NationStates Jolt Archive


Trolling/baiting

Fassigen
04-05-2007, 18:05
http://forums3.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12609007&postcount=30
http://forums3.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12609057&postcount=34
http://forums3.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12609127&postcount=45
http://forums3.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12609161&postcount=53
http://forums3.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12609202&postcount=65

OK, "you masturbate/wank/jerk off!" once, perhaps twice, would IMO be very lame attempts at puerile flaming, but continuous repetition isn't just unimaginative and still not particularly successful a flame, it's also seemingly trolling and flamebaiting used to launch other attempts at flames.

Mods only, as always, please.
Liuzzo
04-05-2007, 18:13
please review this thread. Cluitchistan seems to have lost his/her grip on reality. The responses are not only juvenile, but they are baiting others to attack. Telling people to use kleenex, vasaline, and to masterbate, etc. is not exactly a thrilling debate.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=525848&page=4

I posted from the third page but it is filled with the same lame nonsense.
Kanabia
04-05-2007, 18:44
I don't take any particular pleasure in dobbing people in, but I did notice these two in another thread:

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12609001&postcount=1553
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12609025&postcount=1555

I might have misinterpreted that one (I didn't watch the clips), but i'll let the mods make of it what they will. Note that earlier in the thread people were asking Cluich to be blunt about their appearance and such; i'm not sure whether or not Terrorist Cakes was one of them.
Cannot think of a name
04-05-2007, 18:47
All of Cluichistan's posts in the media thread were collected here (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=12609238&postcount=79) to attempt to divine his point and/or argument.
Frisbeeteria
04-05-2007, 20:12
I do express opinions, but then you "batshit-insane" lot ignore them.

Let's face it, TPH, you ignore anyone who doesn't agree with you. You're a twat. End of story.Nice try, jackass. Nice to see you resorting to even more absurd arguments. I hope this means that either your arguments will eventually be funny or that you'll just shut the fuck up.

Profit is the motivation for all business. If you've got a problem with that, well, you're just gonna gag on reality then, aren't you? I don't even have to tell you to go suck a whale dick.

You're arguing, if it can even be called that, from a whiny-bitch standpoint.

Yes, you have. Commercial, commercial, commercial. Yeah, not getting funny at all. You can shut the fuck up now.

Respectfully,
Sheik Nadnerb bin Cluich
Cluichstani Ambassador to the UN

When I add these two (one from later in the thread, and one from the UN, I think it's time that the Cluichstani elect themselves a new ambassador. Cluich, with whatever puppet you read this, we've bent over backwards to try to be fair and let you live, but you pushed too far once again.

The nation of Cluichstan has been deleted for continuous streams of flaming and abuse, both IC and OOC, despite multiple warnings and opportunities for improvement. No more final, Final, FINAL warnings. Start over.
Cluichstani UN Mission
07-05-2007, 17:53
Sorry to disappoint you, Fass, but I'm still here. However, well done on scoring the deletion. Most impressive, though it took you long enough. Almost a year now, eh? Yeesh. I've gotta give props to your perseverence, though, mate. That's some very nice work.
Frisbeeteria
07-05-2007, 20:46
However, well done on scoring the deletion.

FWIW, I was planning on deleting you after your 'IC' tirade in UN anyway. The only thing stopping me was being at the office and wanting to run it by a couple other mods first. Once I saw this thread, it was a no-brainer.

If your behavior is because you're quitting smoking, then you better take a posting break for a while. Your continued attitude towards Fass in this thread does not bode well for the continued health of your other puppets. Remember, repeat offenders have shorter leashes. Back off or back away, your choice.
Cluichstani UN Mission
08-05-2007, 16:38
FWIW, I was planning on deleting you after your 'IC' tirade in UN anyway.

That was IC. And if that one post was cause for deletion, well, shit, there are quite a few others in the UN who've earned a DEAT as well.

If your behavior is because you're quitting smoking, then you better take a posting break for a while.

I'll just take a break from General, since that's where the "he doesn't agree with me, so I'll flame him" lot resides. Funny how it's only my responses to attacks that get noticed.

