Another Spam Thread.
President Shrub
03-08-2005, 21:56
BAN THEM ALL.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=435680&page=1
President Shrub
03-08-2005, 22:55
No warnings, like in this thread?
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=435523&page=3&pp=15
Achtung 45
03-08-2005, 22:58
BAN THEM ALL.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=435680&page=1Too bad it actually turned into a ligitimate discussion. I see it was moved to spam anyway.
E-Xtremia
03-08-2005, 23:00
No warnings, like in this thread?
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=435523&page=3&pp=15
There is already a thread going south on that matter: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=435572
Please dont bother this thread with the substance of the other thread
(ARG! I have been trying to post this the past 5 mins, it keeps telling me I cant!)
President Shrub
03-08-2005, 23:05
Too bad it actually turned into a ligitimate discussion. I see it was moved to spam anyway.
So, you started a spam thread, then hijacked it to turn it into a legitimate discussion?
That's breaking two rules.
President Shrub
04-08-2005, 04:40
Any mods? Anyone?
I mean, in both cases, it's the same rule being broken. Some of the same people are involved too.
Frisbeeteria
04-08-2005, 04:50
President Shrub, they are not the same. The difference revolves around an actual technical problem relating to post timing that has been discussed in several technical and moderation threads.
Furthermore, the thread was moved to the Spam forum over 7 hours ago, indicating clearly that a moderator took action. There is no need to keep bumping a thread AFTER a mod has acted.
If you're trying to prove that Mods are OMGZ BIASED by not giving identical rulings in non-identical situations, you're failing.
Achtung 45
04-08-2005, 05:02
So, you started a spam thread, then hijacked it to turn it into a legitimate discussion?
That's breaking two rules.
I did not start the thread, and it wasn't "hijacked" into a legit discussion. You know how threads drift, right? But I agree with Fris, drop the attitude, the thread was moved to spam meaning action was taken.
President Shrub
04-08-2005, 05:03
President Shrub, they are not the same. The difference revolves around an actual technical problem relating to post timing that has been discussed in several technical and moderation threads.
Furthermore, the thread was moved to the Spam forum over 7 hours ago, indicating clearly that a moderator took action. There is no need to keep bumping a thread AFTER a mod has acted.
If you're trying to prove that Mods are OMGZ BIASED by not giving identical rulings in non-identical situations, you're failing.
Okay. So, just to clarify: In the future, if there's a technical problem in the Jolt forums, I can start a spam thread about it without being warned. Correct?
Frisbeeteria
04-08-2005, 05:18
Okay. So, just to clarify: In the future, if there's a technical problem in the Jolt forums, I can start a spam thread about it without being warned. Correct?
Originally Posted by The One-Stop Rules Shop
Rules Lawyers: We don't like rules lawyering. We've said this before. If someone looks like they're trying to use (or, more specifically, abuse) the above guidelines in bad faith, then an official warning will be issued against them. "But you said this was okay!" "Yes, we did say it was okay. Then you went and tried to use that to bait another player." "I wasn't trying to bait him/her!" "We don't believe you." "But it's true!" "Tough noogies. You are officially warned.".