Trolling the left, apparently
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13083677&postcount=34
Frisbeeteria
26-09-2007, 12:48
Disagreeing with the left, apparently. "Not agreeing with you" != "trolling".
Kryozerkia
26-09-2007, 12:53
This doesn't appear to be isolated. This person may indeed seek to provoke. This is from the same thread.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13081127&postcount=3
Here is another post with similar tactics being used.
Even if it's not trolling, he is toeing the line methinks. And modthink says...?
The Most Glorious Hack
26-09-2007, 13:02
"Rude" isn't the same as trolling, either.
Kryozerkia
26-09-2007, 13:36
"Rude" isn't the same as trolling, either.
OK. Better to check first.
Disagreeing with the left, apparently. "Not agreeing with you" != "trolling".
Well the quote Luporum was replying to said " So basically you are a troll" and Luporum said "Only against the left". So the poster admitted to trolling, right?
Frisbeeteria
26-09-2007, 23:10
So the poster admitted to trolling, right?
I'm not such a literalist that I feel I must be bound by what was typed in the heat of anger. I read a large section of the thread, and what I read was not trolling. If you really want me to act on that, I'd be equally obliged to go back and warn the instigator with "troll-baiting".
How about we call it an argument (like pretty much every other political thread in General) and let it go at that?
I'm not such a literalist that I feel I must be bound by what was typed in the heat of anger. I read a large section of the thread, and what I read was not trolling. If you really want me to act on that, I'd be equally obliged to go back and warn the instigator with "troll-baiting".
How about we call it an argument (like pretty much every other political thread in General) and let it go at that?
No, thats fine. I was just wondering, since he admitted to it. But what ever you guys rule, I am fine with. Good work.