NationStates Jolt Archive


Why Are White People Uncool? - Page 2

Pages : 1 [2]
Nordrreich
16-12-2004, 03:10
Arabs are of Caucasian ancestry, whether they are white or not is a cultural thing. Other primarily Muslim peoples are even closer linked to Caucasians, such as the Indo-European Turks and Persians, many of whom sport green eyes. My Afghan-next door neighbour looks Italian.

What I mean by this is that 'white' is a concept more than it is a firm reality. In the early-mid 19th century, the question was whether the Irish were white, in the mid-late 19th century, it was the southern Italians. Now, it's Arabs, Jewish people of Ashkenazic and Sephardic stock, Turks and the rest. Race is not an absolute, it is subjective. Khoisans are as different from Bantus as Germans are different from the Hausa.
Steel Butterfly
16-12-2004, 03:16
I feel sorry for the dumbass who made this topic.

No need...this topic can't be anything less than what he expected it to be.
Avadria
16-12-2004, 03:33
ANd if you think about it, only white people have developed technology capable of war. It wasn't black or asian scientists that made The Bomb, or any technology for that matter.

Although I agree on you in that respect, the Chinese did invent gunpowder I believe
Aleksandreas
16-12-2004, 03:41
How about we judge people person-to-person rather than sum it up by race. The Jews who used their political pull to have Jesus crucified, and Pontias Pilate who simply stood by and let it happen were scum. The Catholic Priests who molest unsuspecting children, using their position of authority for their perverted schemes are scum. It doesn't mean all Italians, Catholics and Jews are trash.

And the person who made this thread has some very deep self-esteem issues. I'm white, and my friends think I'm a pretty cool guy. Eminem must be cool, I mean, he has made a bajillion dollars due to his popularity, I don't think millions of people listen to his music because he is a loser. But the coolest white guy ever? I don't think so. Why? Because it's a perspective thing. Eminem doesn't even make my Top 100. Number one coolest mothers in the world? Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones. Why? Because I think so. The poster is trapped in a world of self-loathing and pop culture, so he thinks white people aren't cool. Too bad for him.
Defensor Fidei
16-12-2004, 03:59
How about we judge people person-to-person rather than sum it up by race. The Jews who used their political pull to have Jesus crucified, and Pontias Pilate who simply stood by and let it happen were scum. The Catholic Priests who molest unsuspecting children, using their position of authority for their perverted schemes are scum. It doesn't mean all Italians, Catholics and Jews are trash.
I) The Jews brought the blood of Christ upon their whole race through their own words and actions.
II)Catholic priests have never molested children.


And the person who made this thread has some very deep self-esteem issues. I'm white, and my friends think I'm a pretty cool guy. Eminem must be cool, I mean, he has made a bajillion dollars due to his popularity, I don't think millions of people listen to his music because he is a loser. But the coolest white guy ever? I don't think so. Why? Because it's a perspective thing. Eminem doesn't even make my Top 100. Number one coolest mothers in the world? Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones. Why? Because I think so. The poster is trapped in a world of self-loathing and pop culture, so he thinks white people aren't cool. Too bad for him.
The person who made this thread is a Jew, who belittles civilized White culture and promotes "gangsta" "culture" through the Jewish media.
Ge-Ren
16-12-2004, 06:36
I) The Jews brought the blood of Christ upon their whole race through their own words and actions.

Pontius Pilate could have decided if Christ lived or died. He pussyfooted, pissed away, then decided to let the supposedly "inferior" Jews handle it. "White" civilization is equally to blame in that case, and what's worse, "whites" were wimps about it -- they couldn't even manage to do it themselves. This is not a stellar example of civilization here.

Lemme guess? You voted for Bush unless you couldn't read the ballot, which I suspect is the case since you obviously can't read the Bible. Think Kerry's a wimp? Take a look at Pontius Pilate and think again.

II)Catholic priests have never molested children.

