Kol25
28-02-2006, 21:17
Here's the issue I was presented with today:
The Issue
The fierce debate on human hunting in Kol25 has been brought to your attention after vociferous supporters of both sides of the argument stormed your parliament.
The Debate
1. "Human hunting is a cruel and horrible 'sport' for the wealthy," says Randy Winters of the 'Protect Anything Cute and Furry Society'. "How can you possibly justify it? Oh, they witter on about 'tradition' and 'pest control' and other such nonsense, but really we all know it's because these sadists love to torture poor, innocent animals! Hunting must be banned!"
[Accept]
2. "Banning human hunting would be the end for centuries of tradition!" wails esteemed aristocrat Freddy McAlpin from atop his steed. "The thrill of the chase, the baying of the hounds, the human scooting through the undergrowth - it would be a travesty! We provide much needed stimulus to the local tourism, and you can't deny that humans are pests - killing farmers' livestock for example! I propose that human hunting be encouraged, for the cultural - and economic - benefit of the nation!"
[Accept]
3. "Well, you know what I think?" asks Pete Broadside, while helping to assemble a small trebuchet. "I reckon that the real issue about this sport is the cruelty aspect, and no-one can deny that sending a pack of dogs to tear apart a poor, innocent human is cruel. I reckon we should just ban hunting with hounds and only allow kinder and more instantly lethal methods like guns, tranquillisers, and cruise missiles."
[Accept]
4. "I'm firmly against the slaughter of dumb animals," says Jennifer Wong, while feeding an infant human with a milk bottle. "It would be best if the animals didn't die, and hunters could still do what they love to do - how about instead of shooting them or sending vicious canines after them, the hunter runs up to his quarry and gives it a symbolic 'tap' with his hand? Now isn't that much nicer for everyone?"
[Accept]
Do you get issues better than that? If you do, please tell me about them.
The Issue
The fierce debate on human hunting in Kol25 has been brought to your attention after vociferous supporters of both sides of the argument stormed your parliament.
The Debate
1. "Human hunting is a cruel and horrible 'sport' for the wealthy," says Randy Winters of the 'Protect Anything Cute and Furry Society'. "How can you possibly justify it? Oh, they witter on about 'tradition' and 'pest control' and other such nonsense, but really we all know it's because these sadists love to torture poor, innocent animals! Hunting must be banned!"
[Accept]
2. "Banning human hunting would be the end for centuries of tradition!" wails esteemed aristocrat Freddy McAlpin from atop his steed. "The thrill of the chase, the baying of the hounds, the human scooting through the undergrowth - it would be a travesty! We provide much needed stimulus to the local tourism, and you can't deny that humans are pests - killing farmers' livestock for example! I propose that human hunting be encouraged, for the cultural - and economic - benefit of the nation!"
[Accept]
3. "Well, you know what I think?" asks Pete Broadside, while helping to assemble a small trebuchet. "I reckon that the real issue about this sport is the cruelty aspect, and no-one can deny that sending a pack of dogs to tear apart a poor, innocent human is cruel. I reckon we should just ban hunting with hounds and only allow kinder and more instantly lethal methods like guns, tranquillisers, and cruise missiles."
[Accept]
4. "I'm firmly against the slaughter of dumb animals," says Jennifer Wong, while feeding an infant human with a milk bottle. "It would be best if the animals didn't die, and hunters could still do what they love to do - how about instead of shooting them or sending vicious canines after them, the hunter runs up to his quarry and gives it a symbolic 'tap' with his hand? Now isn't that much nicer for everyone?"
[Accept]
Do you get issues better than that? If you do, please tell me about them.