NationStates Jolt Archive


Flame

Nordligmark
31-07-2006, 16:17
He wrote a disgusting post then showed it as if wrote it. The he answered to his own post. I think these count as flame?



I'm biased. I notice this with some other girls as well. So my question is why? Maybe some of female NSGers can explain this bizzare phenomenon. Dating children is also out of the equation in this case and some cases. So why?


Excuse me, what? I find you repulsive. That is SIMPLY DISGUSTING!!!


http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11469904&postcount=191

This is my real post. It's not edited as you will see:

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11465174&postcount=1
Sinuhue
31-07-2006, 17:44
Quite clearly, the specific parts of your post that this poster found reprehensible were highlighted in this manner, likely for the sake of brevity, rather than quoting your entire first post, and bolding the same sentences. That last sentence looks like he was too quick with the cut and paste and truncated your points.
Jocabia
31-07-2006, 19:05
Quite clearly, the specific parts of your post that this poster found reprehensible were highlighted in this manner, likely for the sake of brevity, rather than quoting your entire first post, and bolding the same sentences. That last sentence looks like he was too quick with the cut and paste and truncated your points.

Oh, come on, Sin. He just happened to make a sentence out of non-adjacent words in the original post and that sentence just happened to be fairly rude, but it was all innocent? So if someone calls you a name is it just a 'typo'. I mean, at some point, the mods have to consider poster to have some ability to create a post and review it for content or you could argue 'accident' for every infraction.
Sinuhue
31-07-2006, 19:33
Oh, come on, Sin. He just happened to make a sentence out of non-adjacent words in the original post and that sentence just happened to be fairly rude, but it was all innocent? So if someone calls you a name is it just a 'typo'. I mean, at some point, the mods have to consider poster to have some ability to create a post and review it for content or you could argue 'accident' for every infraction.
Maaaayyybee...it took me a while, honestly to notice the 'children' reference...were there any follow-up posts?
Jocabia
31-07-2006, 19:47
Maaaayyybee...it took me a while, honestly to notice the 'children' reference...were there any follow-up posts?

It was a drive-by. He didn't contribute anything to the thread other than calling NN disgusting for something he didn't say.
Nordligmark
31-07-2006, 22:47
Is this a flame / trolling too, since she's trying to excuse a paedophiliac flame and then backing off (or maybe she wasnt backing off with that maaaybeeee) by saying "she didnt notice" the most important part in a three line text?

Quite clearly, the specific parts of your post that this poster found reprehensible were highlighted in this manner, likely for the sake of brevity, rather than quoting your entire first post, and bolding the same sentences. That last sentence looks like he was too quick with the cut and paste and truncated your points.
Sinuhue
31-07-2006, 22:51
Oh give me a freakin' break:rolleyes: It's no secret that I can't stand you, but trust me...if I flame you, it'll be obvious.
Jocabia
31-07-2006, 22:51
Is this a flame / trolling too, since she's trying to excuse a paedophiliac flame and then backing off (or maybe she wasnt backing off with that maaaybeeee) by saying "she didnt notice" the most important part in a three line text?

Dude, seriously, you really should quit while you're ahead. If you want to actually review the first issue giving them other non-issues is simply going to make your complaint appear to have less weight. You can get a reputation for reporting everyone you don't like to mods like you did with your old alias or you can ignore the stuff that requires you to grow a thicker skin because that's all the mods are going to say on those kinds of issues anyway. /friendly advice
Shazbotdom
01-08-2006, 00:36
What Evil Satanic OzMonkeys said could be considered a flame. But what Sinuhue said is just their oppinion and NOT considered a Flame/Flamebait/Troll at all.
Frisbeeteria
01-08-2006, 01:47
what Sinuhue said is just their oppinion and NOT considered a Flame/Flamebait/Troll at all.
How about leaving Moderation rulings to Moderators, Shaz.


Evil Satanic OzMonkeys has been warned via TG to knock off quote-altering flaming.
Nordligmark
01-08-2006, 02:17
Thx...
The Niaman
01-08-2006, 19:23
Honestly, people, we all just need to grow thicker skin. I've been called worse, and I'm sure everyone else has too. Just be like a duck- let the water slide off your back.