NationStates Jolt Archive

Well, Hitler fought Judaism. That's a good thing, even if he maybe had done it out of the wrong motives.
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11522869&postcount=40

That's rubbish. Israel started this war almost 60 years ago. This is not about Hezbollah or Israel racting to it, this is about an obscure religious group trying to make a state in a foreign land for over 100 years now. Every Arab and everyone in the entire world who has decency has a moral obligation to oppose Israel and its unsound religious and ideological foundation. Israel is the aggressor and the obstacle to peace in the region. And as you say it must be eliminated.

And BTW someone in support of Israel really should not refer to UN resolutions. That's rediculous.

http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11507086&postcount=310

There will be no peace until the Jews have all returned to where they came from.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11408652&postcount=8


Of course there will never be peace. As soon as one "enemy" is beaten, the Jews will find a new one. Jews have always defined themselves through their enmity to others. That's also the purpose of the Tanaach.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11408671&postcount=11

All Jews are religious fundamentalists. Of course there is no Jewish race, but a ideologically driven group of people who have always believed to be something special
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11408692&postcount=17

You are right. Judaism is bigotry
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11408711&postcount=21

Jews aren't a people. They are a religious group.
And of course there is ant-Jewish sentiment among the Arab world. There has been anti-Jewish sentiment everywhere Jews have lived ever since Jews existed.
So if one kid always stirs trouble, is it the other kids' fault?
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11434497&postcount=147


It's more than that. The UN have simply realized that they have allowed statehood to an evil religious group and that this is an error that needs correction.http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11416869&postcount=65

The fact of the matter is that Israel has always been a terrorist state ever since its articifial creation. But what does one expect? Judaism is an unenlightened aggressive ideology after all.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11395352&postcount=195

What does the Munich incident have to do with any god? In Munich some Palestinians were only paying back some of the cruelty imposed on entire Palestine by the intruding Jews. Zionism has someting to to with the onedimensional Jewish view on god and their alleged covenant with a god, but not the Munich incident. You seem to forget what Israel had done just prior to 1972. And "Wrath of God" and the Israeli impudence to name their revenge thus should be the reason why you don''t anylonger believe in god, especially the Jewish god. The Palestinians have every right to defend themselves and hurt Israel in every way they can.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11366744&postcount=4

You want aggressive gods? Then go for the Jewish god: most arrogant, ignorant, jealous, and aggressive god of all...
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11366673&postcount=90


Jews launched an aggressive offensive against the Palestinians by coming to Palestine in the first place. Palestinians are only defending their ancestral land. There were always Jews in Palestine and that's OK. But what happened since the end of Ottoman rule in the province of Palestine due to the irresponsible and ideologically driven influx of foreign Jews is not OK.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11258727&postcount=697

You were hardly perfect:

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11521912&postcount=2

He died. THat's the only good thing that fucking cocksucker did.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11522902&postcount=53

Let me just say that it's too bad the Mossad doesn't go after Nazis like you anymore.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11522940&postcount=62

You are really a sick disgusting human being.
You are a vile human being.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11522984&postcount=67

Be specific mr white trash

You BOTH got a little out of hand. But IDF, it was justifiable. YOU (the Hilter lover), on the other hand, should be thrown out of this forum. It's one thing to state your disliking of Jews, it's entirely another to speak murderously and slanderously against them.

Can we say "ban" anyone?

You BOTH got a little out of hand. But IDF, it was justifiable. YOU (the Hilter lover), on the other hand, should be thrown out of this forum. It's one thing to state your disliking of Jews, it's entirely another to speak murderously and slanderously against them.

Can we say "ban" anyone?

I should be banned?

I didn't even post in the thread. *sigh*

You BOTH got a little out of hand. But IDF, it was justifiable. YOU (the Hilter lover), on the other hand, should be thrown out of this forum. It's one thing to state your disliking of Jews, it's entirely another to speak murderously and slanderously against them.

Can we say "ban" anyone?
breaking the rules is not justifiable. Even when provoked. At best, you could call for a lesser punishment.

And if we can't speak murderously and slanderously against a group, we might as well ban half this forum for their comment on arabs and muslims.

Flaming a specific forum user > criticising a religion, in the hierarchy of rule violations as far as I am concerned.

Some of the posts quoted are legitimate criticisms (a country may be an aggressor and a god a bastard), others are borderline trolling (the stuff about all jews being religious fundamentalists is for example an unjust and unacceptable generalisation, as it would be for followers of any other religion).

IDF however, directed clear-cut flames at a specific forum user. While the case above is a post-by-post judgement call, this one clearly is not. You may wish to consider withdrawing your complaint in light of this, because should you request the matter to be pursued, you will not escape punishment.

My suggestion is for both people involved, to reconsider their tone when debating subjects in which they are unable to maintain emotional distance.