NationStates Jolt Archive


Sex is Bad - Page 2

Pages : 1 [2]
Dingoroonia
24-01-2005, 21:42
I posted a previous thread on this, but I believe it got a low turnout. So I'm trying again.
By nature, sex is evil. It leaves physical dependency between two people, and this disguises itself as love. The end of this physical need happens to be the end of many a relationship, whether the couple realizes it or not. The worst part is that it isn't needed. Sex was designed for the survival of the human race. However, that isn't necessary anymore. Artificial semination and such can do the job just as effectively.
I envision a future where no one has sex, as no one desires it. It is primative and destructive to the human mind and spirit. But I know that it will take an extremely long time for humans to overcome their primative desires.
Does this apply to sex with your sheep as well?
Occidio Multus
24-01-2005, 21:47
What I find disgusting and disturbing is how moralists focus on sexuality as horrible and bad, yet never raise their voices about humans killing one another in the name of god, country, whatever.

Up with sex, down with violence.

well, i say up the sex and the violence! thats my perfect world..... an afterthought- the person who started this thread has their right to their opinion...but really, we can certainly tell they need to get laid, also.
Hannah the Queen
24-01-2005, 22:24
hahahaha man pls dont tell me ur serious bout this future where nobody has sex!!! y'all are fuckin crazy, have you guys ever had sex before? whats a world without sex??? ughhh i cant believe people has this kind of beliefs, i though believing in evolution is pretty insane, but this!!!! grrr ima go now before i explode, :confused: hold on why am i making a big deal bout this anyways...... uhmm ohh yeahhh cause its crazy!!!! laterz lozerzzzzzz

-naynay-

if y'all dont wanna have sex, just sk8 in replacement, so when ur horny, all u have to do is grab ur board and sk8, hahahaha, that sounds great. NOT!!!
Neo-Anarchists
24-01-2005, 22:28
Please refrain from using text-messenger shorthand, as it aggravates some people.
Just a tip.
:)
Dingoroonia
24-01-2005, 22:32
early relationship sex that is bad.
Well, sure, it's awkward sometimes when you're just getting to know what the person likes, but it gets better!
Dingoroonia
24-01-2005, 22:33
hahahaha man pls dont tell me ur serious bout this future where nobody has sex!!! y'all are fuckin crazy, have you guys ever had sex before? whats a world without sex??? ughhh i cant believe people has this kind of beliefs, i though believing in evolution is pretty insane, but this!!!! grrr ima go now before i explode, :confused: hold on why am i making a big deal bout this anyways...... uhmm ohh yeahhh cause its crazy!!!! laterz lozerzzzzzz

-naynay-

if y'all dont wanna have sex, just sk8 in replacement, so when ur horny, all u have to do is grab ur board and sk8, hahahaha, that sounds great. NOT!!!
Please learn English before posting
Occidio Multus
24-01-2005, 22:35
hahahaha man pls dont tell me ur serious bout this future where nobody has sex!!! y'all are fuckin crazy, have you guys ever had sex before? whats a world without sex??? ughhh i cant believe people has this kind of beliefs, i though believing in evolution is pretty insane, but this!!!! grrr ima go now before i explode, :confused: hold on why am i making a big deal bout this anyways...... uhmm ohh yeahhh cause its crazy!!!! laterz lozerzzzzzz

-naynay-

if y'all dont wanna have sex, just sk8 in replacement, so when ur horny, all u have to do is grab ur board and sk8, hahahaha, that sounds great. NOT!!!
if this is not a joke, as i suspect it is, were your parents related?
New Anthrus
25-01-2005, 01:56
I find life without sex quite exciting, btw.
Nation of Fortune
25-01-2005, 01:59
I find life without sex quite exciting, btw.
why? There would be nothing to look forward to in your life, all you would do would be working.

All work and no play makes for a dull day
New Anthrus
25-01-2005, 02:08
why? There would be nothing to look forward to in your life, all you would do would be working.

