NationStates Jolt Archive


Two flames, more to follow probably

Neo Cannen
29-03-2005, 18:15
I would like to point out two examples of flames in the "Christian persecution" thread which I started (Flames being arbiatary insults)

http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8555412&postcount=5

http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=8555640&postcount=43
Frisbeeteria
29-03-2005, 18:28
No flaming there at all, Neo Cannon. Mild trolling perhaps. I'll mention it in-topic to the first poster. The second one isn't even trolling, just a comment.

Check the Glossary of Forbidden Actions (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=288255) for the definition of flaming, trolling, and flamebait. Also be aware that disagreement is not the same as trolling or flaming. People can hold and express different opinons that you may find offensive, but that doesn't mean they break the sites Terms of Service. You've brought this up before (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=407045), and the answer is still the same.
Keruvalia
29-03-2005, 18:46
Actually, the whole thread is just another Neo Cannen anti-Islam troll.

Every point in the article has been proven either completely false or shown to be conjecture in previous threads, yet he continues to post these threads.

Formal complaint? No, just mildly indignant that a person would complain about flaming in his trolling.