NationStates Jolt Archive

I resent the fact that the moderators would stand by the lies and twisted words of two liars and rename a portion of the thread "South Lizasauria's thread" It implies that the "SL is trying to make the whole thread about him and that he represents the entire group of self pitying Christians on NSG" BS is true which of course it isn't.

As I mentioned in my rebuttles I do not represent the Christian populace here, furthermore I do not represent the victim players, I am not a victim player and most importantly as I questioned the OP's motives the two I argued with attempted to sneakily shift the discussion to me by making false claims that I am and represent all Christian victim players here and that I made the thread selfishly about me when in fact they twisted my assertion into a false discussion about me then claimed I made the thread selfishly about me after wards.

I am shocked that you are standing by their lies and attacks. Maybe if the thread was called something like "a question of posting motives" or "how biased is NSG against Christians". The copy thread and title implies that I am a selfish narcissistic church leader that represents ALL NSG Christians that pulls a pity party whenever the opportunity presents itself.

It was off-topic. You attempted to make the thread about Christians being persecuted rather than discussing the fact that the OP was being kept awake by a badly-thought-out permit. That discussion was shunted off into its own thread so that people could continue the discussion they had begun, and so that anyone interested in continuing to talk with you about your perception that the forum was simply slamming Christians would have a place to discuss it without either group having to shout over each other.

I named it South Lizasauria's thread because it was your discussion, as nearly half the original thread was being used to answer your claims that those who disagreed with you were against Christians. It also seemed rather a neutral title to me given that it places absolutely no value judgment whatsoever on the content therein.

Whatever implications you see of it being an indictment, persecution, or personal attack, frankly, is not there. It simply did not belong in the original thread.

I think the point is that it wasn't indicated clearly enough that it was a thread split, which kind of made SL seem more of a jackass then he was actually being.

I think the point is that it wasn't indicated clearly enough that it was a thread split, which kind of made SL seem more of a jackass then he was actually being.

For my part I simply assumed it was another of his spam threads and he'd run out of witty titles. Mustn't say it.

Me too, Khadgar. To avoid confusion I've added "thread split" to the (totally accurate) title and provided a link to the original in the first post.

Seems to me that a person whose topic-wrenching posts cause a thread split has little cause to complain when the only penalty he suffers is a title he dislikes.

SL, there's a reason Khadgar and I made the assumption we did. You do indeed have a history of spammy threads. Please take our befuddlement as a heads-up to start trying to turn that perception around.