They have, and often enough to gain the attention of the media. I am a Catholic, and I am appalled that our Church hasn't done more to stamp out this problem. It should have been done years ago. While I think that Catholic priests are no more likely to molest children than anyone else, the Catholic Church, by its complicity (look that word up son, I know it's a big one) allowed potential molestors to find a haven for their behavior. I ashamed of my Church for this. You should be too, but you can't read and are apparently blind on top of it.

Or waitaminute...maybe you think what those priests did was NOT molestation? That is was normal?

Are you an ex-priest? C'mon, tell us Fidei, what were YOU doing in the Church last year...?

The person who made this thread is a Jew, who belittles civilized White culture and promotes "gangsta" "culture" through the Jewish media.


The media is mostly non-Jewish, and it's so-called "white" males who listen to this music most, to the tune of about 85 percent of the market. "White" civilization is a stupid term, just as "black" or any other "civilization" based on race is. If you are representing yourself as part of the "white" civilization you hold so dear, I'll take the blacks, Jews, and "wiggers" any day. You are nothing to be proud of.

God help us, why does my beloved Church put up with morons like this?


Ge-Ren
Piquantrax
17-12-2004, 00:30
Ge-Ren

Thanks
Lacadaemon
17-12-2004, 00:36
I admit that white people lack urban hip. It's true.

On the other hand, why do black people lack brains?

Maybe stupid = cool.

Is that it ?
Defensor Fidei
17-12-2004, 00:46
Pontius Pilate could have decided if Christ lived or died. He pussyfooted, pissed away, then decided to let the supposedly "inferior" Jews handle it. "White" civilization is equally to blame in that case, and what's worse, "whites" were wimps about it -- they couldn't even manage to do it themselves. This is not a stellar example of civilization here.

Lemme guess? You voted for Bush unless you couldn't read the ballot, which I suspect is the case since you obviously can't read the Bible. Think Kerry's a wimp? Take a look at Pontius Pilate and think again.
The Jews killed Iesus, this is both Scipture and Tradition. Your opinion here matters not, only the Divine opinion that is the Church's.

And a somewhat decent parallel can be made between the war in Iraq and Crucifixion of Christ: Do you blame the instigators (Jorge Boosh/ Jews) or those who are "just doing their job" for fear of horrific repercussions (U.S. Troops/ Roman soldiers) when terrible events occur? Are the soldiers doing the actual fighting in Iraq those to blame for the war?
I would hope to expect an actual answer this time.



They have, and often enough to gain the attention of the media. I am a Catholic, and I am appalled that our Church hasn't done more to stamp out this problem. It should have been done years ago. While I think that Catholic priests are no more likely to molest children than anyone else, the Catholic Church, by its complicity (look that word up son, I know it's a big one) allowed potential molestors to find a haven for their behavior. I ashamed of my Church for this. You should be too, but you can't read and are apparently blind on top of it.

Or waitaminute...maybe you think what those priests did was NOT molestation? That is was normal?

Are you an ex-priest? C'mon, tell us Fidei, what were YOU doing in the Church last year...?




Those were not Catholic priests! It is getting repetitive now.
Kahta
17-12-2004, 01:02
Although I agree on you in that respect, the Chinese did invent gunpowder I believe

Yes, they did. That was the major non-white scientific advance for a long time.
Lacadaemon
17-12-2004, 01:06
Yes, they did. That was the major non-white scientific advance for a long time.

Chinese were the first to observe sunspots too.
Conceptualists
17-12-2004, 01:06
Yes, they did. That was the major non-white scientific advance for a long time.
Well I would say that the printing press was also fairly majoy.
Piquantrax
17-12-2004, 02:29
Also the Egyptians invented paper. So thinking about it, they were not white.
Kahta
17-12-2004, 02:54
Well I would say that the printing press was also fairly majoy.

The printing press was a european invention. It was invtented by Gutenberg.

http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/story039.htm
Kahta
17-12-2004, 03:00
Also the Egyptians invented paper. So thinking about it, they were not white.

