Flame
Hydesland
20-06-2006, 23:34
Offensive statement:
The Muslins, kill then all. The Christians, kill then all. Then finish with all the religions too .... and then the peoples will go to fight between itself for any another idiotic reason who anybody invent.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=488278&page=16
By Capim.
Tactical Grace
20-06-2006, 23:43
The grammar is so poor, I cannot discern the intended meaning.
I will let another Mod have a go.
Philosopy
20-06-2006, 23:55
The grammar is so poor, I cannot discern the intended meaning.
I will let another Mod have a go.
Can I have a go as a non-Mod?
*Starts 'Countdown' Music, or any other suitable word game tune*
Two options:
1) Pottentially offensive/flame
The Muslims, kill them all. The Christians, kill them all. Then finish all the other religions too .... and then the people will go and fight between themselves for any idiotic reasons.
2) Not intended as offensive
The Muslims kill. The Christians kill. Finish with all the religions too .... and people will go to fight for other idiotic reasons instead.
I've used a little poetic licence there, because, as far as I can tell, the two parts of the sentence contradict each other. It seems to start as a flame ("kill them all") but finish as a defence of religion ("it's not religion, people will just fight for other reasons instead").
Hydesland
20-06-2006, 23:57
I think his M key is broken.
Tactical Grace
21-06-2006, 00:13
Bizarre. :confused:
I don't see a need for action if there is substantial puzzlement as to what he said.
Philosopy
21-06-2006, 00:19
Bizarre. :confused:
I don't see a need for action if there is substantial puzzlement as to what he said.
I think he's just clarified the issue himself:
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=11202040&postcount=230
It swims against the religions, any religion. The problem is not the religion in itself, any religion, but the way for which its worshippers use it.