NationStates Jolt Archive

OMGz BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Pracus, the faerie dust! He must be snorting it!!! No more faerie dust for Terminalia. It's making him kinky.

It wouldn't be the first time I've turned one ;)

j\j

Languages. I'm pretty sure that the Old Testament was written in Hebrew, and the New in Latin.

And you know what pisses me off? I had that S in there and editted a word I had put in it afterwards and took the damned thing off. I would kick myself, but term might be turned on in his kinkiness.

It wouldn't be the first time I've turned one ;)

j\j


to completely KILL this topic:


I REALLY REALLY LIKE CHEESE.

[QUOTE]

I wouldnt be surprised, tweaked at least.

Again I say, PROVE IT.

OMGz BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Pracus, the faerie dust! He must be snorting it!!! No more faerie dust for Terminalia. It's making him kinky.
or he's just gotten into the amyl nitrate i was saving for the thread locking party

or he's just gotten into the amyl nitrate i was saving for the thread locking party
Wait...it might've been my nitrous oxide as well...

First - no no forget it. Most intelligible people who are grateful to have been born in a country where you don't get your head chopped off for not bowing down to some fat old geizer with a funny hat know that the nation we currently live in was founded on christianity and held strong by noble men who fought an out of control empire against all odds and came out victorious. I could have made a much better point, but I didn't want to humiliate some retarded liberal bastard on a national scale.

What version of American history did you study? Most intelligent people know that we were founded by a group of men who didn't want to pay their taxes. Further, those that have actually taken the time to read the Constution (that's the document that founded our nation and the highest law in the land which frames our entire system of government) know that it is not based upon Christian belief or dogma, makes no reference to Christianity/Jesus, or indeed any reference to any God at all. Instead, it expressly provides for equal treatment for all under the law and for the right for all to worship as they see fit without governmental inteference. You are free to worship. So am I. I should also be free to live my life as I see fit when I am hurting none--which gay marriage would not do, nor does gay kissing.

Wow...you really don't know me. Since when is having ratings on TV and movies (which are in place to help parents guide what their children view in the first place) a knock on my "just go out and reproduce".

I'm actually a young Republican who's reponsible about reproduction and marriage. I, for one, take marriage, family and sex in an old fashioned and very serious manner. Jesus Christ, so shoot me in the ass if I don't want my kids watching Mtv or NYPD Blue. You think I have time to watch every single tv show and movie before they see it? These programs has a rating for a reason.

If anything, I'd like to see people have less kids and smaller families.

Okay. He's got a point. I wouldn't let any offspring of mine watch MTV either. Not because of nudity or sexual overtones, mind you, but because I'd HATE for the fruit of MY loins to get retarded ideas about having to be or chase emaciated blonde hoes with big chests. But the reasons we don't want our offspring not to watch isn't as importnt as taking responsibility for what they watch ourselves.

ALWAYS a solid foundation to stand on.

The evil lies in wanting to dictate what OTHER people are allowed to choose to do and watch. I don't understand the entire deal with uptight people not wanting their kids to see nudity (the most NATURAL state in human existance) but I support their right to restrict their children from looking at it on TV and online. I do NOT support, but rather vehemently FIGHT their wishes to restrict the REST of us from choosing to view or not to view to make THEIR parenting choices easier.

Think about the children? Think about YOUR children and leave the rest of the parents to mind their own. And leave those of us who are adults to choose what WE wish to do and see. Because the moment you attempt to use your children as a justification to take my freedom to look at and do what I wish (that OMGz does not include kids at ALL euw!) is the same moment I'll turn around and tell you to ram them right back up your *bleep!!!*

It wouldn't be the first time I've turned one ;)

j\j

Think he's a closet self-loather? Kinda beginning to sound like one... the desperation in his baseless arguements rather resembles that "methinks she doth protest too much" bit of Shakespeare...

eewww?

your not vey bright are you.

your not vey bright are you.

no, im not, ive already stated this!

or he's just gotten into the amyl nitrate i was saving for the thread locking party

Do you actually sniff that stuff?

No wonder you have brain damage.

I say that if he thinks they were faked, he needs to show it. Put his money where his mouth is or shut up.

Its a gut feeling, they should never be discounted.

Wow, has this broken down or what...

Sloth is also one of the seven deadly sins. But he doesn't care.

lol I work harder than you.

Do you actually sniff that stuff?

No wonder you have brain damage.
its was actually a moderately obscure reference to old school gay drug culture, poppers were often used in conjunction with sexual activity to prolong orgasm. i'm not even sure if you can get amyl nitrate anymore, it use to be used for heart patients but i'm not sure if it still is used for legit medical purposes.

Wow, has this broken down or what...

Well you started it.

Well you started it.

no, j00 started it!

i launch deese n00kles at you and take your country, cause i am 1337 [-]/-}X0RZ

[QUOTE=Red Guard Revisionists]its was actually a moderately obscure reference to old school gay drug culture, poppers were often used in conjunction with sexual activity to prolong orgasm. i'm not even sure if you can get amyl nitrate anymore,

You can, all the gays I know have a little bottle of it in their fridges, I used

to sniff it sometimes at partys, but I got tired of the headaches.

no, j00 started it!

i launch deese n00kles at you and take your country, cause i am 1337 [-]/-}X0RZ''

And thats what in english?

no, im not, ive already stated this!

Sorry man.

''

And thats what in english?


im just making fun of the xtreme rping nerds sometimes here...

all this crap under this post, in my sig, is so they dont report me to a mod for some rediculous reason.



YOU TRIPLE POSTER! DIE!

First - no no forget it. Most intelligible people who are grateful to have been born in a country where you don't get your head chopped off for not bowing down to some fat old geizer with a funny hat know that the nation we currently live in was founded on christianity and held strong by noble men who fought an out of control empire against all odds and came out victorious. I could have made a much better point, but I didn't want to humiliate some retarded liberal bastard on a national scale.

Heheheh! You are beginning to amuse me, little man. And no, that's not a good thing in your case, as it's a very cruel kind of humor you're indulging me in. It's that truely mean, absolutely shameful laughing-at-the-mentally-disadvantaged kind of amusement. If you continue to make me laugh this way, I'll need to go all Martin Luther on y'all and start scourging myself. But no... I can't do that because Terminalia might get off on it and then blame me for making him commit the sin of Onan.

But seriously now, the only one you're humiliating with this post is yourself. Quite fortunately for you, you don't know very much about the foundations of our nation or the men who helped found it, so you will be spared the discomfort of realizing what an ass you've made of yourself with the quoted post.

My irreverance towards our founding fathers has nothing to do with ingratitude and a great deal to do with actually bothering to learn about who founded the country I live in and why it is I enjoy what few freedoms that still remain to me. I have no need to deify the men who have been given credit for founding our nation. The truth is far more interesting and much more relevant. And the truth is that the men who started our nation did so for financial and political reasons and just happened to be in a situation much like the pre-industrialized version of what we, the people are living under now. Restrictions on basic freedoms, religious intolerance, taxation without proper representation and a system under which we, the people do not have a real voice in the shaping and direction our nation takes.

America was NOT founded on Christianity. It was founded on money. Get back to your books, Hook.

im just making fun of the xtreme rping nerds sometimes here...

all this crap under this post, in my sig, is so they dont report me to a mod for some rediculous reason.



YOU TRIPLE POSTER! DIE!

Logic Jim.

Logic Jim.


i dont know who jim is.


try pat!


yes, i have a bisexual name, and its kickass!

[QUOTE]

You can, all the gays I know have a little bottle of it in their fridges, I used

to sniff it sometimes at partys, but I got tired of the headaches.

i knew people who had little bottles of stuff called rush which i think is actually butyl nitrate, but i thought the little glass tudes of amyl nitrate that you broke open and stiffed (the real poppers) went out in the early 80s. maybe not though, or it may depend on where you live.

i knew people who had little bottles of stuff called rush which i think is actually butyl nitrate, but i thought the little glass tudes of amyl nitrate that you broke open and stiffed (the real poppers) went out in the early 80s. maybe not though, or it may depend on where you live.


all kansas has is meth, pot,and beer!


go beer! whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[QUOTE=Booslandia]Heheheh! You are beginning to amuse me, little man.

lol what are you, some big sweaty waddling trailerpark chick I bet,who walks

around all day with sunnys on, a constantly lit fag in her chubby hand, and a

24/7 grudge against men harhar




to make me laugh this way, I'll need to go all Martin uther on y'all and start scourging myself. But no... I can't do that because Terminalia might get off on it and then blame me for making him commit the sin of Onan.

Yeah, sticks` and stones may break my bones, but whips and chains excite

me lol



America was NOT founded on Christianity. It was founded on money. Get back to your books, Hook.

Tell that one to the guys who landed on Plymouth rock.

if i have to die killing this topic, then so be it!


who likes boobs! even if your gay, you have to admit, there soft like pillows!

i knew people who had little bottles of stuff called rush which i think is actually butyl nitrate, but i thought the little glass tudes of amyl nitrate that you broke open and stiffed (the real poppers) went out in the early 80s. maybe not though, or it may depend on where you live.

No its Amyl in Australia, and it does screw your head with prolonged and

constant use.

if i have to die killing this topic, then so be it!


who likes boobs! even if your gay, you have to admit, there soft like pillows!

anybody seen that boyfriend pillow shaped like an arm in japan or the girlfriend pillow shaped like a womans knee?

if i have to die killing this topic, then so be it!
who likes boobs! even if your gay, you have to admit, there soft like pillows!

Theres nothing better than a womans breast, especially if its nice and round.

anybody seen that boyfriend pillow shaped like an arm in japan or the girlfriend pillow shaped like a womans knee?


those msut be lo9nely lonely men, i saw that..

stupid japanese

anybody seen that boyfriend pillow shaped like an arm in japan or the girlfriend pillow shaped like a womans knee?

It sounds very uncomfortable.

No its Amyl in Australia, and it does screw your head with prolonged and

constant use.

ah yes, oz the magical land where all thinks are possible, and everyone has flying monkey servants to do their evil bidding.

Tell that one to the guys who landed on Plymouth rock.

...Why? They made the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, etc, etc...? o_O

anybody seen that boyfriend pillow shaped like an arm in japan or the girlfriend pillow shaped like a womans knee?
So am I the only guy who would rather have a girlfriend arm pillow over a girlfriend knee pillow?

ah yes, oz the magical land where all thinks are possible, and everyone has flying monkey servants to do their evil bidding.


NO HO!!! NOT THE FLYING MONKEYS!



oh, and instead of santas saying ho ho ho, they should say: lady of the night, lady of the night, lady of the night!

i dont know who jim is.


Get some old Star Trek episodes and you will.

what about a real girlfriend? thats even better,

Get some old Star Trek episodes and you will.


aha, no, im working on socializing, not trekizing...

i would much rather lose virginity, thank you.

I'm amazed. Twice I've checked in over the last 36 hours, and this thread is not only still active, it's right at the top of the thread-heap.

I just didn't realize there were 71? 72? pages worth of stuff to write on this stooopid topic...

*poots*

[QUOTE=Goed Twee]...Why? They made the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, etc, etc...? o_O

No, on Christianity.

