NationStates Jolt Archive

I stumbled across this (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13718340&postcount=11) while the forums were downish. Seems like approving of mass murder to me, in particular the part that's "a shame."

EDIT: MODS ONLY PLEASE.

It's called class warfare scumbag, it's the reason slime like you will be lined up against a wall after the Revolution.

I believe Andaras' posts are intended as parody.

It's called class warfare scumbag, it's the reason slime like you will be lined up against a wall after the Revolution.
Well, now. Considering the attention this is garnering, I'm going to ask for MODS ONLY from here on.

It's called class warfare scumbag, it's the reason slime like you will be lined up against a wall after the Revolution.

It's called flaming, and quite honestly you're out of line.

Take a two day vacation.

It's called flaming, and quite honestly you're out of line.

Take a two day vacation.

Yes, I see that you have ruled, but in the interests of transparency I would like to ask what Andaras was banned FOR.

Here is the content of Andaras's post (it survived the ruling, so it's OK to post it in-thread):
(Quoted)Tarasovka: As a Russian anti-communist monarchist
Andaras: Talk about stupidity, how the hell can you be a Russian monarchist, who the hell are you going to put on the throne? I guess that speaks volumes about the intelligence of the Russian far-right, it's a shame comrade Stalin didn't wipe you all out, your like parasites.

That isn't flaming, surely? Andaras attacks Tarasovka as a monarchist, not personally.

And "Comrade Stalin" is so long dead it can't possibly be taken as a threat against a person or class of people.


I am in no doubt that "flaming in moderation" is the reason for this two-day ban. But I think that should be said explicitly, not just "you're out of line."

Justice must be seen to be done. Please be specific about Andaras's offence.

EDIT: MODS ONLY PLEASE.

Yes, I see that you have ruled, but in the interests of transparency I would like to ask what Andaras was banned FOR.

Here is the content of Andaras's post (it survived the ruling, so it's OK to post it in-thread):
(Quoted)Tarasovka: As a Russian anti-communist monarchist
Andaras: Talk about stupidity, how the hell can you be a Russian monarchist, who the hell are you going to put on the throne? I guess that speaks volumes about the intelligence of the Russian far-right, it's a shame comrade Stalin didn't wipe you all out, your like parasites.

That isn't flaming, surely? Andaras attacks Tarasovka as a monarchist, not personally.

And "Comrade Stalin" is so long dead it can't possibly be taken as a threat against a person or class of people.


I am in no doubt that "flaming in moderation" is the reason for this two-day ban. But I think that should be said explicitly, not just "you're out of line."

Justice must be seen to be done. Please be specific about Andaras's offence.

How is saying someone deserves to die not a flame? Even if it is because the person is a monarchist, that doesn't justify saying someone deserves to die in any way at all.

Yes, I see that you have ruled, but in the interests of transparency I would like to ask what Andaras was banned FOR.

Here is the content of Andaras's post (it survived the ruling, so it's OK to post it in-thread):
(Quoted)Tarasovka: As a Russian anti-communist monarchist
Andaras: Talk about stupidity, how the hell can you be a Russian monarchist, who the hell are you going to put on the throne? I guess that speaks volumes about the intelligence of the Russian far-right, it's a shame comrade Stalin didn't wipe you all out, your like parasites.

That isn't flaming, surely? Andaras attacks Tarasovka as a monarchist, not personally.

And "Comrade Stalin" is so long dead it can't possibly be taken as a threat against a person or class of people.


I am in no doubt that "flaming in moderation" is the reason for this two-day ban. But I think that should be said explicitly, not just "you're out of line."

Justice must be seen to be done. Please be specific about Andaras's offence.

EDIT: MODS ONLY PLEASE.

Nobel Hobos, you will notice that I used the quote function. Within the quotation was Andaras calling someone a scumbag. Calling someone a scumbag is flaming.

I should have thought that that was quite transparent enough and quite easy enough to follow.

Nobel Hobos, you will notice that I used the quote function. Within the quotation was Andaras calling someone a scumbag. Calling someone a scumbag is flaming.

I should have thought that that was quite transparent enough and quite easy enough to follow.

Has there been a ruling on the initial complaint yet?

Nobel Hobos, you will notice that I used the quote function. Within the quotation was Andaras calling someone a scumbag. Calling someone a scumbag is flaming.

OK. Andaras got a two day ban for the comment you quoted. Got it.

I should have thought that that was quite transparent enough and quite easy enough to follow.

I was confused by the fact that Andaras's flame in this thread began with the phrase "It's called ..." and your ruling began with the same phrase. That implies you are talking about the same thing he was talking about ... the post in the "Indiana Jones ..." thread.

Surely you can see how that is confusing ?

===========

Has there been a ruling on the initial complaint yet?

^^^ This.