Papayan paper, not wood paper, which is different.
Piquantrax
17-12-2004, 03:06
But papyrus scrolls are considered the first paper, be it wood or not. Plus there are scores of other things that non-caucasian culture advanced to first. Think about all our technology today, all the companies are based in Japan.
East Canuck
17-12-2004, 13:51
The Jews killed Iesus, this is both Scipture and Tradition. Your opinion here matters not, only the Divine opinion that is the Church's.

And a somewhat decent parallel can be made between the war in Iraq and Crucifixion of Christ: Do you blame the instigators (Jorge Boosh/ Jews) or those who are "just doing their job" for fear of horrific repercussions (U.S. Troops/ Roman soldiers) when terrible events occur? Are the soldiers doing the actual fighting in Iraq those to blame for the war?
I would hope to expect an actual answer this time.

Defensor Fidei, the church has forgiven the Jews for killing Jesus. Maybe you should forgive too, as asked by our Lord and move on.

Those were not Catholic priests! It is getting repetitive now.

You'll have to explain that one because the papers all said that they were.
Ge-Ren
17-12-2004, 13:55
The Jews killed Iesus, this is both Scipture and Tradition. Your opinion here matters not, only the Divine opinion that is the Church's.

This isn't opinion. Read the story, slowly this time so you get it. I will paraphrase JUST IN CASE for you:

Pontius Pilate was given the choice of sparing Jesus, killing him, or doing nothing. The Jews called for his death, Pilate wondered why and was concerned about it. RATHER THEN OVERRIDE THE JEWS' DEMANDS, which he could have, Pontius Pilate stepped back, made NO decision, and let the Jews choose whom they wanted to set free. Some versions of the Bible portray Pilate as respecting the cultural values of the Jews on a holiday, but historically, Roman governors in Judea didn't respect these wishes, and the Bible can be better-trnaslated as Pilate simply not caring and letting the Jews get their blood and he his entertainment. Pilate was no saint, and he was a wimp on top of it.

I'm not changing what the Bible says. The Word of God said that Pontius Pilate was a spineless bastard. Deal.

And a somewhat decent parallel can be made between the war in Iraq and Crucifixion of Christ: Do you blame the instigators (Jorge Boosh/ Jews) or those who are "just doing their job" for fear of horrific repercussions (U.S. Troops/ Roman soldiers) when terrible events occur? Are the soldiers doing the actual fighting in Iraq those to blame for the war?
I would hope to expect an actual answer this time.

You have received several actual answers, but you don't like them, so you ignore them. I will answer you one last time to see if your reading comprehension has improved:

Complicity (I asked you to look that one up, do it again so it sticks) does sometimes deserve blame. When one has as much singular power over a man's life as Pontius Pilate over the life of Jesus, he should be blamed for his complicity. The Jews called for the death of someone who threatened their society. The authority (Rome) failed to protect Jesus when it could have. I blame them both.

George Bush has a lot of power too. He is abusing it in Iraq. The soldiers who choose to follow him have to decide for themselves whether or not their Commander in Chief is right. While they can't be blamed to the extent that Bush can be, they can be blamed if they decide to go to Iraq against their conscience, or do things in Iraq that are wrong, illegal, and inhumane. That's been happening too, and they should be blamed squarely for that.

That being said, I will add these few words:

I don't blame Jews NOW for what SOME of their ancestors did almost 2000 years ago. That's stupid, you should get over it. I mean, if Pilate and the Jews had caused things to go differently, we might NOT have our Saviour. Jesus KNEW he had to die for the sins of the world, and God got his only Son back after Jesus was renewed. I honestly think this is a happy ending. Why are you angry at the people who made your Saviour HAPPEN? Things went as God ordained. Be joyful, especially as we celebrate our Saviour's birth. I bet He's just shaking His head at you going, "Well, I guess ALL who claim to love Me can't get it at once..."

You are a bad representative of Jesus' love. You have no love. It's sad.

Those were not Catholic priests! It is getting repetitive now.

