NationStates Jolt Archive

Heikoku is deliberately flamebaiting me on my thread about electoral process in the primaries.


Furthermore, you have not answered my prior comment about the votes.
I have. You have no point. The hag wanted caucus states not to be counted, the hag wanted to pretend the results in Florida and Michigan would be the same were they actual elections, the hag moved goalposts, whined and played the victim ALL THE TIME, and the hag finally accepted her slow political demise, not to run again due to being too old by the time Obama leaves office.

As for your rage, it's your problem, not mine, if you get angry over me calling the hag "the hag".


http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?p=13746719&posted=1#post13746719

Now, I am only requesting a caution. I do not want a Moderator to ban Heikoku either temporarily or permanently. I do, however, request that a Moderator have a word with him and urge him to be just a little less incendiary when he's speaking to me and others that he does not agree with.

Regards,
Shal

1- I have called her "the hag" way before you claimed you go into a "fit of rage".

2- Flamebaiting is WAY beyond calling Hillary a hag after the way she's behaved.

3- You've been calling me elitist, sexist, and every name under the sun in the last weeks.

4- You have to actually make a case that I'm flamebaiting you.

We will allow the Moderator to decide whether or not I am jumping the gun.

Heikoku is deliberately flamebaiting me on my thread about electoral process in the primaries.



http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?p=13746719&posted=1#post13746719

Now, I am only requesting a caution. I do not want a Moderator to ban Heikoku either temporarily or permanently. I do, however, request that a Moderator have a word with him and urge him to be just a little less incendiary when he's speaking to me and others that he does not agree with.

Regards,
Shal

1- I have called her "the hag" way before you claimed you go into a "fit of rage". Indeed, only now it came up.

2- Flamebaiting is WAY beyond calling Hillary a hag after the way she's behaved.

3- You've been calling me elitist, sexist, and every name under the sun in the last few weeks.

4- You have to actually make a case that I'm flamebaiting you.

5- I actually made sure I COULD call her a hag, as opposed to the other name I asked another mod about.

Oh GREAT! The time warp effect is back! :headbang:

Here's an idea: How about both of you sit down and shut up. You both have been relentless in the race to be more of an asshole. Currently, any political thread devolves into the two of you bitching and moaning at each other. Guess what? That's not debate. The threshold for debate isn't high in NSG, and yet you two continue to dig deeper, looking for God damn China. I, for one, am tired of you two. Neither o f you will back down because you're so blockheaded in your own unique way.

Evens rams get tired after a while. Give it a rest, I implore you.

Eh. You're probably correct in the sense that my complaint serves no purpose. It will not change how he speaks to me, and short of asking for him to be banned (something I resolutely object to), there's not much else I can do.

Complaint withdrawn by sender.

Eh. You're probably correct in the sense that my complaint serves no purpose. It will not change how he speaks to me, and short of asking for him to be banned (something I resolutely object to), there's not much else I can do.

Complaint withdrawn by sender.

Don't forget your side of the assholery. You choose to respond when you know you aren't winning.

Don't forget your side of the assholery. You choose to respond when you know you aren't winning.

I am not being an asshole.

I am not being an asshole.

Both you and Haiku have both dished out flaming and flamebating. What you have been doing borders on trolling. Saying the same thing over and over again, while acting like a victim, does not work. I believe the Mods will look at the totality of both of your posts to make a fair decision. You are not a victim and neither is Hillary.

Both you and Haiku have both dished out flaming and flamebating. What you have been doing borders on trolling. Saying the same thing over and over again, while acting like a victim, does not work. I believe the Mods will look at the totality of both of your posts to make a fair decision. You are not a victim and neither is Hillary.

I do submit that no, I didn't flamebait. Heck, I only called the woman a hag, some people threw the B-word at her (not without reason) and not one of them is in the mod forum. Nor did I flame, unless Hillary is a poster in this forum.

I do submit that no, I didn't flamebait. Heck, I only called the woman a hag, some people threw the B-word at her (not without reason) and not one of them is in the mod forum. Nor did I flame, unless Hillary is a poster in this forum.

I am not talking about this specific offense. Even I have been responsible for a little heat. We'd all do well to dial it down a notch. Shal can be frustrating because it's the same song over and over again. I have wanted to drench him in liter fluid and use a cigar to set it off at times. I think Shal is more at fault than others. Mods will decide this eventually and we'll play by their rulings.

/not a mod


But in order to make sure that BOTH of you aren't in trouble by the Glorious Mods, I would suggest ignoring each other. You two seem to have an on going problem, and from what I have seen here on NS in the past, it only leads to people getting deated, and banned. You two can avoid each other easily. Just click ignore, and go about your way.

I propose the mods experiment with this one and maybe switch their accounts or set up that post review system noobs have only the other one has to approve their posts instead of the mod nobody ever sees

all I'm really asking for is a little tyranny :(

I propose the mods experiment with this one and maybe switch their accounts or set up that post review system noobs have only the other one has to approve their posts instead of the mod nobody ever sees

all I'm really asking for is a little tyranny :(

That would SO not work well...

I don't have time to deal with this now, but that's quite enough chatter.

It appears that there is still a mod request here, and someone will deal with it soon enough. For now, everybody else just shut up.

Wait... one person calls (I assume) Clinton "the hag" and the other person gets all upset about it. That's the core of the complaint? Seriously?

With my due apologies for posting in this thread in case it's frowned upon (but I don't think it is, as I'm the other part in the complaint, and the thread would be closed otherwise):

Yup.

And that after Shalrirochia doing everything to aggravate anyone that disagreed with him, including but not limited to name-calling, victim-playing, and so on. I didn't go to moderation due to this before, but, given what he went to moderation over, I am considering now. Shalrirochia has been playing victim for about a month now, over people disagreeing with him about Clinton and Obama, both in the defunct Obama vs. Clinton thread and in others. He has also called me and others elitist and other names several times. Do I have a case for a complaint? Can I do it in this thread or should I make another one? Should I use specific links or could you just check on the threads?

Typically you'd just keep it in this thread, and yes links are always helpful, but maybe you guys should just avoid one another? :/

NOT A MOD!
UNOFFICIAL OPINION!

Everybody's told you, Shalrirorchia and Heikoku, to stay away from each other. I can't think why you seem to need mods to say exactly the same thing, but since I've got my half-hour on the computer now, let me add my voice to Fris's and Hack's ...

Shalrirorchia and Heikoku 2, STAY AWAY FROM EACH OTHER.

To be specific, Shalrirorchia, stop over-reacting when your arguments are criticised. Heikoku, stop doing your best to make him over-react. Both of you, stop the personal comments.

As there doesn't seem to be a great deal else to say, iLock.