17-03-2004, 22:39
Conservatives and family values campaigners have called on the government to ban homosexual intercourse. A furious debate has ensued.
Validity: All nations outside the UN
Options:
[option]Family values campaigner @@RANDOMNAME@@ from the Campaign for Morality in @@NAME@@ says, "It is time the government acted against this immoral and obscene act and defended family values with actions rather than just words. The rate of STI infections from it is much higher than other practices and it clearly says it is wrong in the Bible! Would you want to share a locker room with a homosexual?"
[effect] homosexual acts become illegal
[stats] happiness goes down a bit, crime goes down a bit, civil freedom goes down a medium ammount, religion goes up, income tax goes up a bit.
[option]Gay rights campaigner @@RANDOMNAME@@ from the Gay Liberation Front says, "Poppycock! The religious fanatics can't be allowed to dictate what consenting adults can and can't do. If anything we should be encouraging homosexual activities by extending sex education to cover homosexuality and giving it at an earlier age, like maybe in elementary school so that children grow up to be tolerent adults. If the government is serious about equality they will back us!"
[effect] homosexual acts are legal and sex ed is extended to elementary school students and covers homosexual relationships
[stats] happiness goes up slightly, crime goes up a bit, civil freedom goes up a bit, religion goes down a medium ammount, income tax goes down a bit.
[option]Tabloid newspaper journalist @@RANDOMNAME@@ from the @@NAME@@ Daily Standard says, "I'm sitting on the fence on this one. I guess you could sail down the middle and rather than banning homosexual acts altogether you could just ban them from say, kissing and touching in public. That way you're pleasing the conservatives and not alienating the gay lobby too much either.".
[effect] homosexual acts in public become illegal
[stats] happiness stays the same, crime goes down a bit, civil freedom goes down slightly, religion goes up slightly, income tax stays the same.
Validity: All nations outside the UN
Options:
[option]Family values campaigner @@RANDOMNAME@@ from the Campaign for Morality in @@NAME@@ says, "It is time the government acted against this immoral and obscene act and defended family values with actions rather than just words. The rate of STI infections from it is much higher than other practices and it clearly says it is wrong in the Bible! Would you want to share a locker room with a homosexual?"
[effect] homosexual acts become illegal
[stats] happiness goes down a bit, crime goes down a bit, civil freedom goes down a medium ammount, religion goes up, income tax goes up a bit.
[option]Gay rights campaigner @@RANDOMNAME@@ from the Gay Liberation Front says, "Poppycock! The religious fanatics can't be allowed to dictate what consenting adults can and can't do. If anything we should be encouraging homosexual activities by extending sex education to cover homosexuality and giving it at an earlier age, like maybe in elementary school so that children grow up to be tolerent adults. If the government is serious about equality they will back us!"
[effect] homosexual acts are legal and sex ed is extended to elementary school students and covers homosexual relationships
[stats] happiness goes up slightly, crime goes up a bit, civil freedom goes up a bit, religion goes down a medium ammount, income tax goes down a bit.
[option]Tabloid newspaper journalist @@RANDOMNAME@@ from the @@NAME@@ Daily Standard says, "I'm sitting on the fence on this one. I guess you could sail down the middle and rather than banning homosexual acts altogether you could just ban them from say, kissing and touching in public. That way you're pleasing the conservatives and not alienating the gay lobby too much either.".
[effect] homosexual acts in public become illegal
[stats] happiness stays the same, crime goes down a bit, civil freedom goes down slightly, religion goes up slightly, income tax stays the same.