NationStates Jolt Archive

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=437685 As someone else pointed out, it might've been more valid had he not been so hostile, nor flamed someone for pointing that out, as well.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9433328&postcount=26

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9433328&postcount=26

lol, that's definitely the first time (and prolly the last) I've ever seen a mod use that phrase. Also, when's the next Mod Olympics...?

You know, he would get on so much better if he would just take a deep breath and not post angry...but he's getting pretty worked up again. It's a good thing he's tired, I thought my eyeballs were going to catch fire reading his posts. When he's more awake I'll be scared to read the thread!

Okay, I'm going to start talking to you as if you are an idiot,

What fucking stereotype are you talking about? Are you just talking to be talking, or is there a point somewhere in that mess of a paragraph?

It's not a fact, that's not an obvious deduction, and I don't think anyone short of retarded would gather that from my reply. What the poster and I were referring to solely was the a movement called masculinism, as opposed to antifeminism, that I did not know existed.

The difference was the name. That was the entire subject of my original post on that specific point, which you would most positively understand, could you read. I said why not call the pursuit of equality masculinism instead of feminism. It had nothing to do with the concept of antifeminism. They said masculinism exists. I didn't know that. That was the end of it.

A lack of knowledge that didn't exist except in name, thus my views are no more flawed than your incoherent rant, and in fact are much less so.

No, my post was semi-sarcastic, which should have been obvious to anyone intelligent, and the fact that you seemed to miss that and take everything I said completely literally pissed me off - for instance, the part about feminists killing themselves. All of what you have said leads me to believe that you are a complete dolt, and I fear that if I keep talking to you, my head will cave in and my heart will explode. As such, I am not going to waste anymore energy replying to your stupid posts, as they are without merit and mostly incoherent, citing unclear goals and quoting apparently nonexistent sources.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.p...28&postcount=26
[QUOTE=Aldranin]
That's just the way I post. My apparent intolerance is at least 30% show. [/QUOTE.]


Your 30% show is going to get you warned and forumbanned if you're not more careful. Knock off the flamebait aspects, and stick to your topic. And while you're at it, Jesus titty-fucking Christ, lose the irrelevant profanity.

~ Frisbeeteria ~
NationStates Game Moderator
The One-Stop Rules Shop
__________________

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9433393&postcount=35

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9433613&postcount=50

Okay, first of all, I must say one thing: holy shit. You have a lot of time on your hands.

Second of all, while the history on feminism was informative, it was generally irrelevant up to the part about post-modern feminism, because I'm not referring to ancient feminism, I'm referring to the feminism of today, which seems unnecessary, and which no one has shown me to be wrong about yet.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9433754&postcount=52
...Okay, first of all, in your apparent quote - which I doubt is an actual quote - the person quoted spelled homicide incorrectly, so those statistics just lost all of their credibility. Also, to suggest that the women who join the military want to be on the frontlines so that they can die more often is laughable.

Gee, I don't personally know any terrorists, and I hate them just fine. I don't personally know any lawyers, and I hate them just fine. Maybe I'm just good at hating people

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9433885&postcount=54
Because if it were actually from another party on the fucking internet, you'd have copied and pasted it. Obviously
But not as many as you would have people believe, and definately not that many women. It has nothing to do with being sexist. Males are more eager to kick ass because their bodies produce a bunch of testosterone.Let's say fuck stereotypes and pretend we have a fucking brain for just a second. How likely is it that women are consistently so much better at parenting, especially at parenting boys, that they win out over the father on that alone?What does that even mean? Was that an argument or a concession or just you blubbering around?God, damn it, are you fucking with me? Seriously, you have got to be kidding me. My point is that saying you can't hate someone without meeting them personally is fucking retarded. Jesus.What the hell are you talking about? "We," my ass, someone else mentioned that and I wasn't aware that there was an actual movement called "masculinism." I had heard of antifeminism, just not masculinism. I doubt you were, either, I don't know why you brought it up, or what the hell you think someone else's point does for your credibility. Besides, male counterparts of feminism don't make feminism any less useless. Are you just trying to piss me off now or are your replies always this lacking in substance?

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9433980&postcount=56
Exactly. All I'm saying is that real feminists no longer exists, and modern day ones should die. I have no idea why you spelled "feminist" three different incorrect ways, but I'll pass it off as technique.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9434109&postcount=62
Okay, I'm going to start talking to you as if you are an idiot, whether or not that is the case, because you're acting like one. A: Why would you have not copied and pasted it, B: why wouldn't you have just given me a link by now?

What fucking stereotype are you talking about? Are you just talking to be talking, or is there a point somewhere in that mess of a paragraph?

It's not a fact, that's not an obvious deduction, and I don't think anyone short of retarded would gather that from my reply. What the poster and I were referring to solely was the a movement called masculinism, as opposed to antifeminism, that I did not know existed

A lack of knowledge that didn't exist except in name, thus my views are no more flawed than your incoherent rant, and in fact are much less so.

No, my post was semi-sarcastic, which should have been obvious to anyone intelligent, and the fact that you seemed to miss that and take everything I said completely literally pissed me off - for instance, the part about feminists killing themselves. All of what you have said leads me to believe that you are a complete dolt, and I fear that if I keep talking to you, my head will cave in and my heart will explode. As such, I am not going to waste anymore energy replying to your stupid posts, as they are without merit and mostly incoherent, citing unclear goals and quoting apparently nonexistent sources.

Meethinks this shows a pattern of abusive, flaming, and flamebaiting. Continued after a specific warning to tone it down.

Knew I forgot something... 5 day ban.