Gauthier
04-12-2008, 19:43
It's starting to simmer and get personal on the Polar Bear Thread:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14274291&postcount=318
Lick my ass.
Sorry, didn't want you to feel left out.
False. I'm saying that I'm willing to side with IQ for reasons I already gave. I also stated that cooperation between the two systems would be preferable, because ultimately both sides need to be convinced. My main gist has been that no one here has the expertise or experience to say SHIT about IQ, and I've given many examples of how it would be impossible to present IQ to you within the scope of this discussion because of the lack of intellectual infrastructure (unlike Western paradigms, which we have been exposed to since infancy).
All I've been trying to do is point out the massive flaws in declaring IQ to be wrong, full stop, without any understanding of what IQ is. My position isn't predicated on polar bears, it's couched in a wider ideological framework that applies to all clashes between aboriginal and non-aboriginal paradigms. You can stand there on the outside, taking no position other than 'you're not playing nice'...you're welcome to it. But frankly, this thread would have just been a 'giggle, look at how dumb those eskimos are' if some of us hadn't decided to challenge the basic assumption that traditional knowledge is primitive and wrong.
And seriously, fuck off with the whole 'you're so mean Sinuhue'. It's tiring. Yes. I am. We all know it. Move on.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14274291&postcount=318
Lick my ass.
Sorry, didn't want you to feel left out.
False. I'm saying that I'm willing to side with IQ for reasons I already gave. I also stated that cooperation between the two systems would be preferable, because ultimately both sides need to be convinced. My main gist has been that no one here has the expertise or experience to say SHIT about IQ, and I've given many examples of how it would be impossible to present IQ to you within the scope of this discussion because of the lack of intellectual infrastructure (unlike Western paradigms, which we have been exposed to since infancy).
All I've been trying to do is point out the massive flaws in declaring IQ to be wrong, full stop, without any understanding of what IQ is. My position isn't predicated on polar bears, it's couched in a wider ideological framework that applies to all clashes between aboriginal and non-aboriginal paradigms. You can stand there on the outside, taking no position other than 'you're not playing nice'...you're welcome to it. But frankly, this thread would have just been a 'giggle, look at how dumb those eskimos are' if some of us hadn't decided to challenge the basic assumption that traditional knowledge is primitive and wrong.
And seriously, fuck off with the whole 'you're so mean Sinuhue'. It's tiring. Yes. I am. We all know it. Move on.