NationStates Jolt Archive

He's gone a bit far this time. Blatant flamebait/trolling.

http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=399954

Especially:

Originally Posted by Servus Dei
Once again, the corrupt American government is forcing their sick sociology experiment on America's children. This is going on all over the country. The article starts with an "Eisenhauer" complaining about "segregation." Eerily reminiscent of the criminal president Eisenhower's brutal practices in forcing integration almost half a century ago...

Originally Posted by Servus Dei
Whites should not be forced to integrate (and have to pay for) the education of non-Whites.

Originally Posted by Servus Dei
Negroes = Crime

Originally Posted by Servus Dei
To be accurate:
Novus Ordo Priests = Homosexual Child rapists

When did unpopular views on race start to equal trolling?
That label is thrown around far too often to avoid discussing legitimate issues.

When did unpopular views on race start to equal trolling?
That label is thrown around far too often to avoid discussing legitimate issues.
I do agree that some of what you said isn't especially serious, however, "Negroes = crime" is taking it a bit far, isn't it?

I do agree that some of what you said isn't especially serious, however, "Negroes = crime" is taking it a bit far, isn't it?
The statistics prove it, it is only the truth.

When did unpopular views on race start to equal trolling?
That label is thrown around far too often to avoid discussing legitimate issues.
Trolling is saying controversial things deliberately to incite a flame war. You've done a nice job of it. Oh, and equating all blacks to crime and all priests to homosexuality and child rape is blatant flamebait.

Its not flamebait. Anything can be made into a topic to flame over. You're free to debate the facts...

Its not flamebait. Anythingcan be made into a topic to flame over. You're free to debate the facts...
What do you mean its not flamebait? Saying that all blacks commit crimes and that all priests are child molesters falls within every definition of flamebait that I've ever seen.

What do you mean its not flamebait? Saying that all blacks commit crimes and that all priests are child molesters falls within every definition of flamebait that I've ever seen.
I) Black Forrest said that all priests are child molesters, ignored by your selective quoting here.

II) Had I stated "kill all n*ggers cuz they look like gorillas" then you would have a point about pointless trolling and flamebait. All I did was state a debatable fact that you are free to disprove but instead decided to launch ad-hominem style attacks.

I) Black Forrest said that all priests are child molesters, ignored by your selective quoting here.

II) Had I stated "kill all n*ggers cuz they look like gorillas" then you would have a point about pointless trolling and flamebait. All I did was state a debatable fact that you are free to disprove but instead decided to launch ad-hominem style attacks.

But it isn't a fact, which makes it flamebaiting.

I) Black Forrest said that all priests are child molesters, ignored by your selective quoting here.

he said that in a rhetorical sense, since it logically followed from your statement that all blacks perform violent crimes.

it's a form of argument that i like to call " show how ridiculuos the logical equivalent is to show how ridiculous the argument is"

it's not our fault that you happened to agree with the obviously sarcastic statement bade by black forrest

II) Had I stated "kill all n*ggers cuz they look like gorillas" then you would have a point about pointless trolling and flamebait. All I did was state a debatable fact that you are free to disprove but instead decided to launch ad-hominem style attacks.

frankly, i'm suprised you didn't

let's give you an example:
let's say i stole money from a Quick Check.

if i argue (as you are doing) that i did not shoot the clerk in the process of the robbery, and therefore should be let off the hook, is it going to happen?

no.



certainly, there are worse things that you could have said, but what you did say was already bad enough

But it isn't a fact, which makes it flamebaiting.
As of yet, nobody has disproved it, only ridiculed it. Thus, we can conclude it is simply a fact nobody wants to face, until some other response is made other than crying "troll."

As of yet, nobody has disproved it, only ridiculed it. Thus, we can conclude it is simply a fact nobody wants to face, until some other response is made other than crying "troll."

did it ever occur to you that the crime rate is naturally higher in denser areas?

and that blacks tend to live in the inner cities?


the fact that crime happens more in cities and that blacks live in the cities are not at all related.

even cities in regions not known for racial diversity have higher crime rates than interracial, or even all-black, rural areas.

You left off that most serial killers tend to be white.

:rolleyes:

As of yet, nobody has disproved it, only ridiculed it. Thus, we can conclude it is simply a fact nobody wants to face, until some other response is made other than crying "troll."

Can you provide proof for you "fact"?

P.S. Sorry to do this in moderation if it's against the rules.

:rolleyes:

I stated facts, not conjecture.

It's very simple, folks. These sorts will eventually cross the line, and then they'll be dealt with. In the meantime, don't get sucked into crossing the line yourselves in defending your own views (which should most likely be done in General, and not in Moderation as referenced in the Khata thread), and above all:
http://test.air-power.us//gallery/albums/Nathi/troll.png
PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLL.

It's very simple, folks. These sorts will eventually cross the line, and then they'll be dealt with. In the meantime, don't get sucked into crossing the line yourselves in defending your own views (which should most likely be done in General, and not in Moderation as referenced in the Khata thread), and above all:
http://test.air-power.us//gallery/albums/Nathi/troll.png
PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLL.
Ok. Haha funny pic!

three words:

'out'

'of'

'context'


studies have shown that 100% of people with linolium countertops die eventually

does this mean that they are related?

no.

sure, the facts are (or might be, you still haven't verified this) true, but the context is so skewed that they cannot be taken seriously, and anyone who tries to do so is really stretching their luck.

not to mention the fact that you attempt to use faulty data to enforce ratial bigotry and exclusion.