Flamebaiting and Trolling
Texpunditistan
06-06-2005, 20:57
Spaam has decided to make a number of flamebaits and attacks against NSCL members. He's being a troll.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9020534&postcount=48
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9020381&postcount=543
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9020502&postcount=546
I could probably pull up 10 more examples, but I'm tired of dealing with this jerk.
Spaam has decided to make a number of flamebaits and attacks against NSCL members. He's being a troll.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9020534&postcount=48
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9020381&postcount=543
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9020502&postcount=546
I could probably pull up 10 more examples, but I'm tired of dealing with this jerk.
Spelling bee time!
H-Y-P-O-C-R-A-C-Y
I don't think I was flaming, and I'm not alone on that opinion, however I will stop if Fris says the word.
Spaam has decided to make a number of flamebaits and attacks against NSCL members. He's being a troll.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9020534&postcount=48
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9020381&postcount=543
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=9020502&postcount=546
I could probably pull up 10 more examples, but I'm tired of dealing with this jerk.
Tex, don't get started on this. Do you want me to post what you did in the UDCP thread, hmm?
Spelling bee time!
H-Y-P-O-C-R-A-C-Y
I'm sorry, but that is an incorrect spelling (http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=hypocrisy). You have been eliminated from the competition. :p
I'm sorry, but that is an incorrect spelling (http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=hypocrisy). You have been eliminated from the competition. :p
LOL You're right. More the fool me. I've been dealing with Particracy and Democracy too much methinks...
Texpunditistan
06-06-2005, 21:26
Spelling bee time!
H-Y-P-O-C-R-A-C-Y
You just failed.
It's "hypocrisy".
Come back next year and try again.
Sarzonia
06-06-2005, 22:38
Looks like both of you are guilty of flamebait. Also, continuing to snipe at each other in Moderation is a BAD idea. Just wanted to point that out.
Aligned Planets
06-06-2005, 22:44
I reckon you both need to take a bit of a time out.
Chill - these are only forums, it's only a game - not Real Life ^^
Go get a cold drink, watch some tv - then come back and see how your Nation is doing...
Frisbeeteria
07-06-2005, 00:11
Trust me newb, you aren't special. You are the sort that give Texas a bad name.
Then again, you are both Poms, so what can I say?
Yes, Spaam, those are flames. Mild ones, I'll grant you, but anything that is a direct personal attack on an individual can be considered a flame ... like this one:I'm tired of dealing with this jerk.
Both of you need to back off, but I don't see anything here that qualifies as warnable.
okay... I'm out of here for the night before I REALLY lose my cool and Frisbeeteria (of whom I'm convinced hates my guts) bans me for life.I think calling someone a fucking arsehole tends to have that effect.
Texpunditistan, you are a relative newcomer to this game, and you have already been the topic of discussion several times in the secret mod hideout. Your 'R' rated sense of humor and your tendency to fly off the handle do not sit well in this 'PG-13' environment. Consequently, you've been warned and forumbanned for rulebreaking, plus several unoffical warnings for image spam and probably other stuff I've long since forgotten. You need to adapt to the environment, because the environment isn't going to adapt to you.
Do I (we) hate your guts? I don't have time for that luxury.
Do I (we) pay more attention to your posts than somebody who never breaks the rules? Of course. Profiling is just one of our many tools for keeping things moving on these forums without letting them get too close to the edge.
As long as you push us closer to that edge, we'll push back. Count on that.
~ Frisbeeteria ~
NationStates Forum Moderator
Thanks Fris, I'll keep the newb (and Pom) comments down.
Vittos Ordination
07-06-2005, 05:16
I like how a reasonable complaint about Spaam, who was baiting, trolling, and flaming for three pages, was used as an opportunity to warn Texpundistan that he is on thin ice.
You informed Spaam that he was guilty of mild flaming with a short couple of sentences, then went on a long paragraph warning Texpundistan that had nothing to do with the topic of the thread.
That looks like mod bias to me.
