Different set of rules when it's claimed the US did it?
Eutrusca
09-11-2005, 17:01
I've been threatened with being banned when I posted nothing more than a picture of US aircraft taking out a terrorist gun emplacment with no illustration of the results. How can this then be allowed, or is it just that they were alleged "US atrocities?" :(
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?p=9906169&posted=1#post9906169
Euroslavia
09-11-2005, 17:37
It's called, we hadn't see it yet. Just because they haven't been immediately removed doesn't mean that they're acceptable.
Texan Hotrodders
09-11-2005, 17:58
Eut, may I suggest that you keep in mind that there are a lot more modern liberals than conservatives on this board and as a result stuff that offends modern liberals tends to get reported more quickly and more often? It's just the nature of the beast, in my opinion.
Eutrusca
09-11-2005, 18:05
Eut, may I suggest that you keep in mind that there are a lot more modern liberals than conservatives on this board and as a result stuff that offends modern liberals tends to get reported more quickly and more often? It's just the nature of the beast, in my opinion.
I know. **SIGH** :(
The Lone Alliance
09-11-2005, 19:24
I know. **SIGH** :(
You should be used to it by now.