That's your fantasy honey. Some were EX-PRIESTS when they were accused, if that's what you mean, but they committed these crimes as priests. More were STILL priests when accused. It happened, stop digging your head in the sand and DO something if you love our Church so much!

How can you even CLAIM to represent Catholics? You are SUCH an embarassment!

Ge-Ren
Lacadaemon
17-12-2004, 14:04
This isn't opinion. Read the story, slowly this time so you get it. I will paraphrase JUST IN CASE for you:

Pontius Pilate was given the choice of sparing Jesus, killing him, or doing nothing. The Jews called for his death, Pilate wondered why and was concerned about it. RATHER THEN OVERRIDE THE JEWS' DEMANDS, which he could have, Pontius Pilate stepped back, made NO decision, and let the Jews choose whom they wanted to set free. Some versions of the Bible portray Pilate as respecting the cultural values of the Jews on a holiday, but historically, Roman governors in Judea didn't respect these wishes, and the Bible can be better-trnaslated as Pilate simply not caring and letting the Jews get their blood and he his entertainment. Pilate was no saint, and he was a wimp on top of it.

I'm not changing what the Bible says. The Word of God said that Pontius Pilate was a spineless bastard. Deal.



You have received several actual answers, but you don't like them, so you ignore them. I will answer you one last time to see if your reading comprehension has improved:

Complicity (I asked you to look that one up, do it again so it sticks) does sometimes deserve blame. When one has as much singular power over a man's life as Pontius Pilate over the life of Jesus, he should be blamed for his complicity. The Jews called for the death of someone who threatened their society. The authority (Rome) failed to protect Jesus when it could have. I blame them both.

George Bush has a lot of power too. He is abusing it in Iraq. The soldiers who choose to follow him have to decide for themselves whether or not their Commander in Chief is right. While they can't be blamed to the extent that Bush can be, they can be blamed if they decide to go to Iraq against their conscience, or do things in Iraq that are wrong, illegal, and inhumane. That's been happening too, and they should be blamed squarely for that.

That being said, I will add these few words:

I don't blame Jews NOW for what SOME of their ancestors did almost 2000 years ago. That's stupid, you should get over it. I mean, if Pilate and the Jews had caused things to go differently, we might NOT have our Saviour. Jesus KNEW he had to die for the sins of the world, and God got his only Son back after Jesus was renewed. I honestly think this is a happy ending. Why are you angry at the people who made your Saviour HAPPEN? Things went as God ordained. Be joyful, especially as we celebrate our Saviour's birth. I bet He's just shaking His head at you going, "Well, I guess ALL who claim to love Me can't get it at once..."

You are a bad representative of Jesus' love. You have no love. It's sad.



That's your fantasy honey. Some were EX-PRIESTS when they were accused, if that's what you mean, but they committed these crimes as priests. More were STILL priests when accused. It happened, stop digging your head in the sand and DO something if you love our Church so much!

How can you even CLAIM to represent Catholics? You are SUCH an embarassment!

Ge-Ren


I'll spare you many hours of pain. And I'm just doing this becuase I'm a nice guy. He is a sedevacantist, so he no longer recognizes those priests as legitimate. Hence no catholic preists were involved in the whole molestering deal.

Nor does he recognize the current pope. In fact he beilives that the present pope is a polish jewish anit-christ, or something. Probably.

I hope that helps.
My Gun Not Yours
17-12-2004, 15:00
Once again, I'm lost. What does that have to do with white people being uncool?
East Canuck
17-12-2004, 16:19
Once again, I'm lost. What does that have to do with white people being uncool?
A good part of being cool is the advantage it gives of passing remarks on uncool people and their view. Everybody agrees with the cool people.

(at least, that is how it worked when I was in high school)
Defensor Fidei
17-12-2004, 23:20
That's your fantasy honey. Some were EX-PRIESTS when they were accused, if that's what you mean, but they committed these crimes as priests. More were STILL priests when accused. It happened, stop digging your head in the sand and DO something if you love our Church so much!

