NationStates Jolt Archive

*Mods only*

NationStates Moderators
Received: 16 hours ago We've discussed it, and decided that the tactics employed by ******** ********** are within NationStates rules.

Thanks..... :rolleyes:

No explanation? no point to a specific ruling? Nothing on the other Regional Name Duplicity issue? Or is that still in 'discussion'?

I take the correct course of action by contacting you through the FAQ asking a reasonable question and all I ask is a reasonable response to my query - And you throw THIS crap back at me?

I don't like posting these horrid moaning posts on the forum, but I feel I've been left with no option!

*Mods only*

NationStates Moderators
Received: 16 hours ago We've discussed it, and decided that the tactics employed by ******** ********** are within NationStates rules.

Thanks..... :rolleyes:

No explanation? no point to a specific ruling? Nothing on the other Regional Name Duplicity issue? Or is that still in 'discussion'?

I take the correct course of action by contacting you through the FAQ asking a reasonable question and all I ask is a reasonable response to my query - And you throw THIS crap back at me?

I don't like posting these horrid moaning posts on the forum, but I feel I've been left with no option!
The moderators answered your question. They aren't required to give you an explanation of their ruling. I don't know exactly what you sent to be reviewed, but since you know, as well as having the answer from a moderator, that should be sufficient enough.

You shouldn't talk that way to the moderators. They did exactly what you requested, review whatever the case may have been, and gave you an answer.

*Mods only*

Are YOU a Mod? No? Then shut up.

I don't know exactly what you sent to be reviewed, but since you know, as well as having the answer from a moderator, that should be sufficient enough.

No - You DON'T know what I sent to be reviewed - Hence I asked for this to be dealt with by a moderator and NOT some wannabe brown noser looking to score brownie points.

You shouldn't talk that way to the moderators. They did exactly what you requested, review whatever the case may have been, and gave you an answer.

Well, no. If they had done what I'd requested would I be here posting this inane drivel? I asked a two part question - Part one seemed to be semi-answered in a very loose 'We discussed it and think it's ok' but with no real explanation - And the second part and the main question was dismissed completely!! It's a shame that the Mods took time out to read the opening paragraph of my query and little else.

p.s. By responding to your post, I'm not inviting you to return and post again.

Are YOU a Mod? No? Then shut up.

No - You DON'T know what I sent to be reviewed - Hence I asked for this to be dealt with by a moderator and NOT some wannabe brown noser looking to score brownie points.
That was totally unnecessary and totally uncalled for, and pretty much makes any polite response from moderation extremely unlikely. You DON'T flame in Moderation, and you DON'T decide how we're going to respond.

For the record, I was not the Mod who handled this case. But since you seem unable to respond in anything resembling a polite or respectful manner, I'll just lock this thread. If the mod in question sees it and wants to add a post, he/she can. If not, you've gotten an answer from a mod, and I reckon it'll have to do.

~ Frisbeeteria ~
NationStates Forum Moderator