenty of women in mixed units, yet they seem to have no problem staying focused on the mission rather than, say giving into their baser impulses. If it works for them how come it couldn't work for gays?

Remember kids, to assume is to make an ass out of you and...well in this case maybe just you.


How did you get all that out of her original statement which was something along the lines of:

thats what chauvinists would say about women.

I can see the validity but is it really necessary to bring that up AGAIN. I mean fuck there are women in the military. No issues there why bring it back up again? The issue here was and is homosexuals in the military not women. Umm i believe this is what you guys refer to as trolling: women are the biggest minority group ever. There i had to say it so you can simply call me a fuckin idiot and refuse to answer me. I am in fact a fuckin idiot and im surprised ive even come this far but whatever. Trolls away!

Actually, what she meant was that there are plenty of women in mixed units, yet they seem to have no problem staying focused on the mission rather than, say giving into their baser impulses. If it works for them how come it couldn't work for gays?

Remember kids, to assume is to make an ass out of you and...well in this case maybe just you.


How did you get all that out of her original statement which was something along the lines of:

thats what chauvinists would say about women.

I can see the validity but is it really necessary to bring that up AGAIN. I mean fuck there are women in the military. No issues there why bring it back up again? The issue here was and is homosexuals in the military not women. Umm i believe this is what you guys refer to as trolling: women are the biggest minority group ever. There i had to say it so you can simply call me a fuckin idiot and refuse to answer me. I am in fact a fuckin idiot and im surprised ive even come this far but whatever. Trolls away!

Hey, I've got that one too! Here, let me participate with the posters!

http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i48/Lordgreyii/ThreadHijackposter.jpg
http://bighugelabs.com/flickr/output/motivator4355451.jpg
hey guys is this motivator appropriate for the situation?

How did you get all that out of her original statement which was something along the lines of:

thats what chauvinists would say about women.

I can see the validity but is it really necessary to bring that up AGAIN. I mean fuck there are women in the military. No issues there why bring it back up again? The issue here was and is homosexuals in the military not women. Umm i believe this is what you guys refer to as trolling: women are the biggest minority group ever. There i had to say it so you can simply call me a fuckin idiot and refuse to answer me. I am in fact a fuckin idiot and im surprised ive even come this far but whatever. Trolls away!

WTF? :confused:

How did you get all that out of her original statement which was something along the lines of:

thats what chauvinists would say about women.

I can see the validity but is it really necessary to bring that up AGAIN. I mean fuck there are women in the military. No issues there why bring it back up again? The issue here was and is homosexuals in the military not women. Umm i believe this is what you guys refer to as trolling: women are the biggest minority group ever. There i had to say it so you can simply call me a fuckin idiot and refuse to answer me. I am in fact a fuckin idiot and im surprised ive even come this far but whatever. Trolls away!

It's a little something called context and relevancy.

You assumed rather than looking at the posts around it to draw a conclusion.

hey guys is this motivator appropriate for the situation?

Nah. The appropriate one is:

http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i48/Lordgreyii/WordsofWisdom-Stupidity.jpg

:D

Would you like to have a gay man watching your butt instead of watching your back in the heat of battle?

Because when you're being shot at, you'll turn and stare at ass instead of take cover and return fire, right? So straight men must work the same way. Let's take a supply unit. Females and males serve together in supply units, so if this supply convoy were to come under ambush, the men would instantly throw down their rifles, unzip, and grab their guns and stare at the females, yeah?

As my first post back in.. a year or so:

IF YOU HAVE NOT SERVED IN THE MILITARY, BEEN IN SOME YOUTH MILITARY PROGRAM, OR GROWN UP IN A MILITARY FAMILY, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, AND DON'T BELONG IN THIS THREAD.

Thread creator: The United States was founded on the basis that all men are created equal. Of course that wasn't really true when the US was founded, but in taking steps towards reaching that goal, we must tolerate everything except intolerance. What does this mean? It means if a gay man, though I personally disagree with homosexuality, wants to serve in the military of the country that allows him to express himself and find himself, if he wants to put himself on the line, then of course he should be. It is not for us to judge him, but only for God. Since we as fellow military members sin just the same but in a different way as him, we are in no place to judge him or deny him anything.

