Community Property
20-09-2006, 19:48
Is it possible to correct the duplicated word from the second defining paragraph of the proposal “Free Trade in Hemp”?“LEGAL EMBARGOES” are all limitations on trade imposed against an enemy in time or war, or the enemy of an ally in time or war, or in response to some heinous act on the part of the nation subject to embargo, so long as hemp is not the only embargoed good and so long as the cause of the embargo is not not, in whole or in part, the decision on the part of the embargoed nation to grow, process, trade in, or use non-narcotic hemp products, as defined above,I would hate to have to ask for deletion and resubmission.
Frisbeeteria
20-09-2006, 20:35
No. We can delete, but not edit.
It's not legal to propose a replacement until the repeal passes, so it's been deleted anyway. No penalty given. Besides, you had zero approvals. Resubmit if/when the repeal passes.
Community Property
20-09-2006, 20:41
No. We can delete, but not edit.
It's not legal to propose a replacement until the repeal passes, so it's been deleted anyway. No penalty given. Besides, you had zero approvals. Resubmit if/when the repeal passes.Actually, UNR #65 didn't require the importation of hemp - just its domestic production. But we won't quibble about it.
Too bad, though: coat-tailing off the current debate would have been nice.