NationStates Jolt Archive

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12629314&postcount=59

I don't know if I should call this Flameing or a Noob flash back. Can one of you cheek it out?

ITs not a flame or noob backlash. Its an IC post.

EDIT: Plus that poster is known to post ICly like that. If you ever seen one of his IC posts you will see this is rather normal for him.

Hataria one of the things you fail to understand is the difference between in character and out of character. Your posts are a very dangerous mix of the two which is the end result of all these problems.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12629314&postcount=59

I don't know if I should call this Flameing or a Noob flash back. Can one of you cheek it out?
No that would be Toc telling your government to fuck off ICly.
ZacK: Its a she:p

*Sigh*

Are you ever going to understand the difference between IC and OOC? Because that is an In-character post that has nothing, absolute zero to do with you out of character. I really don't know of I can make that any more clear.

Hataria; it is an IC post. She didn't make demands, she just insulted your government. Proper protocol would be to respond in kind and do the usual saber rattling, but seeing as your sabre was destroyed at the hands of a grand-slam bomb, a nasty reply back will have to suffice.

that is an In-character post that has nothing, absolute zero to do with you out of character.

I gotta say that I looked over the thread, and it appears to be chock full of players using the convention of "In character" to slam Hataria the player, not Hataria the nation. Tocrowkia, your recent post history is heavily comprised with anti-Hatarian posts posted in anti-Hataria threads. As it currently stands, you appear to be brushing heavily against the IC/OOC line of flaming.

If you don't want to play with him, don't play with him. It's clear he doesn't want to play with you. Find yourself another battle for your crusades.


As for you, Hataria, I'm not even going to consider policing your threads anymore. In business terms, you're "not adding value" to the game of NationStates. We're not going to tolerate your threats to seek out new players and "warn them about the cyberbullies". Our tolerance has exceeded its limits.

End transmission.

As for you, Hataria, I'm not even going to consider policing your threads anymore. In business terms, you're "not adding value" to the game of NationStates. We're not going to tolerate your threats to seek out new players and "warn them about the cyberbullies". Our tolerance has exceeded its limits.

End transmission.

:Slow Clap:

As for you, Hataria, I'm not even going to consider policing your threads anymore. In business terms, you're "not adding value" to the game of NationStates. We're not going to tolerate your threats to seek out new players and "warn them about the cyberbullies". Our tolerance has exceeded its limits.

End transmission.

Hands down to the NS moderation. Thank you so very much for this awesome decision.

I gotta say that I looked over the thread, and it appears to be chock full of players using the convention of "In character" to slam Hataria the player, not Hataria the nation. Tocrowkia, your recent post history is heavily comprised with anti-Hatarian posts posted in anti-Hataria threads. As it currently stands, you appear to be brushing heavily against the IC/OOC line of flaming.

If you don't want to play with him, don't play with him. It's clear he doesn't want to play with you. Find yourself another battle for your crusades.



Huh? Where? Point me to where I've insulted Hataria in a way that could be considered anything but pure RPing. I called for genocide of his people yes, but how is that any different from the dozen or so similar threads floating around II?

You can look, but you won't find any. Regardless, I know this is a futile arguement, so yeah...I accept your decision, respect it and all that.

Dalai Llama's Goat's Beard's Lice's Toe...

Save us all.