I'm amazed. Twice I've checked in over the last 36 hours, and this thread is not only still active, it's right at the top of the thread-heap.

I just didn't realize there were 71? 72? pages worth of stuff to write on this stooopid topic...

*poots*


there isnt stuff worth writing,there are just republicans.

No, on Christianity.

No, what I'm asking is, "They founded America? I was under the impressing those blokes in the Constitutional Congress did it"

aha, no, im working on socializing, not trekizing...
i would much rather lose virginity, thank you.

If your an attractive girl, over 18, I'll be happy to help.

Theres nothing better than a womans breast, especially if its nice and round.

Yeah... totally unlike those square breasts. Man, I hate them.

No, what I'm asking is, "They founded America? I was under the impressing those blokes in the Constitutional Congress did it"

They both did.

there isnt stuff worth writing,there are just republicans.

democrat booooo!!! still sore from the election not so big now lol. go ted kennedy, campus bum :D

They both did.

Actually, just to point it out, no they didn't.

And America is not a christian nation. Some people have actually given me a small little reputation for doing this, but I really don't WANT to whip out the Treaty of Tripoli again. So please don't make me?

Yeah... totally unlike those square breasts. Man, I hate them.

Could be worst. Could be octogonal. Although, if you're into math, that would be heaven :p

democrat booooo!!! still sore from the election not so big now lol. go ted kennedy, campus bum :D


no! i kinda agree with the election. still wouldve voted kerry, buthey, bush one fair n square, no one cares anymore.


kerry blew more dick then monica lewinzky

Could be worst. Could be octogonal. Although, if you're into math, that would be heaven :p


then again, a math nerd would never EVER see breasts in his life.

Yeah... totally unlike those square breasts. Man, I hate them.

Must be plastic surgery lol, seriously but, some jugs are too droopy or

small, they should be nicely rounded, perky and about the size of a small

watermelon, perfection!

then again, a math nerd would never EVER see breasts in his life.

I've already proven you wrong by going out with a maths nerd. So neener.

[QUOTE]

lol what are you, some big sweaty waddling trailerpark chick I bet,who walks

around all day with sunnys on, a constantly lit fag in her chubby hand, and a

24/7 grudge against men harhar

A picture's worth a thousand words, they say...whoever they are.
http://blood-dance.net/~azhrarn/azhr599.jpg
Bow down, little man, bow down. I LOVE men. The ones who aren't born without brains, that is. MY man is marvellously intelligent, extremely sweet and usually very open-minded, despite his being descended from pro-life Republicans. My love of men is the sole reason I did not finally settle down with someone of my own sex. If I couldn't have both... well I just couldn't live without the deep... you know. <EG!>


[QUOTE] Yeah, sticks` and stones may break my bones, but whips and chains excite
me lol

And thus, I will not damn myself by leading you into sin, but leave you to do the work yourself. And you're doing a mighty fine job of damning yourself, my dear. Congrats.

[QUOTE]Tell that one to the guys who landed on Plymouth rock.

OMGzzorz, you learned your American history from saturday morning television, didn't you....

Must be plastic surgery lol, seriously but, some jugs are too droopy or
small, they should be nicely rounded, perky and about the size of a small
watermelon, perfection!

I've already assumed that I'm the only guy that would perfer an arm pillow over the knee pillow.

Am I also the only guy who really doesn't set standards for breasts? o_O

[QUOTE=Goed Twee]Actually, just to point it out, no they didn't.

Well I think they did.


And America is not a christian nation.

Tell that to the people who voted in Bush.

Some people have actually given me a small little reputation for doing this, but I really don't WANT to whip out the Treaty of Tripoli again. So please don't make me?

I'd like to see it, how exactly, does a North African coastal city fit into your

constitution, did you fight over it once?

A lot of countrys have, thats all.

http://blood-dance.net/~azhrarn/azhr599.jpg


ewww, who is that?

thats one disgusting goth.

I've already assumed that I'm the only guy that would perfer an arm pillow over the knee pillow.
Am I also the only guy who really doesn't set standards for breasts? o_O

No, but most guys like them at least bigger than a handful.

ewww, who is that?

thats one disgusting goth.

That would be me. Kindly take your foot out of your mouth and your brain out of neutral.

That would be me. Kindly take your foot out of your mouth and your brain out of neutral.

whoops.

whoops.

Hehehhhee! Whoops indeed. Suuuure. *shrug* I am not for the weak of heart OR head.

http://blood-dance.net/~azhrarn/azhr599.jpg

OK, I wouldnt knock you back.

Very witchypoo.

Tell that to the people who voted in Bush.
I do. Very often.

I'd like to see it, how exactly, does a North African coastal city fit into your
constitution, did you fight over it once?
A lot of countrys have, thats all.
It's not the city, it's the treaty. Article 11 states quite clearly that the US is not a christian nation.

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/barbary/bar1796t.htm#art11

As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

still...

iick! omg ima puke!

hmm, i can smell the ignorance from here. just because something isn't normal to you does NOT mean it is wrong. if two people love and need each other it does not matter if they're a man and woman, two men, or two women. and as for children imitating homosexuals, as they grow they're going to experiment in life anyway, so what's the problem?

http://blood-dance.net/~azhrarn/azhr599.jpg

OK, I wouldnt knock you back.

The weight of my boots alone would make that improbable. They have more steel in and on them than most cars. Pair that with the fact that I learned to defend myself against larger, more muscular agressors and am quite willing to bite, scratch and seriously damage anyone stupid enough to attack me...

hmm, i can smell the ignorance from here. just because something isn't normal to you does NOT mean it is wrong. if two people love and need each other it does not matter if they're a man and woman, two men, or two women. and as for children imitating homosexuals, as they grow they're going to experiment in life anyway, so what's the problem?



yes, i agree with you, blah blah.. but you missed what we are currently talking about...


eewww! EWW!!!

hmm, i can smell the ignorance from here. just because something isn't normal to you does NOT mean it is wrong. if two people love and need each other it does not matter if they're a man and woman, two men, or two women. and as for children imitating homosexuals, as they grow they're going to experiment in life anyway, so what's the problem?

still its a bit strange, like out of teh ordinary for children to witness and a bit hard to explain to them. not that its wrong.

still...

iick! omg ima puke!

Go away, child. I am not for you.

I am not for you.



GooD! AACK! *throws up*

snip

Ok, we get the point. You think she's ugly. I got that a long time ago. Are you trying to be funny? Cause...uh...well, let me give you a hint.

The biggest and most important part of making a joke...ready for this?

It has to be funny.

GooD! AACK! *throws up*

you are a strange one

Ok, we get the point. You think she's ugly. I got that a long time ago. Are you trying to be funny? Cause...uh...well, let me give you a hint.

The biggest and most important part of making a joke...ready for this?

It has to be funny.


no, im just kinda in shock at the moment...

no, im just kinda in shock at the moment...

Obviosuly you're coherent enough to type out said shock, so I'm doubting your level of shock at the moment.

Ok, we get the point. You think she's ugly. I got that a long time ago. Are you trying to be funny? Cause...uh...well, let me give you a hint.

The biggest and most important part of making a joke...ready for this?

It has to be funny.

Heh. See Czec? Goed is funny. You should take notes. I can lend you a pencil if you need one.

Heh. See Czec? Goed is funny. You should take notes. I can lend you a pencil if you need one.


actually, you probably couldnt.

want to fly to kansas? its flatter then a pancake, you know...

hey, im just happy ive succesfully killed the soon-to-be flame topic...


however, i inadvertantly started another one... :/

GooD! AACK! *throws up*

It is so very easy to criticize the appearance of someone else when your own is hidden. The joys of cowardice and anonymity. *grin* It is my good fortune to be pleased when I see my own reflection. Can you claim to be similarly blessed?

*Arches an eyebrow and smiles*

actually, you probably couldnt.

want to fly to kansas? its flatter then a pancake, you know...

I could lend you a theoretical pencil. Or I could give you instructions on how to make one... or ship one airmail...

But then, I think I'd rather keep my pencil :p

Breeders will always breed, because it is their nature. The homosexual free from the burden of procreation and child rearing will always lead, in art, literature, politics , all the fields which require a focused will. this will is lost in the concerns of conventional family life. that is why i believe, inorder to save the aryan race from destruction, it must be lead by an elite cadre of dedicated homosexuals. thus i present The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual National Socialist Workingperson's Party.

This post is from back at the beginning, but I'll confess, I've seen plenty of people bash homosexuals before, but that's the first time I've seen anyone bash hetrosexuals. Congrats on being the first small-minded person on the other side of the fence.

This post is from back at the beginning, but I'll confess, I've seen plenty of people bash homosexuals before, but that's the first time I've seen anyone bash hetrosexuals. Congrats on being the first small-minded person on the other side of the fence.


yea, that is a bit of a first isnt it...

back to the off topic-topic...

hey, im just happy ive succesfully killed the soon-to-be flame topic...
however, i inadvertantly started another one... :/

.......
'inadvertantly'? You were unaware that insulting people's looks is frowned upon?

I could lend you a theoretical pencil. Or I could give you instructions on how to make one... or ship one airmail...

But then, I think I'd rather keep my pencil :p



you can make a PENCIL!

i thought that it took some kind of mathematical genius to come up with such a thing.

i mean, THEY DONT ROLL OFF DESKS! ITS AMAZING!

.......
'inadvertantly'? You were unaware that insulting people's looks is frowned upon?


good point :p

still, if your gonna post an image of yourself on the internet (which is pretty creepy in itself) you must realise the possible critisism you can face.

as for looking into the mirror: theres a reason why i walk around naked! (jking, hah...)

It is so very easy to criticize the appearance of someone else when your own is hidden. The joys of cowardice and anonymity. *grin* It is my good fortune to be pleased when I see my own reflection. Can you claim to be similarly blessed?

*Arches an eyebrow and smiles*

That totally reminds me, I need to take another picture of myself soon with my longer hair :D

Ok...so...I made it through about half of the posts, and I can read no more. I think it would take too long to run through and quote all of the things I'm planning on commenting on...I do apologize if that bothers anyone, and I hope I'm not being terribly repeatitive seeing as I have like 100 more posts to read...ah well. I'm just going to try to address things I haven't noticed addressed.

First...there was some attempted point about how in gay relationships where children are involved bad shit happens cus of the lack of a mother or father. If that's causing a problem then, logically thinking, divorces should be illegal, yes? Doesn't the United States currently have a senselessly high divorce rate? I can't remember what it is off the top of my head...but umm...it was high.

Second, homosexuality occurs in nature in monogamous animals. It is genetic. Genes are incredibly compilcated and certain combinations cause certain behaviors. There is probably not a SINGLE gene that just up and makes someone gay, it is likely to be a combination, and sometimes these combinations of genes are affected by the environment, and something triggers a certain reaction. A gay person and a straight person can have the same gene patterns, but something obviously happened to cause some reaction. REGARDLESS, it is not a conscious decision, and I don't understand why people have so much hatred toward something that is not a decision. No one gets up in the morning saying, "Oh snap! Today I'm going to go out and be gay!"

