NationStates Jolt Archive

Bullshit. The mods have already ruled twice that this is legal. Don't try spreading your santorum (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=santorum) here just because you're pissed that your own proposal is on the brink of deletion.Correct.
Hee. Hadn't heard that usage before. How fitting.santorum

The sometimes frothy, usually slimy, amalgam of lubricant, stray fecal matter, and ejaculate that leaks out of the receiving partner's anus after a session of anal intercourse. Named, by popular demand and usage, after legislator Rick Santorum because of his homophobic political statements.

"That move was about as slick as santorum!"santorum

1. That frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the by-product of anal sex.

2. Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA)

As his happy cries subsided, the sweet sticky santorum began dribbling from his distended asshole like melted mocha frappuccino. He told me that he loved me. It was only then that I realized the man I'd sodomized in a Pittsburgh bathouse was none other than Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA). I felt dirty.You know, if I said this to a mod, I'd be forum-banned.

I don't pretend to be popular; in fact, I've pissed off some very influential people. Interestingly enough, I haven't done this by swearing at them; I've done it by saying things they don't like, and saying them in ways they don't like...

"... and upon further reading of Resolution #67, interpreting the word 'is' to mean 'militant breast-feeding moms,' and 'recognizes' to mean 'Incredible Hulk SMASH!!!', it is painfully clear that, interpreting this article's citation of 'individual freedoms' to mean 'giant radioactive mutating squid,' this proposal -- if one reads it upside-down while cross-eyed and glaring at it through a kaleidoscope -- actually commands us to eat our children! Now, Madame Secretary-General, I'd like to amend my statement for the record to include 18 pages of non-germane footnotes. Footnote the first ..."

Shit, is that lady from Community Property ever going to shut the hell up? Jessie thought exasperatingly to herself.Up until now, I've generally let this slide, aside from protesting against the excessive use of expletives by those debating against me (not that there are minors viewing these forums; we're all adults here and there's nothing wrong with us swearing like construction workers here, right?). I've even laughed at some of the satire directed against me, including some that's been pretty barbed.

But at some point, enough is enough – especially when the mods jump in.

I'm not asking that everybody like me; for that matter, I'm not asking that anybody like me. I am asking that – at some point – a line be drawn at the level of abuse hurled my way. I hear mods telling people that they need thicker skin; how thick am I supposed to let mine be?

Surely you don't want me to retaliate in kind – or do you?

I shouldn't have to avoid participation in NSUN debates in order to avoid abuse; I shouldn't have to leave the NSUN and come back with a puppet nobody recognizes, and then suck up to the Antarctian clique, aping the positions and debating style in order to be heard without these sorts of comments. But if that's the way things are meant to go in the United Nations forum, maybe you'd better say that now, so that me and other people like me can avoid wasting time walking into a verbal shooting gallery where the rules of engagement say that – unless you're on the favored side of the debate – you're limited to playing the role of target.

I know I shouldn't laugh at anything in the Moderation forum, but thanks for those quotes.

**disappears**

You know, if I said this to a mod, I'd be forum-banned.

Actually, you would not be, at least by me. It's in bad taste, quite rude even, but not sufficiently rule-breaking to warrant a ban.

The contents of the linked material may well violate the PG-13 rule, though.

I don't pretend to be popular; in fact, I've pissed off some very influential people. Interestingly enough, I haven't done this by swearing at them; I've done it by saying things they don't like, and saying them in ways they don't like...Up until now, I've generally let this slide, aside from protesting against the excessive use of expletives by those debating against me (not that there are minors viewing these forums; we're all adults here and there's nothing wrong with us swearing like construction workers here, right?). I've even laughed at some of the satire directed against me, including some that's been pretty barbed.

I really don't give a damn who you've pissed off, and could not possibly care less about what you think construction workers swear like. That's not really relevant to the discussion of whether the post in question broke a site rule.

But at some point, enough is enough – especially when the mods jump in.

I'm not asking that everybody like me; for that matter, I'm not asking that anybody like me. I am asking that – at some point – a line be drawn at the level of abuse hurled my way. I hear mods telling people that they need thicker skin; how thick am I supposed to let mine be?

Surely you don't want me to retaliate in kind – or do you?

Retaliate in kind all you like as long as you don't break the rules.

I shouldn't have to avoid participation in NSUN debates in order to avoid abuse; I shouldn't have to leave the NSUN and come back with a puppet nobody recognizes, and then suck up to the Antarctian clique, aping the positions and debating style in order to be heard without these sorts of comments. But if that's the way things are meant to go in the United Nations forum, maybe you'd better say that now, so that me and other people like me can avoid wasting time walking into a verbal shooting gallery where the rules of engagement say that – unless you're on the favored side of the debate – you're limited to playing the role of target.

1. I knew exactly who you were, and without using my Mod tools.

2. If you feel the need to suck up to a particular group, that's your problem. I have not once felt the need to do so.

3. If, and this is I think a pretty laughable if, there is a favored side of the debate, that's of little concern to me as a Mod. Talk to the community about it if you don't like it.

I see.

Please lock or delete this thread.

I see.

Please lock or delete this thread.

Done. I'll be asking Fris about removing the link from his post, and discussing with the other Mods whether or not we want to allow links to urbandictionary here in the future.