NationStates Jolt Archive


Flaming

Neo Art
19-02-2009, 06:42
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14527927&postcount=25

Mods only please
Ardchoille
19-02-2009, 07:31
Addressed. (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14528035&postcount=63)
Wilgrove
19-02-2009, 07:35
Can y'all go ahead and lock it please, thank you very much.
Wilgrove
19-02-2009, 07:38
and it goes on. (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14528054&postcount=65)
Ardchoille
19-02-2009, 08:03
Thread closed. I accept Neo Art's explanation that his most recent post -- the one in which he did exactly what I warned him against doing -- was made while I was posting mine.

I do not accept that a person who is a regular on NS should need a moderator to point out how objectionable his previous posts were,

The OSRS puts it well: Erudite slams while maintaining a veneer of politeness can also be considered flaming.
And, even more aptly, Flamebait: Posts that are made with the aim of angering someone indirectly. Not outright flame, but still liable to bring angry replies. Flame baiting is a far more subtle and covert action; it is an underhanded tactic ..."

Yeah. Underhanded. Not one of your best moments, NA.
Smunkeeville
19-02-2009, 17:28
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/member.php?u=1071188

Is Wilgrove's sig okay? It offends me greatly but I'm unsure if it's flamebait or if I need to grow a thicker skin.

Also, it misrepresents me as I've never claimed to be a lawyer.
Neo Art
19-02-2009, 17:36
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/member.php?u=1071188

Is Wilgrove's sig okay? It offends me greatly but I'm unsure if it's flamebait or if I need to grow a thicker skin.

Also, it misrepresents me as I've never claimed to be a lawyer.

I'll also add that, as a sig, it falls into the issue of not allowing a direct response.
Kryozerkia
19-02-2009, 18:05
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/member.php?u=1071188

Is Wilgrove's sig okay? It offends me greatly but I'm unsure if it's flamebait or if I need to grow a thicker skin.

Also, it misrepresents me as I've never claimed to be a lawyer.

You best opt for the latter on this.

Yes, it may not 'represent' you, as you never claimed to be a lawyer, but it appears to be a sarcastic remark.

I'll also add that, as a sig, it falls into the issue of not allowing a direct response.

It also contains a clickable link to the post. Thus, one can reply to it in the originating thread.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?p=14527978#post14527978

I suggest that Smunk goes and replies. The thread is still active; a current thread.
Neo Art
19-02-2009, 18:09
I suggest that Smunk goes and replies. The thread is still active; a current thread.

actually...that thread has been locked, at author's request.
The Cat-Tribe
19-02-2009, 20:00
I'll also add that, as a sig, it falls into the issue of not allowing a direct response.

Without opining on this particular signature, I thought sigs were somewhat like flags, about which the FAQ says:

You betcha. In fact, we're much stricter on nation flags than we are on forum posts, because they're not open for challenge and debate. If you want to make a political point, don't use your flag -- use the forum, where other people have a right of reply.

Especially since threads devoted to rebutting a particular poster's sig are verboten, I'm not clear on how one can challenge and debate a sig's content.
Kryozerkia
19-02-2009, 20:02
actually...that thread has been locked, at author's request.

Blah, I hadn't noticed. Stupid cold... making me disoriented.
Smunkeeville
19-02-2009, 21:20
Without opining on this particular signature, I thought sigs were somewhat like flags, about which the FAQ says:

You betcha. In fact, we're much stricter on nation flags than we are on forum posts, because they're not open for challenge and debate. If you want to make a political point, don't use your flag -- use the forum, where other people have a right of reply.

Especially since threads devoted to rebutting a particular poster's sig are verboten, I'm not clear on how one can challenge and debate a sig's content.
Exactly.

Also, TCT and Neo Art I don't have anything against lawyers, I just don't want people to think I actually claimed to be one.......I have a real problem with people who claim to be lawyers on the internet......you know since most of them aren't.
The Cat-Tribe
20-02-2009, 17:04
Exactly.

Also, TCT and Neo Art I don't have anything against lawyers, I just don't want people to think I actually claimed to be one.......I have a real problem with people who claim to be lawyers on the internet......you know since most of them aren't.

*sniff*

I am deeply hurt and offended that you would want to deny you are a lawyer, just because you are not a lawyer. Us lawyers have feelings, you know!!

*waits for Smunkee to be punished for blasphemy*

**cries self to sleep**