All work and no play makes for a dull day
There are more forms of play than sex. You see, that's how dependent you guys are on it. Children are far more happier, and that is only partially becaus of less responsibility. Sex is like drugs: it makes nothing better, but it just masks inner anguish.
Nation of Fortune
25-01-2005, 02:14
There are more forms of play than sex. You see, that's how dependent you guys are on it. Children are far more happier, and that is only partially becaus of less responsibility. Sex is like drugs: it makes nothing better, but it just masks inner anguish.
But consesual sex can strengthen a bond between a loving couple. besides we are programed internally to be sexual beings, children as young as two have been found masterbating, of both sexes. Despite if you like it or not you are also evaluating memebers of the opposite sex, sexually. When you smell a memeber of the opposite sex, and they smell good, it's your body catching a sniff of that persons genetic makeup, it's a normal response saying that yes this person has good gene's that aren't too similar to mine. If you really care for a person, and they care for you sexuall activity can strengthen your relationship, it's only when people think only of sex that it becomes bad.
New Anthrus
25-01-2005, 02:18
But consesual sex can strengthen a bond between a loving couple. besides we are programed internally to be sexual beings, children as young as two have been found masterbating, of both sexes. Despite if you like it or not you are also evaluating memebers of the opposite sex, sexually. When you smell a memeber of the opposite sex, and they smell good, it's your body catching a sniff of that persons genetic makeup, it's a normal response saying that yes this person has good gene's that aren't too similar to mine. If you really care for a person, and they care for you sexuall activity can strengthen your relationship, it's only when people think only of sex that it becomes bad.
I know we are programed to, but we've outgrown it. Evolutiion is too slow for humanity.
Nation of Fortune
25-01-2005, 02:26
I know we are programed to, but we've outgrown it. Evolutiion is too slow for humanity.
we are far from out growing it, just a question but were you homeschooled?
Eastern Coast America
25-01-2005, 02:28
I posted a previous thread on this, but I believe it got a low turnout. So I'm trying again.
By nature, sex is evil. It leaves physical dependency between two people, and this disguises itself as love. The end of this physical need happens to be the end of many a relationship, whether the couple realizes it or not. The worst part is that it isn't needed. Sex was designed for the survival of the human race. However, that isn't necessary anymore. Artificial semination and such can do the job just as effectively.
I envision a future where no one has sex, as no one desires it. It is primative and destructive to the human mind and spirit. But I know that it will take an extremely long time for humans to overcome their primative desires.


No one has sex = no offspring.
No offspring = the decrease in human population. Maybe to the point of EXTINCTION.
Nature thinks, and realizes that not liking sex may be a problem. So nature says, "Lets wire humanity to like sex."

Dude, humans are WIRED to like sex. Animals are WIRED to like sex. Does this mean were evil? It's not morality or anything, its freaking genetics. Artificial seminization won't work, because we just like having sex. Can't go against genetics boy.

We havn't outgrown it. Why? We can't. This is one of the things that has been HARD WIRED into our system. Forget what the church is telling you. It's not ALL true.
Shai Hulud II
25-01-2005, 02:31
hmmmmm..... I like the idea that sex is bad but people will never stop doing it. It feels good so people will do it. :fluffle: hehehe. u cant make every1 stop just because u cant get a girl and say sex is bad.
Neo-Anarchists
25-01-2005, 02:34
No one has sex = no offspring.
No offspring = the decrease in human population. Maybe to the point of EXTINCTION.
Actually, by definition no offspring would cause extinction.
;)
New Anthrus
25-01-2005, 02:37
we are far from out growing it, just a question but were you homeschooled?
Nope. I went to a public school.
Machapopo
25-01-2005, 02:41
Um, right. Have fun with that New Anthrus....a future where you masturbate into a cup when you want children. Wait, isn't masturbation a sin? Guess that doesn't work either.

Hahahaha, right on!

But yes, sex isn't evil. Yes, people in our society do abuse it, but it is meant to be the highest expression of love that two people share with each other. Maybe if your mind wasn't in the gutter along with everyone else who has way too much promiscious sex and doesn't get layed, you wouldn't think that sex was so bad. And yes New Anthrus, sex is primitive, and do you know why? Cause we are some primitive bastards. Were did you get this idea that humans are supposed to be oh so refined. We are mammals buddy and are chilling at the top of the food chain. Sure, other creatures could eat us or year us to shreads if they wanted to, but due to the corticalization of our brain's cortex, we are smarter. So condomn the world if you want for wishing to keep human life on this planet or w/e other thoughts that running through that odd little mind of yours, but just remember, sex wasn't meant to be abused or dirty; it's meant to be beautiful and practical.
Machapopo
25-01-2005, 02:45
No one has sex = no offspring.
No offspring = the decrease in human population. Maybe to the point of EXTINCTION.
Nature thinks, and realizes that not liking sex may be a problem. So nature says, "Lets wire humanity to like sex."

