NationStates Jolt Archive


Corporations Demand Political Say

Kitsilano
28-01-2004, 18:21
Any ideas as to the effect of Option 2? I'm leaning towards dismissing this, as I'm already a Corporate Bordello - Option 1's not the wayI want to go. Option 2 sounds good onthe surface, but I can just see it crippling my economy somehow.


Corporations Demand Political Say

The Issue
A well-heeled lobby group is pushing for the elimination of regulations that prevent corporations from donating money to political parties.

The Debate
"This is supposed to be a democratic country," Woodchip Exports industry spokesperson Falala Hendrikson says. "Yet these archaic laws say I can't donate money to support a political party. They put ceilings on the amount any party can spend on advertising. It's time to stop treating voters like children, and trust them to make up their own minds. Free the ballot box!"
[Accept]


"You say political freedom, I hear vote-buying," says popular anarchist Beth Mistletoe. "If these fat cats get their way, politicians will buy their own seat in Congress. And let's face it, a slick advertising campaign can convince a lot of apathetic voters. We need to tighten the laws, not repeal them. Money should have no place in politics!"
[Accept]


"Frankly, I don't see why we need to have elections at all," says your brother, Lars McAlpin, over a late-night malt whiskey. "You always seem to know what's best. Why not scrap the whole political system? It would make things so much simpler."
[Accept]
_Myopia_
29-01-2004, 13:05
Any ideas as to the effect of Option 2? I'm leaning towards dismissing this, as I'm already a Corporate Bordello - Option 1's not the wayI want to go. Option 2 sounds good onthe surface, but I can just see it crippling my economy somehow.


Corporations Demand Political Say

The Issue
A well-heeled lobby group is pushing for the elimination of regulations that prevent corporations from donating money to political parties.

The Debate
"This is supposed to be a democratic country," Woodchip Exports industry spokesperson Falala Hendrikson says. "Yet these archaic laws say I can't donate money to support a political party. They put ceilings on the amount any party can spend on advertising. It's time to stop treating voters like children, and trust them to make up their own minds. Free the ballot box!"
[Accept]


"You say political freedom, I hear vote-buying," says popular anarchist Beth Mistletoe. "If these fat cats get their way, politicians will buy their own seat in Congress. And let's face it, a slick advertising campaign can convince a lot of apathetic voters. We need to tighten the laws, not repeal them. Money should have no place in politics!"
[Accept]


"Frankly, I don't see why we need to have elections at all," says your brother, Lars McAlpin, over a late-night malt whiskey. "You always seem to know what's best. Why not scrap the whole political system? It would make things so much simpler."
[Accept]

I would guess that option 2 wouldn't necessarily wreck your economy, but it might do a little damage - however it might lower your political freedoms.
Argyres
29-01-2004, 18:38
Option 1 raises political freedoms. Options 2 and 3 lower them.
The Defeatists
30-01-2004, 00:47
Option 1 probably will lead to your government being labelled "corrupt" but should increase political freedoms.

Option 2 should decrease political freedoms but reduce corruption in government

Option 3 should drastically reduce political freedoms resulting in a dictatorship or one party state of some sort.
The Zoogie People
30-01-2004, 04:24
Test:

The Zoogie People

Before:

Superb-Good-Excellent

Left Wing Utopia

After Option 1:

Superb-Thriving-World Benchmark

Civil Rights Lovefest

After latest UN resolution:

Superb-Powerhouse-World Benchmark.

Ah, crap. Anarchy.
_Myopia_
30-01-2004, 18:19
After latest UN resolution...

Ah, crap. Anarchy.

Same! Really bad timing too - we're having an election for regional delegate, and my opponent used it against me! Had to claw my way back into civil rights lovefest ground.