How can you even CLAIM to represent Catholics? You are SUCH an embarassment!

Ge-Ren
Those are not Catholic priests. The Catholic Church does not allow "homosexuals" into Her Sacred Priesthood.
Ge-Ren
18-12-2004, 04:57
I'll spare you many hours of pain. And I'm just doing this becuase I'm a nice guy. He is a sedevacantist, so he no longer recognizes those priests as legitimate. Hence no catholic preists were involved in the whole molestering deal.

Nor does he recognize the current pope. In fact he beilives that the present pope is a polish jewish anit-christ, or something. Probably.

I hope that helps.

It does. I am grateful to know that in fact, this moron does NOT represent Catholics, since being Catholic does require recognizing the Pope. Thanks. I definitely won't talk to this guy anymore.

Ge-Ren
Colodia
18-12-2004, 05:00
My question is this:
What is it that makes white people uncool? Eminem seems to be the exception, but other than that, why is it that white people can't be cool?
He's just BEGGING to be on SA
All the Germans
01-01-2005, 21:52
Umm, Arabs are NOT WHITE.

Actually, Arabs are white. Their pigmentation of their skin has nothing to do with it. They are descended from the same Caucasion Aryan tribes that the Europeans, Canadians, Russians, etc. are. To be "white" does not mean you have to look like Morticia Addams. Hell, even some Indians, who's skin is really dark, are scientifically and anthropologically classified as "white". Its all part of the four major divisions of the human race, that are Caucasians (all whites), Asians (excluding the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, and the former Soviet Union), Africans (blacks), and Australoids (Australian natives). Arabs definitely aren't Australians, and we know they aren't black. They sure aren't Asians, so they fit into the Caucasoid class.
Stabbatha
01-01-2005, 22:09
I'm not cool or uncool. I'm Shawn. Hi.
Andaluciae
01-01-2005, 22:55
I confess! It's all my fault! The vibrations of my uncool-ness bounded throughout history, and has given white people an image of uncool. I'm so sorry folks.
Nekonokuni
01-01-2005, 23:02
Whites have achieved the greatest success in all the world and are indeed "cool," so to put it. "Eminem" is not cool, as he acts like the negroes and is a member of the Jewish establishment.

Hmm. DF pops up everywhere these days. <sigh> One of the signs of the apocalypse. It has to be...
Jenn Jenn Land
01-01-2005, 23:10
If by "uncool" you mean not ghetto-acting, it's because we appreciate education and don't mind speaking and acting as we've been educated.
And we wear our pants for a reason, so there's no need to wear our pants around our knees. Or for the guys to continuously grab their penises. Or for the women to be hanging out of all their clothes. And we play real music.
Festivals
01-01-2005, 23:23
If by "uncool" you mean not ghetto-acting, it's because we appreciate education and don't mind speaking and acting as we've been educated.
And we wear our pants for a reason, so there's no need to wear our pants around our knees. Or for the guys to continuously grab their penises. Or for the women to be hanging out of all their clothes. And we play real music.
i dont think they do, cuz any white person can do that and it would just be weird like this one white person at my school who is a total dumbass
Jenn Jenn Land
01-01-2005, 23:28
i dont think they do, cuz any white person can do that and it would just be weird like this one white person at my school who is a total dumbass
I'm sorry. I didn't understand what you just said due to lack of punctuation.
Festivals
01-01-2005, 23:33
I'm sorry. I didn't understand what you just said due to lack of punctuation.
I'M SORRY I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THAT DUE TO LACK OF STRAIGHTNESS!!!!1!
S'RRRRRRR'VD
Ralina
02-01-2005, 00:31
If by "uncool" you mean not ghetto-acting, it's because we appreciate education and don't mind speaking and acting as we've been educated.
And we wear our pants for a reason, so there's no need to wear our pants around our knees. Or for the guys to continuously grab their penises. Or for the women to be hanging out of all their clothes. And we play real music.