ABOUT women, not TO women.
I don't think they'd live very long if they said it TO women.

Yeah you've proved that women are tough and if you said something to them you'd be physically assaulted. Or maybe you meant something else if so please elaborate. My point is still valid. I don't see how that invalidated my point at all. Whether it was a chauvinist saying something to or about women it still has to be a male and not a female otherwise it contradicts the definition of a chauvinist.

Really?
Yup, it's true. Back when Fascist D (and his wallet) were roaming the forum with a vengance, and the Spamalanche struck random threads. These posters were needed back then.

Aaaah... Good times. :D
Really?! I bow to you sir. It has been a usefull weapon of choice in many a forum situation.
Thank you very much :)

I'm glad to see my creations being used outside of this forum. You made my day with that one :p

One should think that in 'the War on Terror', against a predominantly dogmatic Muslim enemy, that there would be much to fear from our 'gay rays'.

LOL.

Whether it was a chauvinist saying something to or about women it still has to be a male and not a female otherwise it contradicts the definition of a chauvinist.

That is a really important point, and I'm glad you've brought it to our attention.

See the quote button, down there on the right? Learn to use that, it'll make your posts readable.

Actually ive been using the quote button the entire time ive been posting.

That is a really important point, and I'm glad you've brought it to our attention.

Oh im sorry i didnt get round to buying the bullshit detector mentioned by rule caucasians or whatever his name was are you for real?

http://bighugelabs.com/flickr/output/motivator4355451.jpg
hey guys is this motivator appropriate for the situation?
It's a nice one, but I get the feeling that you want to save the thread - and that can't be right here :D

Or are you running for Spam?
WTF? :confused:
Please - for the love of macaroni - don't ask.

Actually ive been using the quote button the entire time ive been posting.
Actually, you went back and edited the post I first replied to. Edited it poorly, I should add, as you've left your second quote untagged.

Yup, it's true. Back when Fascist D (and his wallet) were roaming the forum with a vengance, and the Spamalanche struck random threads. These posters were needed back then.

Aaaah... Good times. :D

Thank you very much :)

I'm glad to see my creations being used outside of this forum. You made my day with that one :p

Your awesome level is now over NINE THOUSAAAAANDD! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkI)

It's a nice one, but I get the feeling that you want to save the thread - and that can't be right here :D


I dunno, I just wanted a hijack response, and to test out the Motivator.

Your awesome level is now over NINE THOUSAAAAANDD! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkI)

Nine Thousand!?

NINE THOUSAAAAANDD! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkI)

It's a nice one, but I get the feeling that you want to save the thread - and that can't be right here :D

Or are you running for Spam?

Please - for the love of macaroni - don't ask.

What i meant was this: i dont know the technical definition of "trolling" but from what i've read it seems that staements made with no basis or backup arguments are that of a troll nature. So i said "women are the biggest minority group" so i could be a troll. I said i wanted to be a troll so that posters who couldnt be bothered making a valid point and would rather just critique my posting ability (which did happen) can just label me as a troll and have no need for a valid argument. I was having a stab at their inablility to form an argument. I suppose its not as easily understandable over the internet and i apologise.

Actually, you went back and edited the post I first replied to. Edited it poorly, I should add, as you've left your second quote untagged.

All i've been doing is pressing that quote button. I have no clue what "tagging" is and i don't know what "editing" of posts is?

posters who couldnt be bothered making a valid point and would rather just critique my posting ability (which did happen)

I was trying to help, as your earlier posts were near-unreadable. Try to paragraph on longer posts, too.

Actually, my mother, although she is not a principal is quite principled. They are words which are commonly misused, so you should take care. It's tricky.

Spelling mistake or not, the point still stands. You do not go to a school, you (claim you) are home schooled.