Third, marriage was not invented by Christians. There was marriage before Christianity came into existence. If marriage is Christian, why is it ok for an atheist to get "married" and not homosexuals, eh?

Fourth, religion...Christianity does not preach prejudice, and a lot of people seem to use it as a crutch for their own prejudice and that just makes a perfectly lovely religion concept look like complete shit. The Golden Rule...do unto others as you would have them do unto you...or if you would like to me to quote straight from the Bible (it is there several times, but here it is from Matthew 7:12: "Therefore, all things whatever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them; for this is the law..." On that note, as a homosexual individual, no good Christian individual should take any "rights" or "privaleges" from you because no good Christian would like it if those things were taken from them.
I have more...this time from John 8:7, "So when they continued asking him, he lifted himself up, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her." I suppose everyone is familiar with Jesus STOPPING the bunch of guys from stoning the prostitute, right? Jesus, Mr. Christianity, himself, STOPPED the punishment of a sinner. Hmmm...let me ponder this...prostitution, unlike homosexuality is an obvious conscious decicion (unless one was forced into prostitution, of course), and Jesus said, "Hey, don't be trying to punish her for her sins because EVERYONE sins, and none of you have the right to condemn anyone." Condemnation is up to God ONLY. No mortal person has the superiority to say that something is wrong. This is supposing homosexuality is a sin...
Yes, in the Old Testament, in Leviticus (20:13), "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Alright, what about women? Are lesbians ok? It don't say nothing about women...and it also very blatantly contradicts ALL of the teachings of Jesus Christ. Jesus was a pacifist, he didn't want anyone to hurt anyone, not even a sinner like the previously mentioned prostitute.
Leviticus is full of crazy sins. I will enumerate, and enlighten ye all.
1) 19:27, "Ye shall not shave around your temples; neither shalt thou mar the corners of they beard." IT'S A SIN TO SHAVE! OMG! TO HELL WITH ALL OF THE CLEANLY SHAVEN MEN. I, personally, think even stubble is yucky, but do I go around saying men who shave can't get married? Nah, yo.
2) 19:19, "Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind; thou shant not sow thy field with mixed seed; neither shall a garment mixed of linen and woollen come upon thee." Ohnos! I can't mix ANYTHING or so it seems...and oh dear...I think my shirt is a cotton polyester blend...to Hell I go with all the fags, and men who shave.
3) 11:10, "And all that have no fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you." No lobsters, no craps, no shrimp. SIN! MEEP! I like shellfish...a lot. Why are no Christians out protesting Red Lobster restraunts?
4) 11:7, "And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and he cloven-footed, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you." No pork. No ham for Christmas, it is very CLEARLY a sin. I like bacon a great deal, I'm screwed.
Wow. I wonder how many Christians keep all of those...do tell me if you do because I will applaud you, and you can bash the gay folk all you want.
Want something from the New Testament, seeing as the Old Testament is terribly outdated with the exception of being gay? How about Timothy 2:9, "In this manner, also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with godly fear and sobriety, not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array." Braiding hair + jewelry = SIN. Onward to Timothy 9:11-12, "Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I permit not a woman to teach, nor usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence." Sounds kinda sexist, doesn't it? Women are inferior. The Bible says so. Right there. *points at it*
Whoa...that was a lot to type, and with it done, if you're going to take the Bible completely literally, take ALL of it literally, and not just the things you don't like...such as homosexuals. Take into account how old it is, and how it's been interpretted and reinterpretted to fit whoever was doing the interpretting, and how LIKELY it is that things have been added and ommited, and it was being translated.

Want some personal experiences too? You're gonna get them. I'm from North Carolina (a good ol' Bible Belt state). I was raised in a completely conservative family in a completely rural area with no exposure whatsoever to homosexuality, aside from random family members telling me they would kill me if I were ever a lesbian or dated anyone black. I was honestly unsure what a gay person even was, and well...I'm a lesbian. And I hate to break it to some of you, but I played with dolls, and I like the color pink, and I wear dresses, and high heels, and make-up, and everything else a "normal" girl would. If you were to see me, there would be no way you could tell I happen to be capable of loving other girls. It seems like I would be a racist, homophobic conservative...I guess racism, homophobia, and conservativism are not contagious diseases like being gay, which I seriously doubt is a disease. If it were, I wouldn't be single because I would have severely contaminated a lot of people. At times, I have become rather distraught over my sexuality, and I have wished with all of my wishing power that I were straight and "normal" like most other people, but the reason that happened was because of all the ignoranance, and prejudice toward us by...people like the person who started this post, to whom I say...sheltering children from reality is not the answer to the "gay problem" or any problem for that matter.

Have a nice day, everybody.

This post is from back at the beginning, but I'll confess, I've seen plenty of people bash homosexuals before, but that's the first time I've seen anyone bash hetrosexuals. Congrats on being the first small-minded person on the other side of the fence.

Oh no, he's far from the first. I've seen a very small handful of homosexuals who are just as bad as their hetero brothers in asshattiness. I only wish that both sides of the fence were less ugly and bigoted about it. Live and let live.

Let the homosexuals be glad that the heteros choose willingly to take up the onus of breeding. Let the heterosexuals be glad that the homosexuals aren't competeing for both their prospective mates and their offspring's neccessary resources. Let the bisexuals stand on the fence and watch them all in confusion and delight at being free to live in both worlds.

This is sexual freedom.

That totally reminds me, I need to take another picture of myself soon with my longer hair :D


man, i had long hair once... 2 feet of hair! it was kickass!

Oh no, he's far from the first. I've seen a very small handful of homosexuals who are just as bad as their hetero brothers in asshattiness. I only wish that both sides of the fence were less ugly and bigoted about it. Live and let live.

Let the homosexuals be glad that the heteros choose willingly to take up the onus of breeding. Let the heterosexuals be glad that the homosexuals aren't competeing for both their prospective mates and their offspring's neccessary resources. Let the bisexuals stand on the fence and watch them all in confusion and delight at being free to live in both worlds.

This is sexual freedom.

I'm all for gay men.

Less competition :D

That totally reminds me, I need to take another picture of myself soon with my longer hair :D

Oooh! Can I see? *bouncebounce*

long hair is kinda wierd, cause you actually feel it weighing your head down.

whenever i tossed my hair back, i would always inadvertandly slap someone in the face, whilst getting it in some mashed potatoes of some kids tray.

Oooh! Can I see? *bouncebounce*

There's a picture I took over the summer floating in the Picture thread, if you want :p

Oooh! Can I see? *bouncebounce*

Bounce bounce, huh? How very interesting.

long hair is kinda wierd, cause you actually feel it weighing your head down.

whenever i tossed my hair back, i would always inadvertandly slap someone in the face, whilst getting it in some mashed potatoes of some kids tray.

there is an invention like a rubberband but furry and different colours called ahair tie, you are aware of such and invention no?

*shudder*



how exactly is one supposed to stop things from getting stuck in long hair? i swear to god, after i got it cut, a ham sandwich and a watch fell out.

there is an invention like a rubberband but furry and different colours called ahair tie, you are aware of such and invention no?

Furry? I don't have a furry one, mine is just a boring black band :p

And...I hate rubber bands. SO much. I couldn't find ANYTHING else one day, and used a rubber band instead. My head was aching all through work.

there is an invention like a rubberband but furry and different colours called ahair tie, you are aware of such and invention no?


aha, no, im a dude, im not putting my hair in ponytails, damnit.

aha, no, im a dude, im not putting my hair in ponytails, damnit.

Bah, screw you :p

Oooh! Can I see? *bouncebounce*

Seconded! I want Goed photos! *also bounces*

And Boos, I adore your sig. It makes me feel warm and fuzzy for some strange reason (insanity on my part, I suspect)

Bah, screw you :p

if your a woman, and not of ugly descent, then i think this could be arranged.

otherwise, eww!

if your a woman, and not of ugly descent, then i think this could be arranged.

otherwise, eww!

I was born with, and still own, a penis :p

Furry? I don't have a furry one, mine is just a boring black band :p

And...I hate rubber bands. SO much. I couldn't find ANYTHING else one day, and used a rubber band instead. My head was aching all through work.

the ones my sis hangs all over the house and in teh car are furry and flowery im forever throwing them out.

*Hugs Turkehnaria*

Thank you. That was beautiful. That might have been the sanest thing I've seen on this thread.

I was born with, and still own, a penis :p


k, then we apply option 2#: EWW! Hell no!

im sorry, but my fudge factory isnt openin its doors for business ever.

k, then we apply option 2#: EWW! Hell no!

im sorry, but my fudge factory isnt openin its doors for business ever.

1) you assume I'm homosexual or bisexual

2) you assume I'm into anal.

I won't tell you which ones are right/wrong ;)

The weight of my boots alone would make that improbable. They have more steel in and on them than most cars. Pair that with the fact that I learned to defend myself against larger, more muscular agressors and am quite willing to bite, scratch and seriously damage anyone stupid enough to attack me...

Nooo lol, I didnt mean attack you, knock you back in Australia means, not

accepted, so by saying I wouldnt knock you back, I meant the opposite, how

old are you anyway?

You look between 19 and 21.

You would be a fine addition to my harem.

There's a picture I took over the summer floating in the Picture thread, if you want :p

Yay! I want. I'm a very visually orientated person. Think it has something to do with my being kind of an artist. That whole living through my senses thing. Having a visual link to a person makes them easier for me to empathize with and speak to on a human-to-human basis. Must go look!

1) you assume I'm homosexual or bisexual

2) you assume I'm into anal.

I won't tell you which ones are right/wrong ;)


ill go with 2, since im just the *slightest* bit homophobic, for some strange reason.

Nooo lol, I didnt mean attack you, knock you back in Australia means, not

accepted, so by saying I wouldnt knock you back, I meant the opposite, how

old are you anyway?

You look between 19 and 21.

You would be a fine addition to my harem.

My harem is better than yours. Booslandia should join mine.

My harem is better than yours. Booslandia should join mine.

I'm pretty sure anyone who brags about having a harem, doesn't have one.

And I'm noticably silent aobut such matters ;) :D

Nooo lol, I didnt mean attack you, knock you back in Australia means, not

accepted, so by saying I wouldnt knock you back, I meant the opposite, how

old are you anyway?

You look between 19 and 21.

You would be a fine edition to my harem.

ROTFLMAO! Okay, points for flattering the old woman. I'm 39. And I've got a man whom I am very happy with. Even if he doesn't let me date women. ;D

I'm pretty sure anyone who brags about having a harem, doesn't have one.

And I'm noticably silent aobut such matters ;) :D


theres a question i need to ask to respond to this, but i dont want to ask it...

I'm pretty sure anyone who brags about having a harem, doesn't have one.

And I'm noticably silent aobut such matters ;) :D

Heh, shows what you know. Shaed, Fairy Tinkerbelly, Gaeltach, and Wild Orchid have all committed themselves to my harem. So ha!

I don't even know if Booslandia is a man or woman, or what he/she looks like. I'm just being a jerk to Term.

My harem is better than yours. Booslandia should join mine.

'Your' harem Sd? :p

And oooh yes! Boos should join me and Tink and Gael and WO!

*puts on creepy zombie voice* jooooooooinnnnnn ussssssssssssssss!

