Jaredcohenia
22-12-2007, 21:26
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=545899
Post #3 by Beatus
Post #4 by Greston
Post #11 by Kahanistan
Post #15 by Omigodtheykilledkenny
Omigodtheykilledkenny
23-12-2007, 00:18
I deleted my post, sorry about that.
No endorse
23-12-2007, 03:38
I don't know about anyone else, and I'm not sure what all has caused this little OOC lovefest, but I'm not the hugest fan of reading Greston's religious rantings and ravings in what could be a perfectly harmless Christmas ball thread.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13314694&postcount=15
I mean, I can understand that being VERY emphatic IC, but a subsequent post:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13314721&postcount=17
makes believing that that was even remotely IC difficult for me. I don't know (and frankly don't care) about what might have happened previously, but it's junking up that thread with OOC religion garbage.
Would a mod please review this?
Ardchoille
23-12-2007, 03:55
Merged yours with the OP's, No endorse. Gimme a minute to sort it out, plstks.
No endorse
23-12-2007, 04:04
no probs, anything for relief from OOC posts :)
Ardchoille
23-12-2007, 05:51
Hokay. The cast, in approximate order of appearance:
Jaredcohenia, you might want to edit your first post again so it's clearly back to no entry without TG. You'll note when you do that I've already helpfully edited out "demand".
Greston may be putting you on ignore:
I don't care what people like you [The Warmaster] and Jaredcohenia think when I post something, because I don't care to RP with you and plan on not RPing with for my entire Nation States life.
Even if he doesn't, I trust you'll respect his opinion and not enter his threads without direct invitation.
I'm sorry about the unsightly "post deleted by" lines, but I'm leaving them in so the posts can be reviewed if necessary.
You'll note I've edited out some IC posts, such as Kahanistan's and the first one by Greston that No endorse quoted. I did so because I assume, from your reaction, that they hadn't TGd you for entry.
The Beatus, it may surprise you to know that a string of meaningless symbols can still be seen as flaming. Now you know it, don't do it.
You also encouraged Greston in his pursuit of Jaredcohenia. Don't do that, either.
Holy Paradise, The Warmaster and Automagfreek, thanks for your sensible advice to Greston, which said, in summary, that Jaredcohenia's remarks were IC and should be responded to IC.
Greston: The response "mine were IC too" doesn't cut it. You flamed Jaredcohen in this thread (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=545672&page=2), got an official warning (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13304543&postcount=12) from HotRodia on December 19, muttered about that OOC-ly, and then made clear yesterday (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13312568&postcount=29) that you were still pursuing the subject by posting in Jaredcohen's thread. You may want to argue that the actual content of your posts isn't flaming, but your declared reason for making them is.
You are not allowed to pursue personal feuds across threads. If you wish to continue RPing, you must learn to separate IC views from the poster's OOC self. Jaredcohenia's nation mocks Christianity; your nation despises his form of Judaism; fine. You, the poster, attack him, the poster; flame.
I don't like forumbanning someone in the middle of an RP, but I'm afraid your nation's guests will simply have to chat among themselves for 24 hours while you, the poster, think this point over.