NationStates Jolt Archive

Although Tsaraine already said something about it, can one of you people please delete them? It's annoying and a bit rude actually since the thread (linked below) highlights a vastly important issue II is suffering from since the beginning.

The historical stuff about the British Empire can be deleted. If you can, don't let the 'post deleted by ...' remain, it looks quite messy.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=456053

Thanks! :)

its a debate about the rules is it not? if it isn't its basically flamebait saying that nuke rule supporters are just scared of people

Also I have kept on the topic

I've put forth possible reasons why people might not want to have young nations carry nuclear weapons. And I want to see the off-topic posts deleted, irregardless of you posting them, Santa in Finland or Johnny from across the block.

Mind if I add, this 'no nukes for young nations' is NOT a rule of NationStates. Feel free to look it up; you won't find it in ANY sticky out there. It's debate whether it makes sense or not.

no off topic posts have been made I'm stating the practical reasons for not having nukes I'm not enforcing the no nukes policy nor do I think its a rule I'm stating why I think it should be discouraged

but I not going to post anymore in this unnecessary thread if you think my posting is off topic tell me on the thread don't jump strait to them mods

no off topic posts have been made I'm stating the practical reasons for not having nukes I'm not enforcing the no nukes policy nor do I think its a rule I'm stating why I think it should be discouraged

but I not going to post anymore in this unnecessary thread if you think my posting is off topic tell me on the thread don't jump strait to them modsYou have problems with your reading comprehension skills haven't you? I said that I do not want to see off-topic posts about the British Empire, since that has zero relevance to the thread.

I DO NOT CARE WHO WROTE THE OFF-TOPIC POSTS, I SIMPLY DO NOT WANT OFF-TOPIC STUFF IN THAT THREAD.

That clear? Good. Now stop posting here and let the mods take care of this.

Funny, Guffy complaining about rude and asking the mods for help now, while calling them names not too long ago :rolleyes:

Funny, Guffy complaining about rude and asking the mods for help now, while calling them names not too long ago :rolleyes:Oh CG, what won't you do to make yourself more popular among the mods?

I know calling one a child abuser like you did just because a roleplayer was deleted doesn't help making friends.

I know calling one a child abuser like you did just because a roleplayer was deleted doesn't help making friends.You this is spamming right? Aren't you supposed to say something in the lines of: 'stop spamming or be reported?' And I was calling a player a pedophile, not some child abuser, and secondly you have no business here.

PS: Get your facts straight!

I was there, Guffy, and you did call a mod a child abuser. You're the one who needs to get his facts straight. Luckily for you your buddy deleted the thread on that other forum.

And I asked you to leave, is that so hard to understand? It probably is. And nobody ever told me Gruenberg is a moderator. Anyway, let's make it easier for you to understand:

You (Crazy girl)
must (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=must)
leave (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=leave)
this (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=this)
thread (http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/faq.php?faq=vb_faq, here you'll find what a 'thread' is)

Now leave.

Whoah woah. Lets not get into into an arguement in Moderation.

Both of you, knock it off.

Call to power seems to have left the thread, so I'm inclined to leave it be. If he returns and attempts to change the topic, more action will be taken (deletion of posts).