I agree, and its a shame how it is deemed uncool to get an education and a nice job, but hey, that just means there is less competition for us uncool people. Let all the cool guys compete with the illegal immigrants for that janitor job.

I just want to point out the pants around the knees thing. It originally had a reason, it was so they could conceal guns in an easy to acess area...you know, for shooting people, because murder makes you so cool.
Haverton
02-01-2005, 00:49
Actually, Arabs are white. Their pigmentation of their skin has nothing to do with it. They are descended from the same Caucasion Aryan tribes that the Europeans, Canadians, Russians, etc. are. To be "white" does not mean you have to look like Morticia Addams. Hell, even some Indians, who's skin is really dark, are scientifically and anthropologically classified as "white". Its all part of the four major divisions of the human race, that are Caucasians (all whites), Asians (excluding the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, and the former Soviet Union), Africans (blacks), and Australoids (Australian natives). Arabs definitely aren't Australians, and we know they aren't black. They sure aren't Asians, so they fit into the Caucasoid class.

Arabs and Jews are Semetics, not Caucasians.
Naturality
02-01-2005, 00:52
My question is this:
What is it that makes white people uncool? Eminem seems to be the exception, but other than that, why is it that white people can't be cool?

Haha, this is Your personal opinion dude. And Eminem = Not Cool !
Cymric Tribes
02-01-2005, 01:34
I've skipped some pages on this thread, so eccuse me if this has been said.
People are too quick to shout "rascism" when the topic of race is brought up by someone who is white. Race is a topic which is out of bounds for white people, and yet if a white person proclaims that they are proud to be white, they will get attacked.

The problem is that these attakcs come from white people, often it comes from "liberals" who are always quick to brand the proud person. Do a google search for White pride, then do the same for black or gay or female.....Which one will be only of negative sites?

The problem comes from white people with a "guilt complex", on the UK it is people who are ashamed of the British Empire and do not want it's history (good and bad) taught in schools. Despite whites being the people who shipped Black slaves to America, we are not taught that those slaves were sold by Black Tribal chiefs, or that the Majority of "slave masters" were Arabs. History is geared to be negative to just white people.

The pendulum swings both ways, and there are already signs that white people are fed up with being seen as the enemy or great satan, this is leading to resentment against minorities, and they will eventually win out in the west if things continue.

The best way to solve it, is to stop pandering to minorities and tell them to get on with life and stop blaming others for your misfortune. And for certain groups of white people to stop feeling guilty for history. Also in the UK "liberal or Left" politicians are always banning things like Xmas nativities and things so they don't offend minorities. This is condescending and ironically more rascist than those who question.

In todays world, liberals will brand my post as rascist but if we can't debate how can we solve the problems?

In the end, being cool or not is not important. What is important is giving all people respect, but if they treat you with hate then they don't deserve the attention (no matter colour)......And Eminem is arse....LED ZEPPELIN ROCK.
Jenn Jenn Land
02-01-2005, 01:59
I'M SORRY I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THAT DUE TO LACK OF STRAIGHTNESS!!!!1!
S'RRRRRRR'VD
LoL.
You're not helping your cause, buddy.
Naturality
02-01-2005, 02:33
It's generally agreed that anyone who's actually TRYING to be cool -isn't- cool, they're simply posers.

Eminem is a poser in about a dozen ways, and is about as cool as Vanilla Ice in a mohawk and speedos.

Frankly, anyone who has to focus on some generic branded culture to show themselves in a positive light is -far- from cool.

Genuine self-expression and disinterest in the societal demands of your peers is where 'coolness' comes from.


