Is this sort of thing really necessary on a continuing basis?
Eutrusca
11-01-2006, 01:33
I mean, com'on, it just gets soooo tedious to keep explaining again and again and again that being pro-military and pro-America does not equate to being "neo-conservative."
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=10239635&postcount=71
Teh_pantless_hero
11-01-2006, 02:20
I mean, com'on, it just gets soooo tedious to keep explaining again and again and again that being pro-military and pro-America does not equate to being "neo-conservative."
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=10239635&postcount=71
Oh sorry, the incessant anti-liberal, pro-Bush postings are throwing off our "neocon-dars."
Sarzonia
11-01-2006, 03:05
Independent of context, I don't think that post in itself is all that big a deal. In my opinion based on the posts you have made, I would have figured you as a right-winger, though that's lessened in the last few months.
Then again, I can't divorce the context entirely. I still don't think that's the worst offender I've seen (thinking of "the 'centrist' speaks" as being markedly worse).
Bobs Own Pipe
11-01-2006, 03:51
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, I'd be surprised if anybody would mistake it for a "centrist independent" instead of a duck.
Eutrusca
11-01-2006, 05:30
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, I'd be surprised if anybody would mistake it for a "centrist independent" instead of a duck.
Sigh. The prosecution rests, your Honor. :(
Steel Butterfly
11-01-2006, 06:07
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, I'd be surprised if anybody would mistake it for a "centrist independent" instead of a duck.
Keep your mindless bickering in "General," bob. It has no place here.