As I previously stated, she also expounded upon, at length, how that common scientific conception is flawed. Nonetheless, she informed me that it would most likely be on the SAT II subject test and that I would need to know of it, despite its being false. Our educational system is quite dead-set against religion, so it's always a struggle for us, but we have to do the best with what we've got.

Funny how you answered this after answering a point made after my post, almost as if you need the time to construct your lies. Your story doesn't hold water. What sort of mother who so carefully controls how you learn, would allow you frequent access to the internet? Also, what other subjects did you do, and how well did you do on them? Why haven't you explained why you continually post soley controversial stuff if you aren't a troll?

Incidentally, your continous efforts to entice me into a debate about fundamentalist Christian beliefs are in vain. Just don't bother.

What i meant was this: i dont know the technical definition of "trolling" but from what i've read it seems that staements made with no basis or backup arguments are that of a troll nature. So i said "women are the biggest minority group" so i could be a troll. I said i wanted to be a troll so that posters who couldnt be bothered making a valid point and would rather just critique my posting ability (which did happen) can just label me as a troll and have no need for a valid argument. I was having a stab at their inablility to form an argument. I suppose its not as easily understandable over the internet and i apologise.

*sigh*

1) In a previous post to Rhaomi's, Rule suggested that gays would spend all their time looking at attractive squad member's asses rather than "watching their back".
2) Rhaomi suggested in response, quite rightly that a male chauvinist could suggest the same thing about women in the military.
3)We all know that isn't the case, as women in mixed units are just as effective as their male counterparts.
4) Therefore, it would be unreasonable to suggest gays would suffer from their base instincts.
5) Therefore, Rule's point is invalid.
6) Therefore, your point is invalid.

Feeling better now that I've spelt it out for you?

Your awesome level is now over NINE THOUSAAAAANDD! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkI)
:D Yay! I like being awesome. Especially when the scouts report that it's over 9000! :cool:

Doesn't look equally cool in numbers, does it? :p
I dunno, I just wanted a hijack response, and to test out the Motivator.
A good start! :)
Nine Thousand!?

NINE THOUSAAAAANDD! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBtpyeLxVkI)
:eek: Ok, I'm scared now...

:p
What i meant was this: i dont know the technical definition of "trolling" but from what i've read it seems that staements made with no basis or backup arguments are that of a troll nature. So i said "women are the biggest minority group" so i could be a troll. I said i wanted to be a troll so that posters who couldnt be bothered making a valid point and would rather just critique my posting ability (which did happen) can just label me as a troll and have no need for a valid argument. I was having a stab at their inablility to form an argument. I suppose its not as easily understandable over the internet and i apologise.

Why are you telling me this? :confused:

Each day (excluding most weekends), I wake up at 7:00 in the morning, eat breakfast, and go to school. Where is my particular school? In my own house. Is it a learning institution? Yes. Am I assigned homework? Yes. Am I taught a particular course by a particular teacher? Yes. Why, then, can it not be considered a school? I have a feeling -- well, actually, it's more than a feeling, that most children who participate in homeschooling will claim that they go to school. And yes, my mother did teach me biology in 9th grade, although she took great care to ensure that the class conformed to the Bible, and taught only the bare essentials of evolution and presented a compelling argument for why Darwinism is flawed, but that's another matter.

LOL this quote makes me think this guy is seriously pulling our legs. But he's ambiguous I can't really tell for sure. LOL OMG. Funny stuff!

:D Yay! I like being awesome. Especially when the scouts report that it's over 9000! :cool:

Doesn't look equally cool in numbers, does it? :p

A good start! :)

:eek: Ok, I'm scared now...

:p


Why are you telling me this? :confused:

You said wtf didn't you? you didnt understand so i clearly spelt it out for you.


To the other guy i apologise i thought you were merely having a stab at me. Since you werent and you were trying to help i apologise.

