NationStates Jolt Archive

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14567367&postcount=17

And now we know. NSG: pro-pedophilia.

For god's sake, the man is a child molester! He should consider himself lucky that he isn't still in jail or hasn't been lynched already.

:rolleyes:

Trolling.

Edit: And others:

You can't debate a liberal. It's always "political correctness" this and "save the terrorists" that.

Trolling and...

Boy, you just love those terrorists, don't you? Were you one of those guys who partied on 9/11?

...flamebaiting.

And now we know. NSG: pro-pedophilia.

For god's sake, the man is a child molester! He should consider himself lucky that he isn't still in jail or hasn't been lynched already.

Legitimate statement of opinion.


You can't debate a liberal. It's always "political correctness" this and "save the terrorists" that.

VERY legitimate statement of opinion.


Boy, you just love those terrorists, don't you? Were you one of those guys who partied on 9/11?

Legitimate question.

Legitimate question.
I fail to see how this:

Boy, you just love those terrorists, don't you? Were you one of those guys who partied on 9/11?

is a legitimate question in response to this:

Because the British government is attempting to treat him in a way that is against British law; the law that the government must abide by.

They're also attempting to treat him in what I believe is an immoral manner; this is one of those occasions where law and morality agree.

However, I couldn't say if FO is genuinely trolling, or simply believes his (farcical) statements. I'm certainly not offended, if that makes any difference to the ruling.

The above posts merely give myself and others a further chance to show the gaping holes in his 'arguments'.

VERY legitimate statement of opinion.



Legitimate question.




You can't debate a conservative. It's always "guns" this and "kill the muslims" that.


Boy, you just love those warcrimes, don't you? Were you one of those guys who masterbated to waterboarding videos?

Still legit? Or is it only legit when its against dirty liberals, but it becomes slanderous trolling against your side?

Dont bother answering NM. We all know you have a double standard.
I would suggest this is not the place for such statements.

I would suggest this is not the place for such statements.

Removed. However my point remains. I recall NM and Co reporting a poster to the mods because he kept saying NM masterbated to war crime footage, and a warning was issued. Yet, apperantly, saying a fellow poster partyed after 9/11 is a legit question.

isn't New Mitanni the reincarnation of ghost?

but the internet is full of pedophiles :confused:

Keep a lid on it folks. In fact, there is no room for petty bickering here. I'll sort it out and to the rest, there's no reason to get your knickers in a bunch. Chill. It will be addressed.

EDIT: So it seems he's been banned before and in deep shit with the mods for similar behaviour. The previous 24 hour ban doesn't appear to have helped, so I'm upping the ante to 72 hours. I'm feeling nice. This time out is more than reasonable. The number of infractions would have added up to a ban, so let's avoid all that extra pesky paperwork and get out the big guns.