^.^!

You can have your own niche, since I don't think any of the others of us are goths... Tink's a dominatrix... I'm the stereotypical harem girl/serving wench... don't know about Gael or WO....

*muses*

Heh, shows what you know. Shaed, Fairy Tinkerbelly, Gaeltach, and Wild Orchid have all committed themselves to my harem. So ha!

I don't even know if Booslandia is a man or woman, or what he/she looks like. I'm just being a jerk to Term.

...Oooooh, your harem is online. Big differences then.











<cough>

k, now i NEED to ask, wtf is a harem? sounds like some kinda goth thing... or a sex group....

...Oooooh, your harem is online. Big differences then.











<cough>

Hahahahaha

k, now i NEED to ask, wtf is a harem? sounds like some kinda goth thing... or a sex group....

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=harem

Note entry 3.

k, now i NEED to ask, wtf is a harem? sounds like some kinda goth thing... or a sex group....

It's a bunch of concubines - basically extra wives kept around for sex. Only they aren't allowed to nag or housekeep. They just laze around in a room full of silken cusions and occasionally get sex. My kind of life-style ^.^.

Well, that's my understanding anyway.

oh hell yes!

i want a harem...

It's a bunch of concubines - basically extra wives kept around for sex. Only they aren't allowed to nag or housekeep. They just laze around in a room full of silken cusions and occasionally get sex. My kind of life-style ^.^.

Well, that's my understanding anyway.


so you like having no actual value and having no expectations in life?

kickass.

oh hell yes!

i want a harem...

Pfh, not with THAT attitude...

ROTFLMAO! Okay, points for flattering the old woman. I'm 39. And I've got a man whom I am very happy with. Even if he doesn't let me date women. ;D

39!

you must have been a corker once.

whistles

Pfh, not with THAT attitude...

aww, but i really really really want one!
damn.

39!

you must have been a corker once.

whistles

I wanna see!

so you like having no actual value and having no expectations in life?

kickass.

You put no value on girls that would give you sex? Are you sure you're male?

And I have expectations. At the very least, I'd expect good orgasms ^.^

But seriously, it's an online harem. I can live a real life *and* be in an online harem. so nyer.

k, now i NEED to ask, wtf is a harem? sounds like some kinda goth thing... or a sex group....

"Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore..."

Honey, I know that Kansas is one of those middle-of-the-nation-food-producing-places that I tend to avoid to preserve my sanity and avoid being tossed on a big pile of wood and set on fire... but really... it IS part of America, therefor recieves at least a modicum of civilization and some minor educational assistance.

Have you actually been conscious during your school days? Did they give you books?

Let me educate you just a little. From the Miriam-Webster Dictionary:

Main Entry: har·em
Pronunciation: 'har-&m, 'her-
Function: noun
Etymology: Arabic harIm, literally, something forbidden & haram, literally, sanctuary
1 a : a usually secluded house or part of a house allotted to women in a Muslim household b : the wives, concubines, female relatives, and servants occupying a harem
2 : a group of women associated with one man
3 : a group of females associated with one male -- used of polygamous animals

Pfh, not with THAT attitude...

Every man deserves his own harem.

The muslims have got the right idea, if one starts sulking and abusing you,

you can go find another one.

Forty is a good number

You put no value on girls that would give you sex? Are you sure you're male?

And I have expectations. At the very least, I'd expect good orgasms ^.^

But seriously, it's an online harem. I can live a real life *and* be in an online harem. so nyer.

But seriously, it's an online harem. That's all you needed to really say. It's all just fun.

You put no value on girls that would give you sex? Are you sure you're male?

And I have expectations. At the very least, I'd expect good orgasms ^.^

But seriously, it's an online harem. I can live a real life *and* be in an online harem. so nyer.



oho, i have no problem with teh whole sex thing, sex= teh goodie goodie, but

you have no real input into life as one of those and---oh wait, just internet... screw it...

im off to another forum.

I wanna see!

Here you go.
http://blood-dance.net/~azhrarn/azhr599.jpg

I dont know what Czech is on about.

39!

you must have been a corker once.

whistles

Only things that have really changed on me since I was the age you assessed me to be has been the colour of my hair (which changes every few months as I tire of the colour combination), the amount of ink and metal embedded in my skin and the perkiness of my.. erm... pillows. But hey... that's what corsets and wonderbras were designed to manage.

So basicly, I'm the same as I was then, just more decorated and slightly less elastic. I have visions of myself at 60, sitting on a porch with a cigar and a walking cane, sporting a green and gold mohawk and bitching about those damned kids not knowing how to mosh.

I dont know what Czech is on about.

No one does.

Here you go.
http://blood-dance.net/~azhrarn/azhr599.jpg

I dont know what Czech is on about.

Kinky.

No one does.


i was on something, but i realised ihave successfully killed the topic, and do not need to go further.


enjoy.

Only things that have really changed on me since I was the age you assessed me to be has been the colour of my hair (which changes every few months as I tire of the colour combination), the amount of ink and metal embedded in my skin and the perkiness of my.. erm... pillows. But hey... that's what corsets and wonderbras were designed to manage.
So basicly, I'm the same as I was then, just more decorated and slightly less elastic. I have visions of myself at 60, sitting on a porch with a cigar and a walking cane, sporting a green and gold mohawk and bitching about those damned kids not knowing how to mosh.

lol you will never get old :)

No one does.

not even czech I suspect.

Kinky.

Very Gypsie/witch I thought, interesting.

Very Gypsie/witch I thought, interesting.

I like it because she looks dom, something I am very attracted to. But I could be wrong.

not even czech I suspect.

then you suspect correct!

btw, there is another name i would go by, but i was flamed several... whoah, a year ago i guess under it, so i shall not disclose it.


you can, however, know it starts with an I andends with H

I disagree on that, Im not trying to villify gays for it, just point out it is alot

more easier for them to do so, casual sex on the spot with no strings

attached, comes easier between men, than between men and women.

Once again, this is not a flame.

A thought I have been having through this whole post is...I really think those against this gay marriages really mean against two men marrying, and this post shows that the definition of gay seems to be men only, so I would like to ask if in the original post it were two gay Women that kissed would there have been such a knee jerk reaction?

I think not, as men seem to think it cute when two women are together not to mention their hope that they will be the filling for that sandwich! Sad thing for them is if they ever got two women in bed I think they would feel a bit left out of the equation as the two women would pay more attention to each other rather then the man.

As a bisexual in a monogomous hetero relationship ie marriage whom is also raising 4 children trust me I have heard it all. And before I am questioned I am faithful and I don't act on urges compelling me to go find a woman to be with. I am attracted to both sexes but in love with my husband.

Now perhaps I am getting into the too much information bit however, what do you all think..would there be such an outrage if it was lesbians kissing in public as long as those gay men just kept it hidden away?

Here you go.
http://blood-dance.net/~azhrarn/azhr599.jpg

I dont know what Czech is on about.

Czech was reacting in the xenophobic manner I tend to associate with people who were raised to believe that all things must conform to a certain mold. These are also people who tend to see something strong and independant and immediately feel the need to tear it down or make it small so as to feel less threatened by it. I long ago learned that such people were nothing to take to heart.

And really, I'm NOT for everyone. My particular aesthetic is not by any means regarded as attractive by the mainstream US population and it causes me a lot of having to endure that kind of open griefing. THAT more than any other factor allows me to understand to a good extent what it is that openly gay people have to deal with on a day to day basis. But unlike them, I CAN just let my hair grow back its natural red, I CAN remove my piercings and I CAN go have lazer treatments done to remove my tattoos.

With gay people, it's more like me donning a red wig and a business suit. You can still see it and it's still there, no matter what you do to hide it. Which is why I become so INFURIATED when people say "Live like a hetero and start banging women like normal folks." They don't HAVE that choice, really. They can only go through the motions and be horribly miserable doing so.

Do you see what I'm saying?

I like it because she looks dom, something I am very attracted to. But I could be wrong.

A little bit, I think she looks quite tasty, not mean or bitchy enough to look

like a dominatrix, no great loss but.

Czech was reacting in the xenophobic manner I tend to associate with people who were raised to believe that all things must conform to a certain mold. These are also people who tend to see something strong and independant and immediately feel the need to tear it down or make it small so as to feel less threatened by it. I long ago learned that such people were nothing to take to heart.

And really, I'm NOT for everyone. My particular aesthetic is not by any means regarded as attractive by the mainstream US population and it causes me a lot of having to endure that kind of open griefing. THAT more than any other factor allows me to understand to a good extent what it is that openly gay people have to deal with on a day to day basis. But unlike them, I CAN just let my hair grow back its natural red, I CAN remove my piercings and I CAN go have lazer treatments done to remove my tattoos.

With gay people, it's more like me donning a red wig and a business suit. You can still see it and it's still there, no matter what you do to hide it. Which is why I become so INFURIATED when people say "Live like a hetero and start banging women like normal folks." They don't HAVE that choice, really. They can only go through the motions and be horribly miserable doing so.

Do you see what I'm saying?


actually, i wasnt on to that at all, i was just killing the thread... this wasnt a big dramo-graphic thing of me attacking gays...

seriously, where the hell you get this?>

[QUOTE=Booslandia]Czech was reacting in the xenophobic manner I tend to associate with people who were raised to believe that all things must conform to a certain mold. These are also people who tend to see something strong and independant and immediately feel the need to tear it down or make it small so as to feel less threatened by it. I long ago learned that such people were nothing to take to heart.

I think he was only joking, what do you think strong and independant is

anyway, sometimes you have to bend a little.


With gay people, it's more like me donning a red wig and a business suit. You can still see it and it's still there, no matter what you do to hide it. Which is why I become so INFURIATED when people say "Live like a hetero and start banging women like normal folks." They don't HAVE that choice, really. They can only go through the motions and be horribly miserable doing so.
Do you see what I'm saying?

No, I have no problem with gays being who they are, I just dont agree with

them marrying or raising familys.

OMG stop stop stop... you're going to give me ego problems. I don't need those. I already have bad habits and am obviously already overly impressed with my own reflection. LOL.

Heh, well you already know I'm a bi chick in a monogamous het relationship... if you were paying attention. I'll merrily add to the TMI then. Dom? Half right. Switch. I sit that fence really well. ROTFL

Bitchy? Well I think my postings kinda tell that story better than my photo does. I dish out what I percieve each merits on a situational basis, updated with each action and word. If I treat you poorly, you've done or said something in my presence that was an unsolicited act of rudeness or hostility. If I treat you well, you haven't done anything like that in my presence. If I'm REALLY nasty with you... well then you've been a bad, bad person. And if I am CONSISTANTLY nasty with you... you've either persisted in being naughty in the eyes of Saint Bootay or you've done something I find absolutely unforgivable.

Of course one week out of every month all that flies out the window, I start bitching about wanting to be a man and everyone ends up with little Boo-sized teethmarks. But that's all the evils inherent in my being the legendary variety of female that goes insane for one week a month and sends all intelligent, rational types running away until the hormones clear and I'm my normal, rational, judgemental self again.