Dude, humans are WIRED to like sex. Animals are WIRED to like sex. Does this mean were evil? It's not morality or anything, its freaking genetics. Artificial seminization won't work, because we just like having sex. Can't go against genetics boy.

We havn't outgrown it. Why? We can't. This is one of the things that has been HARD WIRED into our system. Forget what the church is telling you. It's not ALL true.

Who said it was the church telling him?! I may not be the most devout Christian, but Christianity is not that messed up. People almost try to look at religion as bad, but it's people interpretations of it that people are usually disturbed or bothered by. So don't believe whatever this dude is saying links back to religion. It's too stupid...
Machapopo
25-01-2005, 02:49
Please learn English before posting

Thank you!

Dingoroonia is right Hanna, you're dumb. lol.
Shomatopia
25-01-2005, 03:07
The idea of no sex seems to me a bit idiotic. It's not that it's a bad idea, it would elimenate STDs andpossibly help humanity, I just don't think humans will ever be ready for that kind of idea to be put into action.

The merits of this being said, people have been having sex for thousands of years, all other animals have sex (by all animals I mean mammels) so I see nothing wrong with two concenting adults who are mentaly stable enough to have sex, having sex. Sex can be a beautiful thing that, when prefomed by two people who "love" each other, can be productive in our socity.

Sex can be abused, but by the same token it can be a wonderful way to deepen your relationship with your partner.
Fascist Dictators
25-01-2005, 03:15
If you outlaw something, it doesn't stop it from happening, especially something as meaningful as sex. Just because a few stupid kids think they know what love is, sleep around and screw up their own lives doesn't mean it makes bad things happen to all relationships. Most are doomed to begin with quite frankly.

That would easily be the biggest violation of basic human rights in history, if sex was outlawed. An ultimate invasion of personal life. No, even I don't think the world is screwed up enough to pass a law like that.
New Anthrus
26-01-2005, 01:42
If you outlaw something, it doesn't stop it from happening, especially something as meaningful as sex. Just because a few stupid kids think they know what love is, sleep around and screw up their own lives doesn't mean it makes bad things happen to all relationships. Most are doomed to begin with quite frankly.

That would easily be the biggest violation of basic human rights in history, if sex was outlawed. An ultimate invasion of personal life. No, even I don't think the world is screwed up enough to pass a law like that.
I don't wanna outlaw it. I just want humans to realize how bad it is.
La Terra di Liberta
26-01-2005, 01:50
Making humans realize how "bad" it is won't change the fact that they'll still do it anyway.
Flamingle
26-01-2005, 02:44
I don't wanna outlaw it. I just want humans to realize how bad it is.

sorry, i've been naughty and not read the last 18 pages. WHAT is it exactly that makes sex bad? and how would declaring something bad stop anyone but ignorant sheep from doing it? it hasn't worked for drugs, prostitution, communism, or guns, so why on earth would it work for sex?
New Anthrus
26-01-2005, 03:02
sorry, i've been naughty and not read the last 18 pages. WHAT is it exactly that makes sex bad? and how would declaring something bad stop anyone but ignorant sheep from doing it? it hasn't worked for drugs, prostitution, communism, or guns, so why on earth would it work for sex?
Read my first post.
Lictoria
26-01-2005, 03:21
Artificial insemenation costs money, sex is free. Also sex feels good, nature made it that way so that we would do it and procreate.

Oh yah and also, usually when a thread gets low turnout, there's a reason.

Sex is free you say!?! I got totally ripped off!
HorseTeets
26-01-2005, 03:23
sex aint free in vegas
Una-Predictabiria
28-01-2005, 14:43
sex aint free in vegas
Well that's relevant.
Steel Butterfly
28-01-2005, 14:48
Read my first post.

Don't bother. This whole thread is a pathetic joke created by someone who can't get laid. For god's sake, sex is natural, and necessary for natural survival. Are you to say that breathing is evil? Perhaps water? Maybe shelter? Food? Parent-child relationships?
Terra Formi
28-01-2005, 14:55
Sex is free you say!?! I got totally ripped off!

I just had to say that that's the greatest thing I've read all day.