/agree
Antichristz
02-01-2005, 02:45
about the Jesus thing, you are imbecils. The reason he died/was killed was bcuz the jew referred to him as their king, while that is a power only the emporer is supposed to have. Therefore they removed a threat, unfortuanately that was useless and that action could have been prevented through what is now Orthodox Christianity. Furthermore, the reason whites are seen as bad (i dont think so and neither does anyone else i know" is because
A) the ppl need a scapegoat
B) The years of oppression
C) The history of white skinned wackos (hitler, Himmler, Stalin, The Zodiac Killer,
Rasputin, Ted Bundy, Ted Kozzinsky, and ed gein (of texsas chainsaw massacre fame)
I personally think that to blame a whole ethnicity for the crimes of SOME of its members is stupid beyond imagination. Plus cool is subjective, such as if you are a rocker there are more white cool people than black. Although arguably the coolest is Jimmi Hendrix (my own opinion) but their are otyhers such as Ozzy, Zack Wylde, and Kobain.
Naturality
02-01-2005, 02:49
They are slow and depressing, almost impossible to have fun to.

How many people do you know who like Pink Floyd aren't white males?


Me, white female
Eridanus
02-01-2005, 02:54
White peoples is crackers and needs to burn!

Actually, I think white people have the potential to be cool, as long as you roll with the right crowed, that's nice and diverse, and you're not an asshole.

But you'll always be a cracker. I know I am! I like it.
Naturality
02-01-2005, 03:05
As if my day wasnt crappy enough here at work, then I find out I'm not cool cause I'm white. Friday cant come soon enough.


Oh and in regards to a previous post......what is the correct term to call black people since negro, black and african american are taboo? What do we call them without sounding racist? :confused:


When speaking of a black persons race, I've always said black. Haven't ever had a problem from any black person about it. Either because they just arent offended by it, or because they knew I wasnt meaning it in a derrogatory(sp?) way. /shrug

I live in North Carolina not sure if that might have something to do with it as well.. but I'd think not.
Antichristz
02-01-2005, 03:10
Dakini (by my standards) is cool
1) loves rock
2) knows whats classic and whats not
3) Sounds like someone who likes to be an indivisual

Oh and trust me being Asian is soooooo much uncooler ( i know i am one) most of us are in the geek category. And ill be honest i have never been on a date, or been to parties with more than 15 ppl. So if u ever feel down just remember good ole Antichrist :). O and dont get to creeped out im only 13ish. And the bible isnt the best source for historical accuracy due to the nature of religion. Plus jesus (as in the bible) wasnt white. There is a passage where he goes to egypt to escape some king and the bible said there was no difference between him and the locals. O and the solid proof that he did not have long hair is in the letters of saint paul and one other apostle that clearly read "having long hair (for men) is a travesty".
Im not christian but i believe it is a beautiful religion and study it. It has alot of good messages. Albeit some that arnet so "dandy". (such as the mentions of homosexsuality)
Naturality
02-01-2005, 03:11
i dont know- down here where i live, the correct thing to say is black person or african american. but as someone pointed out- some may not be from africa or america. of course i live in the south(USA) and we have inbred rednecks who still call them Niggers. I hate that word and sorry i had to type it.

The word ****** isnt only used in the south, sorry.
Dresophila Prime
02-01-2005, 03:18
Is it therefore acceptable to ask why mexicans are so lazy? I am by no means a racist but I feel that this poll is senseless in the fact that white people are perfectly capable of being 'cool,' but obviously not by today's twisted standard.

If I shoot a cop, ingest some alcohol and take in a massive dose of narcotics, then impregnate 15 women, I will be cool, no? I could be cool if I can spin on the floor and squirm around...or if I pretend like I don't care about anyone or anything, but rather act loud and racous.

My friend, if you are victimizing white people because they are not 'cool,' I extend my condolences to you.
Naturality
02-01-2005, 03:28
[QUOTE=Defensor Fidei]I) II)Catholic priests have never molested children.


You also believe it isn't spread through out Jehovah Witness's society either? Or even in the Omish Community? Anytime you have doctrines/laws in a religious culture enforced and going against mans natural instincts, they will find a way. It is usually at the cost of children.
Viva la Hippy
02-01-2005, 03:40
Hello you people.. I am not white.. I am indian living in Australia. and i thought that this was an innocent thread but i was mistaken.. i didnt realise that there were people who were so against people of other colour.. 1 thing about what this thread originally was about.. In my view you are not cool based on your religion/colour or race but if you are your own person, you don't follow the crowd and have a high self esteem but not a fat head.. Well thats me anyway.. and you know what? i find life really fun and an enjoyable ride..
Festivals
02-01-2005, 03:50
LoL.
You're not helping your cause, buddy.
i helped your mama last night
Rashaulge
02-01-2005, 18:16
i helped your mama last night

It is likely that the jewish author of this thread would argue that Festivals here is "cool".

