NationStates Jolt Archive

A nudist protestor said "My body--my choice to dangle!", this was obviously not written by someone who understand nudism as it focuses on a physical aspect.

The professor says it's liberating, but then he says it should compulsory which contradicts the definition of freedom.

I'm not a nudist or anything but I know nudism is culturally liberating and having the freedom that comes from knowing nobody cares if you have the wrong outfit or put on a little weight. Wearing no clothes is just the means of achieving that <U>feeling</U> of liberation.

Therefore this debate is not truly representative of naturism or nudism. :x

I am nude.

I'm sort of kidding, but a little curious, why are nudists always people that noone on earth wants to see naked?

Why would people have anything against nakedness in the first place? There are no logical answers I can think of.

Why would people have anything against nakedness in the first place? There are no logical answers I can think of.

They may be embarassed about having a little willy...?

Why would people have anything against nakedness in the first place? There are no logical answers I can think of.

They may be embarassed about having a little willy...?

Heh, well, it's the erected thing that counts anyway, right? I mean, the choice between a) it looks good in the shower but doesn't work properly and b) it doesn't look that much in the shower but functions all night long, I'd choose b) anyday.

Besides, if everyone was naked there would be more of the same caliber, but I do see your point.

The professor says it's liberating, but then he says it should compulsory which contradicts the definition of freedom.


True that.

we're all naked underneath anyhow. :wink:

Bodies are just bodies - so what if someone has a little extra flesh, or teeny pee-pee - in the long run, what difference does it make? [medical reasons aside...!]

TP

TP

A nudist protestor said "My body--my choice to dangle!", this was obviously not written by someone who understand nudism as it focuses on a physical aspect.

The professor says it's liberating, but then he says it should compulsory which contradicts the definition of freedom.

I'm not a nudist or anything but I know nudism is culturally liberating and having the freedom that comes from knowing nobody cares if you have the wrong outfit or put on a little weight. Wearing no clothes is just the means of achieving that <U>feeling</U> of liberation.

Therefore this debate is not truly representative of naturism or nudism. :x

The debates often tend to be caricatures of real issues, but the effects range from comic to serious.

I've not been confronted with this issue yet, but when you were confronted with the nudism issue: (1) did you support the option that would allow nudists the choice to bear it all? (2) and if so, did either of your freedom settings go up?

There is a hidden stat for nudism or nudists for our countries, so while I'm sure that this issue probably monkies around with that stat, I would guess that the issue really is a civil liberty as you make your case for.

If the game stats give the desired effect, I'm in favour of silly debates and silly game text (not stat) modifications.

The point of NationStates seems to be to get people to realize that governing is about making compromise. My all time favorite issues are ones like the cannibalism one where a political freedom is hidden by an exmtreme example and handled in an extremely silly fashion.

Michael

The professor says it's liberating, but then he says it should compulsory which contradicts the definition of freedom.


True that.

we're all naked underneath anyhow. :wink:

Bodies are just bodies - so what if someone has a little extra flesh, or teeny pee-pee - in the long run, what difference does it make? [medical reasons aside...!]
Actually no one wants to see nudist is because it is sick and discusting and tecknically it only exploits porn.

The professor says it's liberating, but then he says it should compulsory which contradicts the definition of freedom.


True that.

we're all naked underneath anyhow. :wink:

Bodies are just bodies - so what if someone has a little extra flesh, or teeny pee-pee - in the long run, what difference does it make? [medical reasons aside...!]
Actually no one wants to see nudist is because it is sick and discusting and tecknically it only exploits porn.

pron is ART--and people should be allowed to walk naked thru the food ailes in supermarkets if they want---its our bodys and our lifes

Actually no one wants to see nudist is because it is sick and discusting and tecknically it only exploits porn.

Since this topic was moved from general I really shouldn't argue, but how on earth do you exploit porn through general nakedness?

lol, i made nudism compulsory

lol, i made nudism compulsory

Shocking. Then there's nothing to take off. :wink:

A nudist protestor said "My body--my choice to dangle!", this was obviously not written by someone who understand nudism as it focuses on a physical aspect.

The professor says it's liberating, but then he says it should compulsory which contradicts the definition of freedom.

I'm not a nudist or anything but I know nudism is culturally liberating and having the freedom that comes from knowing nobody cares if you have the wrong outfit or put on a little weight. Wearing no clothes is just the means of achieving that <U>feeling</U> of liberation.

Therefore this debate is not truly representative of naturism or nudism. :x

Lighten up.

If you want something truly representative of naturism why don't you go to a naturist's website? As I see it the game's a bit of fun, let's not make it all deep.

Shocking. Then there's nothing to take off. :wink:

Porn only works by revealing forbidden pleasures. If there is nothing to reveal, how can it be pornographic?

In a society where nudity was compulsory, would we have clubs and resorts for people to wear clothes? Would playboy girls be photographed or filmed slowly covering up their body?

What I find strange is that one minit you can pass a law that makes nudity compulsory but then shortly after that criminalise streaking at sports events!!

Anyway, next time it comes up I might change from a clothes free republic to a c/opt. republic. That might improve my civil liberties rating.