Now back to the regularly scheduled thread. Gays. Love them. They are teh sexay!

then you suspect correct!
btw, there is another name i would go by, but i was flamed several... whoah, a year ago i guess under it, so i shall not disclose it.
you can, however, know it starts with an I andends with H

Indianah?

actually, i wasnt on to that at all, i was just killing the thread... this wasnt a big dramo-graphic thing of me attacking gays...

seriously, where the hell you get this?>

Sorry, Kansas, no thread killing tonight. And bye the bye... PLEASE for the love of GAWD go pick up some reading comprehension and logic skills.

And no, I will NOT surrender Dorothy, so sod off.

Indianah?


*sigh* i guess that most of you arent into the rp... anyway, so:

i was Izath, and i made a little freakin rp ship, but because of some stupid rp technicality, they fuckin bitched me out, reported me, and got my little nation, along with the 2 puppets, erased.

thats why i follow the rp *etiquette*- i call it nerds excuse for a life - by having this crap in my sig.

its 2500 letters, my sig. i cant even add 1 more letter

why do you bother rping? you might ask: because sometimes it can be fun, but rarely nowadays. it has gotten too damn technical.

Sorry, Kansas, no thread killing tonight. And bye the bye... PLEASE for the love of GAWD go pick up some reading comprehension and logic skills.

And no, I will NOT surrender Dorothy, so sod off.


Err, actually, in that little flame (that i dont really understand) you confirmed the death of this...

damn I guess my previous post came at a thread killing time...ahhh well

I will add to it then...boo I think your lovely and more gutsy then I am I envy the fact that you are so comfortable with yourself and I want to dress like you!! But decorum dictates I can't or at least I perceive it that way...thought my age was a factor too but you blew that one away for me as well.

Guess I just need to stop wanting and start doing...yeah that is what I will do ~heads off to camden to get some proper clothes~

Yes, this is dead...let's all move over to the other thread about gay people and go at it over there with the same stuff...over and over...because none of us know when to stop, and none of us listen very well to the other side, and this is going to go on forever, for all eternity.
Did no one read my post before this (other than Booslandia, who gave me an internet hug for it)...it was somewhere back on page 74 of this rot, I think, and no one attempted to argue with me. Was that because you couldn't, or because you didn't read it?

Yes, this is dead...let's all move over to the other thread about gay people and go at it over there with the same stuff...over and over...because none of us know when to stop, and none of us listen very well to the other side, and this is going to go on forever, for all eternity.
Did no one read my post before this (other than Booslandia, who gave me an internet hug for it)...it was somewhere back on page 74 of this rot, I think, and no one attempted to argue with me. Was that because you couldn't, or because you didn't read it?


Ima make it easy for a mod:

lock the thread,and delete all posts up to 1000: rest are total and complete hijacking.

Yes, this is dead...let's all move over to the other thread about gay people and go at it over there with the same stuff...over and over...because none of us know when to stop, and none of us listen very well to the other side, and this is going to go on forever, for all eternity.
Did no one read my post before this (other than Booslandia, who gave me an internet hug for it)...it was somewhere back on page 74 of this rot, I think, and no one attempted to argue with me. Was that because you couldn't, or because you didn't read it?

I really, really wish I could say that it was because no one could reasonably argue what you had to say. From my standpoint, what you presented was beyond arguement. But I fear, judging by the long and often ridiculous gauntlet of posts I have read (and yes, I was masochistic enough to read them all), that being rational, citing relevant biblical quotes and making an inarguable case is not enough to make many of the posters to this thread not respond.

Sad sad sad... but I think they didn't read it. Maybe it looked too daunting, being such a large textblock...

I still thank you for it though. It really was very well presented and very rational. It even made me feel vindicated.

yes, well... lets let this rest in peace now...


R.I.P. Gay topic... united and divided us....

*Lays a flower on grave*

Czech, why is it that you are so amazingly insistant on ending the thread? Really, I find myself wondering what it is that brought you here to disrupt and hyjack it in the first place. It isn't as if any of the debates of this type can ever be satisfactorily resolved, but it DOES open dialog and allow opposing sides of the idea to see and understand just a litle bit better by the reading and responding. If not the ideas, then the people who carry the ideas... which in its own way is a step towards eventually, in the future, coming to some form of agreement and understanding.

Otherwise why would ANYONE debate a sizzling issue like homosexuality, pro-life vs pro-choice, or any topic of intensely opposing political and idealogical veiw?

Czech, why is it that you are so amazingly insistant on ending the thread? Really, I find myself wondering what it is that brought you here to disrupt and hyjack it in the first place. It isn't as if any of the debates of this type can ever be satisfactorily resolved, but it DOES open dialog and allow opposing sides of the idea to see and understand just a litle bit better by the reading and responding. If not the ideas, then the people who carry the ideas... which in its own way is a step towards eventually, in the future, coming to some form of agreement and understanding.

Otherwise why would ANYONE debate a sizzling issue like homosexuality, pro-life vs pro-choice, or any topic of intensely opposing political and idealogical veiw?



why kill it?

"well, the bible says blah blah verbal diahreah"

"well im a iberal and blah blah verbal diahreah"

"well fuck you all an blah blah verbal diahread"

Next thing ya know, 3 people are forum banned and the topic is closed. i'd rather the topic be closed and some people get a warning. I.E.: Me.

plus, if i got temp banned, i really relly wouldnt mind, as long as i stopped this from getting too nasty.

ive tried to stop it for 200 posts because every point has been made, and every arguement pretty much has been picked at, so unless you wanta big screaming match...

why kill it?

"well, the bible says blah blah verbal diahreah"

"well im a iberal and blah blah verbal diahreah"

"well fuck you all an blah blah verbal diahread"

Next thing ya know, 3 people are forum banned and the topic is closed. i'd rather the topic be closed and some people get a warning. I.E.: Me.

plus, if i got temp banned, i really relly wouldnt mind, as long as i stopped this from getting too nasty.

ive tried to stop it for 200 posts because every point has been made, and every arguement pretty much has been picked at, so unless you wanta big screaming match...

So by that logic, not a single debate thread should even be allowed to be made, because everything's already been said before and nothing new will be accomplished.

So by that logic, not a single debate thread should even be allowed to be made, because everything's already been said before and nothing new will be accomplished.

aha, no.

im saying that when a topic gets violent and becomes backwash, its stopped.
you know what, im tired oftrying to explain this... but the thread has pretty much died... along with all the other ones... i dont know why i even tried, it was going to happen naturally when people get tired of posting the same crap over and over...

carry on, if you really REALLY want to...

this topic was sensible... up to about page 67. then i noticed it was going in a bit of a repetitive circle. so sue me.

why kill it?

"well, the bible says blah blah verbal diahreah"

"well im a iberal and blah blah verbal diahreah"

"well fuck you all an blah blah verbal diahread"


Is that ALL you got from any of the posts here? Really? Hon... I almost kind of feel sorry for you if that's the case. Even those posts which made the veins pop out in my neck and my fingers flex with the desire to throttle the poster gave me more insight into who believes these things that make me so angry and why they believe them and perpetuate them. To me, this is the essence of building an understanding of people that aren't like me at all so that in time I can make an effort to peacefully coexist with them rather than blindly hate them. And to me, this is a noble and worthwhile pursuit.

I never delude myself that anything I say will change their minds, though I do from time to time flatter myself by thinking that SOMEthing I say might make them stop for a few minutes and THINK about what they believe in and try to find some rational, logical reason to support it. This is something I feel that benefits both my debate opponent AND myself. Because maybe, just maybe they might barf up a nugget of truth that might change how *I* percieve things. I walk into these debates HOPING that someone will shed some light on the nature of the arguement and what can be done to resolve it so that EVERYone is left wiser and more informed and KNOWING that I might not have every fact and truth and that the presentation of some misplaced fact or truth might change my view of things.

I know this is not how a lot of people approach this kind of thing, being impatient, closed to new thoughts and ideas and sometimes stunningly unable to draw meaning from the opposing ideas of others... but not everyone has the comprensive ability of the average rat terrier, only able to get blah blah blah damned homos or blah blah blah damned bigots out of another person's post. Sure, sometimes you have to pop someone in the nose a few times to make them wake up and reread to understand what you're saying... but I assume even a 15 year old with a poor education has enough maturity and intelligence to take something of value away from a heated debate.

I like these debates because they help me clarify why *I* believe what I do. And the opposing side let's me see where the weaknesses in my own arguments lie. I don't need to convince anyone else of anything.

A thought I have been having through this whole post is...I really think those against this gay marriages really mean against two men marrying, and this post shows that the definition of gay seems to be men only, so I would like to ask if in the original post it were two gay Women that kissed would there have been such a knee jerk reaction?

Probably not.

Especially if they were cute, but still not something little kids should have to

see.


I think not, as men seem to think it cute when two women are together not to mention their hope that they will be the filling for that sandwich!

Ahhh!

Sad thing for them is if they ever got two women in bed I think they would feel a bit left out of the equation as the two women would pay more attention to each other rather then the man.

Yeah well, I'd put a stop to that real fast, with a few good spankings!



''As a bisexual in a monogomous hetero relationship ie marriage whom is also raising 4 children trust me I have heard it all. And before I am questioned I am faithful and I don't act on urges compelling me to go find a woman to be with. I am attracted to both sexes but in love with my husband.

All women are bisexual, Im starting to think.

no, i got tons out of this, but if you read my post... there was a point where it got repetitive...

oh hell, youpeople wont let it die, so i might as well repeat what ive been saying, since thats all everyone else is doing...

gays deserve rights just as much as blacks and asians and any minority do.

no, i got tons out of this, but if you read my post... there was a point where it got repetitive...

oh hell, youpeople wont let it die, so i might as well repeat what ive been saying, since thats all everyone else is doing...

gays deserve rights just as much as blacks and asians and any minority do.

That is the nature of the long-fought open debate. It becomes cyclicly repetetive as those who don't have the patience to read through the entirety before posting join the debate. But even in the repetition, there is some variation that allows for new insights and understandings. But you have to actually READ and try to understand what each person is trying to say.

Sure, there will always be those who make statements like your reiteration of gays deserve rights without supporting statements that clarify WHY you believe this to be true. And there isn't much to be gained from that kind of post. But then there will ALSO be beautifully articulated, deeply insightful posts like the one made by Turkehnaria that actually make you step back and THINK about the issue and its origins, regardless of what side you support -- if you bother to take the time and read them.

So you really can't say that nothing fresh is being brought to the table without making it clear that you aren't really LISTENING to what's being said.

Ah, I completely misunderstood half of the posts you made. Okay, I believe I get it now.

Yeah, after a point I would cetainly tell a gay guy to piss off if he were hitting on me repeatedly, but since I'm gay myself, I haven't had much experience with being labeled a homophobe.

Actually, there *was* one fairly funny occasion...
I digress.
Okay, whatever.


well, since essentially, You are the topic at hand... why dont you kinda tell me what being gay is... about?

i mean, is the attraction with men, or is it with the... 'feeling?'

or, if im not gonna be politically correct: is it cause you like dudes or you like it up the ass? or both?

Yeah well, I'd put a stop to that real fast, with a few good spankings!


