NationStates Jolt Archive

To head this,
Kimchi has stated at least once he would support the genocide of all Muslims and has repeatedly created threads defaming Muslims with anything he can find in the news that he could construe to do so.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=502340

The thread is another Muslim bashing thread and should have been closed for trolling as such the moment it was posted. I would go so far as to suggest that any thread Kimchi creates about Muslims be removed since it only devolves into a "discussion" of whether or not the post is for the plain substance of the article or to further Kimchi's view that all Muslims are bad, but I doubt that would happen.

Teh_pantsless_hero, drop it. There was a viable discussion going on in that thread; you and a few others decided to come in and tell the rest of us we'd signed "flame me waivers" for discussing it.

I get you don't like him. He's not breaking the rules here. He is not the only person who a favorite topic, and as we are not going to ban people for criticizing Bush, Christians, Nazis, Atheists, Pro-Lifers, Pro-Choicers, Liberals, Republicans, Gun control proponents, et al, we aren't going to remove him just because you find his arguments unpopular. Were he flamebaiting or trolling in that thread, guess what? It would have been closed and he would have been warned. He wasn't, it won't be.

Now. You, Heikoku and BackwoodsSquatches were directed to stop the ad hominem attacks on Deep Kimchi and counter his argument, or stop posting to the thread. You all decided not to follow this advice. Heikoku and BackwoodsSquatches have been in trouble for flaming before.

You are all going to have a five day vacation. When you come back, you'll either debate Deep Kimchi and prove him wrong, or leave off following him around and flaming him. It would have been nice had you taken the "friendly" advice, but now you'll have to take the "modly" advice.

I must admit Deep Kimichi's threads do seem rather trollish. But thats just my POV. /2cents

/2cents
A moderator has already ruled quite clearly in this case. There is no need for any further comment on the merits or lack thereof from anyone other than the principals of the specific case.

In other words, "don't do dat no more".