NationStates Jolt Archive

I propose that the UN-delegate must be the only one in having and practising the regional control.

As you know, a founder which is not the UN-delegate can prevent the democraticaly-elected delegate to have the regional control, and he can also disable this option.

Let us make things democraticaly! We must let the UN-delegate practising in every case the regional control, substituting the founder of the region.

What do you think?

No, not in any circumstances. Founder is as the word says the FOUNDER, of the region, and should in all and every situation have the final word in the matter of regional control. Founder must have the right to deny access to the regional control if he/she feels like it. Other people come to the region that has been founded by the Founder, and as I see it, the region represents the ideas and visions of the founder. If you don't wanna play along those visions, then you don't have to stay in that region. There is lots of other regions that one can join, or found his/hers own one.

If the founder trusts the delegate, then it's ok the give access to the delegate.

No the Founder founded a regio and should control it, and that would make invasions soooooo easy 8)

The introduction of the position of founder, along with other things have made large scale invading something nearly possible to do legally. Its not fair to people who want to invade legally.

The introduction of the position of founder, along with other things have made large scale invading something nearly possible to do legally. Its not fair to people who want to invade legally.
Then stop invading....

May as well ask us to quit breating.

May as well ask us to quit breating.
It would make my job a lot easier :lol:

Touche'

what job? Griefing and refounding Regions?

Ooh Loop babe you're at it again ;)

please stop making unfounded jibes at us, we were trying to have a friendly thread here :?

For the record I voted no on the poll... what a silly idea, lol, that would make the game awful

they should make it that founder could not kick out new delegates as if the region was invaded

Soo yeah what you're saying is they should take founders regions away from them? :lol:

you invaders are a funny lot. I wonder how well you'd like it to be peacefully sitting in a region with some friends and others, then one day BAM! you're in the big wide unfriendly RR (no offense Kandarin) and your old region is gone or inaccesible and you can't do anything about it. Contrast that with the slight ego trip that some teenage outcast (mind you, I'm stereotyping here, don't take this personally) gets when he presses that 'eject' button twenty times and writes "PWND!1" in the Factbook, and what have you got?

The NS rules are actually very reasonable 8)

excuse my naivity but can you eject the founder? can the founder transfer his role?

Can the founder transfer his role?
Not exactly, no. If the founder is leaving the game, he/she could pass contol of their nation to someone they trusted. This is the only way of preserving the Founder's presence if someone leaves the game.

Can the Founder be ejected?
Presumably.

Can the founder transfer his role?
Not exactly, no. If the founder is leaving the game, he/she could pass contol of their nation to someone they trusted. This is the only way of preserving the Founder's presence if someone leaves the game.

Can the Founder be ejected?
Presumably.



Yes the Founder can be ejected i learnt the hard way, :wink:

Can the Founder be ejected?
Yes, as others have said, but he/she can still control their region from the RR, or whereever else they might be.

what job? Griefing and refounding Regions?
Where have we griefed, and where have we refounded a region? Got any examples?

No, not in any circumstances. Founder is as the word says the FOUNDER, of the region, and should in all and every situation have the final word in the matter of regional control. Founder must have the right to deny access to the regional control if he/she feels like it. Other people come to the region that has been founded by the Founder, and as I see it, the region represents the ideas and visions of the founder. If you don't wanna play along those visions, then you don't have to stay in that region. There is lots of other regions that one can join, or found his/hers own one.

If the founder trusts the delegate, then it's ok the give access to the delegate.

I agree. The delegate's job is solely to REPRESENT a particular region.

Im not getting into an argument about this again*, all I will say is.


I dont partivcularly agree with founders being done away with.



(*if you want to discuss the topic we can do it on an offsite forum, like the EP one.)