At least will you please TRY to be fair???
Eutrusca
13-12-2004, 07:23
You know, I didn't say one word when I was threatened with having my nation deleted because I was "posting flames and flamebait," even though I definitely didn't agree with that assessment. But shouldn't you at least make a GESTURE in the direction of being fair???
Take a look at this thread and tell me that the original poster isn't indulging in flamebaiting, and then take a look at some of the follow-up posts by this same individual who uses the "m-f" word when refering to Christians. http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=381141
Please tell me that NS hasn't joined the noisy anti-Christian rabble by allowing blatant attacks against Christians which would never be tolerated against any other religious group.
Forrest Lee Horn, Sr.
Eutrusca
13-12-2004, 07:25
"*yawns*
Buncha pobuckin' white trash dumbass mothafuckas.
I'd thought of a few choice clever/nasty things to say, but I don't much feel like taking it on the chin from the sort of dreck who'd wade in to the hips to defend these troglodytes...and their puerile pamphlet...and their whitewashing of the despicable practice of humans claiming and exercising ownership over their fellow humans.
Good luck in your upcoming race wars.
DT"
Eutrusca
13-12-2004, 07:26
"Poll Options
What do you think about Christian's defending slavery with the bible?
These people are a bunch of morons.
I'm indifferent
It's in the bible, so slavery is ok"
Gothic Kitty
13-12-2004, 07:37
Yepz. Calling all christians morons, because they allow slavery is flamebait and trolling. There is no doubt here. The fact that it is only a poll option, so only voters are calling the Christians morons, makes it a little bit more trolling, and a little less flamebait.
Weapons of Mass Terror
13-12-2004, 07:55
The fact that the poll was created in such a way is flamebait the way I see it... it's like a poll where you're asked if George Bush is doing "Good, Great, or Excellent" and you can't pick anything else. it's biased, and it's just not cool, regardless of what your actual views are. The title of the thread, and the responses that the author of the thread make are both inflammatory as well.
Sdaeriji
13-12-2004, 08:24
Was it really necessary to attack the moderators like you did? You do realize that they aren't always actively scouring the forums looking for bad posts, right? Sometimes they don't see something until it's pointed out to them. Hence one of the purposes of the moderation forum. Maybe instead of attacking them and accusing them of uber-bias, you could just post the flamebait threads like a civil human being.
I am so going to get yelled at for this post.
Eutrusca
13-12-2004, 08:33
Was it really necessary to attack the moderators like you did? You do realize that they aren't always actively scouring the forums looking for bad posts, right? Sometimes they don't see something until it's pointed out to them. Hence one of the purposes of the moderation forum. Maybe instead of attacking them and accusing them of uber-bias, you could just post the flamebait threads like a civil human being.
I am so going to get yelled at for this post.
Sorry about that. I allowed my irritation to override my intellect. I'm still smarting from being told that if I don't stop getting verbally irritated with dimwits my nation is going to be deleted.
Sdaeriji
13-12-2004, 08:34
Sorry about that. I allowed my irritation to override my intellect. I'm still smarting from being told that if I don't stop getting verbally irritated with dimwits my nation is going to be deleted.
Then perhaps you should stop getting verbally irritated with dimwits. I'd suggest starting by not calling other people on NS 'dimwits.'
Los Banditos
13-12-2004, 09:02
The fact that the poll was created in such a way is flamebait the way I see it... it's like a poll where you're asked if George Bush is doing "Good, Great, or Excellent" and you can't pick anything else. it's biased, and it's just not cool, regardless of what your actual views are. The title of the thread, and the responses that the author of the thread make are both inflammatory as well.
You mean I can't make a poll like that?
From what I can see, it's an attack on Christians who use the bible to defend slavery. Not an attack on Christianity itself.
Eutrusca
13-12-2004, 09:23
Then perhaps you should stop getting verbally irritated with dimwits. I'd suggest starting by not calling other people on NS 'dimwits.'
Quit being so damned logical. It's unbecoming! ;)
Eutrusca
13-12-2004, 09:24
From what I can see, it's an attack on Christians who use the bible to defend slavery. Not an attack on Christianity itself.
He's allowing the part to become the whole.
Jaggerts Speaker
13-12-2004, 15:56
Then perhaps you should stop getting verbally irritated with dimwits. I'd suggest starting by not calling other people on NS 'dimwits.'
You mean there are actually people on NS that aren't dimwits!? ;)
lol!
Eutrusca
13-12-2004, 16:46
"http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...taar/no-reb.gif
*coughs* ullshitbay, ullshitbay.
The whole thing goes to show that Sherman should have done a lot more than he did. Too bad he did not give the South its well-deserved Final Solution."
New Tyrollia
13-12-2004, 17:17
From what I can see, it's an attack on Christians who use the bible to defend slavery. Not an attack on Christianity itself.
I'd have to strongly disagree. He's using a small segment of Christians who use the bible to defend slavery (And note: no where in the article he posts is there actually an example of any christian at this school using the bible to defend slavery, or even defending slavery at all. The simply allow the students to read *one* pamphlet of people who have that view, along with all the other literature the teach as part of that curriculum, so that the students see all sides of the debate.) as an excuse to attack all christians. Allow me to quote:
Here's another example of the stupidity of Christianity
Looks like an attack on all Christianity to me.
Buncha pobuckin' white trash dumbass mothafuckas.
Pleasent.
The whole thing goes to show that Sherman should have done a lot more than he did. Too bad he did not give the South its well-deserved Final Solution.
I think that's just about as hateful as a person can be.
Really? I consider leaving a Reb alive to be the ultimate crime. Only good Rebs are dead ones.
And here he elaborates . . .
Now, I'm a Canadian. I'm not religous at all. I have no connection whatsoever to slavery in the south, or a dispute over Catholicism. But this sickens me. It really does. There's no justification for this kind of assult, it's cheap, juvenille, and hateful. It represents everything this person is criticising in the people he dislikes, and goes far worse. If this isn't flame-bait, I don't know what is.
GMC Military Arms
13-12-2004, 17:38
"http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...taar/no-reb.gif
*coughs* ullshitbay, ullshitbay.
The whole thing goes to show that Sherman should have done a lot more than he did. Too bad he did not give the South its well-deserved Final Solution."
Use the [quote] tag when posting things other people have posted, or y'all might get what they have coming to them.