Stop that right now. I absolutely cannot consider joining the harem of a man who doesn't fully support gay marriage. I just can't. Not even for spankings. Nope.

=Booslandia]OMG stop stop stop... you're going to give me ego problems. I don't need those. I already have bad habits and am obviously already overly impressed with my own reflection. LOL.

I dont look at mine anymore, its just too good too look at.



Bitchy? Well I think my postings kinda tell that story better than my photo does. I dish out what I percieve each merits on a situational basis, updated with each action and word. If I treat you poorly, you've done or said something in my presence that was an unsolicited act of rudeness or hostility. If I treat you well, you haven't done anything like that in my presence. If I'm REALLY nasty with you... well then you've been a bad, bad person. And if I am CONSISTANTLY nasty with you... you've either persisted in being naughty in the eyes of Saint Bootay or you've done something I find absolutely unforgivable.

Sorry mistress, forgive me.

lol


Of course one week out of every month all that flies out the window, I start bitching about wanting to be a man and everyone ends up with little Boo-sized teethmarks.

Penis envy, every chick gets that.

But that's all the evils inherent in my being the legendary variety of female that goes insane for one week a month and sends all intelligent, rational types running away until the hormones clear and I'm my normal, rational, judgemental self again.

I think women should be barred from society when this happens, you know

nothing prison camp, just somewhere by a river, or beach, nice and relaxing,

flowers, nice quiet time etc

no, i got tons out of this, but if you read my post... there was a point where it got repetitive...

oh hell, youpeople wont let it die, so i might as well repeat what ive been saying, since thats all everyone else is doing...

gays deserve rights just as much as blacks and asians and any minority do.

Here we see a basic problem: minorities deserving rights. In fact, as a member of the majority, I feel discrimated against. My rights have become secondary.

My vote is equality for all people -- even the Christian, American, white, male, heterosexual, middle-aged, non-handicapped, law-abiding individuals.

As for homosexual people being a negative influence, as was stated at the start of this thread, that is a subjective opinion. If my children were of an impressionable age, but were too young to have been exposed to the concept of homosexual behavior, I would explain it to them.

I would say, "For some reason, some people of the same sex are aroused only by those of that persuasion."

I would explain my belief that we must love all people -- even those who believe differently than we believe about what comprises a sin. I would also explain that while I believe public displays of affection are inappropriate for heterosexual as well as homosexual people, it is also impolite to stare. Therefore, let us continue with our Christmas shopping...

well, since essentially, You are the topic at hand... why dont you kinda tell me what being gay is... about?

i mean, is the attraction with men, or is it with the... 'feeling?'

or, if im not gonna be politically correct: is it cause you like dudes or you like it up the ass? or both?

You don't have to be gay to like it up the ass.

You don't have to like it up the ass to be gay.

You don't have to like it up the ass to be gay.
okay, but it really wouldn't suit you too well, would it?
You don't have to be gay to like it up the ass.
well... not sure how this works with men, but with women, yea, this works.

Stop that right now. I absolutely cannot consider joining the harem of a man who doesn't fully support gay marriage. I just can't. Not even for spankings. Nope.

LOL you have no choice in the matter, you will be in the harem and at my

disposal regardless of my position on gay marriage.

ho ho ho :p

*wakes up, oh what a lovely dream.

*snip a lot of other stuff*

I think women should be barred from society when this happens, you know

nothing prison camp, just somewhere by a river, or beach, nice and relaxing,

flowers, nice quiet time etc

THAT is fuel for a completely different discussion. Which we should probably begin in another thread. And yes. I often wish I had a nifty phallus of my very own that wasn't made out of rubber, latex or some other non-fleshly material. Though my boyfriend tells me every time I mention it that he'd just hate the living daylights out of it if I had such an appendage.

Am I the only one beginning to wonder if I wasn't a bisexual man in my last life?

Christmas shopping...


its too late, im sorry.

also, nixon is no longer president, and the ussr is no more.

well... not sure how this works with men, but with women, yea, this works.

I could show you. ;)

Am I the only one beginning to wonder if I wasn't a bisexual man in my last life?


must... resist... response.... *struggles*

I could show you. ;)

1st off, eww?

2nd off, i mean with a person, not a 'toy'

its too late, im sorry.

also, nixon is no longer president, and the ussr is no more.

Dear Czecho: You obviously failed to read the initial post for this thread, as well as failed to read what I wrote entirely. The complainant noted that he or she was offended by seeing two men kiss in an area of a mall, while he and his child were shopping, and there were other children around who were able to witness that act.

Richard Nixon is dead, but he is still a former President of the United States. The political subdivisions of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic no longer exists, but the geography is still there and the people who comprised that republic still exist (except those who were alive but have died and those who were born after the reorganization of that area's political system).

So, I must presume you are simply an objectionable, mentally retarded person. That's O.K. Be proud of your uniqueness.

i find it very interesting the way the homosexuals in this forum think.

I think there could be a list started to why you think the way you do.

A. instead of admitting that you made the decision to be gay and taking responsibility, you say you were born that way to make yourself feel better.

B. Gays are like any other highschool clique. imposing themselves upon others in a manner far different then a simple wardrobe or hair-style.

people are finding new ways to stand out and this is one of those extremes.

C. Mental/Hormonal imbalances(i have no research or anything to prove it but there has got to be something wrong with your head.)

D. Insecurities. their is something about yourself you dont like and experimenting with those you feel most comforable with(same sex) is your self-expression.

if homosexuality was right, god would have made men be able to have kids out their asses. because afterall that is the whole point in sex....procreation. thats why even anal and oral with the opposing sex is wrong.

I think it's very interesting the way the bigots in this forum think.
I think there could be a list started to why you think the way you do.

A. Instead of accepting that some people are gay, you first have to claim that it's 'wrong' and 'evil' and 'goes against nature'. Then, you refuse to even entertain the possibility that it may be a choice, instantly dismissing it with the argument that was used in the above-quoted post or some variation thereof. Then, to top it off, you claim that many of us aren't even gay, and we're just doing it for attention.

B. Bigots are like any other highschool clique. imposing themselves upon others in a manner far different then a simple wardrobe or hair-style.
People are re-using old ways and ideas to stand out and this is one of those extremes.

C. Mental/Hormonal imbalances(i have no research or anything to prove it but there has got to be something wrong with your head.)


D. Insecurities. their is something about yourself you dont like and surrounding yourself with those you feel most comforable with(same beliefs) is your self-expression.


If bigotry was right, 'god' wouldn't have written in the very book that many of said bigots are using to further their bigotry that bigotry is wrong. Making them complete hypocrites. Because afterall that is the whole point in bigotry....feeling like you are right.. Thats why even following a different sect of Christianity is an unforgivable offense.

:p

So, I must presume you are simply an objectionable, mentally retarded person. That's O.K. Be proud of your uniqueness.


uhm... k?

i was just stating that it was after christmas, no reason to go apeshit on me! would you have preferred:

"Its after christmas, actually."

honestly, if it isnt more then 5 words, it isnt worth mentioning.

I think it's very interesting the way the bigots in this forum think.
I think there could be a list started to why you think the way you do.

A. Instead of accepting that some people are gay, you first have to claim that it's 'wrong' and 'evil' and 'goes against nature'. Then, you refuse to even entertain the possibility that it may be a choice, instantly dismissing it with the argument that was used in the above-quoted post or some variation thereof. Then, to top it off, you claim that many of us aren't even gay, and we're just doing it for attention.

B. Bigots are like any other highschool clique. imposing themselves upon others in a manner far different then a simple wardrobe or hair-style.
People are re-using old ways and ideas to stand out and this is one of those extremes.

C. Mental/Hormonal imbalances(i have no research or anything to prove it but there has got to be something wrong with your head.)


D. Insecurities. their is something about yourself you dont like and surrounding yourself with those you feel most comforable with(same beliefs) is your self-expression.


If bigotry was right, 'god' wouldn't have written in the very book that many of said bigots are using to further their bigotry that bigotry is wrong. Making them complete hypocrites. Because afterall that is the whole point in bigotry....feeling like you are right.. Thats why even following a different sect of Christianity is an unforgivable offense.

:p

good job, still... coul you explain how you 1st discovered your gay? hopefully it's pg-13 :D :p :D

THAT is fuel for a completely different discussion. Which we should probably begin in another thread. And yes. I often wish I had a nifty phallus of my very own that wasn't made out of rubber, latex or some other non-fleshly material. Though my boyfriend tells me every time I mention it that he'd just hate the living daylights out of it if I had such an appendage.
Am I the only one beginning to wonder if I wasn't a bisexual man in my last life?

Yes most women, probably all wish they could really give it back, and a lot of

men wish sometimes they were women, this is carnal desires ruling our

consience, and must be resisted, so we are true men and women.

What makes it correct or incorrect?
I can hardly think of a way that it makes any rational sense to use 'correct' and 'incorrect' in reference to a sexual orientation.

i agree, it's like saying "most of the world is white, so anyone not white is wrong"

and yes, i know that most of the world actually is asain... just stating a theory... dont get alol technical on me...

uhm... k?

i was just stating that it was after christmas, no reason to go apeshit on me! would you have preferred:

"Its after christmas, actually."

honestly, if it isnt more then 5 words, it isnt worth mentioning.

You see? Here is another example of a lack of thought. I simply noted your failure to respond appropriately to anything related to the point I made. Instead, you took one part of my notation out of context. This is a typical ploy of objectionable people who are a tad slower than average in the mental realm. As for "ape shit," I suppose it can be used as one word and it can be used as a verb by people of your mental caliber.

Here we see a basic problem: minorities deserving rights. In fact, as a member of the majority, I feel discrimated against. My rights have become secondary.

My vote is equality for all people -- even the Christian, American, white, male, heterosexual, middle-aged, non-handicapped, law-abiding individuals.

*snipping lots of very good sense and good parenting tactics while being really impressed*

I fully support the truth of the idea that the white, hetero, XTian man is losing his equality in the huge fracas that is our government's and society's attempts to equalize things for a number of minority groups. Affirmative action as it stands in its implementation is horribly skewed and unjust. This is not to say that I think that women and people of non-caucasian descent do not deserve the same chance that the plain old white male has traditionally gotten, but that I believe that in a lot of ways those who have the advantage of rigorously enforced affirmative action are given an unfair advantage.

I also loathe all of this political correctness crap. It emasculates white guys socially and often, in MY perceptions, kind of leans towards making them the enemy. It's like some bass-ackwards form of racism against white men.

We, as Americans seem hellbent on excess in everything we do, oftentimes to the point where we exchange one wrong for its opposite wrong rather than balancing the scales to RIGHT the original wrong. When I argue to defend the rights of my gay friends, I'm not supporting elevating them above straight people, I'm arguing to win some sort of "even playing field" where they recieve the same basic rights, freedoms and opportunities as everyone else.

And with that... I'm off to bed.

that is perfectly fine, but if they have the values that allows them to have sex with men, what stops them from haveing sex with children. but that is besides the point.

if you were straight...and your 4 yr. old son was straight, would you want the gay teacher to be influencing your son to be gay....he doesnt have to be saying" Son! you should be gay just like me" but his actions and thoughts could be jsut as influential.

but again here comes the double standard with the straight teacher and a gay student.

but you do have to cater to the majority eh?

