Liberals dont deserve to live
Sumamba Buwhan
09-08-2006, 17:14
apparently:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11518830&postcount=90
not sure if it's a rule violation but this guy just annoys me so I hope it is.
Forgottenlands
09-08-2006, 19:38
He didn't say liberals. He indirectly said stupid people. He's talking about the removal of "liberal" safeguards.
I'd say it's minor (if anything), especially in the manner it was worded.
Sumamba Buwhan
09-08-2006, 20:19
you might be right but looking at his name "Luckign Fiberals" and his porting history:
this:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11519647&postcount=117
the far left will have to be content in their moronic adolescence and drug induced daze for the time being.
coupled with this:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11518830&postcount=90
we are being over run by people that don't deserve to live, I say let their stupidity take them to the grave and quit protecting them!!!
as well as other posts like this:
buffoon hardcore leftards voting lamont
&
Liberalism: knowledge untempered by wisdom or common sense.
&
moonbat leftard morons
&
Painfully crush all liberals, socialists, communists, and other warped forms of the far left.
(I got tired of looking thru his posts)
I am hard pressed not to believe that he is calling liberals the stupid people that don't deserve to live.
Tactical Grace
09-08-2006, 20:23
There is also the nation name, flag and motto to consider. There is probably enough to delete the nation here, but I can't do it myself.
The Niaman
09-08-2006, 21:54
Honestly, I don't see anything wrong. He's strongly opinionated. I happen to agree with most of what he said. Nothing wrong with stating your disliking for someone (or a group of people).
Scolopendra
09-08-2006, 22:06
No, there is nothing wrong with saying "I do not like liberals. I disagree with their policies."
"Libtard" on the other hand is the definition of a defamatory ad hominem. Besides, what else could we expect from the reincarnation of Liberal Extinction?
Terminated with extreme nonchalance.
Dobbsworld
09-08-2006, 23:53
He's back. (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11521084&postcount=5)
Think of a happy place.
Think of a happy place.
Think of -
I can't.
Luckin Fiberals
10-08-2006, 01:05
awww booo hoooo he hurt my wittle feewings...
Judging from as many anti-christian, anti American, and pro terrorist posts in this forum that go unchallenged this just confirms the hypocrisy of liberalism. You people are only tolerant of those that agree w/ your socialist, athiest, and communist views.
Empress_Suiko
10-08-2006, 01:09
awww booo hoooo he hurt my wittle feewings...
Judging from as many anti-christian, anti American, and pro terrorist posts in this forum that go unchallenged this just confirms the hypocrisy of liberalism. You people are only tolerant of those that agree w/ your socialist, athiest, and communist views.
You can hate Liberals all you want, and even disagree and challenge their views. But please do so sans flaming. You were not deleted because they hate anyone who is not Liberal, you were deleted because you flamed beyond reason. I am just trying to help you out.
Shazbotdom
10-08-2006, 01:10
No...what your doing is breaking many rules. Thus the reason for your DEAT's.
Dread Lady Nathicana
10-08-2006, 01:17
Man, if I had a dollar for every poster who bitches that they're backing the only viewpoint that gets punished around here ... (NS history states otherwise for those who care to look).
Take a moment, and grasp some clarity:
For the most part it isn't WHAT you're defending (with obvious rules-breaking bits excluded) - it's HOW you go about doing it. It takes no talent, skill, or brains to just dish petty insults and take the cheap shots.
You want to forward your viewpoint without getting banned, or put on forced vacation or warned?
Then learn how to actually debate.
EDIT: Pssst ... >_> ... (Freedom of speech is not protected, nor a right on this site. Read the FAQ. Get a grip. If everyone's sensibilities were catered to, no one would be posting anymore. If it breaks the site rules, that's a different matter.)
Luckin Fiberals
10-08-2006, 01:29
While you're ousting nations and oppressing free speech let me show you some nations that offend me.
The Federation of Buck Fushs: Insults my President
The Free Land of Republicans eat Crap: Implies Republicans consume feces, disgusting...
The Theocracy of Cooler Than Jesus: Insulting to Christians
The Holy Republic of Dead Jesus: """""""""""""""""
The Community of Drunken Jesus: """"""""""""""""
The Dictatorship of Gigolojesus: """"""""""""""""""
The Holy Empire of Jesus666: """"""""""""""""""""
The Allied States of Jesus on a Stick: """"""""""""""""
The Holy Empire of Jesus The Bastard: """"""""""""""""""""
I won't go on there, but there are 5 pages of nations using Jesus' name, some insulting some not.
Long story short, if my nation is going to be deleted you people have some house cleaning to do, nice job oh almighty fair and balanced moderators. No wonder liberalism brings the word failure to mind.
Scolopendra
10-08-2006, 02:52
And when the good Christ or the honorable POTUS gets a forum account, that will be a problem. Thank you for alerting us to "Republicans eat Crap," and have a nice day somewhere else.
meah - there aren't enough hours in the day to actually find this guy offensive.
Looks like he needs to go back to ol' Far Right School of Polemics and hone his skills some.
Frisbeeteria
10-08-2006, 03:02
Looks like he needs to go back to ol' Far Right School of Polemics and hone his skills some.
Looks like you need to stop posting backhand insults in moderation threads before you earn a warning yourself.
Thread closed.