Flame
Ny Nordland
10-10-2006, 14:22
Simple reasoning.
Something you're incapable of, but why let that stop you, huh?
No flames in the thread before. So it's not "heat of the debate" to quote a certain mod.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11787314&postcount=35
Ny Nordland
10-10-2006, 14:33
More and from an unrelated thread I havent even posted:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11787323&postcount=37
I believe "court-appointed Fool" is a flame.
Crazy girl
10-10-2006, 15:08
Maybe add a link to the first one...though IMO they're both pretty mild..
Ny Nordland
10-10-2006, 15:12
Maybe add a link to the first one...though IMO they're both pretty mild..
Click on the green arrow after someone's nick and it takes you to the post and it's not his first flames against me.
All of them are pretty mild IMO, but http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11787476&postcount=70
Pot, kettle, black, etc.
Fartsniffage
10-10-2006, 15:38
All of them are pretty mild IMO, but http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11787476&postcount=70
Pot, kettle, black, etc.
'Twas aimed at me and I don't consider that to be a flame. Maybe I just have thick skin but I would imagine that the mods have better things to do than deal with kindergarden stuff like this.
Ice Hockey Players
10-10-2006, 15:41
Right, and that's so much worse than telling people they can't read. If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
More and from an unrelated thread I havent even posted:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11787323&postcount=37
I believe "court-appointed Fool" is a flame.
Because you weren't appointed by a court or because you constantly whine about people flaming you (or anyone if said people have a history with you, QED the "please, oh please, ban Heikoku for my pleasure" posts after my chat with MeansToAnEnd) while flaming people in worse ways?
The reason why saying you are incapable of simple reasoning does not sound like a flame to me is quite simple, really: In most threads you post, maybe all, your logic tends to be flawed, and you do tend to flaunt the basest rules of reasoning. Racism, for one, is based on inductive reasoning, which almost anyone can perceive it is a wrong kind of reasoning.
In short, before claiming you ARE capable of simple reasoning, you must show that you are, indeed, capable of simple reasoning.
The Most Glorious Hack
10-10-2006, 16:50
Grow some skin.
Grow some skin.
Talking to me or him? o_O
Euroslavia
10-10-2006, 17:11
Talking to me or him? o_O
To him. (Ny Nordland).
Cluichstan
10-10-2006, 17:49
Grow some skin.
I was gonna say the same thing. His threads in this forum, which seem to pop up nearly everyday, are as bad as a four-year-old crying about someone making a face at him.
Ny Nordland
10-10-2006, 17:59
The reason why saying you are incapable of simple reasoning does not sound like a flame to me is quite simple, really: In most threads you post, maybe all, your logic tends to be flawed, and you do tend to flaunt the basest rules of reasoning. Racism, for one, is based on inductive reasoning, which almost anyone can perceive it is a wrong kind of reasoning.
In short, before claiming you ARE capable of simple reasoning, you must show that you are, indeed, capable of simple reasoning.
Considering the moronic logic of this post, I guess the intelligence of some Nazi scientists wont change your mind, for starters, to address your delusional correlations. I'm not even going to talk about your flawed understanding of racism.
Grow some skin.
I would if I wasnt banned before for saying things like "ignorance is a bliss for you people, isnt it?"
Considering the moronic logic of this post, I guess the intelligence of some Nazi scientists wont change your mind, for starters, to address your delusional correlations. I'm not even going to talk about your flawed understanding of racism.
I would if I wasnt banned before for saying things like "ignorance is a bliss for you people, isnt it?"
... perhaps because you said things like that about forty times?
Ny Nordland
10-10-2006, 18:16
... perhaps because you said things like that about forty times?
Repetition didnt matter in Heikoku's case.
Greater Trostia
10-10-2006, 18:16
I would if I wasnt banned before for saying things like "ignorance is a bliss for you people, isnt it?"
Clearly, it was for trumped-up charges by the evil liberal multicultural nonwhite immigrant conspiracy.
Ny Nordland
10-10-2006, 18:18
Clearly, it was for trumped-up charges by the evil liberal multicultural nonwhite immigrant conspiracy.
Ok GT, whatever your say...:rolleyes:
Cluichstan
10-10-2006, 18:21
Clearly, it was for trumped-up charges by the evil liberal multicultural nonwhite immigrant conspiracy.
Actually, it's because we all paid Kat a dollar to have him banned. :p
You made out quite nicely on that one, I think, Kat. What'd you buy with all that cash? A yacht? ;)
Greater Trostia
10-10-2006, 18:23
Ok GT, whatever your say...:rolleyes:
I know, I know... I'm putting forth strawmen arguments that deliberately misconstrue the simple and innocent meanings behind your threads into being somehow racist, xenophobic, bigoted or paranoid...
... obviously, in order to further the genocide of the white race by supporting the multicultural pro-immigrant, pro-genocide forces of liberalism!
Frisbeeteria
10-10-2006, 18:28
Enough.