Ohmigawd, who would want a female student with a male teacher?
If they have the values that allows them to have sex with women, what stops them from haveing sex with children. But that is not the point.

If you were a parent...and your 4 yr. old daughter was not sexually active, would you want the male teacher to be influencing your daughter to be sexually active...he doesn't have to be saying" Girl! You should like me" but his actions and thoughts could be influential.

(seriously, man, actually read some of the posts before yours, mmkay? Being gay has literally nothing to do with paedophilia, and having values that allow you to have sex with men has nothing to do with having values that allow you to have sex with children. It's called the Slippery Slope fallacy, for future reference, as you will be accused of it a lot.)
:p

Blah blah useles flaming...

I suppose it can be used as one word and it can be used as a verb by people of your mental caliber.

Told you it was coming to a flame match...
you are purposely inticing a flame match with things like that, please go back onto the apearantly newly revived (though highly unreccomended for this reason) topic.





i do believe racism does kinda go in reverse, but i like to think of it as a slowing pendulum.

Black white


racism here...

racism here...
racism here...
racism here...
and then it stops right about here...

Actually, it was when I was in second grade...
I had crushes on other guys in class instead of girls. I didn't know it was supposed to be 'evil' or anything, I didn't even know anybody else felt any different. It just seemed normal.


aah, okay. so, how did your parents react to what you told them?

I actually don't really like sex. I guess I could join the new 'asexual' movement, if I felt like I needed a banner for some reason or other...

So in this case, it's because I like dudes.

okay, so its more emotional then physical.

i think its probably that case with most homosexuals.

I forgot what the name for it is.


are you the one who said you have no sex drive? because it may be, in that case, that you are simply attracted to the emotion, not the... sex....



sorry, im a *bit* immature, sex drive... hahahahaah... lmao... sex drive... ahh... okay,done.

this dropped off the list! wtf?

but there's that whole theory of there aren't many people that are completely straight or gay, just a continuum between the two...
I forgot what the name for it is.

No.

I dont agree with that.

I think the majority of people experiment to some degree, but dont drift

between homo and hetrosexuality constantly through their lives.

Id say its about 80% hetero, 15% bisexual, and 5% completely gay only.

Don't worry Robin, I'm here.

Had to put the rubbish out first, if the rest of the family had drank tequila like i did over christmas there would be far fewer bottles to cart down the drive.

Now, what's the issue?

No.

I dont agree with that.

I think the majority of people experiment to some degree, but dont drift

between homo and hetrosexuality constantly through their lives.

Id say its about 80% hetero, 15% bisexual, and 5% completely gay only.

how can you possible say this without any backing!

HE IS FREAKIN GAY! he should know~!

Don't worry Robin, I'm here.

Had to put the rubbish out first, if the rest of the family had drank tequila like i did over christmas there would be far fewer bottles to cart down the drive.

Now, what's the issue?


essentialy, we are trying to stop the overflow of spewing diahreah from fundamentalist's mouthes.

*nice entrance, hah...*

how can you possible say this without any backing!

HE IS FREAKIN GAY! he should know~!

Well what backing has he got, that the majority of the worlds population is

bisexual?

No.

I dont agree with that.

I think the majority of people experiment to some degree, but dont drift

between homo and hetrosexuality constantly through their lives.

Id say its about 80% hetero, 15% bisexual, and 5% completely gay only.

Oh oops, I didn't clarify what I was talking about first, I just randomly launched into it. Sorry, I tend to do that...

I didn't mean that the theory says people drift back and forth, I meant that it said something more along the lines that there aren't many people that feel only desire for the opposite sex, and the same with only desire for the same sex.

I don't know if it's true or not, but I'd say it makes sense for many people. I don't know if for all, since I'm sure my acquaintances are not a good representative sample.

I hope I made a bit more sense...

Well what backing has he got, that the majority of the worlds population is

bisexual?
no, what hes saying is that you cant generalize like people have. there is no border between gay and not gay, or gay and bisexual... its kind of a mix.

some things arent clear-cut.

Well what backing has he got, that the majority of the worlds population is

bisexual?

He has none, if infact, as we are led to believe by some that homosexuality is hereditary, now that homosexuality is more openly accepted less gay people are having children through forced male-female marriages/partnerships then the number of gay people in the world would be decreasing.

I know many people who would like to consider themselves open to experimentation, but the same sex just turns them off so badly they can't do it.

So personally, i would disagree with the claim.

[QUOTE=Neo-Anarchists]I didn't mean that the theory says people drift back and forth, I meant that it said something more along the lines that there aren't many people that feel only desire for the opposite sex, and the same with only desire for the same sex.

Most people get a crush sometimes on someone of their own gender, but few

take it to the sexual level.

He has none, if infact, as we are led to believe by some that homosexuality is hereditary, now that homosexuality is more openly accepted less gay people are having children through forced male-female marriages/partnerships then the number of gay people in the world would be decreasing.

I know many people who would like to consider themselves open to experimentation, but the same sex just turns them off so badly they can't do it.

So personally, i would disagree with the claim.


:confused: :confused: :confused:
*smack* fool!



again... unclear lines... no real clear cut border..

[QUOTE]
Most people get a crush on someone of their own gender

whoah, uh... not in my case!

i mean, my math teacher, if i was a chick, i'd be on him in a second... but... no, i dont have a crush on him...

[QUOTE=Czecho-Slavakia]no, what hes saying is that you cant generalize like people have. there is no border between gay and not gay, or gay and bisexual... its kind of a mix.

Well thats another generalisation then, isnt it, that both sexes want to have

sex with the same gender as much as the opposite, something I find hard to

believe.

some things arent clear-cut.

Actually you would be surprised that alot of people, the majority actually, are

pretty clear cut to be with the opposite sex only.

Experimentation doesnt really count.

right sorry, that was written hastily and under the influence of too much coke.

Just give me time to get the feel of this thread, and yes, blurred boundaries.

Homosexuality is apparently affected by a great number of factors, which exactly are the real factors we don't know, but anything environmental which would affect ones choice of sexual preference would definitely have blurred lines.

People have many reasons for experimenting and so on with members of the same sex, each with differing degrees of strength. So you can't define everyone into gay, bi, straight. It's just too general

That any better CS?

[QUOTE]

Well thats another generalisation then, isnt it, that both sexes want to have

sex with the same gender as much as the opposite, something I find hard to

believe.



Actually you would be surprised that alot of people, the majority actually, are

pretty clear cut to be with the opposite sex only.

Experimentation doesnt really count.


yea, i guess so, considering i would never do it with a guy... EVAR!

whoah, uh... not in my case!

i mean, my math teacher, if i was a chick, i'd be on him in a second... but... no, i dont have a crush on him...

Come on Czech, it will happen sooner or later, even if its only for a few

seconds, it sounds like you like the maths teacher.

yea, i guess so, considering i would never do it with a guy... EVAR!

Exactly, horrible.

Exactly, horrible.


i mean, 1st off, i think that would HURT!...

ow!

Come on Czech, it will happen sooner or later, even if its only for a few

seconds, it sounds like you like the maths teacher.

i guess your right, for that like, 15 seconds, then i think about boobs and i continue the class.

but, seriously, hes like a manlier clay atkin.


AHH DAMNIT! DRIVE THE GAY FROM MY MIND SOMEONE! SHOW ME BOOBS! FAST! *types in random porn word on searchbar*

i mean, 1st off, i think that would HURT!...

ow!

And not to mention the uh shitty smell.

well to be honest, i have kissed a guy before, but that was for a reaction. and no I'd never do it again.

There are pictures on the internet actually. But I'm not giving out the address.

well to be honest, i have kissed a guy before, but that was for a reaction. and no I'd never do it again.

There are pictures on the internet actually. But I'm not giving out the address.



... you know, your a really shitty forum superhero! damn!

=Czecho-Slavakia]i guess your right, for that like, 15 seconds, then i think about boobs and i continue the class.
but, seriously, hes like a manlier clay atkin.

Who the hell is that?


AHH DAMNIT! DRIVE THE GAY FROM MY MIND SOMEONE! SHOW ME BOOBS! FAST! *types in random porn word on searchbar*

lol your turning gay, type quickly man.

lol your turning gay, type quickly man.


christ, that was like mango on snl. perfectly straight men turned gay, and lesbians turned straight by him!
sweet jesus! im saved though, i saw some nice round boobies, and forgot all about his face... DAMNIT!!! *looks for more porn*

christ, that was like mango on snl. perfectly straight men turned gay, and lesbians turned straight by him!
sweet jesus! im saved though, i saw some nice round boobies, and forgot all about his face... DAMNIT!!! *looks for more porn*

lucky you saw those boobies in time, I suggest you dont look at this guy

anymore if you can help it.

Hopefully a nice foxy chick with nice round tittys

will come along soon, to occupy your mind.

lucky you saw those boobies in time, I suggest you dont look at this guy

anymore if you can help it.

Hopefully a nice foxy chick with nice round tittys

will come along soon, to occupy your mind.

hah,. funny you say foxy...

theres a chick in my class named foxy... cheer leader... short... b cup... oh i'd tap that in public wearing a chicken suit.

... you know, your a really shitty forum superhero! damn!

well jeez, you didn't even give me a mission. Everyone knows superhero's a big dumb idiots who require very specific direction.

well jeez, you didn't even give me a mission. Everyone knows superhero's a big dumb idiots who require very specific direction.


oh, im sorry, take 4 rights and drive up your own ass :D

How can this world survive if we don't stamp out those radicals? Stamp out liberalism! These people are traitors. They challenge the way we live. They threaten our sacred habits. It is the responsibility of any great nation to protect itself and its people from these radicals. Especially if the radicals are peaceful, promote love, and can be hung on a cross.

In other words, is someone complaining about gays in love and not noticing that rank comercialism has supplanted real Christmas for all too many?

How can this world survive if we don't stamp out those radicals? Stamp out liberalism! These people are traitors. They challenge the way we live. They threaten our sacred habits. It is the responsibility of any great nation to protect itself and its people from these radicals. Especially if the radicals are peaceful, promote love, and can be hung on a cross.

In other words, is someone complaining about gays in love and not noticing that rank comercialism has supplanted real Christmas for all too many?


lets say hi to teh newbie *picks up hunting rifle*

Chk chk *AHA!*

How can this world survive if we don't stamp out those radicals? Stamp out liberalism! These people are traitors. They challenge the way we live. They threaten our sacred habits. It is the responsibility of any great nation to protect itself and its people from these radicals. Especially if the radicals are peaceful, promote love, and can be hung on a cross.

In other words, is someone complaining about gays in love and not noticing that rank comercialism has supplanted real Christmas for all too many?

YES! KILL THE LIBERALS BEFORE THEY KILL US! THEY ARE DIFFERENT FROM US SO THEY MUST BE EEEVIL!!! THEY DO DIFFERENT THINGS THAN WE DO, SO THEY MUST OBVIOUSLY BE LIKE US AND WANT TO CHANGE IT SO OTHER PEOPLE ACT LIKE THEM, SO THEY *MUST* BE A THREAT!!! LET'S KILL THEM IN EXTREMELY INHUMANE WAYS FOR NO JUSTIFIED REASON!!! BECAUSE PEACE AND LOVE ARE REALLY REALLY BAD!!!