Anyway, I may have said some strange and cynical things before, but I'm bitter. I've also never had sex, but I think you should just trust everyone else who has and take their advice: If you actually had sex, you'd probably change your opinion.
Corporate Infidels
28-01-2005, 14:59
I posted a previous thread on this, but I believe it got a low turnout. So I'm trying again.
By nature, sex is evil. It leaves physical dependency between two people, and this disguises itself as love. The end of this physical need happens to be the end of many a relationship, whether the couple realizes it or not. The worst part is that it isn't needed. Sex was designed for the survival of the human race. However, that isn't necessary anymore. Artificial semination and such can do the job just as effectively.
I envision a future where no one has sex, as no one desires it. It is primative and destructive to the human mind and spirit. But I know that it will take an extremely long time for humans to overcome their primative desires.

I'm flaming you.

Shut up, you fool! Animals do it. It's nature. And you obviously haven't gotten laid before.
Aeopia
28-01-2005, 15:05
As you say it sex is evil because of the revolution of artificial insemination. I say it it now unecessary because of it. You should probably read Brave New World. And by the way, have fun with existance you Christian/straight-edge/scared virgin!

edit:to clear something up for the rest of you. getting laid isn't necessary for survival, but killing a guy might be. reproduction is NOT more important that surviving. do what is needed to live first,THEN screw.
Bottle
28-01-2005, 15:13
I posted a previous thread on this, but I believe it got a low turnout. So I'm trying again.
By nature, sex is evil. It leaves physical dependency between two people, and this disguises itself as love.

"physical dependency"? do you know what that means? sex does not generate a symbiotic biological connection between two individuals, last i checked. and it's a good thing, too, because i haven't seen my "first" in over 7 years...if we were "physically dependent" upon each other we would have died long since.

also, i have had sex with several people, but only one of them is somebody i believe i might be in love with. i know that i love all the people i have been involved with, just as i love all people i am emotionally or physically intimate with, but that is a more platonic love...like friendship, only just a little more so. the one person i have experienced the feeling of being "in love" with is a person who i have been physically involved with for about 4 years, and it is only very recently that i have begun considering that we might be in love.

so if sex makes people dependent, and if sex makes people think they are in love, how is it that i have had so much sex and yet have never become dependent or been convinced that i am in love?

The end of this physical need happens to be the end of many a relationship, whether the couple realizes it or not.

yeah, some people mistake infatuation for love, and some people have relationships that are based only on sex. so what? that doesn't mean sex is wrong, just that those people have a lot to learn.


The worst part is that it isn't needed. Sex was designed for the survival of the human race. However, that isn't necessary anymore. Artificial semination and such can do the job just as effectively.

as somebody who has actually learned what artificial insemination requires, i can only laugh at this.

I envision a future where no one has sex, as no one desires it. It is primative and destructive to the human mind and spirit. But I know that it will take an extremely long time for humans to overcome their primative desires.
sex is not a "primative desire" any more; the vast majority of sex actually occurs in direct conflict with the primative forces behind sexual reproduction, since the vast majority of sex in the developed world is NOT engaged in for the purposes of procreation. people go to serious lengths to prevent reproduction from resulting from their sexual contact, after all, and the "promative desire" behind sex is reproduction.

now, perhaps you are simply against pleasure in general. in that case, you also should oppose allowing people to eat anything other than a precisely constructed artificial nutritional suppliment. you also should oppose people enjoying anything for aesthetic reasons; art should be outlawed, since viewing it distracts people from more important matters, and buildings should all be constructed in ONLY the way most structurally valid for their location. you should also oppose the love of a parent for their child, since that love quite often makes the parent less able to correctly determine the proper response to given situations; love makes parents over-react or under-react, and can endanger the health or life of the child, so it clearly should be forbidden.

gee, i wonder why people weren't very enthusiastic about the first thread you made on this subject? could it be that your amazing arrogance, ignorance, and obviously frustrated virginity are simply too boring for most people to want to contemplate?

i hope some day you learn how to love, how to be loved, and how to experience pleasure with another human being. until you do, you have my pity.
Liskeinland
01-02-2005, 21:28
I don't think he's a frustrated virgin. I think he has no desire to have sex whatsoever.

Anyway: he says that sex is the end of many relationships, whether the couple realise it or not. Interesting. So, if they don't realise it, how the Hell did he come by that hypothesis?