NationStates Jolt Archive

Latest thread: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=494437

Look, I KNOW there are many threads similar to this still floating around, and they've been allowed. Much discussion has ensued. But seriously. We are talking about adults who want to, or do, have sex with children. Should they really be given access to the children on this site in this way? THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!! (I can't believe I said that) I just don't understand how this is in any way appropriate considering the extremely young ages of some of our posters. This isn't just a sexual conversation, this is a conversation about adults who want to sexually exploit children. By definition, non-consensual sex. Would a rapist get so much forum-play? Describing how he or she likes to force others to have sex? Because that is essentially what this is.

Erastide, you are swift.

Thank you.

Déjà effacée....

Latest thread: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=494437

This isn't just a sexual conversation, this is a conversation about adults who want to sexually exploit children. By definition, non-consensual sex. Would a rapist get so much forum-play? Describing how he or she likes to force others to have sex? Because that is essentially what this is.

I have to assume this is in response to my mysteriously disappearing thread. To begin with, I only posted the thing in response to a request from another poster to do so.

Also I'd like to point out how interested I was to find that I want to sexually exploit children. I assure you it was news to me. Glad I have you around to let me know what I'm thinking and feeling. This, in fact, was the very purpose of my post to begin with, to attempt to dispel some of the mistaken beliefs that people like you seem to have about 'my people'.

However I suppose this isn't the place to do it. Others can talk about pedophilia all day, filling this board with hate speech and erroneous conjecture, but I'm somehow restricted from discussing those same topics. I'd like someone to explain why.

Suvyamara']Others can talk about pedophilia all day, filling this board with hate speech and erroneous conjecture, but I'm somehow restricted from discussing those same topics. I'd like someone to explain why.

Because you like to have sex with little boys.

Actually, again, you're wrong. I suppose you should be used to that by now.

I agree with Sinuhue. Pedophiles should not have the leeway nor the leverage they currently have. Expressing desire to exploit children and/or supporting it and hinding behind "It's my opinion" is a load of baloney. It is not a simple matter of opinion. It is horrendously wrong and has no place in ANY forum in ANY society of good faith. No bona fide forum would allow them to remain. Give every last pedophile the boot. Quit banning those who oppose them valiantly, and start banning them- permanently.

There have been Moderator discussions about this recently, and unless there is exceptional value in a particular debate, threads on that subject will generally get locked. Not all debate topics were born equal. Some have intrinsic flamebait value, some while neutral may give unpleasant characters too much of an invitation to do their thing. It's a case of report them as you see them, and we will see what we can do. Considering the audience of this site, the volume really should be at negligible levels.

Expressing desire to exploit children and/or supporting it and hinding behind "It's my opinion" is a load of baloney.

Again, not sure what part of this you're failing to understand. I don't have a desire to exploit children nor do I support anyone who does. Yet again I'll state that this is the sort of belief that my post was meant to address.

I am not retarded.

I am not sick.

I do not hang out in parks with pockets full of candy.

I do not have any less self-control than anyone else.

I do not have a desire to rape children.

I do not troll the internet looking for young children with whom to talk.

I do not view child pornography.

I could go on, but I'm not sure I see the point. It's obvious that you folks are convinced of your own truth and superiority and are incapable and unwilling to see beyond that. I feel sorry for you. And I feel sorry for your children. Because when the real predator comes around you're not going to know what he looks like.

So, the thread was deleted, but the OP was saved to include in another thread: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11476436&postcount=1467

Is this fine? It's certainly on-topic, but considering it wasn't fit for the forum the first time around....?

So he wants questions?

Would it be allowed to ask that guy to jump off something really high without a parachute? Or would that be illegal? :)

I was expecting this to happen sooner or later, as I don't think discussion of pedophillia is acceptable in a PG-13 movie according to the MPSA.

So, the thread was deleted, but the OP was saved to include in another thread: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11476436&postcount=1467

Is this fine? It's certainly on-topic, but considering it wasn't fit for the forum the first time around....?

Not sure what you mean. As stated, I had posted on another thread and a poster suggested I start a new thread instead. That's what I did. It was deleted. That brings us right back here.

Suppose it would help if I knew what OP was.

Ah...I did not check the time stamps...

Suvyamara']Not sure what you mean. As stated, I had posted on another thread and a poster suggested I start a new thread instead. That's what I did. It was deleted. That brings us right back here.

Suppose it would help if I knew what OP was.

Opening Post or Original Post, at any rate OP is the first post in a thread. Ive also seen it refer to the poster who started the thread but I do not think that this is usually proper usage.

I was expecting this to happen sooner or later, as I don't think discussion of pedophillia is acceptable in a PG-13 movie according to the MPSA.

Wrong- the discussion of it is acceptable- it's promotion and allowance to be openly allowed is NOT. The pedo's need to GO.

Wrong- the discussion of it is acceptable- ...To my knowledge, not here in Moderation.