BY THE WAY, I CAN'T FIND OUT HOW TO TURN OFF THE BIG LETTERS THINGIE!!! AND MY EXCLAMATION MARK KEY IS DOING TRIPLES!!! CAN ANYBODY HELP ME FIX MY KEYBOARD?

:p

oh, im sorry, take 4 rights and drive up your own ass :D

*takes 2 rights then mistakes right for left and gets completely lost and ends up with the car lodged firmly up someone else's ass.*

!

BY THE WAY, I CAN'T FIND OUT HOW TO TURN OFF THE BIG LETTERS THINGIE!!! AND MY EXCLAMATION MARK KEY IS DOING TRIPLES!!! CAN ANYBODY HELP ME FIX MY KEYBOARD?

:p

I CAN!!! *Punch*

there you go

How can this world survive if we don't stamp out those radicals? Stamp out liberalism! These people are traitors. They challenge the way we live. They threaten our sacred habits. It is the responsibility of any great nation to protect itself and its people from these radicals. Especially if the radicals are peaceful, promote love, and can be hung on a cross.

In other words, is someone complaining about gays in love and not noticing that rank comercialism has supplanted real Christmas for all too many?

WHAT? JUST THE LIBERALS? Methinks you want to stamp out the human race entirely, they challenge our right to live! They challenge our opinions and ideas! How dare they! Destroy them all!

WHAT? JUST THE LIBERALS? Methinks you want to stamp out the human race entirely, they challenge our right to live! They challenge our opinions and ideas! How dare they! Destroy them all!
Die human race! *shoots butch then self*

Die human race! *shoots butch then self*

I agree!

*Picks up up gun*
*puts barrel in mouth*
*looks over at Butch and Czech*
"Oh, what the hell?"
*shoots Butch and Czech some more instead*

:sniper:

:p

Die human race! *shoots butch then self*

Finally, all the evil in the world is dead, now we can all live peacefully.

hijacking this thread again with butches help is great!

Finally, all the evil in the world is dead, now we can all live peacefully.

Nope, I'm still here.

Damn evil just doesn't die...

Nope, I'm still here.

Damn evil just doesn't die...

evil always destroys itself eventually

*weight of czecho and my bodies hitting the ground dislodged a small stone at the top of a cliff, Neo-Anarchists hears the rumble of of the landslide and is suddenly buried by several tonnes of rock*

Told you.

evil always destroys itself eventually

*weight of czecho and my bodies hitting the ground dislodged a small stone at the top of a cliff, Neo-Anarchists hears the rumble of of the landslide and is suddenly buried by several tonnes of rock*

Told you.
isnt hijacking fun?

isnt hijacking fun?

*gazes longingly at passing plane*

nothing compares to hijacking

well in my country christianity is the main religious influence (England) so any1 who is not christian and want to havea moan about the things we celebrate in england can go back to thier country where they belong

okay Gays:-

i hate them, to be gay is to be a traitor to yourself and to men everywhere. Its just morally wrong that men should commit in acts of love with another man, im sorry, but no. Thats not meant to happen. If God wanted men to have sex with men then all men would have both sets of genitalia

*gazes longingly at passing plane*

nothing compares to hijacking


*also looks at plane* hey, wheres your stinger missile, again?

*also looks at plane* hey, wheres your stinger missile, again?

DAMN! I knew i left something behind, why can't you remind me?

DAMN! I knew i left something behind, why can't you remind me?

because i love you.

if you really loved me you'd let me destroy planes

you're right *shoots butch*

*mysteriously finds stinger missile and returns fire*

bwuahaah! you have failed! i am jeebus! jesuses slick, mischevous younger brother, who copped out of the cross things!

oh, no! not.... FALIURE!

*collapses to ground in spasms*

ANYTHING BUT THAT!

okay Gays:-

i hate them, to be gay is to be a traitor to yourself and to men everywhere. Its just morally wrong that men should commit in acts of love with another man, im sorry, but no. Thats not meant to happen. If God wanted men to have sex with men then all men would have both sets of genitalia
what about women? you realize that women can be gay, too, don't you? and you do realize that women are 1) more likely to report being satisfied with their sex life if they are gay and 2) are far less likely to contract STDs if they are gay. if God wanted women to be straight, wouldn't he have made it more pleasurable and safer for them? or does he really just want women to be unhappy and diseased?

well in my country christianity is the main religious influence (England) so any1 who is not christian and want to havea moan about the things we celebrate in england can go back to thier country where they belong

okay Gays:-

i hate them, to be gay is to be a traitor to yourself and to men everywhere. Its just morally wrong that men should commit in acts of love with another man, im sorry, but no. Thats not meant to happen. If God wanted men to have sex with men then all men would have both sets of genitalia

Oh their going to love you on here.

Picks up uzi to find Pracus and Gobsnort.

bla-*****************m !!!die! PC fruit goblins!

evil always destroys itself eventually

*weight of czecho and my bodies hitting the ground dislodged a small stone at the top of a cliff, Neo-Anarchists hears the rumble of of the landslide and is suddenly buried by several tonnes of rock*

Told you.

Damn it, that always happens...

My eeevil plans of love, peace, and happiness have been foiled again!

:(

I'm not really that bad, I'm just misunderstood!

:(

what about women? you realize that women can be gay, too, don't you? and you do realize that women are 1) more likely to report being satisfied with their sex life if they are gay and 2) are far less likely to contract STDs if they are gay. if God wanted women to be straight, wouldn't he have made it more pleasurable and safer for them? or does he really just want women to be unhappy and diseased?

Speak for yourself manhater, millions of women are quite satisfied with their

sex lives with other man, dont put it down to your own bad experiences.

Speak for yourself manhater, millions of women are quite satisfied with their

sex lives with other man, dont put it down to your own bad experiences.
um, dude? i was citing general statistics. i have stated many times in the past that i prefer friendships and relationships with men, and my current relationship (going on 4 years now) is with a man.

come on, Termie, at least put some effort into it. you're just embarassing yourself now.

test msg (will be deleted)

um, dude? i was citing general statistics. i have stated many times in the past that i prefer friendships and relationships with men, and my current relationship (going on 4 years now) is with a man.
come on, Termie, at least put some effort into it. you're just embarassing yourself now.

You think so, well you just told the other guy, all women are disadvantaged

in some ways, by having sex with men, pain, disease etc and that women are

a safer option for them, does this mean your one of the few lucky ones?

Please everyone, ignore anything said by Chedder Goodness, especially the threads in which he talks about England, how Christian we all are, or how we want non-English people to go back to whence they came. He is a silly moron who does not represent the rest of us Brits, and just goes to show how ignorance and fear can lead to such a pathetic and flawed state of mind.

Personally, what two people choose to do, sexually, has no impact on my life whatsoever. I shall do as I please in that respect, as should everyone. Nobody chooses their sexuality and should not expect to be subject to prejudice because of their natural predisposition. You cannot simply turn someone gay, or stop being gay, just because you see someone in a shop kissing another man or because it is taught in schools. Homosexuality has always been a part of society and it always will be. As far as I'm concerned, anybody that loves anybody is a positive thing. It's the lack of love that has caused us all to be in the shit we're in today, and it's intolerance that pushes that further.

Being gay is not natural only in the sense that you cannot reproduce. But, then again, somebody who has lost their ability to carry a child in a car accident, say, also cannot give birth. So, do we cast them out of society too? You're treading a dangerous path. And what about all the hetero parents that abuse their child, as well as the shocking divorce rate and levels of teenage pregnancy? Surely, if a child can have two loving parent figures, whether they be all male, all female or a mixture, he/she is going to have as strong a foundation as possible in life?

And another thing, this whole stereotype of Christians being intolerant in matters of homosexuality is inaccurate for many, so don't you, Chedder Goodness, start to promote that idea just because you've had a failed life and have serious issues with matters that you cannot understand, the whole of Christiandom shares your opinion. The truth is, especially in the whole "go back where they came from" bullshit, Christian society would probably spit on you. You pathetic excuse for a human being.

You think so, well you just told the other guy, all women are disadvantaged

in some ways, by having sex with men, pain, disease etc and that women are

a safer option for them, does this mean your one of the few lucky ones?

Nice style. So if Bottle doesn't fit in to the statistics she was quoting, then she is obviously twisted and bigoted?

Hmm...

There's evidence toward this belief, but there's also evidence against it. The truth is there's no gene that says hey I'm gay. It just happens, the gay gene was a hope for some scientific fools who wanted to find a way to ex out homosexuality. Problem is, it's been around a lot longer than people think, so even if it was genetic almost everyone has this gene anyway.


Homosexuality is a way for nature to balance out and deal with overpopulation. It's a genetic trait that works when there is too much genetic variation in a species which signifies that it is overpopulated, and so this gene becomes a dominant one and simply rearranges the normal chemicals that channel sexual feelings. A lot of people, however, usually don't notice they are gay until an experience where they feel things different from straight people happens, but I'm thinking this is changing since it is mostly caused by growing up with people who don't touch on sexuality in such a way, and as society is expanded and more people open up then I think you'll see more newcomers from the closet.

Leviticus 18:22 says,
"You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female. It is an abomination.


Leviticus 20:13 says,
"If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood guiltiness is upon them."


Romans 1:26-27 (Pauline epistle):
"For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men . . ." (Revised Standard version)


2 Peter 2:4-6


“For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment: and spared not the original world, but preserved Noe (Noah), the eighth person, the preacher of justice, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly. And reduced the cities of the Sodomites, and of the Gomorrhites, into ashes, condemned them to be overthrown, making them an example to those that should after act wickedly.”


Jude 7 depicts the activity as "gross immorality" and going after "strange flesh." Peter wrote that Lot was "oppressed by the sensual conduct of unprincipled men," and "by what he saw and heard...felt his righteous soul tormented day after day with their lawless deeds." These people were "those who indulged the flesh in its corrupt desires and despised authority" (2 Peter 2:7-10).
________________________________________________________________
Since most of the arguments relating to religion are primarily Christian/Catholic I used the Bible. Now look, it IS in the Bible and these passes are MUCH more clear than the story of the Sodomites. HOWEVER, just because it's in the Bible of course doesn't mean that we - on earth - should judge these sinners. Yes, homosexuality is one of the gravest of sins and will cost its sinners an eternity in hell. JUST because we know that, we have no right to treat them inhospitably for Christ teachers throughout the New Testament to love you neighbors as yourself et cetera and nowhere does he preach the condemnation of a minority (if if they're sinners). For we are not their judge, God the Father Almighty will judge them on the day of the apocalypse, not us, so it isn't our job to discriminate against them - regardless. However, in terms of marriage, that is a religious union between a man and a woman and cannot be changed. If homosexuals really want the tax breaks and monetary benefits associated with marriage maybe we can give them a civil union or something. But don't call people that are against homosexuality psycho bigots just because they disagree with you... don't you find that ironic at all? Because they have a different opinion here you are ripping on them... for discriminating against people that have a different sexual preference.