Not PG-13.
The Parkus Empire
24-02-2009, 17:35
I respectfully request that a moderator evaluate whether or not this thread is appropriate:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=584623
Please consider what is it is leading to:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14544551&postcount=13
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14544722&postcount=80
Cabra West
24-02-2009, 17:38
If I remember correctly, this has previously been ruled as ok. Mind you, the last ruling on a sex-related thread that I know off was about a year ago, so things might have tightened up... though I don't hope so.
The Parkus Empire
24-02-2009, 17:41
If I remember correctly, this has previously been ruled as ok. Mind you, the last ruling on a sex-related thread that I know off was about a year ago, so things might have tightened up... though I don't hope so.
A sex-related thread is one thing, but the posts in that one are explicit to an unprecedented degree, even for NSG. That type of detail would surely give a film an "R" rating.
Cabra West
24-02-2009, 17:44
A sex-related thread is one thing, but the posts in that one are explicit to an unprecedented degree, even for NSG. That type of detail would surely give a film an "R" rating.
What, mentioning the word "blowjob"? I very much doubt it.
I think the ruling back then was that being explicit inside threads is ok, although it needs to be toned down for the titles.
The Parkus Empire
24-02-2009, 17:49
What, mentioning the word "blowjob"? I very much doubt it.
"My goal is to get his balls in my mouth instead of just his full shaft."
That is beyond the pale.
Poliwanacraca
24-02-2009, 18:09
"My goal is to get his balls in my mouth instead of just his full shaft."
That is beyond the pale.
I am very much confused by the idea that discussing blowjobs is okay, but mentioning male genitalia and/or mouths while doing so is not. What exactly is your objection to that post? :confused:
The Parkus Empire
24-02-2009, 18:15
I am very much confused by the idea that discussing blowjobs is okay, but mentioning male genitalia and/or mouths while doing so is not. What exactly is your objection to that post? :confused:
One is beyond PG-13, one is not; what else is there to it? I do not run the MPAA, I do not make the rules of NSG. Do not ask me to try to determine to construction of the morals and hypocrisy of society.
I would also like the mods to consider what this thread is leading to:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14545911&postcount=161
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14545981&postcount=167
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14545992&postcount=169
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14546005&postcount=173
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14546023&postcount=178
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14546040&postcount=182
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14546046&postcount=184
Yes, it's been explicit. I like to think it's also been informative.
I am very much confused by the idea that discussing blowjobs is okay, but mentioning male genitalia and/or mouths while doing so is not. What exactly is your objection to that post? :confused:
euphamisms my dear. "next time, I want to try and fit the walnuts in my mouth, not just the banana".
See, now all safe for children.
Sgt Toomey
24-02-2009, 18:36
So, I shouldn't even post my thread about whether its possible to hickey the clitoris, then.
Kryozerkia
24-02-2009, 20:08
I'm going to leave it open, but with a warning in the OP and a rating in the title.
NSFW = not safe for work (I had my acronym wrong, but you get the right idea).
Smunkeeville
25-02-2009, 01:39
euphamisms my dear. "next time, I want to try and fit the walnuts in my mouth, not just the banana".
See, now all safe for children.
Only if they don't have any food allergies.
euphamisms my dear. "next time, I want to try and fit the walnuts in my mouth, not just the banana".
See, now all safe for children.
"Mommy, why would someone want to put walnuts and bananas into their mouths?" :D