If you have a complaint, feel free to email admin@nationstates.net
Frisbeeteria
07-06-2005, 05:25
I like how a reasonable complaint about Spaam, who was baiting, trolling, and flaming for three pagesLinks?
You informed Spaam that he was guilty of mild flaming with a short couple of sentences, then went on a long paragraph warning Texpundistan that had nothing to do with the topic of the thread.There are typically two or more parties to most flamefests. We don't give a 'bye' to the first one who got here to report it. In fact, there was a second thread from another perspective. I encapsulated the ruling for both in this thread.
That looks like mod bias to me.What Raem said.
Vittos Ordination
07-06-2005, 06:19
If you have a complaint, feel free to email admin@nationstates.net
I'm a big boy, I don't need to lodge a complaint. I'll let Frisbeeteria know what I think, and he can take it into consideration if he pleases.
BLARGistania
07-06-2005, 06:30
I'm a big boy, I don't need to lodge a complaint. I'll let Frisbeeteria know what I think, and he can take it into consideration if he pleases.
Well, I'm pretty sure Fris will just ignore your opinion of (him/her?) and continue to mod. By being a big boy and filing a complaint, you might get something done.
Just a little note for consideration, the ONLY people who want me banned are all Classic Liberals. I campaigned for the DemSocs in the last 36 hours of the election, debating them to the ground, and was instrumental in making sure that they did not win. If you ask me, they are merely bitter and biased. They claim that we cheated. In my opinion, I think everyone should just put it all behind them and get on with life.
Vittos Ordination
07-06-2005, 06:38
There are typically two or more parties to most flamefests. We don't give a 'bye' to the first one who got here to report it. In fact, there was a second thread from another perspective. I encapsulated the ruling for both in this thread.
The topic of this was Spaam's flamebaiting, not Texpundistan's history on NS or his apparent feelings that you don't like him.
As for the posts, there were four occurences where Spaam was simply trying to piss of the individuals posting in the NS Classic Liberals thread.
He made posts:
1. Calling Wegason a bitter newb
2. Referring to AB and Wegason as Pom in a derogatory way (I have never actually heard that term before, so I don't know if it is derogatory to begin with)
3. Saying: "I don't think I was the one who got the official warning yesterday" in a response to Texpundestan
4. And antagonizing AB by saying "Congratulations. You just earn yourself a report."
There were others outside of that thread. He came in there looking to stir up shit, he did it and Texpundistan got shit on for it.
Vittos Ordination
07-06-2005, 06:41
Well, I'm pretty sure Fris will just ignore your opinion of (him/her?) and continue to mod. By being a big boy and filing a complaint, you might get something done.
I have no opinion of Fris. I never posted one. I just pointed out that I thought Texpundistan may have a legitimate gripe.
Fris has always been fair to me, so there is no reason for me to post a complaint.
Vittos Ordination
07-06-2005, 06:44
Just a little note for consideration, the ONLY people who want me banned are all Classic Liberals. I campaigned for the DemSocs in the last 36 hours of the election, debating them to the ground, and was instrumental in making sure that they did not win. If you ask me, they are merely bitter and biased. They claim that we cheated. In my opinion, I think everyone should just put it all behind them and get on with life.
You continue to single members of the group out and antagonize them. It is no wonder that they are the ones raising a stink.
And I don't believe anyone suggested any disciplinary measures.
Just a little note for consideration, the ONLY people who want me banned are all Classic Liberals. I campaigned for the DemSocs in the last 36 hours of the election, debating them to the ground, and was instrumental in making sure that they did not win. If you ask me, they are merely bitter and biased. They claim that we cheated. In my opinion, I think everyone should just put it all behind them and get on with life.
A-R-R-O-G-A-N-C-E.
James Madison was right. Parties really are bad for democracy.
This whole flap is silly. Chill.
The topic of this was Spaam's flamebaiting, not Texpundistan's history on NS or his apparent feelings that you don't like him.
As for the posts, there were four occurences where Spaam was simply trying to piss of the individuals posting in the NS Classic Liberals thread.
