Whaddaya think about my issues?
Please don't send in all the issues in one thread. In addition to being hard to read, you sometimes make mistakes, such as the little line in about the middle of the post, showing your political views a little too much. Anyway, make sure you say [stats] and not [stat] in all of the options, and make sure none of the effects are good (why do I have to keep saying that?).
Please don't send in all the issues in one thread. In addition to being hard to read, you sometimes make mistakes, such as the little line in about the middle of the post, showing your political views a little too much. Anyway, make sure you say [stats] and not [stat] in all of the options, and make sure none of the effects are good (why do I have to keep saying that?).
As I said, it was a rough draft. Don't say "in addition to being hard to read"; point out the supposed mistakes. I typed [stat] for a single option, you're being a bit hypercritical. I think you misinterpret the issue guidelines, they say that no option is supposed to have all good effects and no option is supposed to have all bad effects. To say that no option in the entire game should have a "good" effect is asinine. I was looking more for "I thought so and so issue was hilarious, but you could reword line ..... of issue ..... a certain way for etc. etc.", ie constructive criticism, rather than ticky-tack allusion to supposed mistakes with no elucidation, and no commentary relating to the actual issues whatsoever. I warned about the post's length, and a person would obviously not have to read every single issue to comment. Take them for what they are, lighthearted silliness, rather than acting like I'm wasting your time with my great post length, and forcing you to state your incorrect assessment of no option being able to have a single positive effect. Be cool and constructive about it, or keep your nitpicking bs to yourself; that sort of criticism is not particularly helpful, and appears closer to covert condescension.
The Silver Sky
14-06-2005, 06:35
Pwned!!!!!
Well looks good to me, I hope the mods consider some of these.
Originally posted by Aryanis
As I said, it was a rough draft. Don't say "in addition to being hard to read"; point out the supposed mistakes. I typed [stat] for a single option, you're being a bit hypercritical. I think you misinterpret the issue guidelines, they say that no option is supposed to have all good effects and no option is supposed to have all bad effects. To say that no option in the entire game should have a "good" effect is asinine. I was looking more for "I thought so and so issue was hilarious, but you could reword line ..... of issue ..... a certain way for etc. etc.", ie constructive criticism, rather than ticky-tack allusion to supposed mistakes with no elucidation, and no commentary relating to the actual issues whatsoever. I warned about the post's length, and a person would obviously not have to read every single issue to comment. Take them for what they are, lighthearted silliness, rather than acting like I'm wasting your time with my great post length, and forcing you to state your incorrect assessment of no option being able to have a single positive effect. Be cool and constructive about it, or keep your nitpicking bs to yourself; that sort of criticism is not particularly helpful, and appears closer to covert condescension.
I posted less than one line of criticism of the actual issues, and you posted nearly eighteen lines calling me a stupid jerk. Then you said I should be "cool and constructive" instead of so much criticism.
If you didn't want criticism, why did you post them?