NationStates Jolt Archive

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=422155

That thread just seems to be a venue for its starter to post gibberish. Feels "postcount ++"-ish.

This really isn't spam... And its much better to read than 'Christians are better than you all!!!!!11!!' threads that pop up. If those arent spam, this definately isn't spam. Its artwork of a sort, and is really no different that if you or I created a thread to discuss a piece of art.

Art? To post a thread filled with gibberish without saying why, and only after some pressure say it's a dream, and then after some more pressure proclaim ones dreams as prophetic and so on and so forth. As someone in the thread said "I dreamt I went to school naked yesterday. Why is that of interest?"

Art? To post a thread filled with gibberish without saying why, and only after some pressure say it's a dream, and then after some more pressure proclaim ones dreams as prophetic and so on and so forth. As someone in the thread said "I dreamt I went to school naked yesterday. Why is that of interest?"
And just who was it that is supposed to have pressured me? I suppose you will say it was you.

And just who is it that is pressuring me to declare the dream prophetic? Do not the people you accuse have a right to know that you are accusing them?

I would like to know why you feel threatened?

And just who was it that is supposed to have pressured me? I suppose you will say it was you.

And just who is it that is pressuring me to declare the dream prophetic? Do not the people you accuse have a right to know that you are accusing them?

I would like to know why you feel threatened?

This is not a forum for debate.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8970348&postcount=47

It was being discussed but Mr. Fass doesn't want it being discussed. He just wants it banned for being religious in nature. But since you seem to be saying that discussing such things is illegal on NS, I took your suggestion and moved it to one my forums and gave the link to those who were involved in said discussion.

It looks, to me, that it degenerated even if discussion was taking place... I mean, there's the whole sequence of posts talking about dreams which had nothing to do with that thread but another thread.

There's also the question I see, of whether or not it was plagerized (i.e. copy and pasted.)

But since you seem to be saying that discussing such things is illegal on NS, I took your suggestion and moved it to one my forums and gave the link to those who were involved in said discussion.
Whittier, you didn't post anything to discuss. You posted a ramble of a dream, with no commentary, no request for commentary, nothing. It then turned into a discussion, despite any effort on your part.

I don't appreciate you tossing the "Mods are censoring my right to religious beliefs" argument into this when it had absolutely nothing to do with censorship of a position. If you can't be bothered to understand how discussion forums work, then you'd better get used to having your threads locked or dumped to spam.

Whittier, you didn't post anything to discuss. You posted a ramble of a dream, with no commentary, no request for commentary, nothing. It then turned into a discussion, despite any effort on your part.

I don't appreciate you tossing the "Mods are censoring my right to religious beliefs" argument into this when it had absolutely nothing to do with censorship of a position. If you can't be bothered to understand how discussion forums work, then you'd better get used to having your threads locked or dumped to spam.
I wasn't accusing you of censoring religious beliefs I was accusing the OP, who has made similar attempts in the past.

It looks, to me, that it degenerated even if discussion was taking place... I mean, there's the whole sequence of posts talking about dreams which had nothing to do with that thread but another thread.

There's also the question I see, of whether or not it was plagerized (i.e. copy and pasted.)
There was no plagierism involved. That came from my own head. So the only copy pasting involved was when I copy pasted it from the thread on to my own site. But then again, I was unaware it was possible to plagier oneself.

But if you want you could go through every book in the bible and what not and the only place you will find it, is in that thread or on my forum and blog.

There was no plagierism involved.

I wasn't accusing you of copying and pasting from another web site or something, I was merely saying it looked liked it.

I wasn't accusing you of copying and pasting from another web site or something, I was merely saying it looked liked it.
To avoid the appearance of thread hijacking I have sent you a telegram.

I wasn't accusing you of censoring religious beliefs I was accusing the OP, who has made similar attempts in the past.
I have no idea who the OP is. You comment of "But since you seem to be saying that discussing such things is illegal on NS" couldn't have been directed at anyone other than me, as I was the one making the ruling.

Since this is just more of the same pointless bickering, iLock.