NationStates Jolt Archive


Bad nation name?

The Great Sixth Reich
09-01-2005, 21:22
"Republicans_s_uck"?

That nation also appears to be a puppet of "I hate u Vineyard" and other puppets that were deleted for spamming.
Steel Butterfly
09-01-2005, 21:37
That nation name insults my people! ;) By gosh, I'm offended!

Actually I'm not sure if that name is bad or not, but if it indeed is a spammer…then that’s a whole other situation that needs dealt with.
Neo England
09-01-2005, 22:17
If you believe anything in-game violates NationStates rules, please report it at the Getting Help (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/68932/page=help) page.

Forum issues that need Moderator action, should be reported here.
The Great Sixth Reich
09-01-2005, 22:57
If you believe anything in-game violates NationStates rules, please report it at the Getting Help (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/68932/page=help) page.

Forum issues that need Moderator action, should be reported here.

Under what category?

It doesn't fit any in the drop-list...
BLARGistania
09-01-2005, 23:00
I don't know if that's against the rules per say, but it might be pushing the limits there.

My national animal is the republican and I haven't gotten in trouble yet.
The Great Sixth Reich
09-01-2005, 23:01
I don't know if that's against the rules per say, but it might be pushing the limits there.

My national animal is the republican and I haven't gotten in trouble yet.

Yea, but you do not have a history of spamming using multiple puppets... :)
BLARGistania
09-01-2005, 23:03
No. Well, I guess the only way for him/her to get in trouble right now is for spamming the boards
MassPwnage
09-01-2005, 23:04
Then there's my nation.
Jonothana
09-01-2005, 23:04
Under what category?

It doesn't fit any in the drop-list...

Other: Response to Moderator if there really isn't anything else. However, as far as what I can tell from things said by GMs, it doesn't really matter.
Neo England
09-01-2005, 23:14
Other: Response to Moderator if there really isn't anything else. However, as far as what I can tell from things said by GMs, it doesn't really matter.

Correct, Melkor Unchained once stated that as every report goes into the same tasklist, it doesn't matter all that much.
Katganistan
09-01-2005, 23:31
Tsk tsk.... no more Republicans_s_uck.

Yes, it's an improper name.
And we do not allow people as national animals.....
BLARGistania
09-01-2005, 23:59
Tsk tsk.... no more Republicans_s_uck.

Yes, it's an improper name.
And we do not allow people as national animals.....

oohh. . . .I have to change my national animal? :(
The Great Sixth Reich
10-01-2005, 00:03
oohh. . . .I have to change my national animal? :(

Fenminany's is the most offensive ever: The "Male"! :)
Katganistan
10-01-2005, 00:10
BLARGistania, yes, I have to ask you to switch your national animal.

We don't allow any subset of humanity to be used... not even males. ;)

Obviously, since you asked about it, we're not going to warn you or anything, but it will need to be altered.

Thanks in advance.
BLARGistania
10-01-2005, 00:13
BLARGistania, yes, I have to ask you to switch your national animal.

We don't allow any subset of humanity to be used... not even males. ;)

Obviously, since you asked about it, we're not going to warn you or anything, but it will need to be altered.

Thanks in advance.

sigh. . . :(

Yes, Ma'am.
Katganistan
10-01-2005, 00:15
*hugs*
Bodies Without Organs
10-01-2005, 01:18
Fenminany's is the most offensive ever: The "Male"! :)

The "male" does not automatically mean "human male".
Shaed
10-01-2005, 10:27
Out of random curiosity... you specify sub-sets of *humanity* not being allowed... so would, say 'rare Republican treefrogs' be allowed? or 'commi-whales'? or 'mute male alligators'?

Or would that be seen as just trying to duck the 'not-using sub-sets of humanity' rule? Or would some sort of case-by-case thing have to be involved? Or should I just not go giving people bad ideas?

*holds up her non-offensive national animal as a shield against any possible mod-wrath*
Shaed
10-01-2005, 10:32
The "male" does not automatically mean "human male".

OMG! Is this a case of 'great minds thinking alike' *coughnocough*, or is BWO secretly stealing my brainmeats while I sleep? Will Josh ever find out he's the father of Candy's child? Why am I asking random questions in a dramatic fashion?

Find out next week!

...

Or not, I really don't care either way.
The Great Sixth Reich
11-01-2005, 08:59
The "male" does not automatically mean "human male".

That was more of a joke.

Just to clear that up for the record. ;)
Kwaswhakistan
11-01-2005, 10:09
commie whales... what an idea for national animal