NationStates Jolt Archive

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8813594&postcount=171

That whole thread is just on fire.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8813608&postcount=175

"Fruitcakes and fudgepackers". :rolleyes:

Your first post seems to have been dealt with.

The second one I don't think is really illegal. While it doesn't show gays in the most glowing terms, it is in their defense. I'm not a mod, but don't think that's really intended as flamebait.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8813835&postcount=287

Another one.

The second one I don't think is really illegal. While it doesn't show gays in the most glowing terms, it is in their defense. .

You don't seem to have read the post at all.

I wish that whole thread hadn't gotten locked. There was some actual dialogue there.

Nod, well Fris will review it and I'm sure he'll cut out some bits here and there (I know I said some things that should just be deleted ...), but I agree ... there was some real dialogue going on in there. That part should be allowed to continue.

It's a touchy subject, though.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8813594&postcount=171

That whole thread is just on fire.

http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8813608&postcount=175

"Fruitcakes and fudgepackers". :rolleyes:

you post about recruiting children into homosexuality and then you run to the mods when someone uses a slur? nice.

you post about recruiting children into homosexuality and then you run to the mods when someone uses a slur? nice.
That was a joke, to be fair. It still may not have been appropriate. Then again, I'm not a mod.

Wow. A thread I made got locked. I feel like a real NSer now.

Sweet.

It kind of begs the question why you'd want to conduct genocide of people whose sexual preferences pretty much exclude them from having biological children. They kind of eliminate their own lines of decendency.

It kind of begs the question why you'd want to conduct genocide of people whose sexual preferences pretty much exclude them from having biological children. They kind of eliminate their own lines of decendency.
Posting something like that in moderation takes a lot of chutzpah.

you post about recruiting children into homosexuality and then you run to the mods when someone uses a slur? nice.

Hello Drakedia. I would like you to meet Mr. Humor and Mr. Sarcasm.

Children cannot be recruited into homosexuality. No one can be, unfortunately.

It kind of begs the question why you'd want to conduct genocide of people whose sexual preferences pretty much exclude them from having biological children. They kind of eliminate their own lines of decendency.

This is not a forum for discussion, but here's a quick rebuttal:

1. Gay people aren't sterile.

2. Straight people give birth to most gay people.

3. Children of gay people are straight in the same extent as children of straight people.

It kind of begs the question why you'd want to conduct genocide of people whose sexual preferences pretty much exclude them from having biological children. They kind of eliminate their own lines of decendency.

thats why allowing them to adopt is wrong, i feel so badly for those kids. for those who missed it here is Fass's post: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8813770&postcount=255

Deleuze: I don't see why. It's a fact that, normally anyway, two members of the same sex can't concieve. I'm not taking sides or anything, just making a point.

Fass: Yeah, but how are you supposed to know who to kill then? If you can't eliminate the trait from the gene pool, you'll just have to keep killing every homosexual that surfaces. That seems brutal, don't you think? I mean, genocide is brutal anyway, but that would be like, continual genocide.

Drakedia: Do you think children can be turned gay? I'm pretty sure science has shown that it's biological.

Well, I'll leave this thread now; since Fass is right: this isn't the place for discussion.

Wait, are we about to start a flamewar... in moderation?

Responded and reopened. http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8814111&postcount=316

Mirfak, Drakedia, and yes, you too Fass: DON'T continue the argument in Moderation. This is for MODERATION RULINGS only.

Yay, unlocked!

Oh, and that would have been funny.