Flame
Your masturbatory Marxists semantics are irrelevant to the substance of the discussion.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=550896
Inflammatory flamebait. Not to mention the fact that his entire thread is a giant troll and a bait.
Krytenia
02-03-2008, 09:03
I also bring to the Moderators attention, posts 13-20 in the same thread.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13494684&postcount=20
More of the same.
Actually I elaborated on my claims about Tongass and explained my claims, while the slanders against me were complete random trolling to avoid answering my statement in full.
Krytenia
02-03-2008, 09:23
Actually I elaborated on my claims about Tongass and explained my claims, while the slanders against me were complete random trolling to avoid answering my statement in full.
I wasn't implying anything; just bringing to attention that posts 13-20, as well as the one you indicated, should be looked at as well.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=550896
Inflammatory flamebait. Not to mention the fact that his entire thread is a giant troll and a bait.
Starting a thread to discuss the relevance of a popular political philosophy to a present reality based on an argument that I don't believe had yet been made on the forum is in no way making a "troll" or "bait" thread.
The semantics of yours I was criticizing in the quoted text were a musing of which Marxist hate-term I should be labeled with, and were not relevant to the discussion. If you want to criticize me for pointing that out, that's fine, but I don't think it constitutes a "flame" or anything that the moderators should lose any sleep over.
Actually I elaborated on my claims about Tongass and explained my claims,No you didn't. You merely layered on irrelevant accusations. Which is fine - I'm not complaining - it's just a waste of screen IMO.
Ardchoille
02-03-2008, 12:38
I don't see the title or the thread itself as trolling or baiting, Andaras. The "yet another commie thread" is in line with the NSG habit of making thread titles to grab attention, and the subject "Marxism is obsolete" is simply a thesis open to comment.
Maybe the line you quoted from Tongass could be seen as mild flamebait, but it's addressed to your style of argument, which seems to me fair enough in a discussion.
If you both settle down, deal with each other's points and forgo the personal observations (such as "trolling"), you may have a decent debate instead of an exchange of slogans.
Aggicificicerous, however, is flaming, and should check his TGs.