You know... Women really aren't a minority group with 52% of the world's population. In fact, they seem to be slightly in the majority.

http://www.acc.umu.se/~zqad/cats/1166649580-1163490053696.jpg

Let's take a supply unit. Females and males serve together in supply units, so if this supply convoy were to come under ambush, the men would instantly throw down their rifles, unzip, and grab their guns and stare at the females, yeah?

Which gun ?;)

*sigh*

1) In a previous post to Rhaomi's, Rule suggested that gays would spend all their time looking at attractive squad member's asses rather than "watching their back".
2) Rhaomi suggested in response, quite rightly that a male chauvinist could suggest the same thing about women in the military.
3)We all know that isn't the case, as women in mixed units are just as effective as their male counterparts.
4) Therefore, it would be unreasonable to suggest gays would suffer from their base instincts.
5) Therefore, Rule's point is invalid.
6) Therefore, your point is invalid.

Feeling better now that I've spelt it out for you?

Ok good job patronising me. But that post that you quoted was actually meant to explain what i meant to ifreann so i have no clue why you quoted it and then babbled on with that other shit.

Which gun ?;)

That one.

Homosexuals only think about sex. If we were to give them "ok" to go to Iraq, they'd want nothing more than to fuck every man in sight. We can not let them ruin all the good that we have brought to Iraq.

It's ok to give the enemy aids, but we can't give them the chance to give it to our onw army.

You said wtf didn't you? you didnt understand so i clearly spelt it out for you.
No, that wasn't me. That was Ifreann.


I regret nothing!!

You know... Women really aren't a minority group with 52% of the world's population. In fact, they seem to be slightly in the majority.

http://www.acc.umu.se/~zqad/cats/1166649580-1163490053696.jpg

Thats what i said. They're the biggest minority group in the world. There's more of them, they can vote, they can drive, they can do everything men can (apart from have a penis) and apperantly, according to most women you ask, they can do it better than us and yet they still seem to be a minority.

I feel that the gays have the same rights to heed the call to defend or to serve for the nation. Remember the USA is a 100% volunteer military and gays have the right and honor to serve their nation as we all do.

I agree with you on something!

Thats what i said. They're the biggest minority group in the world. There's more of them, they can vote, they can drive, they can do everything men can (apart from have a penis) and apperantly, according to most women you ask, they can do it better than us and yet they still seem to be a minority.

They're a minority in representation. Learning yet?

No, that wasn't me. That was Ifreann.


I regret nothing!!

Oh im sorry i thought i quoted ifreann. Obviously i was mistaken. I did actually mean to quote ifreann.

Ok good job patronising me. But that post that you quoted was actually meant to explain what i meant to ifreann so i have no clue why you quoted it and then babbled on with that other shit.

Because you've suggested that nobody has effectively countered your points, or made intelligent arguments against you.

RuleCaucasia, I think that you're a racist, sexist pig, who should just blow it out your arse.

They're a minority in representation. Learning yet?

i'll admit im uneducated on this matter please inform me how they're a minority in representation.

i'll admit im uneducated on this matter please inform me how they're a minority in representation.

When 52% of the politicians in the world are female, then we have accurate representation.

I love forum trolls. NSG would be so boring without them.

But anyway, I believe that gays have just as much of a right to volunteer to be shot at as anybody else. I'd think that RuleCaucasia would jump at the idea.

Homosexuals only think about sex. If we were to give them "ok" to go to Iraq, they'd want nothing more than to fuck every man in sight. We can not let them ruin all the good that we have brought to Iraq.

It's ok to give the enemy aids, but we can't give them the chance to give it to our onw army.

Does it scare anyone how convincing a conservative ruffy is?

a mass sex orgy with hard line Muslims in Iraq, I would love to see how fox could spin that :D

Bill O'reilly: Fuck this shit, I'm going to the orgy.
Sean Hannity: Me too.
Alan Colmes: What?
Bill O'reilly: Shut up and bend over, Alan.

I have always regarded the military as a morally pristine institution, free from the corruption of everyday vices.
Instead they have more military-specific vices, like shooting people.