NationStates Jolt Archive

The Gay Marriage thread (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=427522&page=136&pp=15) is looking very, very threateningly useless:



http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9156061&postcount=2026
She's claimed that she will have the last word, and I'm certainly not going to allow it. So the only end will come when we all die
The other side does in fact reciprocate. I'm not sure if there's a rule against that sort of thing.

There is already a thread on this (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=428813) in Moderation.

There is already a thread on this (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=428813) in Moderation.
Different complaint about the same thread. They say over 1300 posts, I say useless.

Just an idea: Perhaps place it in Archive?

Carry on mods.

The other side does in fact reciprocate. I'm not sure if there's a rule against that sort of thing.
I'm not sure I understand the question. I think what you're asking is ... is this legal?You're wrong!
No, you're wrong.
No, you're wrong.
No, you're wrong.
No, you're wrong.
No, you're wrong!
I know you are but what am I?Silly as it seems, no. It's legal as long as it doesn't descend into flaming, spam, or other rulebreaking.

Is anyone going to change their viewpoint in a Gay Marriage thread, after stubbornly resisting it for a mere 2026 posts? Hope springs eternal.

Silly as it seems, no. It's legal as long as it doesn't descend into flaming, spam, or other rulebreaking.

Is anyone going to change their viewpoint in a Gay Marriage thread, after stubbornly resisting it for a mere 2026 posts? Hope springs eternal.
Yeah, I was hoping that this wouldn't be the first thread I see when I wake up tommorow morning. *sigh* Technically, no rule is being broken. But oh well. Thanks Fris.