Oh, wait...that's cuz I don't go running to the mods everytime someone insults me.

Your continued attitude towards Fass in this thread does not bode well for the continued health of your other puppets.

Fass, as I already noted in this thread, has been calling me out in this forum for nearly a year for even the slightest of transgressions. Is he somehow a protected player, immune to criticism?

Remember, repeat offenders have shorter leashes. Back off or back away, your choice.

If my choice is backing off or backing away from the dogpile that comes from disagreeing with people on NSG (hmmm...what happened to "mods only" in this thread, eh?), I choose neither.
Frisbeeteria
08-05-2007, 17:37
That was IC. And if that one post was cause for deletion, well, shit, there are quite a few others in the UN who've earned a DEAT as well.
The so-called "in-character" abuse that gets used in UN has often gotten so bad that Hack keeps having to re-stick this thread (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=450344). You're one of the principal offenders, and you've been specifically warned in the past that your IC comments are being read as OOC by infrequent players who get slammed in various threads and don't come back. Don't even start with a "that's their problem" defense. It's your problem, and you've made it our problem.

I'll just take a break from General, since that's where the "he doesn't agree with me, so I'll flame him" lot resides. Funny how it's only my responses to attacks that get noticed.
Funny how lots of players manage to respond without resorting to counter-flaming. Funny how they tend to keep their nations alive, while the other counter-flamers get banned and deleted with clock-like regularity.

Fass, as I already noted in this thread, has been calling me out in this forum for nearly a year for even the slightest of transgressions. Is he somehow a protected player, immune to criticism?
Fass has lost more than one nation due to his behavior, yet he's still allowed to play. As are you. Are you somehow immune to the same rules that apply to him and everyone else?

If my choice is backing off or backing away from the dogpile that comes from disagreeing with people on NSG (hmmm...what happened to "mods only" in this thread, eh?), I choose neither.
Sounds like a prescription for additional losses. You've been notified about our expectations. You're aware of the rules. You've chosen to push the limits of acceptable behavior. Don't come whining to us when the consequences bite you on the ass.
Cluichstani UN Mission
08-05-2007, 17:59
The so-called "in-character" abuse that gets used in UN has often gotten so bad that Hack keeps having to re-stick this thread (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=450344). You're one of the principal offenders, and you've been specifically warned in the past that your IC comments are being read as OOC by infrequent players who get slammed in various threads and don't come back. Don't even start with a "that's their problem" defense. It's your problem, and you've made it our problem.

If you actually paid attention, Fris, the thread that Hack keeps re-sticking hasn't been re-stuck due to my posts.

Funny how lots of players manage to respond without resorting to counter-flaming.

Are you reading the same threads?

Funny how they tend to keep their nations alive, while the other counter-flamers get banned and deleted with clock-like regularity.

Yeah, funny how that works. Starting the flame war is okay, but firing back? EBIL! :rolleyes:

Fass has lost more than one nation due to his behavior, yet he's still allowed to play. As are you. Are you somehow immune to the same rules that apply to him and everyone else?

Apparently not, because he's allowed to continue his sniping. The rules may be the same in word, but they aren't applied the same.

(I'll leave the rest of your post alone, Fris, as it'll only get contentious, and I'd rather not go down that road.)
Frisbeeteria
08-05-2007, 18:51
If you actually paid attention, Fris, the thread that Hack keeps re-sticking hasn't been re-stuck due to my posts.
Having specifically spoken to him on that very subject, the result being a re-stuck thread, I'd have to disagree with you. I don't appreciate being told that as one of the two most active moderators, Forum AND Game, that I don't pay attention to what goes on here.

As for the rest of your responses, you're well into the realm of 'contentious' already. You've been answered, and the fact that you don't agree with the response doesn't change a thing.

Don't make this out to be the "Big Bad Fris is Teh Ebil Corrupt Mod" thread either. You had more than your share of 'final warnings' - in fact, I think you've been Officially Warned by every active moderator except Tsaraine and Erastide. That's FAR in excess of normal allowances granted.

You've been given chances, plenty of them. You chose to ignore them. We're done here.