NationStates Jolt Archive


Terrorist?

Adler X
29-12-2004, 17:54
Are here any active terrorist nations out there? I would like to know so i may bring them all down :sniper:
Draconis Nightcrawlis
29-12-2004, 18:18
Cute :D

You'll find that they'd probably kick your nations arse, but hey if you're willing to suffer ;)
Henrytopia
29-12-2004, 18:35
Well Adler, we welcome you to share our misery.. if you find the stomach for it you can join this thread (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=385113) or you can simply send some relief workers to PIcaRDMPCia (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=384842) and challenge the RALM. Hold a press conference, roll the dice, I am sure the RALM would love some new targets.
Adler X
29-12-2004, 22:03
Well why cant I just say I have a nuke and Im gionna blow em all up? And jow will they kick my arse?
Gorbachevski
30-12-2004, 00:39
Nukes are a form of godmoding. Read the thread on godmoding for more info.
Henrytopia
30-12-2004, 17:26
OOC: I would only godmod in a completely ridiculous thread.. i.e. any comments made by EScrew and his zen masters would probably necessitate an equally ridiculous response on my behalf. Now the Real Anime Liberation Movement is another issue. They are establishing themselves as a legitimate foe with an agenda so I take them quite seriously.
Adler X
30-12-2004, 17:58
Take them seriously? What are they gonna stalk you and kill you?
Lagrange 4
30-12-2004, 18:32
Take them seriously? What are they gonna stalk you and kill you?

First of all, the whole term "terrorist nation" is a naive simplification. There are some Westers industrialised countries that have practiced terror policies of some sort in the near past, only a few decades ago. This term is used today by American right-wingers when they refer to countries whose leadership is suspected of training or harbouring terrorists. By this definition, America is a terrorist nation as well. It seems that the American Conservative definition of a terrorist nation applies only to countries full of brown people.

Still, the terrorist nations on NS have populations of several billion, and an economy constantly mobilised for total war. Going against them alone isn't sound policy.
Adler X
31-12-2004, 02:30
>( Im a conservative you bum!
Lagrange 4
31-12-2004, 09:58
Yes, I figured as much. You'll still do yourself a favour by getting rid of your Fox News illusions. Conservative doesn't equal ignorant.
Lagrange 4
31-12-2004, 11:48
Well why cant I just say I have a nuke and Im gionna blow em all up?

OOC:
Nuking? Why not. It takes millions and millions of dollars to equip an ICBM, plus more to store it. You'll also go against several international treaties, but if you don't care about the diplomatic cost, that's ok. After you've bankrupted your economy and ruined your international relations, it's time to launch the baby.

A nuclear weapon is an indiscriminate, brutal killer. It makes no difference between the terrorists you're after and women, children or other innocent civilians. With any luck, you just might wipe out a training camp of two, but you'd also kill thousands (or millions) of people in the initial blast and several times that from radiation sickness.

However, it's your country. Do as you please.