Spoffin
10-01-2004, 20:18
I got this issue today
Spoffin Decides:
Compulsory Gun Ownership?
The Issue
This weekend, a citizen's group calling itself Gun Owners of Spoffin has petitioned Congress with a controversial bill making gun ownership compulsory.
The Debate
"This is a very important step to securing the rights and lives of our families and controlling the government," urges noted gun ownership proponent Naki Wu. "Not only would it significantly decrease crime, but it would also effectively stop government tyranny in its tracks. Of course, this also means that every wacko and their cousin will have a gun, but don't worry, you'll have a gun to defend yourself from them, so it will all work out."
[Accept]
"While the Gun Owners of Spoffin have the safety and security of our people in mind, it would simply be impractical to enforce," comments Police Chief George W. Silk. "A better option would be to legalize, and encourage use of, concealed carry laws, which would allow responsible citizens to keep firearms with them at all times, on their person, to kill any wacko or their cousin who they think is threatening them."
[Accept]
"Compulsory gun ownership?! Concealed carry?! Are these fools nuts?!" rants an enraged Million Mummy March activist. "We don't need any of these things! What we need is complete gun registration, so that the government can track down dangerous people, like those people who possess unregistered weapons."
[Accept]
Interesting enough, but... well, I've banned guns now several times. Its either compulsory gun ownership, conceal and carry laws or forced registration, and as I don't allow guns anyway, this seems a little invalid. Also, in the first option it says that the measure would "reduce crime", but in Spoffin "Crime is totally unknown".
The issues fine, I just really don't think I should have got it.
Spoffin Decides:
Compulsory Gun Ownership?
The Issue
This weekend, a citizen's group calling itself Gun Owners of Spoffin has petitioned Congress with a controversial bill making gun ownership compulsory.
The Debate
"This is a very important step to securing the rights and lives of our families and controlling the government," urges noted gun ownership proponent Naki Wu. "Not only would it significantly decrease crime, but it would also effectively stop government tyranny in its tracks. Of course, this also means that every wacko and their cousin will have a gun, but don't worry, you'll have a gun to defend yourself from them, so it will all work out."
[Accept]
"While the Gun Owners of Spoffin have the safety and security of our people in mind, it would simply be impractical to enforce," comments Police Chief George W. Silk. "A better option would be to legalize, and encourage use of, concealed carry laws, which would allow responsible citizens to keep firearms with them at all times, on their person, to kill any wacko or their cousin who they think is threatening them."
[Accept]
"Compulsory gun ownership?! Concealed carry?! Are these fools nuts?!" rants an enraged Million Mummy March activist. "We don't need any of these things! What we need is complete gun registration, so that the government can track down dangerous people, like those people who possess unregistered weapons."
[Accept]
Interesting enough, but... well, I've banned guns now several times. Its either compulsory gun ownership, conceal and carry laws or forced registration, and as I don't allow guns anyway, this seems a little invalid. Also, in the first option it says that the measure would "reduce crime", but in Spoffin "Crime is totally unknown".
The issues fine, I just really don't think I should have got it.