You know, with what the members of the Classic Liberals have done to the Communists and in the election thread, I don't think that is a valid gripe.
He made posts:
1. Calling Wegason a bitter newb
He was bitter and is comparitively a newb. However I will tone down calling people newbs. I have been 'advised'.
2. Referring to AB and Wegason as Pom in a derogatory way (I have never actually heard that term before, so I don't know if it is derogatory to begin with)
Pom = English. NOT derogatory. Unless Yank is also derogatory.
And so it was like saying, well, you're English, so there you go.
It might be mild flaming, but honestly, I don't feel it was bad. And neither does Fris.
3. Saying: "I don't think I was the one who got the official warning yesterday" in a response to Texpundestan
Tex was being fairly hypocritical. Tex DID get an official warning for flaming, baiting, and trolling. I was responding to his fairly antagonistic posts.
4. And antagonizing AB by saying "Congratulations. You just earn yourself a report."
Same thing.
There were others outside of that thread. He came in there looking to stir up shit, he did it and Texpundistan got shit on for it.
Like the Libs came into the Communist thread looking to stir up shit?
You know, honestly, everyone was heated. I'm not going to pick on people because it was an election. However you people seem to intent on crucifying me when YOU PEOPLE DID AS BAD OR WORSE. Following me about calling me troll and jerk? I wonder what you would call that. They were antagonistic, and I bit back, which I shouldn't've, because honestly? I'm better than all that.
My advice again? GET OVER IT.
A-R-R-O-G-A-N-C-E.
James Madison was right. Parties really are bad for democracy.
This whole flap is silly. Chill.
Dude, I agree. I admit I am arrogant. But chilling is the best thing for everyone here.
Vittos Ordination
07-06-2005, 07:03
But they started it.
Someone else's guilt does not exempt you from guilt.
And I was never in need of a chill.
But they started it.
Someone else's guilt does not exempt you from guilt.
And I was never in need of a chill.
I have guilt? Where? Fris determined that it was, at best, mild flaming. Which everyone was guilty of AT LEAST during the election.
The point is, if you want to pursue the issue of me, then you have to pursue the issue of Alien Born. And Wegason. And make sure that Tex is banned. You don't get it both ways.
Vittos Ordination
07-06-2005, 07:22
I have guilt? Where? Fris determined that it was, at best, mild flaming. Which everyone was guilty of AT LEAST during the election.
The point is, if you want to pursue the issue of me, then you have to pursue the issue of Alien Born. And Wegason. And make sure that Tex is banned. You don't get it both ways.
I am quite positive that you don't feel guilt, I would say that you probably very rarely feel like you are wrong. However, I believe you are guilty of following several posters into a thread and baiting them with antagonistic comments.
I have seen Tex get a little agitated and I don't choose to defend him, however, I have no idea what AB and Wegason did, other than accusing you of trolling after you called Wegason a bitter newb.
I am quite positive that you don't feel guilt, I would say that you probably very rarely feel like you are wrong. However, I believe you are guilty of following several posters into a thread and baiting them with antagonistic comments.
I have seen Tex get a little agitated and I don't choose to defend him, however, I have no idea what AB and Wegason did, other than accusing you of trolling after you called Wegason a bitter newb.
Actually, I'm Catholic, so I do feel guilty a lot.
(That was only half a joke...)
I do not feel that I baited anyone. I admit that I was antagonistic, in their own thread, which is independent of the fact that they were. I am also not sure who started the antagonism, and it might've been me. However, they, especially AB, are as guilty as me in this situation. And in the election thread Wegason was baiting with the worst of them.
So thats the situation. I do not feel I warrant any punishment, however I do feel that I should tone things down a little and possibly should've ignored them.
BLARGistania
07-06-2005, 08:55
If this debate wants to continue, I suggest you two move it to General or a private chat where you can duke it out. Moderation is not the place to grip at each other.
A report was made, a moderator gave a decision. That is the end of it. Any further issues should be brought up in another complaint or in a different forum.