He is likely to come from an english speaking country, but for whatever reason, is unable to formulate his thoughts into written english. That is cool. Making insults about your mama is always "cool".

Cool people wouldn't survive if we didn't give them any social services. ;)
Angry Fruit Salad
02-01-2005, 18:23
I said this all through highschool, and I'll say it again. "Historically, white people suck....and I'm not white. I'm green, see?"

Anyway, when you think of white people, you think of the uptight, suit-wearing corporate assholes that everyone seems to worship. If you don't think of that, you think of the geeky, stiff white kid in highschool who talked about aliens constantly.


We're not all like that. Some of us know enough to hide behind our computers and not even try. Others just say fuck it, and end up achieving the coveted status of "cool" by appearing not to care. It's all relative.
The Tribes Of Longton
02-01-2005, 18:29
It's all relative.
Emo geek. Some people find that status as cool. Personally, I don't. Like you say, it's all relative :cool:

*tokes. for some reason*
PIcaRDMPCia
02-01-2005, 18:30
My question is this:
What is it that makes white people uncool? Eminem seems to be the exception, but other than that, why is it that white people can't be cool?
Emenim is a moron like all rappers; I dispise rap music.
Honestly, it depends on your definition of cool; in a country of Star Trek loving intellectuals I'd be hip.
Angry Fruit Salad
02-01-2005, 18:45
Emo geek. Some people find that status as cool. Personally, I don't. Like you say, it's all relative :cool:

*tokes. for some reason*

o.O Emo geek? O.o ..the heck?
PIcaRDMPCia
02-01-2005, 18:47
o.O Emo geek? O.o ..the heck?
It's a reference to a band who is very...shall we say...depressive.
The Tribes Of Longton
02-01-2005, 18:53
o.O Emo geek? O.o ..the heck?
WARNING: Stereotype in progress

Emo geek - skinny person with tight stripy polo neck T-shirt, tight (often ripped) jeans, lovely little arm-bands with chequered flag patterns etc. on them, longish black hair, listens to music like Funeral For A Friend or the Lost Prophets. Also often depressed.

WARNING: Stereotype worse than thought. Not entirely accurate. Please do not kill me.
Schingkong
02-01-2005, 19:01
Whites have achieved the greatest success in all the world and are indeed "cool," so to put it. "Eminem" is not cool, as he acts like the negroes and is a member of the Jewish establishment.
Negroes? That is rude. We are all people, and are skin color should'nt have anything to do with our coolness.

Tottally Pissed off,
President of Schingkong
Angry Fruit Salad
02-01-2005, 19:04
It's a reference to a band who is very...shall we say...depressive.


no, my question was supposed to be "where the heck did that come from?"/"what was the point of that?"
Silenced screams
02-01-2005, 19:15
White people un cool what about Keith Richards he is cool personified as are a shit load of other white rock star people! However Jimi hendrix is the god of all cool and Bob marley is also pretty godly in the cool department so its kinda hard to call this one. I supose it depends on how you define cool but i think we can all agree there are no cool christians..............ok Bob Marley is rasta and they are kinda christian but no there are definately noe cool anglicans, catholics, orthodox, baptists, mormons etc....


Quakers are kinda cool.................


hmmmmm this is a complex issue.

I think black people definately used to be the coolest with all the blues musicans in America but now black music has gone downhill a bit and music is really what makes someone cool.
anyway im rapping up now leaving with the conclusion white people can be cool but prehaps not as cool as black people and some oreintals like jackie chan, bruce lee, Akira toriyama etc.....