NationStates Jolt Archive


Flame

Ny Nordland
22-10-2006, 15:25
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11844170&postcount=23
The Most Glorious Hack
22-10-2006, 15:28
No, it's not. It's a sweeping generalization.

Quit wasting our time.
Psychotic Mongooses
22-10-2006, 15:30
For the love of...

That was the point!

You pointedly misquoted the article to fit your point. You refuse to admit it.
I then used an example of pointedly misquoting you and using you (a Norwegian) as an example that all Norweigans must commit the same crimes. As you had used the same argument in your point against immigrants.
Clearly, this http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11844148&postcount=18

and my post have gone waaaay over your head.

Mods, I've been here long enough. I'm not an idiot. My history is clean.


Edit: Oh, eh nevermind.
Ny Nordland
22-10-2006, 15:31
No, it's not. It's a sweeping generalization.

Quit wasting our time.

He quoted me as saying what I have never said. That was the flame!
Ny Nordland
22-10-2006, 15:32
For the love of...

That was the point!

You pointedly misquoted the article to fit your point. You refuse to admit it.
I then used an example of pointedly misquoting you and using you (a Norwegian) as an example that all Norweigans must commit the same crimes. As you had used the same argument in your point against immigrants.
Clearly, this http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11844148&postcount=18

and my post have gone waaaay over your head.

Mods, I've been here long enough. I'm not an idiot. My history is clean.


Edit: Oh, eh nevermind.


I tried to explain why they reffered to immigrants by that statement. Yours was just a cheap flame.
Psychotic Mongooses
22-10-2006, 15:34
I tried to explain why they reffered to immigrants by that statement. Yours was just a cheap flame.

No it wasn't. It was a pointed example of what you had done. Clearly, this has gone over your head by a mile.

Do I have do put in it 18" high bolded letters saying: Look. This is what you did to the article.
Ny Nordland
22-10-2006, 15:38
No it wasn't. It was a pointed example of what you had done. Clearly, this has gone over your head by a mile.

Do I have do put in it 18" high bolded letters saying: Look. This is what you did to the article.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11844238&postcount=40
Psychotic Mongooses
22-10-2006, 15:47
My final post on this is actually summed up by someone else.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11844293&postcount=66

I hope the powers that be understand what I did, and the intent behind it.

[/Fini]
Ny Nordland
22-10-2006, 15:52
My final post on this is actually summed up by someone else.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11844293&postcount=66

I hope the powers that be understand what I did, and the intent behind it.

[/Fini]

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11844261&postcount=52

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11844295&postcount=68

You made a cheap flame despite the fact that I was explaining my motives in a civil manner.
Frisbeeteria
22-10-2006, 16:54
If you don't like the way people respond to your inflammatory posts, stop coming around here. This is your final warning on this, Ny Nordland. You've been warned and banned often enough. Next one of these will result in your deletion.
And I'm tired of your empty threats.
"Empty" threat? I think not. You've been warned and warned and warned. Enough.